Tero Ahlfors

Mike Most

dermot shane

Chris Martin

Jon Merrifield

Patrick Simpson

Jeff Greenberg

Craig Seeman

Quantel

ADD A NEW POST • CHANGE FORUM • SEARCH • SUBSCRIBE

News: Can Communicate goes wild with Quantel Pablo by Cow News Droid on May 18, 2012 at 8:26:14 pm

Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Nathan Gadd on May 17, 2012 at 5:39:30 am
- Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Margus Voll on May 17, 2012 at 1:03:33 pm
  - Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Joseph Owens on May 17, 2012 at 2:33:50 pm
- Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Rohit Gupta on May 17, 2012 at 2:40:57 pm
  - Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Nathan Gadd on May 17, 2012 at 8:18:08 pm
    - Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Eric Johnson on May 17, 2012 at 11:09:45 pm
    - Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Joseph Owens on May 17, 2012 at 11:28:56 pm
      - Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Gabriele Turchi on May 17, 2012 at 11:34:42 pm
      - Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Colin Travers on May 18, 2012 at 4:01:18 am
        Re: Round trip between Resolve and FCP by Chris Martin on May 21, 2012 at 6:06:48 am

News: Green Dot's Richard Farmer Sets Memories Aflame for Olympus by Cow News Droid on May 17, 2012 at 2:40:50 am

News: STN Extends OASYS Playout Capability by Cow News Droid on May 17, 2012 at 12:05:35 am

Exporting XML with Motion Parameters by Patrick Simpson on May 16, 2012 at 1:26:39 am
- Re: Exporting XML with Motion Parameters by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 2:19:13 pm
  - Re: Exporting XML with Motion Parameters by Patrick Simpson on May 16, 2012 at 2:39:44 pm
    - Re: Exporting XML with Motion Parameters by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 3:07:10 pm

RED/DSLR to Quantel Pablo workflow by Patrick Simpson on May 15, 2012 at 8:35:50 pm

News: ASSIMILATE Congratulates SCRATCH Artists On Festival de Cannes 2012 Entries by Cow News Droid on May 15, 2012 at 5:20:02 pm

Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 2:01:41 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 3:19:16 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 3:57:25 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 13, 2012 at 4:33:07 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Greg Andonian on May 13, 2012 at 4:20:17 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Andy Neil on May 13, 2012 at 4:26:41 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 4:34:29 pm
    - Re: Editing scenario by Bret Williams on May 13, 2012 at 7:00:11 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 7:29:35 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Franz Bieberkopf on May 13, 2012 at 4:47:10 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Lance Bachelder on May 13, 2012 at 5:13:29 pm
    - Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 13, 2012 at 7:02:52 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 7:32:50 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 7:45:42 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 8:08:19 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Lance Bachelder on May 13, 2012 at 7:56:17 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 13, 2012 at 8:14:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 8:48:15 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by TImothy Auld on May 18, 2012 at 4:52:01 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 5:02:03 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 18, 2012 at 5:52:05 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 6:12:54 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 18, 2012 at 8:45:35 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Lance Bachelder on May 13, 2012 at 9:33:13 pm
    - Re: Editing scenario by stevez on May 13, 2012 at 7:50:52 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 9:59:50 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 6:42:26 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 7:29:59 pm
    - Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 7:42:31 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 8:08:33 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 8:39:37 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 8:49:08 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 8:50:11 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 13, 2012 at 8:55:00 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 8:00:35 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 2:39:56 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 3:30:08 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 4:44:08 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 6:49:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 7:09:02 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 7:23:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 8:06:04 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 14, 2012 at 10:12:49 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 10:46:33 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 14, 2012 at 10:58:23 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 3:40:59 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 5:30:52 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 5:38:58 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 6:01:41 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 5:50:42 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Herb Sevush on May 15, 2012 at 12:21:29 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:22:59 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Michael Garber on May 13, 2012 at 9:47:04 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Greg Andonian on May 14, 2012 at 7:15:05 am
        Re: Editing scenario by John Godwin on May 13, 2012 at 9:50:12 pm
    - Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 7:58:19 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Michael Sanders on May 13, 2012 at 7:34:06 pm
    - Re: Editing scenario by Andy Field on May 13, 2012 at 8:49:24 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 8:51:20 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 9:21:38 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 9:49:25 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 10:01:18 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 13, 2012 at 10:06:10 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 10:09:58 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 9:11:26 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Andy Neil on May 14, 2012 at 7:29:21 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 11:42:21 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by John Godwin on May 13, 2012 at 11:46:33 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 13, 2012 at 11:22:47 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 1:02:06 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 2:52:04 am
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 3:33:24 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:04:14 am
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 8:02:28 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 3:59:16 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:18:13 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:31:28 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:33:54 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 4:36:22 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:41:13 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 4:26:04 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:49:42 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 5:15:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 5:44:56 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 10:17:36 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 10:37:34 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 5:37:43 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 6:08:02 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 6:34:18 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 6:57:40 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 7:21:56 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 7:51:48 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:15:00 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 9:30:52 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:52:11 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 10:00:26 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:07:53 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:11:07 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Tony Sarafoski on May 15, 2012 at 8:23:13 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:29:08 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Michael Garber on May 15, 2012 at 4:37:16 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 12:38:31 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:59:51 am
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 1:07:38 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 3:07:58 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 11:42:06 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 1:10:39 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 15, 2012 at 5:35:17 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 6:19:11 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 15, 2012 at 9:10:27 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 7:26:00 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 7:39:52 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 8:26:20 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 9:45:12 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 10:46:48 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 11:05:41 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:12:11 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 12:42:45 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 7:08:52 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 7:31:26 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 7:35:34 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 7:37:48 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 8:13:04 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 8:35:36 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 8:46:42 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:16:33 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Andrew Kimery on May 14, 2012 at 10:33:26 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 10:43:22 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 11:08:15 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:23:24 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 11:31:05 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:36:03 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 11:52:10 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 3:14:15 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 5:09:28 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 5:25:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:36:00 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 5:43:22 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:44:48 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:02:32 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 6:26:46 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:42:32 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 6:55:57 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 6:56:38 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 7:03:24 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:42:21 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 5:55:54 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:04:16 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:51:20 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 6:56:11 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:25:53 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 6:59:00 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 6:09:21 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 6:14:04 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:26:13 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:31:39 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 6:50:43 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 7:32:50 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:46:05 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 7:51:01 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:59:09 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 8:09:08 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 8:13:00 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 8:33:30 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 8:47:39 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 8:59:10 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 9:08:52 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 7:30:40 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 16, 2012 at 8:42:55 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 8:46:04 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 16, 2012 at 8:46:23 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 16, 2012 at 8:46:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 17, 2012 at 1:14:57 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 17, 2012 at 2:11:34 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 17, 2012 at 3:35:09 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 8:48:18 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 7:24:01 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 7:47:21 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 15, 2012 at 8:36:14 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 9:17:01 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 10:16:18 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 16, 2012 at 8:04:07 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 6:53:01 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 17, 2012 at 5:00:55 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 17, 2012 at 5:31:18 am
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 17, 2012 at 5:41:26 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 17, 2012 at 5:52:57 am
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 17, 2012 at 6:28:40 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 17, 2012 at 3:38:01 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Jeremy Garchow on May 18, 2012 at 3:28:28 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 3:54:25 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Jeremy Garchow on May 18, 2012 at 4:59:25 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 5:03:49 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by David Lawrence on May 19, 2012 at 2:33:38 am
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Steve Connor on May 19, 2012 at 9:05:54 am
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Herb Sevush on May 19, 2012 at 2:45:30 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Oliver Peters on May 19, 2012 at 2:56:46 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Herb Sevush on May 19, 2012 at 3:05:30 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Steve Connor on May 19, 2012 at 3:28:56 pm
        Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy by Herb Sevush on May 19, 2012 at 2:43:12 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 19, 2012 at 2:19:04 am
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 11:56:04 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 11:40:18 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 12:02:49 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 15, 2012 at 12:04:50 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 12:04:35 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 15, 2012 at 12:09:23 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 7:38:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 8:17:39 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 8:59:57 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Andy Neil on May 14, 2012 at 9:16:42 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:35:18 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 10:13:06 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 7:53:36 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:27:50 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 12:36:47 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:40:06 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 12:41:53 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 1:10:41 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 12:48:48 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 1:13:20 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 15, 2012 at 1:51:30 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 2:27:27 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 4:33:16 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 4:36:50 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:21:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 7:10:59 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 11:45:58 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 1:52:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Michael Hancock on May 15, 2012 at 1:58:41 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 2:23:34 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Alex Hawkins on May 16, 2012 at 12:44:04 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 6:55:30 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 5:08:22 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 6:29:35 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 6:58:56 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 7:21:42 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 12:11:15 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 4:31:39 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 5:15:36 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 5:44:09 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 9:56:03 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 10:04:35 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 10:28:09 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:10:04 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:46:46 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 1:17:15 am
        Re: Editing scenario by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 1:19:45 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 8:02:40 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 4:15:12 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 1:21:08 am
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 3:06:44 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 5:14:21 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:33:28 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Jim Giberti on May 13, 2012 at 11:02:36 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 2:34:35 am
  - Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 12:04:20 pm
    - Re: Editing scenario by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 11:08:52 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:13:34 am
- Re: Editing scenario by tony west on May 14, 2012 at 11:48:17 am
  - Re: Editing scenario by Michael Sanders on May 14, 2012 at 11:51:37 am
    - Re: Editing scenario by tony west on May 14, 2012 at 1:08:54 pm
      - Re: Editing scenario by Simon Ubsdell on May 14, 2012 at 1:19:15 pm
        Re: Editing scenario by tony west on May 14, 2012 at 3:15:50 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Carsten Orlt on May 14, 2012 at 1:41:52 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:08:11 pm
  - Re: Editing scenario by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 10:04:42 pm
- Re: Editing scenario by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:08:44 pm

News: Thwak! Music Unveils ‘KBV Sync’ Online Search Engine by Cow News Droid on May 12, 2012 at 2:53:04 am

Article: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 12, 2012 at 1:22:34 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by walter biscardi on May 13, 2012 at 9:14:38 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 14, 2012 at 2:10:37 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 13, 2012 at 10:54:25 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Jarle Leirpoll on May 14, 2012 at 6:22:47 am
  - @Jarle Leirpoll by Barend Onneweer on May 15, 2012 at 8:03:23 am
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by stig olsen on May 16, 2012 at 7:53:14 pm
    - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Jarle Leirpoll on May 17, 2012 at 6:07:22 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Steve Shaw on May 14, 2012 at 8:38:26 am
- Re: SGO Mistika by Dennis Kutchera on May 14, 2012 at 11:27:34 am
- Baselight Tracker Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by James Milne on May 14, 2012 at 6:14:46 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Christopher Lowden on May 15, 2012 at 5:40:08 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dylan Hargreaves on May 15, 2012 at 4:18:40 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 16, 2012 at 1:26:38 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Eric Williamson on May 15, 2012 at 5:25:32 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Peter Vogt on May 15, 2012 at 6:37:03 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 16, 2012 at 1:31:47 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Clement Hobbs on May 15, 2012 at 8:16:17 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 16, 2012 at 1:35:42 am
    - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Clement Hobbs on May 16, 2012 at 1:53:23 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by dennis quintanilla on May 16, 2012 at 2:39:53 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Adam Welsh on May 16, 2012 at 9:01:58 am
  - @Adam Welsh by Barend Onneweer on May 16, 2012 at 12:44:40 pm

Service: Ella.J Digital Design by Stephanie Mondragon on May 10, 2012 at 7:10:44 pm

