Debra Kaufman

Michael Gissing

Dennis Radeke

walter biscardi

Lance Bachelder

gary adcock

David Jahns

Walter Soyka

IRIDAS

ADD A NEW POST • CHANGE FORUM • SEARCH • SUBSCRIBE

COW Newsletter: Colorgrading Round-Up: DaVinci, Baselight, Assimilate, SpeedGrade, Avid and Autodesk by Creative COW on May 14, 2012 at 12:00:00 am

Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Tim Wilson on May 13, 2012 at 6:09:56 pm
- Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Lance Bachelder on May 13, 2012 at 9:37:16 pm
- Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Brian Buongiorno on May 14, 2012 at 12:13:55 pm
- Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Greg Andonian on May 15, 2012 at 5:33:49 am
  - Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Lance Bachelder on May 15, 2012 at 8:54:45 am
    - Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by David Cherniack on May 15, 2012 at 11:49:49 am
      - Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Mike Molenda on May 15, 2012 at 2:23:26 pm
    - Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 11:53:36 am
      - Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by David Jahns on May 15, 2012 at 3:32:51 pm
        Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Dennis Radeke on May 15, 2012 at 5:02:08 pm
        Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by William Edwards on May 15, 2012 at 6:27:30 pm
        Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 6:44:19 pm
        Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by David Jahns on May 15, 2012 at 6:48:29 pm
        Re: Any IRIDAS Speedgrade users care to weigh in? by Dennis Radeke on May 16, 2012 at 10:46:00 am

Workflow Premiere to Speedgrade and back again by Jeff Brink on May 13, 2012 at 5:45:05 pm

Article: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 12, 2012 at 1:22:34 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by walter biscardi on May 13, 2012 at 9:14:38 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 14, 2012 at 2:10:37 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 13, 2012 at 10:54:25 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Jarle Leirpoll on May 14, 2012 at 6:22:47 am
  - @Jarle Leirpoll by Barend Onneweer on May 15, 2012 at 8:03:23 am
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by stig olsen on May 16, 2012 at 7:53:14 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Steve Shaw on May 14, 2012 at 8:38:26 am
- Re: SGO Mistika by Dennis Kutchera on May 14, 2012 at 11:27:34 am
- Baselight Tracker Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by James Milne on May 14, 2012 at 6:14:46 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Christopher Lowden on May 15, 2012 at 5:40:08 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dylan Hargreaves on May 15, 2012 at 4:18:40 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 16, 2012 at 1:26:38 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Eric Williamson on May 15, 2012 at 5:25:32 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Peter Vogt on May 15, 2012 at 6:37:03 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 16, 2012 at 1:31:47 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Clement Hobbs on May 15, 2012 at 8:16:17 pm
  - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Dennis Kutchera on May 16, 2012 at 1:35:42 am
    - Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Clement Hobbs on May 16, 2012 at 1:53:23 pm
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by dennis quintanilla on May 16, 2012 at 2:39:53 am
- Re: Colorgrading Round-Up by Adam Welsh on May 16, 2012 at 9:01:58 am
  - @Adam Welsh by Barend Onneweer on May 16, 2012 at 12:44:40 pm

Darkening a blue sky without using Secondary Color by jim bachalo on May 11, 2012 at 6:08:16 pm
- Re: Darkening a blue sky without using Secondary Color by Jon Barrie on May 11, 2012 at 9:46:56 pm
  - Re: Darkening a blue sky without using Secondary Color by jim bachalo on May 11, 2012 at 10:42:43 pm

