SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
AUTODESK COMBUSTION:
Autodesk Combustion Forum
Autodesk Combustion Tutorials
Autodesk Combustion
Autodesk
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
Cow Forums
:
Autodesk Combustion
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by
Dean DeCarlo
on Feb 3, 2009 at 6:13:14 am
I own a Toaster and that isn't going anywhere either. Was a great system for 8 bit SD but as far as I know it still doesn't support anything above that. Seems Newtek is more concerned with the corporate and church group market rather than high end post. My Toaster is available for purchase if interested.
Another thread about AD ignoring Combustion. I feel the pain too but it is unrealistic to think they are going to do any kind of core re-write. They did that when they combined Paint and Effect at the beginning and since then they've been bolting on features with varying success. I don't really use any of the features past C3 and speed / efficiency enhancements have always been my #1 request. Wish it would grow and change but I am weighing my options for the future. I do post work with SD, HD video mostly. Toxik seems a little too almost to me and doesn't seem to have any real foothold. Plus of course it is owned by Autodesk. Nuke seems too film-centric. Fusion seems to be the most promising to me of the node based apps that I've looked at. I'm going to put in some time getting good at After Effects though. That app doesn't seem like it will go away anytime soon and has some very strong capabilites. I'll mourn Combustion if they kill it off but it will continue to be useful to me for a while.
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Don Nash on Jan 29, 2009 at 1:11:05 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Greg Gilpatrick on Jan 29, 2009 at 6:01:43 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Eric Craft on Jan 29, 2009 at 9:57:17 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Don Nash on Jan 30, 2009 at 12:57:48 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Eric Craft on Jan 30, 2009 at 2:00:56 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Alex Udell on Jan 30, 2009 at 8:48:16 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Eric Craft on Jan 31, 2009 at 12:00:49 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Don Nash on Jan 31, 2009 at 9:03:14 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Alex Udell on Jan 31, 2009 at 4:36:27 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Don Nash on Jan 31, 2009 at 6:24:59 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Matthew Beall on Feb 2, 2009 at 4:58:47 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Alex Udell on Feb 2, 2009 at 5:08:23 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Don Nash on Feb 3, 2009 at 1:37:39 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Eric Craft on Jan 31, 2009 at 4:53:59 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Aaron Neitz on Jan 31, 2009 at 7:04:39 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Don Nash on Jan 31, 2009 at 7:09:08 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Eric Craft on Jan 31, 2009 at 8:07:06 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Dean DeCarlo on Feb 3, 2009 at 6:13:14 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Jeff Brown on Feb 3, 2009 at 7:40:07 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Dean DeCarlo on Feb 3, 2009 at 7:44:25 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Jeff Brown on Feb 4, 2009 at 1:17:18 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Matthew Beall on Feb 4, 2009 at 2:14:52 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Dean DeCarlo on Feb 4, 2009 at 3:07:24 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Eric Craft on Feb 4, 2009 at 11:25:18 pm
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Alex Udell on Feb 5, 2009 at 12:51:27 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Matthew Beall on Feb 5, 2009 at 1:16:27 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Alex Udell on Feb 5, 2009 at 1:20:40 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by Eric Craft on Feb 5, 2009 at 2:17:34 am
Re: Why does AD bother with desktop Compositors?
by amir Qureshi on Feb 8, 2009 at 9:05:07 pm
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]