Service: Neil Murphy by Neil Murphy on May 9, 2012 at 1:47:43 am

PP CS6 test drive by Morten Ranmar on May 7, 2012 at 7:58:59 pm
- Re: PP CS6 test drive by David Cherniack on May 7, 2012 at 9:18:04 pm
  - Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lance Bachelder on May 7, 2012 at 11:10:59 pm
    - Re: PP CS6 test drive by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 11:23:20 pm
      - Re: PP CS6 test drive by Michael Gissing on May 7, 2012 at 11:48:20 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lance Bachelder on May 8, 2012 at 3:21:27 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lin Sebastian Kayser on May 8, 2012 at 8:37:23 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 12:18:59 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Tero Ahlfors on May 8, 2012 at 2:41:54 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lance Bachelder on May 8, 2012 at 4:25:13 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lin Sebastian Kayser on May 9, 2012 at 10:37:38 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Mike Molenda on May 8, 2012 at 1:13:35 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lin Sebastian Kayser on May 8, 2012 at 2:56:17 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Oliver Peters on May 8, 2012 at 5:56:43 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 4:07:33 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 6:57:52 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Mike Molenda on May 8, 2012 at 10:51:35 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Mike Molenda on May 8, 2012 at 11:16:22 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 3:49:01 pm

News: RE:Vision Effects Announces Support for Adobe After Effects CS6 and Premiere Pro CS6 by Cow News Droid on May 4, 2012 at 12:35:48 am

News: Quantel revolutionQ wins inaugural IABM Game-Changer award at the 2012 NAB Show by Cow News Droid on Apr 30, 2012 at 5:26:07 pm

SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on Apr 30, 2012 at 1:36:01 pm
- Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 30, 2012 at 2:25:02 pm
  - Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:03:58 pm
    - Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Andy Neil on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:26:42 pm
      - Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:34:17 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Oliver Peters on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:46:05 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:59:23 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Tim Wilson on Apr 30, 2012 at 5:36:24 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on Apr 30, 2012 at 5:52:58 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Oliver Peters on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:09:46 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:19:11 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Chris Harlan on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:32:08 pm
- Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Richard Herd on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43:36 pm
- Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Andrew Richards on Apr 30, 2012 at 7:34:56 pm
  - Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Chris Harlan on Apr 30, 2012 at 7:46:12 pm
    - Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Tim Wilson on Apr 30, 2012 at 9:52:00 pm
      - Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on Apr 30, 2012 at 10:00:43 pm
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Tim Wilson on May 1, 2012 at 12:53:10 am
        Re: SCRI Avid's Official Report by Craig Seeman on May 1, 2012 at 1:30:17 am

fcpx or not? by Rainer Wirth on Apr 27, 2012 at 9:14:09 am
- Re: fcpx or not? by Brian Mulligan on Apr 27, 2012 at 10:20:05 am
  - Re: fcpx or not? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 27, 2012 at 1:02:55 pm
    - Re: fcpx or not? by Brian Mulligan on Apr 27, 2012 at 2:31:19 pm
      - Re: fcpx or not? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 27, 2012 at 3:07:59 pm
  - Re: fcpx or not? by Bob Woodhead on Apr 27, 2012 at 3:08:04 pm
    - Re: fcpx or not? by Brian Mulligan on Apr 27, 2012 at 4:36:16 pm
    - Re: fcpx or not? by moody glasgow on Apr 27, 2012 at 4:37:25 pm
- Re: fcpx or not? by Greg Andonian on Apr 27, 2012 at 11:09:03 am
- Re: fcpx or not? by Andrew Richards on Apr 27, 2012 at 12:46:50 pm
- Re: fcpx or not? by Paul Jay on Apr 27, 2012 at 2:28:42 pm
  - Re: fcpx or not? by Eric Santiago on Apr 27, 2012 at 2:41:25 pm
    - Re: fcpx or not? by Rainer Wirth on Apr 27, 2012 at 3:41:26 pm
    - Re: fcpx or not? by Jamie Franklin on Apr 27, 2012 at 5:28:00 pm
- Re: fcpx or not? by Dustin Parsons on Apr 27, 2012 at 5:36:26 pm
  - Re: fcpx or not? by Oliver Peters on Apr 27, 2012 at 6:00:33 pm
- Re: fcpx or not? by John Heagy on Apr 27, 2012 at 6:37:21 pm
  - Re: fcpx or not? by Bret Williams on Apr 27, 2012 at 7:23:58 pm
    - Re: fcpx or not? by John Heagy on Apr 27, 2012 at 7:56:59 pm
      - Re: fcpx or not? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 27, 2012 at 9:20:00 pm
        Re: fcpx or not? by Richard Herd on Apr 27, 2012 at 10:10:15 pm
        Re: fcpx or not? by Oliver Peters on Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15:06 pm
        Re: fcpx or not? by John Heagy on Apr 28, 2012 at 3:57:25 pm
        Re: fcpx or not? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 4:40:21 pm
      - Re: fcpx or not? by Jules bowman on Apr 27, 2012 at 10:03:21 pm
        Re: fcpx or not? by Bret Williams on Apr 27, 2012 at 11:45:15 pm
        Re: fcpx or not? by David Powell on Apr 28, 2012 at 5:06:49 am
      - Re: fcpx or not? by Greg Andonian on Apr 28, 2012 at 2:15:11 am
      - Re: fcpx or not? by Rainer Wirth on Apr 29, 2012 at 11:35:01 am
- Re: fcpx or not? by Thomas Frank on Apr 28, 2012 at 9:39:30 am
  - Re: fcpx or not? by Miriam Lefkowitz on Apr 28, 2012 at 4:19:13 pm
    - Re: fcpx or not? by Oliver Peters on Apr 28, 2012 at 4:34:24 pm

Interlacing issues 1080 50i to DV PAL by Brtett Ramsey on Apr 25, 2012 at 12:08:58 am
- Re: Interlacing issues 1080 50i to DV PAL by Michael Gissing on Apr 25, 2012 at 11:11:53 pm
  - Re: Interlacing issues 1080 50i to DV PAL by Brett Ramsey on Apr 27, 2012 at 12:29:05 am
    - Re: Interlacing issues 1080 50i to DV PAL by Brett Ramsey on Apr 27, 2012 at 1:08:56 am
      - Re: Interlacing issues 1080 50i to DV PAL by Michael Gissing on Apr 27, 2012 at 1:43:32 am

OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Kevin Patrick on Apr 24, 2012 at 1:54:25 pm
- Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by David Roth Weiss on Apr 24, 2012 at 2:17:02 pm
  - Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Kevin Patrick on Apr 24, 2012 at 4:57:43 pm
- Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Shawn Miller on Apr 24, 2012 at 5:17:39 pm
  - Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Tim Wilson on Apr 24, 2012 at 5:30:25 pm
    - Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Steve Connor on Apr 24, 2012 at 5:35:47 pm
    - Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Andrew Kimery on Apr 24, 2012 at 6:22:06 pm
    - Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Shawn Miller on Apr 24, 2012 at 6:48:34 pm
- Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Walter Soyka on Apr 24, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
  - Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 24, 2012 at 11:46:05 pm
  - Re: OT: Adobe's Colaborative Workflow Concept (at NAB) by Kevin Patrick on Apr 25, 2012 at 11:24:19 am

Service: Station 3 Media by Gene Colburn on Apr 22, 2012 at 3:12:21 pm

Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14:54 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by Marvin Holdman on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:22:18 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:50:08 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:42:35 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:51:26 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:56:25 pm
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:03:25 pm
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:16:24 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:45:27 pm
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:43:23 pm
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:02:33 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:10:22 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:13:30 am
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Walter Soyka on Apr 19, 2012 at 5:26:03 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Harlan on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:07:42 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:28:23 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:46 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:59:43 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:29 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:06:55 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by Paul Jay on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:53:40 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Joseph Owens on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:20:33 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Walter Soyka on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:29:24 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Frank Gothmann on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:31:31 pm
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:39:38 pm
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Harlan on Apr 18, 2012 at 7:40:26 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by Scott Sheriff on Apr 18, 2012 at 6:56:12 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by Glen Hurd on Apr 18, 2012 at 7:28:03 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 7:53:10 pm
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by Ben Scott on Apr 18, 2012 at 9:05:06 pm
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by Glen Hurd on Apr 18, 2012 at 10:38:19 pm
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:09:11 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by TImothy Auld on Apr 18, 2012 at 8:47:14 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Dave LaRonde on Apr 18, 2012 at 9:04:04 pm
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 9:08:37 pm
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by Jamie Franklin on Apr 18, 2012 at 10:39:29 pm
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by Scott Shucher on Apr 18, 2012 at 10:50:14 pm
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:10:25 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Scott Shucher on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:24:38 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:36:49 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Ben Rojas on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:50:16 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:54:41 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Scott Shucher on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:06:49 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:15:23 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Ben Rojas on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:35:26 am
    - Re: Apple are hilarious by katherine taylor on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:39:45 pm
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:55:01 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:47:14 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:56:52 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 19, 2012 at 1:41:01 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 19, 2012 at 8:13:37 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:52:58 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Tim Wilson on Apr 19, 2012 at 1:13:01 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Scott Shucher on Apr 19, 2012 at 1:39:27 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 19, 2012 at 1:44:31 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Tim Wilson on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:51:23 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Harlan on Apr 19, 2012 at 2:00:38 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 19, 2012 at 5:37:39 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Harlan on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:04:37 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:11:40 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Harlan on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:02:23 am
      - Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:45:27 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Jules bowman on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:46:35 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 19, 2012 at 1:48:54 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 19, 2012 at 3:56:14 pm
        Re: Apple are hilarious by chris north on Apr 19, 2012 at 9:45:19 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Steve Connor on Apr 19, 2012 at 9:53:47 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by chris north on Apr 19, 2012 at 10:07:52 am
        Re: Apple are hilarious by Chris Kenny on Apr 19, 2012 at 1:33:20 pm
- Re: Apple are hilarious by Daniel Frome on Apr 19, 2012 at 11:26:10 am
  - Re: Apple are hilarious by Oliver Peters on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:49:08 pm

How does this change anything? by Joseph Owens on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:24:14 pm
- Re: How does this change anything? by Ryan Holmes on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:19:12 pm
- Re: How does this change anything? by Aaron Neitz on Apr 17, 2012 at 6:07:23 pm
  - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:06:38 pm
    - Re: How does this change anything? by Joseph Owens on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:59:16 pm
      - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:33:05 pm
      - Re: How does this change anything? by dermot shane on Apr 18, 2012 at 12:50:28 am
        Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:55:11 am
        Re: How does this change anything? by Tom Masters on May 4, 2012 at 9:24:28 pm
- Re: How does this change anything? by chris north on Apr 18, 2012 at 10:33:09 am
  - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 18, 2012 at 12:29:22 pm
    - Re: How does this change anything? by dermot shane on Apr 18, 2012 at 3:10:30 pm
      - Re: How does this change anything? by Ryan Holmes on Apr 18, 2012 at 3:44:35 pm
    - Re: How does this change anything? by Anhtu Vu on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:57:43 am
      - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:03 am

News: NVIDIA and Partners Transform Entire Content Creation Workflow at 2012 NAB Show by Cow News Droid on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:19:50 pm

