SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
DVDs
BOOKS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
Re: Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
Cow Forums
:
Corporate Video
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Return to Posts Index
•
Read Entire Thread
•
Reply To This Post
Re: Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
by
Mark Suszko
on Jul 4, 2008 at 12:24:04 am
You have a couple choices for the 16:9 footage.
You could center-punch it. That is, show only a 4:3 window view of the center of the 16:9 picture. This would be like when you rent a movie that has been made "full-screen" by the pan-and-scan process. Easy to do in any NLE with just a wipe or crop.
You take a risk with a center-punch not containing all of the vital picture information due to he way the original was framed. Which is one reason why I hate pan-and-scan movie rentals.
OTOH, you have an advantage that you can shift that underlying large wide picture around on it's own layer to try and get the best 3:4 window out of it, as well as to add pans and tilts and even zooms that were not in the original. This method also doesn't hurt the final picture quality as much as scaling might.
When the original shooter is composing his or her frame, some like to shoot to "protect" the 4:3 ratio. That is to say, they shoot wide but arrange the key parts of the shot to still fall into a 3:4 center spot. You do that mostly when you are not sure but suspect that this will get a lot of use in 4:3. It is definitely an aesthetic choice you must make, and some folks say you are crippling the ability to make a better picture in wide screen if everything must be shot for "protection". A policy discussion on this is best held and agreed to before a single frame is shot.
Scaling is the other choice, re-sizing the entire frame. I think generally this is not the way to go, because it needs to radically shrink your widescreen picture to fit into a letterbox or pillarboxed window, which only keeps drawing attention to the difference in proportion. At the same time you make everything in that shot too tiny by comparison, and add distracting black bars.
If the majority of the footage is wide screen, I say, conform the 4:3 footage to match the widescreen. There are some tricks that let you get away with that. If most of the footage is 4:3 ratio, I would rather see the wide screen cropped to mach the smaller framing.
Return to Posts Index
•
Read Entire Thread
•
Reply To This Post
Current Message Thread:
Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
by Pat Ford on Jul 3, 2008 at 6:31:29 am
Re: Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
by Pat Ford on Jul 3, 2008 at 6:54:05 am
Re: Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
by Greg Ball on Jul 3, 2008 at 3:43:48 pm
Re: Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
by Mark Suszko on Jul 4, 2008 at 12:24:04 am
Re: Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
by Pat Ford on Jul 4, 2008 at 8:59:26 pm
Re: Conversion 16:9 to 4:3
by Mark Suszko on Jul 6, 2008 at 1:35:56 am
Related Threads:
DVD to AVI conversion
Note:
If you are a registered user and you
do not
see your name and email in the two respective fields above, you may reset your account cookies by clicking
here
. Your post
will not be accepted
if the name and email provided above are not currently registered in our database.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message
Note:
The following characters are HTML command characters, and may cause parts of your post to disappear, if not used correctly: < > &. To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key. For more on how to post,
click here
.
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
DVDs
•
BOOKS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]