SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
FEATURES
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
AUTODESK COMBUSTION:
Autodesk Combustion Forum
Autodesk Combustion Tutorials
Autodesk Combustion
Autodesk
Re: Six foot under
COW Forums
:
Autodesk Combustion
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Six foot under
by
Dean DeCarlo
on Jan 13, 2010 at 11:39:17 pm
Along the lines of juggling the prices as mentioned in the earlier post is the confusing product placement of Toxik for instance. At first it seemed poised to pick up the market that Combustion held but it was a little feature poor and kind of specialized. Autodesk started doing some good work to remedy this. For a while there it looked like the main options between AE and Flame were Toxik, Nuke and Fusion. Bundling Toxik in with Maya and abandoning it as a standalone sends the signal that Autodesk is not that interesting in aggressively developing the product. Where have I heard this before? It's a great freebie that comes with Maya. For some 3D people maybe that is a boon. For people whose main business is compositing (like me) it's a turn off. Like I said Autodesk is fickle. It seems the marketing is done on a whim rather than following a real plan. It's unfortunate as there is some great technology there that I have spent a lot of time learning.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Six foot under
by Luis Serra santos on Jan 6, 2010 at 4:08:55 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 8, 2010 at 4:34:28 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Mark Suszko on Jan 8, 2010 at 5:03:01 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Jeff Brown on Jan 8, 2010 at 6:21:03 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Mark Suszko on Jan 8, 2010 at 8:36:02 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Eric Susch on Jan 8, 2010 at 8:40:17 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Mark Suszko on Jan 8, 2010 at 9:25:18 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Matthew Beall on Jan 11, 2010 at 1:56:57 am
Re: Six foot under
by Jeff Brown on Jan 11, 2010 at 2:41:46 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 11, 2010 at 3:30:40 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Keith Rocheck on Jan 11, 2010 at 7:21:46 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 12, 2010 at 3:30:57 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Keith Rocheck on Jan 15, 2010 at 1:32:41 am
Re: Six foot under
by Don Nash on Jan 12, 2010 at 5:17:23 am
Re: Six foot under
by Steve Green on Jan 12, 2010 at 9:35:33 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Luis Serra santos on Jan 13, 2010 at 5:37:45 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 13, 2010 at 7:21:24 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Dean DeCarlo on Jan 13, 2010 at 11:39:17 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Keith Rocheck on Jan 15, 2010 at 12:24:50 am
Re: Six foot under
by Stephan Walfridsson on Jan 15, 2010 at 6:23:37 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Marc Petit on Jan 15, 2010 at 7:26:53 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Dean DeCarlo on Jan 15, 2010 at 8:03:40 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Alex Udell on Jan 17, 2010 at 1:57:52 pm
Re: Six foot under
by Dean DeCarlo on Jan 19, 2010 at 1:51:05 am
Re: Six foot under
by Eric Susch on Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39:49 am
Re: Six foot under
by Phil Radelat on Feb 28, 2010 at 9:36:15 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
FEATURES
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]