Blog: "Smoke is Changing" is NOT a Marketing Slogan by walter biscardi on Apr 12, 2012 at 9:34:05 pm
- Re: Blog: "Smoke is Changing" is NOT a Marketing Slogan by Sohrab Sandhu on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:00:07 pm
- Re: Blog: "Smoke is Changing" is NOT a Marketing Slogan by Alan Okey on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:48:11 am
  - Re: Blog: "Smoke is Changing" is NOT a Marketing Slogan by Steve Eisen on Apr 13, 2012 at 2:07:12 am
    - @Steve Eisen by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:26:22 pm
  - @Alan Okey by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:23:47 pm
- Re: "Smoke is Changing" is NOT a Marketing Slogan by Neil Hurwitz on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:19:32 am
  - Re: "Smoke is Changing" is NOT a Marketing Slogan by Michael Horton on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:05:17 am
  - @Neil Hurwitz by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:23:17 pm
    - Re: @Neil Hurwitz by Mark Suszko on Apr 13, 2012 at 2:07:05 pm
      - Re: @Neil Hurwitz by Ryan Holmes on Apr 13, 2012 at 2:25:25 pm
        Re: @Neil Hurwitz by Mark Suszko on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:37:47 pm
      - Re: @Neil Hurwitz by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:58:31 pm
      - Re: @Neil Hurwitz by Walter Soyka on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:02:33 pm
        Re: @Neil Hurwitz by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:48:35 pm
        Re: @Neil Hurwitz by Walter Soyka on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
        Re: @Neil Hurwitz by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:13:29 pm
      - Re: @Neil Hurwitz by Herb Sevush on Apr 14, 2012 at 7:00:06 pm
- Re: "Smoke is Changing" is NOT a Marketing Slogan by Neil Hurwitz on Apr 13, 2012 at 3:37:40 pm
  - @Neil Hurwitz by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:53:57 pm
    - Re: @Neil Hurwitz by Joseph Owens on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:01:33 pm
- some inside news,(maybe) by Richard Cardonna on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:02:05 pm

News: Orad and Quantel Showcase Visual Finesse in Broadcast Production by Cow News Droid on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:45:57 pm

News: Searle Street Post Upgrades Digital Dailies Workflow to FLEXXITY Dailies Software by Cow News Droid on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:57:17 pm

Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:10:06 pm
- Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Phil Hoppes on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:18:37 pm
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:33:33 pm
    - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Chris Harlan on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:40:26 pm
    - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Phil Hoppes on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:53:59 pm
- Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:29:13 pm
- Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Andrew Richards on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:30:49 pm
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:37:27 pm
    - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Andrew Richards on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:50:52 pm
      - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Frank Gothmann on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:03:11 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Tim Wilson on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:11:28 pm
      - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:16:47 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Walter Soyka on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:31:18 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Chris Harlan on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:36:33 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:53:27 pm
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by David Jahns on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:20:17 pm
    - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:31:01 pm
      - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Thomas Frank on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:53:30 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Bill Davis on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:00:15 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Michael Gissing on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:03:50 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Bobby Mosca on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:28:28 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Herb Sevush on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:15:15 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:21:42 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Bill Davis on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:14:37 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38:57 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:25:24 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Lance Bachelder on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:40:18 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 11, 2012 at 11:27:57 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 11, 2012 at 11:46:38 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:00:50 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Lance Bachelder on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:16:00 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:43:31 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:09:43 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:19:07 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:34:16 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by David Lawrence on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:37:03 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:06:56 pm
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Greg Andonian on Apr 11, 2012 at 11:49:21 pm
    - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:19:34 am
      - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:22:23 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:55:09 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:11:50 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:31:07 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:47:32 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:58:58 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:14:40 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:22:13 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:27:16 pm
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Mike Kelland on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:51:41 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:55:52 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Mike Kelland on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:00:14 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:03:59 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:13:36 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:21:59 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:28:36 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:40:18 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:00:41 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:16:46 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:28:19 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:14:59 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26:51 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:46:10 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Chris Harlan on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:42:16 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:22:07 am
        Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30:58 am
- Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:11:20 pm
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Joseph Owens on Apr 12, 2012 at 7:22:59 pm
- Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Mark Palmos on Apr 14, 2012 at 10:43:52 am
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Craig Seeman on Apr 14, 2012 at 11:19:35 am
    - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Mark Palmos on Apr 14, 2012 at 11:59:08 am
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Steve Connor on Apr 14, 2012 at 12:06:41 pm
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 14, 2012 at 2:03:54 pm
  - Re: Apple finally updating their online FCPX Pro marketing by Thomas Frank on Apr 14, 2012 at 11:38:17 pm

News: Detroit’s RingSide Creative stays ahead with Quantel by Cow News Droid on Apr 3, 2012 at 6:04:00 pm

Blog: NAB's PreRelease announcments continue/ Sony4K , BandPro EVF, Thunderbolt Test gear. by gary adcock on Apr 3, 2012 at 2:35:15 pm
- Re: Blog: NAB's PreRelease announcments continue/ Sony4K , BandPro EVF, Thunderbolt Test gear. by Neil Sadwelkar on Apr 3, 2012 at 6:08:37 pm
  - Re: Blog: NAB's PreRelease announcments continue/ Sony4K , BandPro EVF, Thunderbolt Test gear. by gary adcock on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:13:30 pm

Premiere Pro not writing cross dissolves while exporting as DPX by Tero Ahlfors on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:15:18 am

Moire effect when downscaling Redepic 4k to HD by Emil Eriksson on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:09:34 pm
- Re: Moire effect when downscaling Redepic 4k to HD by David Battistella on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:23:40 pm
  - Re: Moire effect when downscaling Redepic 4k to HD by Emil Eriksson on Apr 2, 2012 at 9:03:33 pm
    - Re: Moire effect when downscaling Redepic 4k to HD by Emil Eriksson on Apr 2, 2012 at 9:08:55 pm
      - Re: Moire effect when downscaling Redepic 4k to HD by David Battistella on Apr 2, 2012 at 9:38:41 pm
        Re: Moire effect when downscaling Redepic 4k to HD by Emil Eriksson on Apr 3, 2012 at 12:42:16 am
- Re: Moire effect when downscaling Redepic 4k to HD by Enge Gray on Apr 16, 2012 at 10:21:01 am

Fluke or trend? You decide... by Greg Andonian on Mar 29, 2012 at 7:00:55 am
- Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Neil Patience on Mar 29, 2012 at 1:57:35 pm
  - Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Dave LaRonde on Mar 29, 2012 at 3:31:33 pm
    - Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Steve Connor on Mar 29, 2012 at 3:33:08 pm
    - Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Neil Patience on Mar 29, 2012 at 5:41:28 pm
      - Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Joseph W. Bourke on Mar 29, 2012 at 7:47:54 pm
        Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Neil Patience on Mar 29, 2012 at 10:23:39 pm
      - Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 29, 2012 at 10:26:51 pm
        Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Neil Patience on Mar 29, 2012 at 11:43:27 pm
        Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 30, 2012 at 12:31:46 am
        Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Jason Porthouse on Mar 30, 2012 at 9:34:06 am
        Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Dennis Radeke on Mar 30, 2012 at 10:17:46 am
        Re: Fluke or trend? You decide... by Steve Connor on Mar 30, 2012 at 12:01:40 pm

After Effects feild dominance by Rohan Scarr on Mar 28, 2012 at 2:22:34 am
- Re: After Effects field dominance by Walter Soyka on Mar 28, 2012 at 2:06:18 pm

How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Steven Belcher on Mar 27, 2012 at 7:36:46 pm
- Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Mark Suszko on Mar 27, 2012 at 8:09:00 pm
  - Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Steven Belcher on Mar 27, 2012 at 8:47:27 pm
    - Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Todd Terry on Mar 27, 2012 at 9:01:11 pm
      - Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Steven Belcher on Mar 27, 2012 at 9:16:30 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Todd Terry on Mar 27, 2012 at 9:50:43 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Bill Davis on Mar 28, 2012 at 3:54:28 am
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Mark Suszko on Mar 28, 2012 at 2:14:31 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Steven Belcher on Mar 28, 2012 at 2:19:40 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Todd Terry on Mar 28, 2012 at 3:04:28 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Steven Belcher on Mar 28, 2012 at 3:12:57 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Mark D'Agostino on Mar 28, 2012 at 4:34:16 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by john sharaf on Mar 28, 2012 at 4:41:14 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Steven Belcher on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:11:07 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Bill Davis on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:01:56 pm
- Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Ken Maxwell on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:20:57 pm
  - Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Mark Suszko on Mar 28, 2012 at 7:08:12 pm
    - Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Ken Maxwell on Mar 29, 2012 at 12:01:29 am
      - Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Todd Terry on Mar 29, 2012 at 1:53:22 am
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Ken Maxwell on Mar 29, 2012 at 3:26:45 am
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Ken Maxwell on Mar 29, 2012 at 2:21:19 pm
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Bob Cole on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:42:33 am
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Todd Terry on Apr 22, 2012 at 4:23:30 am
        Re: How to light subject (interior shot) and expose for background through window (exterior)? by Bob Cole on Apr 22, 2012 at 3:10:05 pm

Film grain by Gustavo Bermudas on Mar 26, 2012 at 10:49:34 pm
- Re: Film grain by Robbie Carman on Mar 26, 2012 at 10:52:54 pm
  - Re: Film grain by Gustavo Bermudas on Mar 26, 2012 at 11:02:02 pm
    - Re: Film grain by Greg Turner on Mar 26, 2012 at 11:43:43 pm
- Re: Film grain by Alexander Higgins on Mar 26, 2012 at 11:32:12 pm
- Re: Film grain by John Michaels on Mar 27, 2012 at 2:41:40 am
  - Re: Film grain by Chris Martin on Mar 27, 2012 at 4:23:32 am
  - Re: Film grain by Gustavo Bermudas on Mar 27, 2012 at 4:58:09 am
    - Re: Film grain by John Michaels on Mar 27, 2012 at 5:10:44 am
      - Re: Film grain by Gustavo Bermudas on Mar 27, 2012 at 5:18:08 am
    - Re: Film grain by Carl Ryan Stemple on Mar 27, 2012 at 5:25:42 am
      - Re: Film grain by Knut Jansohn on Mar 27, 2012 at 11:41:35 am
      - Re: Film grain by Greg Turner on Mar 27, 2012 at 4:07:24 pm
      - Re: Film grain by Joseph Owens on Mar 29, 2012 at 9:34:54 pm

Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Robert Ruffo on Mar 25, 2012 at 2:46:37 pm
- Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 25, 2012 at 4:37:13 pm
  - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by dermot shane on Mar 25, 2012 at 5:12:13 pm
    - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Knut Jansohn on Mar 25, 2012 at 5:49:11 pm
      - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Sascha Haber on Mar 25, 2012 at 7:56:52 pm
- Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Mel Matsuoka on Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29:00 pm
  - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by dermot shane on Mar 27, 2012 at 12:13:02 am
    - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 27, 2012 at 12:49:05 pm
      - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by dermot shane on Mar 27, 2012 at 1:06:49 pm
        Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Mike Most on Mar 27, 2012 at 3:46:03 pm
        Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Mike Most on Mar 27, 2012 at 5:37:34 pm
  - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Sascha Haber on Mar 27, 2012 at 9:41:01 am
    - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Robert Ruffo on Mar 28, 2012 at 10:17:12 pm
    - Re: Would love to see a matte choke system in HSL qualifier by Mike Most on Mar 29, 2012 at 12:20:49 am

News: Digital Nirvana to Intro Systems for Multi-Platform and Enterprise-wide IP Distribution by Cow News Droid on Mar 23, 2012 at 6:32:37 pm

News: Revolution not evolution: defining the future with Quantel at NAB 2012 by Cow News Droid on Mar 23, 2012 at 6:22:14 pm