JL Cooper Eclipse CX for sale $2000 by David Gott on May 10, 2012 at 10:37:10 pm

Mercury Engine h.264 playback... Radeon 5770 vs a high end Nvidia card? by Aj Koch on May 10, 2012 at 10:04:26 pm
- Re: Mercury Engine h.264 playback... Radeon 5770 vs a high end Nvidia card? by Shane Ross on May 10, 2012 at 11:17:01 pm
- Re: Mercury Engine h.264 playback... Radeon 5770 vs a high end Nvidia card? by Mike Molenda on May 11, 2012 at 12:52:33 pm
  - Re: Mercury Engine h.264 playback... Radeon 5770 vs a high end Nvidia card? by Aj Koch on May 11, 2012 at 4:28:05 pm
  - Re: Mercury Engine h.264 playback... Radeon 5770 vs a high end Nvidia card? by Russ Blaise on May 12, 2012 at 9:14:20 pm
- Re: Mercury Engine h.264 playback... Radeon 5770 vs a high end Nvidia card? by Douglas Morse on May 12, 2012 at 12:24:13 pm

Premiere Pro CS 6 and 3D editing? by Charles Binn on May 9, 2012 at 12:26:03 pm
- Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 and 3D editing? by Chris Borjis on May 9, 2012 at 3:59:44 pm

After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Daniel Fischer on May 8, 2012 at 8:53:41 pm
- Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 10, 2012 at 6:12:21 am
  - Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Daniel Fischer on May 10, 2012 at 10:53:33 am
    - Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 10, 2012 at 5:11:19 pm
    - Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 10, 2012 at 5:54:06 pm
      - Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 10, 2012 at 6:22:53 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 10, 2012 at 6:30:15 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 10, 2012 at 6:32:09 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 10, 2012 at 6:37:45 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 10, 2012 at 8:20:12 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 10, 2012 at 8:57:07 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 11, 2012 at 12:52:17 am
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 11, 2012 at 11:46:56 am
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 11, 2012 at 5:10:54 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 12, 2012 at 10:05:29 am
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 12, 2012 at 2:59:38 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 12, 2012 at 3:33:26 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 12, 2012 at 3:41:28 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 12, 2012 at 3:50:59 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 12, 2012 at 4:16:09 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 12, 2012 at 4:22:01 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 12, 2012 at 4:33:18 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 13, 2012 at 2:49:48 am
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 14, 2012 at 9:03:42 am
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 12, 2012 at 4:16:35 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 14, 2012 at 11:45:13 pm
        Re: After effects CS6 3D Camera Tracker by Jean-Pierre Michael on May 15, 2012 at 12:03:26 pm

