SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE SHAKE:
Home
Shake Forum
Shake Tutorials
Apple Shake
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
Cow Forums
:
Apple Shake
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by
Andrew Shanks
on Aug 30, 2009 at 9:00:11 am
Shake still is everywhere in the film fx world and will be around for a few more years yet. London is heavily shake still as a number of big houses bought the code and have upgraded it themselves to support 64bit workflow. Having said that, Nuke is starting to be adopted at many places (weta and ILM now have site-wide licences), Australia's two most prominent fx houses have switched to Nuke, and I think more will quickly follow as freelancers start to get trained up and used to it.
So should you buy shake?
Depends. If you can afford Nuke, get it, it is the future and has some sweet tools and a great 3d interface. If you are a student or a freelancer, get Shake, ....just because it is no longer supported doesn't mean it will stop working straight away (advanced word is it still runs fine under snow leopard rendering 10bit quicktimes). It is a strong solid compositor that has been used on many high end oscar winning fx films (LOTR, King Kong, District9, etc), so you can still do very good work with it (its the skill of the artist as much as the toolset, and the tools are good for the most part). Also it will teach you nodal compositing skills that easily translate to Nuke (I'be gone that route, am now a nuke user, and its not hard to make the transition).
Goodluck,
andrew
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Adam Claude Jones on Aug 7, 2009 at 7:52:53 pm
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Arnie Schlissel on Aug 8, 2009 at 1:15:26 am
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Adam Claude Jones on Aug 8, 2009 at 5:16:18 am
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Phil Hoppes on Aug 20, 2009 at 12:14:49 pm
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Adam Claude Jones on Aug 12, 2009 at 7:46:20 am
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Burt Hazard on Aug 13, 2009 at 12:30:20 pm
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Adam Claude Jones on Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43:49 pm
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Burt Hazard on Aug 20, 2009 at 1:53:42 am
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Gray Wilson on Aug 27, 2009 at 2:30:39 am
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Arnie Schlissel on Aug 28, 2009 at 1:50:08 am
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Andrew Shanks on Aug 30, 2009 at 9:00:11 am
Re: Would you buy Shake now if you didn't have it?
by Adam Claude Jones on Aug 30, 2009 at 11:00:31 pm
Related Tags:
DI
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]