Baselight for FCP by Walter Soyka on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:12:47 pm
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:21:03 pm
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Neil Patience on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:09:32 pm
  - Re: Baselight for FCP by dermot shane on Mar 21, 2012 at 11:58:49 pm
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Alexander Higgins on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:08:16 pm
  - Re: Baselight for FCP by Lance Bachelder on Mar 21, 2012 at 11:30:00 pm
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 21, 2012 at 11:47:26 pm
      - Re: Baselight for FCP by Walter Soyka on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:30:26 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Lance Bachelder on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:32:06 am
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Alexander Higgins on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:00:33 am
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:38:13 am
  - Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:51:18 am
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:58:31 am
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Frank Gothmann on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:59:46 am
      - Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:05:42 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:28:44 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Shane Ross on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:35:04 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:53:18 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:48:57 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:44:06 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:52:56 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:05:52 pm
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:40:09 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Deepa Parbhoo on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:34:42 pm
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Craig Seeman on Mar 22, 2012 at 4:07:04 pm
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Keith Pratt on Mar 24, 2012 at 12:16:07 am
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Robert Brown on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:31:56 pm

FOR SALE: Quantel Pablo 4K Package by Brian Hughes on Mar 17, 2012 at 3:05:12 am

Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 1:04:48 am
- Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Michael Jordan on Mar 15, 2012 at 1:59:49 am
  - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:13:06 am
- Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Kevin Cannon on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:03:41 am
  - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:13:32 am
    - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Kevin Cannon on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:04:12 pm
      - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:17:59 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Kevin Cannon on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23:18 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 9:24:07 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 15, 2012 at 9:56:13 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:19:53 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:50:31 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 11:15:07 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Dwaine Maggart on Mar 15, 2012 at 11:18:53 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:52:36 am
- Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:31:22 am
  - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:24:56 am
    - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:30:47 am
    - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Mike Most on Mar 15, 2012 at 5:17:33 am
      - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 15, 2012 at 5:27:13 am
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Mike Most on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:36:05 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 5:06:42 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Juan Salvo on Mar 15, 2012 at 5:17:26 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 5:58:17 pm
        Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Joseph Owens on Mar 15, 2012 at 7:37:31 pm
- Re: Important Workflow Questions. by bob kimberly on Mar 15, 2012 at 9:25:18 am
- Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Nick Anderson on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:23:20 pm
  - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Alexander Higgins on Mar 15, 2012 at 5:14:24 pm
- Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Eric Johnson on Mar 15, 2012 at 7:04:10 pm
  - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Craig Campbell on Mar 15, 2012 at 8:11:34 pm
    - Re: Important Workflow Questions. by Margus Voll on Mar 16, 2012 at 8:13:53 am

What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 13, 2012 at 5:13:34 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 13, 2012 at 5:38:58 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by TImothy Auld on Mar 13, 2012 at 6:00:28 pm
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 13, 2012 at 6:28:11 pm
    - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 13, 2012 at 8:12:49 pm
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 13, 2012 at 9:03:57 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 3:18:40 pm
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Bill Davis on Mar 13, 2012 at 10:24:52 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 1:28:49 pm
    - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 12:53:19 am
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 1:29:04 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:18:29 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:39:44 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:44:04 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:37:25 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 7:44:35 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 8:42:06 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:55:34 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:32:49 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:37:04 pm
    - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 14, 2012 at 2:32:21 am
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:57:21 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by David Lawrence on Mar 14, 2012 at 6:26:47 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 1:26:51 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 14, 2012 at 1:29:35 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 2:12:04 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 14, 2012 at 2:32:47 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Richard Herd on Mar 14, 2012 at 3:47:05 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:32:15 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Tim Wilson on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:50:38 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Richard Herd on Mar 14, 2012 at 5:10:38 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 14, 2012 at 7:56:29 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 14, 2012 at 8:15:07 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 14, 2012 at 8:50:36 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:00:38 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:04:15 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:15:26 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:31:16 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:30:57 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:42:55 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:53:32 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 13, 2012 at 6:20:01 pm
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Frank Gothmann on Mar 13, 2012 at 7:40:13 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Steve Connor on Mar 13, 2012 at 7:29:19 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Richard Herd on Mar 13, 2012 at 7:51:08 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Bill Davis on Mar 13, 2012 at 7:52:21 pm
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Paul Jay on Mar 13, 2012 at 7:57:01 pm
    - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Bill Davis on Mar 13, 2012 at 10:02:44 pm
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 2:18:50 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Helmut Kobler on Mar 13, 2012 at 7:58:02 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 13, 2012 at 8:31:17 pm
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 13, 2012 at 8:39:28 pm
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Steve Connor on Mar 13, 2012 at 8:44:58 pm
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 13, 2012 at 11:15:38 pm
    - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 12:18:34 am
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 14, 2012 at 12:29:25 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 1:42:46 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 2:27:02 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 14, 2012 at 2:48:43 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Michael Gissing on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:40:29 am
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:23:00 pm
    - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 5:08:12 pm
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 5:37:28 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 14, 2012 at 5:43:18 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 14, 2012 at 7:38:32 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Tim Wilson on Mar 14, 2012 at 8:16:40 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 14, 2012 at 8:35:34 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 14, 2012 at 8:52:58 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Andrew Richards on Mar 14, 2012 at 5:54:59 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 14, 2012 at 6:01:07 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Shawn Miller on Mar 14, 2012 at 6:46:54 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 7:01:03 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 15, 2012 at 1:11:45 am
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by John Christie on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:52:25 am
- Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jonathan Ziegler on Mar 14, 2012 at 4:17:31 pm
  - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 14, 2012 at 8:11:16 pm
    - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Tim Wilson on Mar 14, 2012 at 10:29:10 pm
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:40:59 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Tim Wilson on Mar 15, 2012 at 8:15:16 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Paul Dickin on Mar 15, 2012 at 8:39:05 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by T.a. Franks on Mar 15, 2012 at 9:18:55 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Steve Connor on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:27:25 am
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09:16 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 15, 2012 at 2:41:17 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Steve Connor on Mar 15, 2012 at 2:58:30 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:04:00 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Steve Connor on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:05:54 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:32:03 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 15, 2012 at 2:44:57 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Chris Harlan on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:32:59 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:03:21 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:10:07 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:06:07 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:18:21 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 15, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Herb Sevush on Mar 15, 2012 at 8:15:14 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 15, 2012 at 8:35:55 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Walter Soyka on Mar 15, 2012 at 4:26:47 pm
        Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Craig Seeman on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:18:28 pm
      - Re: What if there actually IS a new Mac Pro? by Richard Herd on Mar 15, 2012 at 3:19:47 pm

Resetting A Power Curve Without Losing A Qualified Key by Chris Martin on Mar 13, 2012 at 5:04:35 pm
- Re: Resetting A Power Curve Without Losing A Qualified Key by Dmitry Kitsov on Mar 13, 2012 at 5:31:48 pm
  - Re: Resetting A Power Curve Without Losing A Qualified Key by Chris Martin on Mar 13, 2012 at 6:43:25 pm

EDITING REALITY - How to Edit Reality Like a Pro - 2nd Edition by Chaz Shukat on Mar 11, 2012 at 5:24:56 pm

News: Argentina's Carburando Delivers High Definition Motor Sports with Grass Valley by Cow News Droid on Mar 6, 2012 at 7:03:17 pm

My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Ruffo on Mar 4, 2012 at 10:18:40 pm
- Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Mathieu Marano on Mar 5, 2012 at 3:10:38 am
  - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Ruffo on Mar 5, 2012 at 4:17:21 am
    - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Mike Most on Mar 5, 2012 at 4:09:34 pm
- Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Juan Salvo on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:07:08 pm
  - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Houllahan on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:44:51 pm
    - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Ruffo on Mar 6, 2012 at 5:02:25 am
      - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 6, 2012 at 5:37:41 am
        Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Antoine Baumann on Mar 10, 2012 at 11:12:56 am
        Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 10, 2012 at 4:54:27 pm

Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Daniel Ray on Mar 1, 2012 at 7:35:31 pm
- Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Joseph Hung on Mar 1, 2012 at 8:15:26 pm
  - Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Daniel Sametz on Mar 1, 2012 at 8:29:08 pm
  - Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Daniel Ray on Mar 1, 2012 at 9:13:46 pm
    - Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Daniel Sametz on Mar 1, 2012 at 9:38:11 pm
      - Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Michael Gissing on Mar 1, 2012 at 10:41:12 pm
      - Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Matt Lyon on Mar 3, 2012 at 5:02:33 pm
        Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by David Roth Weiss on Mar 3, 2012 at 5:13:03 pm
        Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Matt Lyon on Mar 3, 2012 at 6:16:25 pm
        Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by David Roth Weiss on Mar 3, 2012 at 6:32:32 pm
        Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Daniel Ray on Mar 3, 2012 at 7:13:52 pm
        Re: Workflow and playback for Uncompressed 10-bit is choppy on my Mac Pro. by Matt Lyon on Mar 4, 2012 at 4:23:42 am

Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Joel Cotlhorpe on Mar 1, 2012 at 12:23:05 am
- Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Steve Crow on Mar 1, 2012 at 3:01:14 am
- Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Peter Burger on Mar 1, 2012 at 9:36:59 am
  - Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Casey Petersen on Mar 1, 2012 at 4:09:02 pm
    - Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Peter Burger on Mar 1, 2012 at 9:48:47 pm
      - Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Joel Cotlhorpe on Mar 2, 2012 at 3:19:18 am
        Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Peter Burger on Mar 2, 2012 at 8:00:25 am
        Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Joel Cotlhorpe on Mar 2, 2012 at 10:11:10 am
        Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Peter Burger on Mar 2, 2012 at 2:21:14 pm
        Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Jason Jenkins on Mar 2, 2012 at 5:24:22 pm
        Re: Canon 600D IMAGE QUALITY ISSUE by Joel Cotlhorpe on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:48:24 pm

8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 28, 2012 at 2:01:19 am
- Re: 8bit Banding by John Cuevas on Feb 28, 2012 at 2:14:10 pm
  - Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 28, 2012 at 2:57:02 pm
    - Re: 8bit Banding by Kevin Camp on Feb 28, 2012 at 6:11:39 pm
      - Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 28, 2012 at 9:21:57 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 3:01:34 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 4:39:53 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 4:47:27 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 5:31:03 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 5:43:31 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 5:51:00 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 6:19:23 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 6:28:39 pm

The Paradise Lost Trilogy by Scott Roberts on Feb 21, 2012 at 8:39:00 pm
- Re: The Paradise Lost Trilogy by Jason Jenkins on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:20:15 pm
  - Re: The Paradise Lost Trilogy by Scott Roberts on Feb 23, 2012 at 10:00:43 pm
    - Re: The Paradise Lost Trilogy by Renato Sanjuán on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:28:56 pm