CS6 is released - so what now? by Steve Connor on May 8, 2012 at 8:19:17 pm
- Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Bret Williams on May 8, 2012 at 8:36:37 pm
  - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Andrew Richards on May 8, 2012 at 8:50:47 pm
- Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Franz Bieberkopf on May 8, 2012 at 8:43:34 pm
  - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Bernard Newnham on May 8, 2012 at 8:48:12 pm
- Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 8, 2012 at 8:55:30 pm
  - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Frank Gothmann on May 8, 2012 at 9:06:50 pm
    - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Alex Hawkins on May 8, 2012 at 11:03:18 pm
      - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 8, 2012 at 11:44:24 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Bill Davis on May 8, 2012 at 11:58:17 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 12:29:22 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Bill Davis on May 9, 2012 at 2:05:52 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 11:11:46 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 11:29:44 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 10, 2012 at 2:16:54 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 10, 2012 at 2:45:42 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 10, 2012 at 2:55:29 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 10, 2012 at 3:09:31 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Herb Sevush on May 9, 2012 at 11:34:02 pm
- Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by David Lawrence on May 8, 2012 at 11:58:02 pm
  - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Lance Bachelder on May 9, 2012 at 12:04:39 am
    - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 12:21:55 am
      - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 12:32:36 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 12:37:15 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 1:21:55 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 1:32:45 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 1:43:15 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 1:57:03 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 2:31:52 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by David Lawrence on May 9, 2012 at 3:25:14 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Dennis Radeke on May 10, 2012 at 10:47:47 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 10, 2012 at 5:46:10 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Aindreas Gallagher on May 10, 2012 at 8:43:46 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 10, 2012 at 11:19:23 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Aindreas Gallagher on May 10, 2012 at 11:53:11 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 11, 2012 at 4:10:45 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 11, 2012 at 12:02:43 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 11, 2012 at 2:11:15 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 11, 2012 at 3:38:00 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 11, 2012 at 7:13:27 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Thomas Frank on May 11, 2012 at 3:03:42 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 11, 2012 at 4:04:42 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Walter Soyka on May 11, 2012 at 1:51:54 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Aindreas Gallagher on May 11, 2012 at 9:45:37 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 9, 2012 at 2:00:37 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 2:39:09 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 9, 2012 at 2:44:28 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by John Heagy on May 9, 2012 at 3:29:30 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by David Lawrence on May 9, 2012 at 2:06:19 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Bill Davis on May 9, 2012 at 2:37:16 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by David Lawrence on May 9, 2012 at 4:14:37 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Steve Connor on May 9, 2012 at 8:05:42 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 9, 2012 at 2:48:23 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 3:13:31 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by David Lawrence on May 9, 2012 at 3:55:25 am
      - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by David Lawrence on May 9, 2012 at 12:39:19 am
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Tim Wilson on May 9, 2012 at 3:05:10 am
        MacPro Petition by Lou Borella on May 9, 2012 at 5:05:51 am
        Re: MacPro Petition by Thomas Frank on May 9, 2012 at 9:18:08 am
        Re: Skimming/Hover Scrub by Walter Soyka on May 9, 2012 at 1:37:57 pm
        Re: Skimming/Hover Scrub by Chris Harlan on May 9, 2012 at 2:21:10 pm
        Re: Skimming/Hover Scrub by Andy Field on May 9, 2012 at 3:02:46 pm
        Re: Skimming/Hover Scrub by Thomas Frank on May 9, 2012 at 4:18:28 pm
        Re: Skimming/Hover Scrub by Walter Soyka on May 9, 2012 at 4:47:56 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 7:04:19 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Tim Wilson on May 9, 2012 at 7:52:20 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jim Giberti on May 9, 2012 at 8:37:19 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 10:43:36 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 7:05:59 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 10, 2012 at 12:31:15 am
- Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Mike Molenda on May 9, 2012 at 1:10:18 pm
  - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jim Giberti on May 9, 2012 at 7:35:42 pm
    - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 9, 2012 at 7:50:26 pm
      - Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jim Giberti on May 9, 2012 at 8:02:56 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Chris Harlan on May 9, 2012 at 8:24:00 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Jim Giberti on May 9, 2012 at 8:40:30 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Thomas Frank on May 9, 2012 at 8:45:52 pm
        Re: CS6 is released - so what now? by Michael Gissing on May 9, 2012 at 10:49:16 pm

Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 3:47:42 pm
- Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Gary Huff on May 8, 2012 at 3:54:46 pm
  - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 4:01:07 pm
- Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 8, 2012 at 4:10:50 pm
- Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Lance Bachelder on May 8, 2012 at 4:14:28 pm
  - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Stephen Bakopanos on May 8, 2012 at 4:36:56 pm
- Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Paul Jay on May 8, 2012 at 4:27:38 pm
  - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 4:40:59 pm
    - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Gary Huff on May 8, 2012 at 5:04:07 pm
    - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 8, 2012 at 5:06:51 pm
    - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 4:17:20 am
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 9, 2012 at 3:13:11 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 3:28:58 pm
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Mel Feliciano on May 10, 2012 at 4:43:39 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 10, 2012 at 5:24:29 pm
- Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Andrew Richards on May 8, 2012 at 5:13:40 pm
  - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 6:15:03 pm
    - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Andrew Richards on May 8, 2012 at 6:28:07 pm
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by David Lawrence on May 8, 2012 at 10:52:32 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 11:02:58 pm
  - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Kevin Patrick on May 8, 2012 at 7:20:52 pm
    - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Shane Ross on May 8, 2012 at 8:07:17 pm
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 8:15:34 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Shane Ross on May 8, 2012 at 8:20:07 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 8:27:27 pm
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Andrew Richards on May 8, 2012 at 8:47:21 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by David Cherniack on May 8, 2012 at 8:58:30 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 9:44:14 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 4:10:48 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by David McGavran on May 9, 2012 at 5:22:29 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by David McGavran on May 9, 2012 at 9:13:13 pm
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Kevin Patrick on May 9, 2012 at 12:05:21 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 12:10:04 pm
    - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Andrew Richards on May 8, 2012 at 8:23:35 pm
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 1:04:29 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Stephen Bakopanos on May 9, 2012 at 2:37:05 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Rob Mackintosh on May 9, 2012 at 11:40:52 pm
      - Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 8:06:31 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 9, 2012 at 3:17:19 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 3:44:41 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 9, 2012 at 4:10:04 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by David Cherniack on May 9, 2012 at 3:44:10 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 3:47:22 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 9, 2012 at 3:52:00 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 3:57:47 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 10, 2012 at 1:06:50 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 10, 2012 at 7:22:06 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 10, 2012 at 3:06:53 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 11, 2012 at 4:01:03 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Jeremy Garchow on May 11, 2012 at 4:31:51 am
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 9, 2012 at 4:16:56 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 4:50:41 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 4:53:58 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 9, 2012 at 5:02:38 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 5:21:51 pm
        Re: Stupid questions regarding CUDA, OpenCL and Premiere 6 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 9, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm

Speedgrade CS6 Trial crashing on render by Stefano Sarzi Madidini on May 8, 2012 at 1:53:16 pm
- Re: Speedgrade CS6 Trial crashing on render by Alexander Kolisnichenko on May 9, 2012 at 11:43:04 am

OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Martin Smith on May 7, 2012 at 8:28:54 pm
- Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Martin Smith on May 7, 2012 at 8:34:18 pm
  - Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Erik Mickelson on May 7, 2012 at 10:37:13 pm
    - Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Tom Daigon on May 7, 2012 at 10:45:35 pm
      - Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Erik Mickelson on May 7, 2012 at 10:53:11 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Tom Daigon on May 7, 2012 at 11:02:25 pm
    - Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Kevin Monahan on May 7, 2012 at 11:17:28 pm
      - Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Erik Mickelson on May 8, 2012 at 3:52:35 am
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by David McGavran on May 8, 2012 at 6:45:44 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Martin Smith on May 8, 2012 at 6:54:50 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Kevin Monahan on May 8, 2012 at 7:58:41 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Todd Kopriva on May 9, 2012 at 4:16:46 am
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Erik Mickelson on May 9, 2012 at 4:32:48 am
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Todd Kopriva on May 9, 2012 at 8:48:44 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by David McGavran on May 9, 2012 at 9:12:50 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Erik Mickelson on May 9, 2012 at 10:03:35 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Thomas Smet on May 10, 2012 at 4:38:34 am
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Thomas Smet on May 10, 2012 at 6:36:00 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Todd Kopriva on May 10, 2012 at 6:58:37 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Thomas Smet on May 10, 2012 at 7:06:52 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Thomas Smet on May 11, 2012 at 3:17:53 am
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Martin Smith on May 13, 2012 at 5:11:12 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Thomas Smet on May 13, 2012 at 9:23:18 pm
        Re: OpenCL acceleration on Macbook Pro with Certified card is BAD by Martin Smith on May 13, 2012 at 10:42:03 pm

