SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
recent posts
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
COW Forums
:
HD High-End
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by
Jeff Brown
on Jun 23, 2009 at 1:46:39 pm
As others may point out, there is "HD" as in an HDV palmcorder, and there is "HD" as in mastering for PBS broadcast. The second type of HD will require a much more substantial system than a MacBook. Do some searching on storage requirements (capacity and throughput) for uncompressed HD, and you should get an idea of what to expect.
I'm also somewhat mystified by the decision to move to HD since your "source footage was so poor". Unless you mean the Beta transfer was lousy and are hoping for a better remastering to HDCAM; then I understand.
-Jeff
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by Tom Wise on Jun 22, 2009 at 5:49:22 pm
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by Mads Nybo Jørgensen on Jun 22, 2009 at 6:19:47 pm
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by Tom Wise on Jun 22, 2009 at 7:51:23 pm
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by Jeff Brown on Jun 23, 2009 at 1:46:39 pm
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by Tom Wise on Jun 23, 2009 at 7:43:37 pm
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by Steve Wargo on Jun 24, 2009 at 4:25:44 am
Re: 35mm > HDCAM > FCP ?
by Dino Sanacory on Jun 24, 2009 at 11:23:54 am
Thanks!
by Tom Wise on Jun 24, 2009 at 10:01:40 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]