Adobe Bridge effects in Premier Pro? by Andy Taplin on Feb 20, 2012 at 5:16:53 pm
- Re: Adobe Bridge effects in Premier Pro? by Vince Becquiot on Feb 20, 2012 at 5:20:35 pm
  - Re: Adobe Bridge effects in Premier Pro? by Andy Taplin on Feb 20, 2012 at 5:25:20 pm
    - Re: Adobe Bridge effects in Premier Pro? by Vince Becquiot on Feb 20, 2012 at 5:36:39 pm
      - Re: Adobe Bridge effects in Premier Pro? by Andy Taplin on Feb 20, 2012 at 6:00:02 pm
        Re: Adobe Bridge effects in Premier Pro? by Tero Ahlfors on Feb 21, 2012 at 7:37:49 am

if the rumours are right this is what I want by Paul mitchell on Feb 18, 2012 at 3:49:23 am
- Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Sascha Haber on Feb 18, 2012 at 9:41:33 am
  - Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Paul mitchell on Feb 18, 2012 at 8:21:16 pm
  - Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by jake blackstone on Feb 22, 2012 at 5:48:29 am
- Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Kevin Cannon on Feb 18, 2012 at 5:55:55 pm
  - Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Paul mitchell on Feb 18, 2012 at 6:06:46 pm
    - Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Kevin Cannon on Feb 20, 2012 at 12:24:06 am
      - Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Peter Chamberlain on Feb 23, 2012 at 6:35:44 am
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Kevin Cannon on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:18:22 am
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by walter biscardi on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:56:06 pm
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Gabriele Turchi on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:29:32 pm
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Paul mitchell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:56 pm
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Lee Niederkofler on Feb 23, 2012 at 10:35:45 pm
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Thomas Maier on Feb 26, 2012 at 10:35:38 pm
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Joseph Owens on Feb 27, 2012 at 5:49:09 pm
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Sascha Haber on Mar 2, 2012 at 1:07:50 pm
        Re: if the rumours are right this is what I want by Marc Czessack on Mar 28, 2012 at 12:42:16 pm

Video: compositing reel by Jon Merrifield on Feb 17, 2012 at 4:02:29 pm
- Re: compositing reel by Garrett Unglaub on Feb 19, 2012 at 2:40:10 am
- Re: compositing reel by Jon Merrifield on Feb 20, 2012 at 5:30:56 pm
- Re: compositing reel by David Hodge on Apr 1, 2012 at 5:57:56 pm

Control surface rumor..... by andrew sableton on Feb 14, 2012 at 8:32:40 pm
- Re: Control surface rumor..... by Paul mitchell on Feb 14, 2012 at 8:55:42 pm
  - Re: Control surface rumor..... by Paul mitchell on Feb 14, 2012 at 9:11:43 pm
    - Re: Control surface rumor..... by Tim Wilson on Feb 14, 2012 at 10:45:30 pm
      - Re: Control surface rumor..... by Margus Voll on Feb 15, 2012 at 10:47:22 am
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Gustavo Bermudas on Feb 15, 2012 at 6:45:13 pm
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Margus Voll on Feb 15, 2012 at 8:33:22 pm
      - Re: Control surface rumor..... by Gabriele Turchi on Feb 15, 2012 at 3:25:13 pm
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Jonathon Lee on Feb 15, 2012 at 7:45:50 pm
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Marc Fisher on Feb 15, 2012 at 9:36:54 pm
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Jonathon Lee on Feb 15, 2012 at 10:30:48 pm
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Chris Martin on Feb 15, 2012 at 11:34:28 pm
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Paul mitchell on Feb 16, 2012 at 4:25:02 am
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by jake blackstone on Feb 17, 2012 at 7:50:39 pm
        Re: Control surface rumor..... by Gabriele Turchi on Feb 18, 2012 at 2:03:47 am
- Re: Control surface rumor..... by Peter Berg on Feb 18, 2012 at 1:23:36 am

EDITING REALITY - How to Edit Reality Like a Pro - 2nd Edition by Chaz Shukat on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:01:55 am

Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:27:36 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Kevin Patrick on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:35:07 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Mark Dobson on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:10:28 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:20:56 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:09:12 pm
    - Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:20:29 pm
      - Re: Remaining enhancements by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:59:36 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:22:53 pm
    - Re: Remaining enhancements by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:55:26 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Ben Scott on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:51:38 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:13:14 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:23:46 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by John Heagy on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:46:21 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08:59 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:14:22 pm
    - Re: Remaining enhancements by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:09:47 pm
      - Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:16:47 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:24:29 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:29:44 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:37:09 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:31:53 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:41:38 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:52:43 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:56:56 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:57:44 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:58:22 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:11:32 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:19:17 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:05 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:57:14 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:37:40 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by John Heagy on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:41 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:36:12 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:00:55 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:15:12 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:33:42 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:28:29 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:38:31 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:52:41 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:05:53 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 2:57:58 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Paul Dickin on Feb 9, 2012 at 9:54:32 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:51 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:30:23 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Craig Seeman on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:51:22 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:46 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Chris Harlan on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:22:24 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:34:30 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 11:43:43 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 4:02:03 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Andreas Kiel on Feb 10, 2012 at 7:55:02 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 11, 2012 at 1:37:16 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Andreas Kiel on Feb 12, 2012 at 1:25:51 am

XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Gylon Jackson on Feb 7, 2012 at 2:54:19 am
- Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Bob Zelin on Feb 7, 2012 at 4:18:40 am
  - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Benjamin Doyle on Feb 7, 2012 at 6:19:38 pm
- Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Jeff Hartman on Feb 7, 2012 at 1:47:04 pm
- Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Richard Crowley on Feb 7, 2012 at 5:05:40 pm
  - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Richard Crowley on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:13:06 am
    - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Bob Zelin on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:27:12 am
      - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Jeff Hartman on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:58:23 pm
        Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Bob Zelin on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:57:28 am
        Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Jeff Hartman on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:46:28 pm
      - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Doug Fish on Feb 10, 2012 at 8:42:50 pm
    - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Benjamin Doyle on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:00:55 am
    - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Rashid Duggan on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:54:10 pm
      - Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Benjamin Doyle on Apr 23, 2012 at 4:15:33 pm
- Re: XLR Audio to SDI AES/EBU on ATEM Television Studio by Deepak Sahasrabudhe on May 9, 2012 at 9:36:53 pm

News: Seven Network Queensland chooses Quantel for news by Cow News Droid on Feb 7, 2012 at 1:33:26 am

FCP X internationally by Oliver Peters on Feb 5, 2012 at 3:42:09 pm
- Re: FCP X internationally by Tapio Haaja on Feb 5, 2012 at 4:13:47 pm
- Re: FCP X internationally by Michael Aranyshev on Feb 5, 2012 at 4:36:07 pm
  - Re: FCP X internationally by Rafael Amador on Feb 5, 2012 at 5:12:34 pm
- Re: FCP X internationally by James Mortner on Feb 5, 2012 at 7:03:28 pm
- Re: FCP X internationally by Neil Patience on Feb 5, 2012 at 8:02:30 pm
  - Re: FCP X internationally by James Mortner on Feb 5, 2012 at 8:09:48 pm
    - Re: FCP X internationally by Neil Patience on Feb 5, 2012 at 8:42:31 pm
      - Re: FCP X internationally by James Mortner on Feb 5, 2012 at 9:05:48 pm
        Re: FCP X internationally by Michael Gissing on Feb 5, 2012 at 10:01:41 pm
        Re: FCP X internationally by Eduardo Serrano on Feb 5, 2012 at 11:17:54 pm
        Re: FCP X internationally by James Mortner on Feb 6, 2012 at 1:23:28 am
- Re: FCP X internationally by Andrew Rendell on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:38:05 am

Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Meadows on Jan 31, 2012 at 7:48:01 pm
- Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Jan 31, 2012 at 7:51:08 pm
  - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Thomas Frank on Jan 31, 2012 at 7:54:55 pm
    - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Mark Suszko on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:07:51 pm
      - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Greg Jones on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:27:30 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Chris Harlan on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:37:55 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:41:02 pm
- Re: Todays FCP X announcement by mark cookman on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:28:29 pm
  - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Greg Jones on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:37:46 pm
  - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:50:46 pm
    - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Thomas Frank on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:57:14 pm
      - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by mark cookman on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:40:52 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:57:35 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by mark cookman on Feb 1, 2012 at 12:51:53 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andrew Richards on Feb 1, 2012 at 3:44:41 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 1, 2012 at 12:55:43 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 4:44:46 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 1, 2012 at 4:54:18 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 5:06:49 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Feb 1, 2012 at 5:45:30 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 6:00:07 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Lawrence on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:01:28 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:14:45 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:25:52 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Aindreas Gallagher on Feb 1, 2012 at 10:27:29 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Paul Dickin on Feb 1, 2012 at 11:03:34 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Aindreas Gallagher on Feb 1, 2012 at 11:16:58 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Lawrence on Feb 1, 2012 at 10:55:31 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Walter Soyka on Feb 1, 2012 at 11:28:54 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Chris Harlan on Feb 2, 2012 at 12:41:14 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Walter Soyka on Feb 2, 2012 at 2:09:11 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Chris Harlan on Feb 2, 2012 at 2:36:04 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Lawrence on Feb 2, 2012 at 12:48:14 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Chris Harlan on Feb 2, 2012 at 1:56:10 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Aindreas Gallagher on Feb 1, 2012 at 11:52:43 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 2, 2012 at 12:30:28 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Aindreas Gallagher on Feb 2, 2012 at 12:51:39 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 2, 2012 at 2:06:41 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 6:26:38 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 1, 2012 at 6:32:39 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Leo Hans on Feb 3, 2012 at 9:48:29 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 3, 2012 at 10:41:08 pm
    - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Morten Ranmar on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:31:55 pm
      - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Thomas Frank on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:34:58 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Morten Ranmar on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:51:28 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Feb 1, 2012 at 12:25:37 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by adam dewhirst on Feb 1, 2012 at 1:27:18 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 1:39:48 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Feb 1, 2012 at 1:56:01 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 2:20:49 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Lawrence on Feb 1, 2012 at 5:02:42 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 4:36:23 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Lawrence on Feb 1, 2012 at 10:29:00 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 2:21:10 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Roth Weiss on Feb 1, 2012 at 2:01:36 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Lance Moody on Feb 1, 2012 at 2:03:47 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by tony west on Feb 1, 2012 at 2:30:05 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Gissing on Feb 1, 2012 at 3:02:51 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Lance Moody on Feb 1, 2012 at 3:23:20 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Gissing on Feb 1, 2012 at 3:29:09 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Chris Harlan on Feb 1, 2012 at 3:47:22 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Lance Moody on Feb 1, 2012 at 4:11:37 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Lawrence on Feb 1, 2012 at 4:18:23 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Chris Harlan on Feb 1, 2012 at 4:18:39 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Aranyshev on Feb 1, 2012 at 9:31:17 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 9:38:52 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Aranyshev on Feb 1, 2012 at 10:39:35 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by adam dewhirst on Feb 1, 2012 at 2:03:59 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 2:15:48 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Robert Brown on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:07:56 am
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 1, 2012 at 1:10:07 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Aranyshev on Feb 1, 2012 at 9:40:07 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by adam dewhirst on Feb 2, 2012 at 3:25:22 am
    - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Carl Edwards on Feb 1, 2012 at 6:59:00 pm
      - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:20:24 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Carl Edwards on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:33:51 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:54:34 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Carl Edwards on Feb 1, 2012 at 8:12:07 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 8:37:40 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Carl Edwards on Feb 1, 2012 at 8:41:13 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Andy Neil on Feb 1, 2012 at 8:43:07 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Frank Gothmann on Feb 1, 2012 at 9:52:08 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Aranyshev on Feb 1, 2012 at 9:45:23 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by David Roth Weiss on Feb 1, 2012 at 9:56:11 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Aranyshev on Feb 1, 2012 at 10:34:01 pm
- Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Brad Davis on Feb 1, 2012 at 1:53:17 pm
  - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 1, 2012 at 4:24:28 pm
  - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 1, 2012 at 10:13:04 pm
    - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Michael Gissing on Feb 1, 2012 at 11:32:13 pm
      - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 2, 2012 at 11:19:45 am
      - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 2, 2012 at 12:10:01 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 2, 2012 at 3:28:35 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 2, 2012 at 3:40:12 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Feb 2, 2012 at 3:50:54 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Oliver Peters on Feb 2, 2012 at 4:33:25 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Feb 2, 2012 at 5:32:12 pm
        Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Craig Seeman on Feb 2, 2012 at 5:48:55 pm
  - Re: Todays FCP X announcement by Bill Davis on Feb 2, 2012 at 4:53:40 am

Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Bob Zelin on Jan 25, 2012 at 11:02:19 am
- Re: Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Shaun Roemich on Jan 25, 2012 at 8:16:39 pm
- Re: Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Bob Zelin on Jan 25, 2012 at 10:04:15 pm
  - Re: Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Shaun Roemich on Jan 25, 2012 at 10:25:33 pm
    - Re: Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Bob Zelin on Jan 25, 2012 at 11:54:53 pm
      - Re: Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Shaun Roemich on Jan 26, 2012 at 12:09:13 am
        Re: Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Shaun Roemich on Jan 26, 2012 at 12:16:35 am
        Re: Article: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Bob Zelin on Jan 26, 2012 at 12:20:41 am
        @Bob Zelin by Dara Yem on Feb 18, 2012 at 12:19:14 pm
- Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Aleksander Steffensen on Jan 25, 2012 at 11:33:37 pm
  - Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Bob Zelin on Jan 25, 2012 at 11:57:05 pm
    - Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Aleksander Steffensen on Jan 26, 2012 at 12:07:17 am
      - Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Bob Zelin on Jan 26, 2012 at 12:21:54 am
- Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by jj johnson on Jan 29, 2012 at 12:47:47 am
- Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Kevin Minderhout on Jan 30, 2012 at 12:21:14 am
  - Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Kevin Minderhout on Feb 2, 2012 at 7:52:15 pm
    - Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Bob Zelin on Feb 2, 2012 at 10:09:23 pm
      - Re: Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Kevin Minderhout on Feb 2, 2012 at 10:10:46 pm
- @Blackmagic Design’s SmartView HD Monitor & Pocket Ultrascope by Shlomo Hazan on Feb 23, 2012 at 11:53:14 pm

Garage Band vs. Pro Tools by Milo Willson on Jan 25, 2012 at 3:44:33 am
- Re: Garage Band vs. Pro Tools by walter biscardi on Jan 25, 2012 at 7:09:29 am

Pro Res 422HQ renders of my feature film render too dark! by Terence Nance on Jan 15, 2012 at 6:16:06 am
- Re: Pro Res 422HQ renders of my feature film render too dark! by Matt Lyon on Jan 15, 2012 at 7:40:00 pm
- Re: Pro Res 422HQ renders of my feature film render too dark! by Gaz Evans on Jan 16, 2012 at 11:48:13 am
  - Re: Pro Res 422HQ renders of my feature film render too dark! by Matt Lyon on Jan 17, 2012 at 3:53:34 am

Service: Juan Carlos Rayon - Freelance by Juan Carlos Rayon on Jan 11, 2012 at 8:28:14 pm

News: Quantel Pablo creates the look for 'The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo' by Cow News Droid on Jan 10, 2012 at 6:58:49 pm

Offsetting the video while not moving the mask by Tero Ahlfors on Jan 10, 2012 at 3:46:21 am
- Re: Offsetting the video while not moving the mask by ben g unguren on Jan 10, 2012 at 5:55:01 am
  - Re: Offsetting the video while not moving the mask by Tero Ahlfors on Jan 10, 2012 at 6:22:06 am
    - Re: Offsetting the video while not moving the mask by Tero Ahlfors on Jan 10, 2012 at 8:30:45 am
      - Re: Offsetting the video while not moving the mask by Tero Ahlfors on Jan 10, 2012 at 11:31:28 am
- Re: Offsetting the video while not moving the mask by Walter Soyka on Jan 12, 2012 at 2:06:29 am

StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Creative COW on Jan 10, 2012 at 1:05:54 am
- Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Rafael Amador on Jan 10, 2012 at 2:23:40 am
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 10, 2012 at 5:00:44 am
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Ronald Lindeboom on Jan 11, 2012 at 1:31:18 am
    - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 5:12:56 pm
    - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Joseph W. Bourke on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31:44 pm
      - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Abraham Chaffin on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47:10 pm
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 9:07:12 pm

Best ways to confirm a noisy image...‏ by Andrew Meek on Jan 9, 2012 at 1:08:05 am
- Re: Best ways to confirm a noisy image...â�� by Andrew Rendell on Jan 9, 2012 at 9:56:41 am
  - Re: Best ways to confirm a noisy image...â�� by Andrew Meek on Jan 9, 2012 at 12:15:21 pm
    - Re: Best ways to confirm a noisy image. by Andrew Rendell on Jan 9, 2012 at 1:54:41 pm
      - Re: Best ways to confirm a noisy image. by Andrew Meek on Jan 9, 2012 at 3:35:51 pm

News: RE:Vision Effects releases RE:Map v2 for Nuke, Composite and Fusion by Cow News Droid on Jan 6, 2012 at 11:41:05 pm

whats with the speed of after effects? by Mark Samuels on Jan 3, 2012 at 8:03:42 am
- Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Tero Ahlfors on Jan 3, 2012 at 8:34:47 am
  - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Sathish Godala on Jan 3, 2012 at 10:20:03 am
    - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Mark Samuels on Jan 3, 2012 at 10:14:06 pm
    - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Dave LaRonde on Jan 3, 2012 at 11:04:30 pm
      - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Mark Samuels on Jan 4, 2012 at 12:43:42 am
    - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Adam Duplay on Jan 3, 2012 at 11:15:26 pm
    - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Walter Soyka on Jan 4, 2012 at 2:15:42 am
      - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Mark Samuels on Jan 4, 2012 at 7:30:56 am
      - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Tero Ahlfors on Jan 4, 2012 at 7:53:12 am
      - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Sathish Godala on Jan 4, 2012 at 8:48:36 am
        Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Mark Samuels on Jan 5, 2012 at 8:14:07 am
      - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Walter Soyka on Jan 4, 2012 at 8:06:45 pm
        Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Mark Samuels on Jan 5, 2012 at 7:46:45 am
        Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Walter Soyka on Jan 5, 2012 at 4:12:22 pm
- Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Michael Szalapski on Jan 4, 2012 at 2:41:50 pm
  - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Jeff Brown on Jan 4, 2012 at 3:02:59 pm
  - Re: whats with the speed of after effects? by Mark Samuels on Jan 5, 2012 at 7:49:42 am

BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Nick Anderson on Dec 31, 2011 at 6:01:46 pm
- Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Laco Gaal on Dec 31, 2011 at 10:30:13 pm
  - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Robert Houllahan on Dec 31, 2011 at 11:19:27 pm
    - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Nick Anderson on Jan 2, 2012 at 12:55:10 am
- Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Dan Moran on Jan 1, 2012 at 12:05:51 pm
  - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Nick Anderson on Jan 2, 2012 at 1:18:16 am
    - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Gabriele Turchi on Jan 2, 2012 at 3:14:59 pm
      - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Dan Moran on Jan 3, 2012 at 8:47:19 am
- Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Juan Salvo on Jan 1, 2012 at 5:14:08 pm
  - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Sascha Haber on Jan 1, 2012 at 5:37:57 pm
    - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Vladimir Kucherov on Jan 2, 2012 at 4:52:16 pm
    - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Nick Anderson on Jan 3, 2012 at 3:02:53 am
      - Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Teo Rižnar on Apr 23, 2012 at 2:03:15 am
        Re: BM, if you can't fix this "Out of memory" bug, tell us the limitation. by Juan Salvo on Apr 23, 2012 at 2:30:05 am

Natural Arm Movement by Justin Berrington on Dec 27, 2011 at 11:49:05 pm
- Re: Natural Arm Movement by Michael Szalapski on Dec 28, 2011 at 12:17:30 am
  - Re: Natural Arm Movement by Justin Berrington on Dec 28, 2011 at 1:00:44 am
    - Re: Natural Arm Movement by Tero Ahlfors on Dec 28, 2011 at 6:57:53 am
      - Re: Natural Arm Movement by Erik Waluska on Dec 28, 2011 at 4:04:43 pm
      - Re: Natural Arm Movement by Justin Berrington on Dec 29, 2011 at 7:05:37 pm
- Re: Natural Arm Movement by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on Dec 29, 2011 at 2:51:43 pm
  - Re: Natural Arm Movement by Chris Buttacoli on Dec 29, 2011 at 6:24:32 pm
  - Re: Natural Arm Movement by Justin Berrington on Dec 29, 2011 at 7:07:54 pm
  - Re: Natural Arm Movement by Justin Berrington on Dec 29, 2011 at 7:11:47 pm

Service: AVI Systems by Matt Johnson on Dec 20, 2011 at 10:00:27 pm

What about using plugins on a Q-box? by Daniel Warvi on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:25:35 pm

Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by andrew smith on Dec 14, 2011 at 1:53:01 am
- Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by Kevin Cannon on Dec 14, 2011 at 2:47:12 am
- Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by kim krause on Dec 14, 2011 at 9:57:52 am
  - Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by Joseph Owens on Dec 14, 2011 at 3:25:50 pm
    - Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by kim krause on Dec 15, 2011 at 5:52:42 am
  - Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by Rick Turners on Dec 14, 2011 at 7:24:22 pm
    - Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by kim krause on Dec 15, 2011 at 6:17:46 am
      - Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by Rick Turners on Dec 15, 2011 at 6:56:03 am
        Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by kim krause on Dec 15, 2011 at 3:32:43 pm
        Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by andrew smith on Dec 15, 2011 at 3:44:38 pm
        Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by kim krause on Dec 15, 2011 at 3:52:28 pm
        Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by Kevin Cannon on Dec 15, 2011 at 4:21:11 pm
        Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by Mike Most on Dec 15, 2011 at 4:29:57 pm
        Re: Hourly Rates, Billing, etc. by Kevin Cannon on Dec 15, 2011 at 5:35:29 pm

Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by David Roth Weiss on Dec 7, 2011 at 10:36:59 pm
- Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Rob Mackintosh on Dec 7, 2011 at 11:42:18 pm
- Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Walter Soyka on Dec 8, 2011 at 4:36:47 am
  - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Jason Jenkins on Dec 8, 2011 at 6:33:19 pm
    - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Herb Sevush on Dec 8, 2011 at 7:41:34 pm
      - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Chris Harlan on Dec 8, 2011 at 8:27:29 pm
- Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Robert Brown on Dec 8, 2011 at 8:17:08 pm
  - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Craig Seeman on Dec 8, 2011 at 10:02:26 pm
    - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Herb Sevush on Dec 8, 2011 at 11:05:51 pm
    - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Christian Schumacher on Dec 9, 2011 at 2:58:33 am
      - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Herb Sevush on Dec 9, 2011 at 3:29:42 am
        Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 9, 2011 at 1:46:49 pm
        Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Christian Schumacher on Dec 9, 2011 at 2:06:55 pm
        Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 9, 2011 at 2:16:14 pm
        Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Herb Sevush on Dec 9, 2011 at 2:17:05 pm
        Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Bill Davis on Dec 11, 2011 at 11:13:04 pm
        Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Herb Sevush on Dec 12, 2011 at 3:50:46 pm
- Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Bernhard Grininger on Dec 10, 2011 at 11:18:19 am
  - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Andreas Kiel on Dec 10, 2011 at 1:03:36 pm
    - Re: Blackmagic makes yet another nice acquisition by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 14, 2011 at 2:23:02 pm

Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Stephen Curry on Dec 6, 2011 at 10:50:34 pm
- Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Dave LaRonde on Dec 6, 2011 at 11:37:38 pm
  - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Joseph W. Bourke on Dec 7, 2011 at 1:20:08 am
    - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Stephen Curry on Dec 7, 2011 at 1:35:21 am
- Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Michael Szalapski on Dec 7, 2011 at 3:57:07 pm
  - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Dave LaRonde on Dec 7, 2011 at 4:05:31 pm
  - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Stephen Curry on Dec 7, 2011 at 6:33:28 pm
    - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Dave LaRonde on Dec 7, 2011 at 6:49:26 pm
      - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Stephen Curry on Dec 7, 2011 at 11:19:36 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Dave LaRonde on Dec 7, 2011 at 11:24:21 pm
    - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Michael Szalapski on Dec 7, 2011 at 8:13:52 pm
      - Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Marco Rosales on Mar 26, 2012 at 5:12:58 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Dave LaRonde on Mar 26, 2012 at 5:29:43 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Marco Rosales on Mar 26, 2012 at 6:15:19 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Dave LaRonde on Mar 26, 2012 at 6:42:34 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Marco Rosales on Mar 26, 2012 at 6:48:58 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Stephen Curry on Mar 26, 2012 at 8:29:27 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Vladas Litvinas on Apr 4, 2012 at 12:46:47 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Alan Johnston on Apr 6, 2012 at 2:55:52 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Stephen Curry on Apr 6, 2012 at 3:26:45 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Mark Buckland on Apr 8, 2012 at 4:50:31 pm
        Re: Convert normal rate video to Time Lapse look by Stephen Curry on Apr 8, 2012 at 7:57:40 pm

Where are all the third party apps? by Herb Sevush on Dec 5, 2011 at 5:34:02 pm
- Re: Where are all the third party apps? by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 5, 2011 at 5:50:09 pm
  - Re: Where are all the third party apps? by Mark Dobson on Dec 5, 2011 at 6:05:07 pm
    - Re: Where are all the third party apps? by Oliver Peters on Dec 5, 2011 at 7:13:15 pm
      - Re: Where are all the third party apps? by Mark Dobson on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:48:03 am
    - Re: Where are all the third party apps? by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:44:57 pm
      - Re: Where are all the third party apps? by Andreas Kiel on Dec 7, 2011 at 2:46:23 pm

HDcam native codec by Anhtu Vu on Dec 4, 2011 at 6:25:08 pm
- Re: HDcam native codec by Jeff Greenberg on Dec 4, 2011 at 11:24:08 pm
  - Re: HDcam native codec by Anhtu Vu on Dec 5, 2011 at 2:42:11 am
    - Re: HDcam native codec by Jeff Greenberg on Dec 5, 2011 at 3:24:22 am
      - Re: HDcam native codec by Mark Spano on Dec 5, 2011 at 3:10:16 pm
- Re: HDcam native codec by Gautam Pandey on Jan 17, 2012 at 10:14:21 am
  - Re: HDcam native codec by Juan Salvo on Feb 7, 2012 at 3:38:36 am
    - Re: HDcam native codec by Juan Salvo on Feb 7, 2012 at 4:35:13 pm
      - Re: HDcam native codec by Breno Bede on Mar 30, 2012 at 9:08:15 pm

After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Shane Newville on Dec 3, 2011 at 9:50:13 pm
- Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on Dec 3, 2011 at 9:54:41 pm
  - Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Shane Newville on Dec 3, 2011 at 11:33:18 pm
    - Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on Dec 4, 2011 at 11:06:53 am
      - Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Shane Newville on Dec 4, 2011 at 5:27:12 pm
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Tero Ahlfors on Dec 5, 2011 at 1:02:54 pm
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Shane Newville on Dec 5, 2011 at 4:36:39 pm
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Dave LaRonde on Dec 5, 2011 at 6:55:59 pm
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Walter Soyka on Dec 5, 2011 at 8:09:29 pm
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on Dec 5, 2011 at 8:42:45 pm
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Shane Newville on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:43:07 am
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Dave LaRonde on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:00:48 pm
        Re: After Effects & Audio: What Does The Future Look Like? by Tero Ahlfors on Dec 6, 2011 at 8:30:48 pm

Working Over the weekend... by Greg Burke on Dec 1, 2011 at 9:56:53 pm
- Re: Working Over the weekend... by tonybadea on Dec 1, 2011 at 10:06:09 pm
  - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Greg Burke on Dec 1, 2011 at 10:08:53 pm
    - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Michael Gissing on Dec 1, 2011 at 10:18:08 pm
- Re: Working Over the weekend... by Walter Soyka on Dec 1, 2011 at 10:27:32 pm
  - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Craig Seeman on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:05:24 pm
    - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Shane Ross on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:11:45 pm
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Craig Seeman on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:52:35 pm
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 12:13:17 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Michael Gissing on Dec 2, 2011 at 12:19:05 am
    - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Greg Burke on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:42:20 am
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:24:47 am
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:32:01 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Greg Burke on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:42:39 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:05:47 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:44:23 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:19:02 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:12:23 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:45:27 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:26:13 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Frank Gothmann on Dec 2, 2011 at 9:01:38 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:01:08 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Frank Gothmann on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:04:24 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:24:15 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Mark Bein on Dec 4, 2011 at 4:52:07 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Andrew Richards on Dec 2, 2011 at 1:42:49 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:36:07 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:21:49 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Andrew Richards on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:37:51 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:41:02 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Andrew Richards on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:43:07 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:54:38 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Andrew Richards on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:10:15 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:24:57 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:02:19 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Andrew Richards on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:15:15 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 7:01:13 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 2, 2011 at 7:34:10 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 8:37:46 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 2, 2011 at 9:16:23 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:11:33 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:21:14 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:49:36 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 3, 2011 at 10:36:56 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Oliver Peters on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29:32 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03:46 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Oliver Peters on Dec 3, 2011 at 8:32:13 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 3, 2011 at 9:06:07 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 8:53:35 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Craig Seeman on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:23:53 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:02:28 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:15:48 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:12:32 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:37:27 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 7:00:38 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by David Roth Weiss on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:54:13 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Bill Davis on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:10:28 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by David Roth Weiss on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:36:30 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:42:53 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Bill Davis on Dec 2, 2011 at 8:22:56 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 2, 2011 at 9:07:12 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Bill Davis on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:13:58 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:29:22 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 3, 2011 at 3:40:18 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:58:10 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by David Roth Weiss on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:25:37 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Herb Sevush on Dec 3, 2011 at 6:22:36 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 3, 2011 at 6:51:58 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Bill Davis on Dec 4, 2011 at 5:29:04 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 4, 2011 at 8:13:31 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 4, 2011 at 8:15:23 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Chris Harlan on Dec 4, 2011 at 10:54:13 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... NOW: Back to Mac Pro speculation by Herb Sevush on Dec 4, 2011 at 2:13:49 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Greg Burke on Dec 3, 2011 at 1:04:40 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Kevin Patrick on Dec 2, 2011 at 1:05:11 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:09:47 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Kevin Patrick on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:48:52 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Kevin Patrick on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:03:08 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:28:16 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Ray Wang on Dec 3, 2011 at 10:54:19 am
  - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Shane Ross on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:07:58 pm
    - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Bob Woodhead on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:22:50 pm
- Re: Working Over the weekend... by tony west on Dec 2, 2011 at 1:46:00 pm
- Re: Working Over the weekend... by Shawn Birmingham on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:29:59 pm
  - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:02:47 pm
    - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:28:07 pm
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Scott Cumbo on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:17:57 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:56:40 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Scott Cumbo on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:30:14 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:38:32 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Craig Seeman on Dec 2, 2011 at 7:33:53 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Richard Cardonna on Dec 3, 2011 at 1:02:13 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Dennis Radeke on Dec 3, 2011 at 2:04:09 pm
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Chris Harlan on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:38:08 pm
    - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Bill Davis on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:18:11 pm
    - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 6:47:58 pm
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by David Roth Weiss on Dec 2, 2011 at 7:04:58 pm
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Chris Harlan on Dec 2, 2011 at 7:17:17 pm
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Shawn Miller on Dec 2, 2011 at 8:42:17 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Kevin Patrick on Dec 2, 2011 at 8:50:35 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Shawn Miller on Dec 4, 2011 at 9:42:42 am
      - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Bill Davis on Dec 2, 2011 at 8:48:58 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Walter Soyka on Dec 2, 2011 at 9:17:08 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Bill Davis on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:42:58 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Frank Gothmann on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:19:22 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:24:59 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Chris Harlan on Dec 3, 2011 at 3:28:54 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:30:14 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Walter Soyka on Dec 4, 2011 at 2:35:28 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Chris Harlan on Dec 4, 2011 at 3:39:31 am
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:07:31 pm
        Re: Working Over the weekend... by Rafael Amador on Dec 3, 2011 at 5:30:09 am
- Re: Working Over the weekend... by kim krause on Dec 3, 2011 at 9:01:46 am
  - Re: Working Over the weekend... by Herb Sevush on Dec 3, 2011 at 6:40:23 pm

Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Johnny Martin on Nov 27, 2011 at 9:42:30 pm
- Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by John Davidson on Nov 27, 2011 at 10:15:48 pm
  - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Johnny Martin on Nov 27, 2011 at 10:25:08 pm
    - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Rob Mackintosh on Nov 28, 2011 at 1:07:11 am
    - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by John Davidson on Nov 28, 2011 at 4:00:34 am
  - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Paul Jay on Nov 28, 2011 at 8:27:09 am
- Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Kenny on Nov 28, 2011 at 6:14:39 am
  - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Frank Gothmann on Nov 28, 2011 at 10:18:40 am
    - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Kenny on Nov 28, 2011 at 3:16:46 pm
      - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Frank Gothmann on Nov 28, 2011 at 3:40:53 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Kenny on Nov 28, 2011 at 4:08:08 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Frank Gothmann on Nov 28, 2011 at 4:28:58 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Kenny on Nov 28, 2011 at 4:55:07 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Frank Gothmann on Nov 28, 2011 at 5:30:12 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Kenny on Nov 28, 2011 at 6:51:10 pm
    - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Mitch Ives on Nov 28, 2011 at 4:49:00 pm
      - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Kenny on Nov 28, 2011 at 7:07:01 pm
  - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Walter Soyka on Nov 28, 2011 at 11:53:47 am
- Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 28, 2011 at 5:58:30 pm
  - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Bill Davis on Nov 28, 2011 at 7:45:34 pm
    - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Walter Soyka on Nov 28, 2011 at 8:41:23 pm
      - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Bill Davis on Nov 29, 2011 at 1:22:56 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Walter Soyka on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:24:13 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Harlan on Nov 29, 2011 at 4:20:36 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Bill Davis on Nov 29, 2011 at 5:09:30 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Harlan on Nov 29, 2011 at 9:26:38 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jason Jenkins on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:16:41 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Walter Soyka on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:28:02 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Aindreas Gallagher on Nov 30, 2011 at 2:27:38 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 30, 2011 at 5:28:11 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 30, 2011 at 7:41:40 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Aindreas Gallagher on Nov 30, 2011 at 12:00:03 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 30, 2011 at 3:07:29 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 30, 2011 at 2:11:16 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 30, 2011 at 5:26:33 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 30, 2011 at 6:36:13 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by David Roth Weiss on Nov 30, 2011 at 6:42:49 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Aindreas Gallagher on Nov 30, 2011 at 1:39:23 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Walter Soyka on Nov 30, 2011 at 3:11:25 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Aindreas Gallagher on Nov 30, 2011 at 3:15:53 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 30, 2011 at 4:16:06 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 30, 2011 at 3:15:34 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Walter Soyka on Nov 30, 2011 at 4:02:14 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 30, 2011 at 7:06:22 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Frank Gothmann on Nov 30, 2011 at 7:15:30 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? NOW: Democratization by Walter Soyka on Nov 30, 2011 at 7:48:26 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? NOW: Democratization by Ken Zukin on Nov 30, 2011 at 8:58:15 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? NOW: Democratization by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 30, 2011 at 9:44:13 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? NOW: Democratization by Bill Davis on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:34:08 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Bill Davis on Nov 30, 2011 at 10:53:58 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 1, 2011 at 12:56:16 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 1, 2011 at 4:38:17 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 1, 2011 at 4:52:05 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 1, 2011 at 5:01:08 pm
    - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Christian Schumacher on Nov 28, 2011 at 9:02:34 pm
  - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Johnny Martin on Nov 28, 2011 at 8:12:36 pm
    - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Frank Gothmann on Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07:44 pm
      - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Chris Harlan on Nov 28, 2011 at 10:11:04 pm
      - Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 29, 2011 at 4:05:43 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Michael Gissing on Nov 29, 2011 at 7:10:45 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Walter Soyka on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:31:02 pm
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Frank Gothmann on Nov 29, 2011 at 10:49:45 am
        Re: Will Apple abandon pro-users all together? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 29, 2011 at 1:22:16 pm

