SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
AUTODESK COMBUSTION:
Autodesk Combustion Forum
Autodesk Combustion Tutorials
Autodesk Combustion
Autodesk
Re: Six foot under
COW Forums
:
Autodesk Combustion
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Six foot under
by
Dean DeCarlo
on Jan 15, 2010 at 8:03:40 pm
Many of us are in the same boat. In any case I think if you are in to heavy duty compositing Nuke looks to be the product to beat. It's definitely not for everyone. I've been doing this a long time and learning it seems a bit daunting. For Shake users it looks like a pretty natural progression. That said it entirely depends on what type of work you do. I'm considering Smoke on Mac to some degree mainly because it is a very good toolset with a familiar interface and has brand name recognition. If that name can help pull work in it might be worth it. I rent space from a larger production / edit house and am talking to them about whether it could be worth the investment. My first choice though will probably be to have the most powerful tool for the job (Nuke from what I've researched) and not to be tied to one physical system. Switching from Flint to Combustion showed me how nice it is to have the option do jobs at home, on a laptop etc.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Six foot under
by Luis Serra santos on Jan 6, 2010 at 4:08:55 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 8, 2010 at 4:34:28 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Mark Suszko on Jan 8, 2010 at 5:03:01 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Jeff Brown on Jan 8, 2010 at 6:21:03 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Mark Suszko on Jan 8, 2010 at 8:36:02 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Eric Susch on Jan 8, 2010 at 8:40:17 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Mark Suszko on Jan 8, 2010 at 9:25:18 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Matthew Beall on Jan 11, 2010 at 1:56:57 am
Re: Six foot under
by Jeff Brown on Jan 11, 2010 at 2:41:46 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 11, 2010 at 3:30:40 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Keith Rocheck on Jan 11, 2010 at 7:21:46 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 12, 2010 at 3:30:57 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Keith Rocheck on Jan 15, 2010 at 1:32:41 am
Re: Six foot under
by Don Nash on Jan 12, 2010 at 5:17:23 am
Re: Six foot under
by Steve Green on Jan 12, 2010 at 9:35:33 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Luis Serra santos on Jan 13, 2010 at 5:37:45 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 13, 2010 at 7:21:24 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Dean DeCarlo on Jan 13, 2010 at 11:39:17 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Keith Rocheck on Jan 15, 2010 at 12:24:50 am
Re: Six foot under
by Stephan Walfridsson on Jan 15, 2010 at 6:23:37 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 15, 2010 at 7:26:53 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Dean DeCarlo on Jan 15, 2010 at 8:03:40 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Alex Udell on Jan 17, 2010 at 1:57:52 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Dean DeCarlo on Jan 19, 2010 at 1:51:05 am
Re: Six foot under
by Eric Susch on Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39:49 am
Re: Six foot under
by Phil Radelat on Feb 28, 2010 at 9:36:15 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]