SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE SHAKE:
Home
Shake Forum
Shake Tutorials
Apple Shake
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
Cow Forums
:
Apple Shake
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by
Andrew Shanks
on Apr 22, 2009 at 5:19:46 am
Just a quick chime in, am busy at work (man i need to find time to go through these threads ;-).
In regards to what compositing systems work best with 3d (as in actually compositing in a 3d environment, allowing you to do camera projection onto basic geometry (be it curved planes or basic meshes), light, etc), hands down my pick would be
Nuke
(...now if I could only win the lottery to get a personal copy), ...second, which isn't noted here is
Fusion
(which also has the ability to generate particles in 3d) and from all accounts is very useable in the 3d compositing realm (again a true 3d environment).
Notes on the other apps mentioned.
Combustion
- great paint, roto and color correction tools, but it has 2.5d planar compositing, not really different to the two apps below at a fundamental level
Shake
- been an industry staple for donkeys years, the keylight/primatte combo kicks butt for keying, extremely powerful and if you do multipass 3d renders there are a number of tutorials on how to relight using these passes (and also macros to relight using normal map renders). Go to fxshare to find out more.
Something I hasten to add is you can do the above multipass tricks in any compositing application and techniques you should learn (why re-render a slow 3d scene when you can tweak things like material colours and basic lighting in 2d interactively and quickly render it off).
In the true 3d comping sense it falls down as it is really just multiplane 2.5d and is fine if you do basic things with it (i.e. bring in a matchmove camera and use some planes to do set extensions), ...but can get buggy if you make things too complex.
After Effects
- lacking in the roto and paint dept, has great tracker in Mocha, integrates closely with C4D but likewise works with maya pretty well. Cs4 has made some progress in 3d land, you can now use 3d geometry in your scenes, ...the BIG gotcha is that you need Photoshop to convert your objects to its proprietry 3d scene format, ...and the render quality is not exactly Mental Ray/VRay/Renderman/etc
Motion
- okay if you're an editor wanting to rustle something quick up but like chinese water torture if you want to get down and dirty with the tweakage (for serious mograph I'd recommend After Effects, Combustion or Fusion over it, ...and for compositing it would come last on my list)
Hope that helps.
andrew
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Mar 29, 2009 at 12:59:22 am
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by chris Sillitoe on Mar 30, 2009 at 7:39:55 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Mar 30, 2009 at 8:31:26 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by chris Sillitoe on Mar 31, 2009 at 12:25:21 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Mar 31, 2009 at 12:54:05 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Shawn Miller on Apr 1, 2009 at 1:02:55 am
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Apr 1, 2009 at 12:37:49 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Apr 1, 2009 at 1:13:25 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Margus Voll on Apr 4, 2009 at 7:39:01 am
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Apr 4, 2009 at 8:35:38 am
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Margus Voll on Apr 4, 2009 at 9:57:41 am
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Apr 4, 2009 at 10:38:25 am
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Margus Voll on Apr 7, 2009 at 7:45:54 am
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Alan Okey on Apr 8, 2009 at 6:30:31 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Apr 8, 2009 at 7:41:45 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Alan Okey on Apr 8, 2009 at 8:04:33 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Adam Claude Jones on Apr 8, 2009 at 8:12:30 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Alan Okey on Apr 8, 2009 at 8:16:49 pm
Re: 3D compositing, Shake, Combustion or After Effects?
by Andrew Shanks on Apr 22, 2009 at 5:19:46 am
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]