Resolve "Failed to Save Project" by Pat Wintersgill on Nov 25, 2011 at 11:23:55 am
- Re: Resolve "Failed to Save Project" by Pat Wintersgill on Nov 25, 2011 at 2:46:23 pm
  - Re: Resolve "Failed to Save Project" by Dragan Shisa on Apr 8, 2012 at 10:16:54 pm
    - Re: Resolve "Failed to Save Project" by Gabriele Turchi on Apr 9, 2012 at 1:35:52 am
      - Re: Resolve "Failed to Save Project" by Dragan Shisa on Apr 9, 2012 at 2:02:13 pm
        Re: Resolve "Failed to Save Project" by Pat Wintersgill on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:40:22 pm

What about continuous PLAY by Charly Stone on Nov 23, 2011 at 11:51:23 pm
- Re: What about continuous PLAY by Job ter Burg on Nov 24, 2011 at 8:05:05 am
  - Re: What about continuous PLAY by Charly Stone on Nov 24, 2011 at 10:15:55 am
    - Re: What about continuous PLAY by Job ter Burg on Nov 24, 2011 at 3:23:17 pm
      - Re: What about continuous PLAY by Charly Stone on Nov 24, 2011 at 5:29:25 pm
        Re: What about continuous PLAY by Job ter Burg on Nov 24, 2011 at 5:32:52 pm
        Re: What about continuous PLAY by Neil Patience on Nov 24, 2011 at 9:06:08 pm
        Re: What about continuous PLAY by Andy Field on Nov 26, 2011 at 2:44:58 am
        Re: What about continuous PLAY by Neil Patience on Nov 26, 2011 at 9:13:28 pm
        Re: What about continuous PLAY by Job ter Burg on Nov 27, 2011 at 8:18:57 am
        Re: What about continuous PLAY by Neil Patience on Nov 27, 2011 at 6:12:53 pm
        Re: What about continuous PLAY by Job ter Burg on Nov 28, 2011 at 12:54:19 pm

After Effects importing at wrong size, quicktime 'movie info' changed? by Joshua Harris on Mar 17, 2011 at 12:43:09 pm
- Re: After Effects importing at wrong size, quicktime 'movie info' changed? by Kevin Camp on Mar 17, 2011 at 3:35:23 pm
  - Re: After Effects importing at wrong size, quicktime 'movie info' changed? by Michael Davis on Dec 9, 2011 at 3:40:04 pm

Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Aug 18, 2009 at 11:23:32 pm
- Re: Change Sequence Settings by Jim Hines on Aug 18, 2009 at 11:38:55 pm
  - Re: Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Aug 20, 2009 at 4:09:21 am
    - Re: Change Sequence Settings by Vince Becquiot on Aug 20, 2009 at 4:12:42 am
      - Re: Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Aug 21, 2009 at 4:14:07 pm
- Re: Change Sequence Settings by Vince Becquiot on Aug 19, 2009 at 12:27:24 am
  - Re: Change Sequence Settings by Vince Becquiot on Aug 19, 2009 at 12:28:24 am
    - Re: Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Aug 20, 2009 at 4:10:31 am
      - Re: Change Sequence Settings by Vince Becquiot on Aug 21, 2009 at 6:05:48 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Aug 21, 2009 at 9:17:44 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Vince Becquiot on Aug 21, 2009 at 9:51:11 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Jon Barrie on Aug 23, 2009 at 12:18:44 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Fennie Ng on Dec 10, 2009 at 7:58:13 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Dec 11, 2009 at 4:05:06 am
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Fennie Ng on Dec 11, 2009 at 5:48:00 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Fennie Ng on Dec 11, 2009 at 8:55:09 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Jan 18, 2010 at 3:23:32 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Jon Barrie on Aug 23, 2009 at 12:24:04 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Vince Becquiot on Aug 23, 2009 at 3:12:21 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Arvin Villapando on Aug 24, 2009 at 5:38:12 pm
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Pablo Geh on Jan 19, 2012 at 3:57:40 am
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Mihael Tominšek on May 21, 2012 at 1:12:19 am
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Pablo Geh on May 21, 2012 at 1:32:37 am
        Re: Change Sequence Settings by Mihael Tominšek on May 21, 2012 at 2:22:44 am

Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 8:38:08 pm
- Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Shane Ross on Jul 29, 2009 at 8:44:46 pm
- Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 29, 2009 at 8:45:08 pm
  - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 8:46:51 pm
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Shane Ross on Jul 29, 2009 at 8:49:36 pm
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 29, 2009 at 8:54:27 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Mat Sunderland on Mar 6, 2011 at 12:25:31 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by David Roth Weiss on Mar 6, 2011 at 5:06:09 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 7, 2011 at 5:18:39 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Mat Sunderland on Mar 7, 2011 at 5:56:54 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Mark Slatski on Dec 31, 2011 at 2:24:49 am
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by walter biscardi on Jul 29, 2009 at 8:59:10 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Fred Kovach on Nov 4, 2009 at 6:39:33 pm
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Al J. Marschke on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:06:20 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:11:43 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by brian mclean on Sep 6, 2009 at 6:22:38 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:13:18 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Al J. Marschke on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:52:28 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:57:40 pm
  - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Baz Leffler on Jul 30, 2009 at 1:28:10 am
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 30, 2009 at 3:47:16 pm
- Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:35:33 pm
  - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:36:58 pm
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:57:42 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:06:39 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:08:00 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:12:24 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:18:40 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:25:29 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Pablo Sánchez on Apr 19, 2012 at 2:56:24 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Apr 19, 2012 at 3:39:41 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Pablo Sánchez on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:53:37 am
  - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 9:57:52 pm
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Vince Sanchez on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:34:51 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:45:19 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:48:10 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:51:58 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Jason Lyons on Jul 30, 2009 at 1:02:02 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 30, 2009 at 3:12:46 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 30, 2009 at 3:16:16 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 30, 2009 at 3:20:50 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 30, 2009 at 3:29:15 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Shane Ross on Jul 30, 2009 at 4:51:07 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 30, 2009 at 7:23:04 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 30, 2009 at 7:30:18 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Shane Ross on Jul 30, 2009 at 7:44:55 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 30, 2009 at 8:03:15 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 30, 2009 at 8:06:33 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 30, 2009 at 8:09:21 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Shane Ross on Jul 30, 2009 at 8:10:46 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Pirouet on Jul 30, 2009 at 8:17:49 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Rennie Klymyk on Jul 31, 2009 at 9:19:03 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 30, 2009 at 10:17:26 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Al J. Marschke on Jul 31, 2009 at 2:44:08 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Andy Field on Jul 31, 2009 at 11:41:39 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Shane Ross on Aug 1, 2009 at 12:31:01 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Hamish Lancaster on Aug 10, 2009 at 2:48:43 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Aug 10, 2009 at 5:51:31 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Hamish Lancaster on Aug 11, 2009 at 1:10:31 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Zane Barker on Jul 31, 2009 at 7:22:02 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Matt Callac on Jul 31, 2009 at 3:53:48 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Christian Towner on May 2, 2011 at 11:13:36 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Doug Drury on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:04:56 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Jul 31, 2009 at 9:43:55 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Zane Barker on Jul 30, 2009 at 3:30:41 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Timothy Habrock on Sep 1, 2009 at 7:51:27 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by walter biscardi on Sep 1, 2009 at 8:00:18 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Sep 1, 2009 at 10:44:11 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by walter biscardi on Sep 1, 2009 at 11:12:38 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Matt Uncapher on Sep 3, 2009 at 4:53:47 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Bunch on Oct 15, 2009 at 5:25:12 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Oct 15, 2009 at 8:14:50 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ben Bunch on Oct 15, 2009 at 9:49:33 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Hamish Lancaster on Oct 15, 2009 at 11:25:51 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Fred Kovach on Nov 4, 2009 at 6:21:40 pm
- Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Doug Drury on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:12:08 am
  - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Michael Gissing on Oct 15, 2009 at 10:11:19 pm
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on Oct 15, 2009 at 11:15:08 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Peter Baumann on Nov 30, 2009 at 7:10:03 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Timothy Habrock on Dec 23, 2009 at 5:39:08 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Wayne Henderson on May 6, 2010 at 6:37:50 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by ashraf boushra on May 24, 2010 at 7:52:56 pm
- Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by stefan link on Apr 12, 2011 at 10:22:16 pm
  - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Christian Towner on May 2, 2011 at 11:00:42 pm
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by David Roth Weiss on May 2, 2011 at 11:04:28 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Andrew Elias on Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42:03 am
    - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by stefan link on May 2, 2011 at 11:29:06 pm
      - Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Christian Towner on May 2, 2011 at 11:46:58 pm
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by stefan link on May 3, 2011 at 12:06:41 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Christian Towner on May 3, 2011 at 12:16:06 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by stefan link on May 3, 2011 at 3:34:25 am
        Re: Final Cut Pro 7 on a PowerPC by Christian Towner on May 3, 2011 at 3:45:03 am
- Re: Final Cut Studio 3 on a powermac G5 - perfected by Coal Akida on Apr 29, 2012 at 9:39:51 am
  - Re: Final Cut Studio 3 on a powermac G5 - perfected by joern werner on May 2, 2012 at 12:47:46 pm

Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Remco Wiekard on Mar 15, 2009 at 8:53:05 am
- Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Bob Zelin on Mar 17, 2009 at 2:05:14 am
  - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Remco Wiekard on Mar 17, 2009 at 6:56:08 am
    - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Jay Cordova on Apr 2, 2009 at 6:19:14 pm
    - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Robert Nicol on May 11, 2012 at 3:01:06 am
  - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Jay Cordova on Mar 24, 2009 at 10:36:50 pm
    - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Remco Wiekard on Mar 25, 2009 at 12:14:06 pm
      - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Jay Cordova on Mar 25, 2009 at 4:22:53 pm
        Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Remco Wiekard on Mar 26, 2009 at 6:20:23 am
- Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Michiel van Haren on Apr 7, 2009 at 10:30:18 am
  - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Martin Eberle on Apr 24, 2009 at 1:30:45 pm
    - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Martin Eberle on Apr 24, 2009 at 2:48:32 pm
      - Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Osama Mneina on May 19, 2009 at 8:41:36 pm
        Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by Andre Welkin on May 12, 2011 at 10:34:14 am
        Re: Solved RS-422 problem with decklink studio card by alejandro gonzalez on Sep 1, 2011 at 10:09:11 am

1 2 3 Next >>

ADD A NEW POST • SEARCH • CHANGE FORUM