PP CS6 test drive by Morten Ranmar on May 7, 2012 at 7:58:59 pm
- Re: PP CS6 test drive by David Cherniack on May 7, 2012 at 9:18:04 pm
  - Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lance Bachelder on May 7, 2012 at 11:10:59 pm
    - Re: PP CS6 test drive by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 11:23:20 pm
      - Re: PP CS6 test drive by Michael Gissing on May 7, 2012 at 11:48:20 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lance Bachelder on May 8, 2012 at 3:21:27 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lin Sebastian Kayser on May 8, 2012 at 8:37:23 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 12:18:59 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Tero Ahlfors on May 8, 2012 at 2:41:54 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lance Bachelder on May 8, 2012 at 4:25:13 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lin Sebastian Kayser on May 9, 2012 at 10:37:38 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Mike Molenda on May 8, 2012 at 1:13:35 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Lin Sebastian Kayser on May 8, 2012 at 2:56:17 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Oliver Peters on May 8, 2012 at 5:56:43 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Tero Ahlfors on May 9, 2012 at 4:07:33 am
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Oliver Peters on May 9, 2012 at 6:57:52 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Mike Molenda on May 8, 2012 at 10:51:35 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Mike Molenda on May 8, 2012 at 11:16:22 pm
        Re: PP CS6 test drive by Aindreas Gallagher on May 8, 2012 at 3:49:01 pm

Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Erik Mickelson on May 7, 2012 at 5:00:35 pm
- Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Erik Mickelson on May 7, 2012 at 6:11:43 pm
  - Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Lance Bachelder on May 7, 2012 at 6:53:23 pm
    - Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Todd Kopriva on May 7, 2012 at 11:31:22 pm
      - Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Erik Mickelson on May 8, 2012 at 3:29:03 am
      - Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Thomas Smet on May 8, 2012 at 7:24:47 am
        Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Todd Kopriva on May 9, 2012 at 4:14:38 am
        Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Thomas Smet on May 9, 2012 at 3:26:22 pm
        Re: Official Open CL test on Macbook Pro...results by Todd Kopriva on May 9, 2012 at 8:49:57 pm

CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Steve Connor on May 7, 2012 at 8:37:36 am
- Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Jules bowman on May 7, 2012 at 8:44:14 am
  - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Bernard Newnham on May 7, 2012 at 9:00:54 am
    - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Jules bowman on May 7, 2012 at 9:04:40 am
    - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Greg Andonian on May 7, 2012 at 9:05:04 am
- Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Chris Harlan on May 7, 2012 at 8:47:51 am
  - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Greg Andonian on May 7, 2012 at 8:57:25 am
  - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Tim Vaughan on May 7, 2012 at 11:06:06 am
  - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 11:42:36 am
    - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Gordon Modin on May 7, 2012 at 2:47:44 pm
      - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Steve Connor on May 7, 2012 at 7:05:26 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Greg Andonian on May 7, 2012 at 7:23:31 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 8:23:16 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 7:26:18 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 8:25:16 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Steve Connor on May 7, 2012 at 9:27:59 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 9:31:25 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Steve Connor on May 7, 2012 at 9:45:59 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 9:49:49 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Steve Connor on May 7, 2012 at 9:57:48 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 10:03:49 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by David Lawrence on May 8, 2012 at 2:03:03 am
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Greg Andonian on May 8, 2012 at 7:03:36 am
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Steve Connor on May 7, 2012 at 9:46:21 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Aindreas Gallagher on May 7, 2012 at 9:55:06 pm
      - Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by David Cherniack on May 7, 2012 at 7:32:16 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Gordon Modin on May 7, 2012 at 8:19:43 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by David Cherniack on May 7, 2012 at 9:11:58 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by Tim Wilson on May 7, 2012 at 8:37:07 pm
        Re: CS6 now available (Creative Cloud May 11th) by David Cherniack on May 7, 2012 at 9:07:47 pm

What are you thinking about CS6? by Tim Wilson on May 5, 2012 at 6:58:43 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Angelo Lorenzo on May 5, 2012 at 9:46:41 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on May 6, 2012 at 6:34:56 am
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Walter Soyka on May 6, 2012 at 5:54:39 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 7, 2012 at 6:56:59 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Roland R. Kahlenberg on May 8, 2012 at 8:38:25 am
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Dave LaRonde on May 8, 2012 at 3:27:48 am

Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Todd Wiseman on May 4, 2012 at 7:59:15 pm
- Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Chris Borjis on May 4, 2012 at 8:26:00 pm
  - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Todd Wiseman on May 7, 2012 at 4:55:28 pm
- Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Ron Pestes on May 4, 2012 at 9:33:32 pm
- Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Greg Andonian on May 4, 2012 at 11:57:40 pm
  - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Chris Borjis on May 5, 2012 at 4:38:35 am
  - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Todd Wiseman on May 7, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
- Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Lance Bachelder on May 5, 2012 at 6:21:08 am
  - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Greg Andonian on May 5, 2012 at 7:48:13 am
    - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Lance Bachelder on May 5, 2012 at 6:39:53 pm
  - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Todd Wiseman on May 7, 2012 at 6:58:45 pm
- Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Eric Addison on May 6, 2012 at 3:32:08 pm
- Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Darren Kelly on May 7, 2012 at 4:18:44 pm
  - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Eric Addison on May 7, 2012 at 6:47:10 pm
    - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by Todd Wiseman on May 7, 2012 at 6:54:57 pm
      - Re: Sony XD-Cam .MOV's Don't Play Nice in Premiere Pro...? by John-Michael Seng-Wheeler on May 8, 2012 at 7:18:07 pm

Shhoting flat on af100 by Richard Cardonna on May 4, 2012 at 5:57:40 pm
- Re: Shhoting flat on af100 by Joe Barta IV on May 4, 2012 at 7:50:36 pm
  - Re: Shhoting flat on af100 by Richard Cardonna on May 7, 2012 at 4:25:11 pm

What are you thinking about CS6? by Tim Wilson on May 1, 2012 at 5:03:04 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Bobby Mosca on May 1, 2012 at 5:17:50 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Dustin Parsons on May 1, 2012 at 6:02:00 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David Lawrence on May 1, 2012 at 6:26:23 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Lance Bachelder on May 1, 2012 at 6:39:37 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Conlee on May 2, 2012 at 2:21:50 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 6:45:15 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Franz Bieberkopf on May 1, 2012 at 6:55:05 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 7:31:17 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Lance Bachelder on May 1, 2012 at 7:36:19 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 7:39:28 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Jeremy Garchow on May 1, 2012 at 7:49:43 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 9:04:39 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Jeremy Garchow on May 1, 2012 at 9:21:16 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Aindreas Gallagher on May 1, 2012 at 9:21:44 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 6:43:38 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Simon Ubsdell on May 1, 2012 at 6:57:29 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 7:20:05 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Simon Ubsdell on May 1, 2012 at 7:33:03 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 7:38:50 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Jeremy Garchow on May 1, 2012 at 7:03:21 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David Lawrence on May 1, 2012 at 7:29:56 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Walter Soyka on May 1, 2012 at 11:19:21 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Franz Bieberkopf on May 1, 2012 at 6:53:33 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Jason Jenkins on May 1, 2012 at 6:55:28 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Frank Gothmann on May 1, 2012 at 7:26:05 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Todd Kopriva on May 1, 2012 at 8:13:19 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Robert Brown on May 2, 2012 at 6:42:12 am
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David McGavran on May 2, 2012 at 3:38:45 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Robert Brown on May 2, 2012 at 4:11:53 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David McGavran on May 2, 2012 at 5:01:49 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Robert Brown on May 2, 2012 at 6:59:13 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David McGavran on May 2, 2012 at 9:43:31 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Robert Brown on May 3, 2012 at 10:40:48 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David Jahns on May 1, 2012 at 8:18:30 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Todd Kopriva on May 1, 2012 at 8:24:47 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Walter Soyka on May 1, 2012 at 10:09:03 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David Jahns on May 1, 2012 at 10:23:22 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Robert Brown on May 2, 2012 at 6:44:53 am
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Todd Kopriva on May 2, 2012 at 4:07:12 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Robert Brown on May 2, 2012 at 4:18:15 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6?- SPEED GRADE by David Jahns on May 2, 2012 at 5:07:10 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6?- SPEED GRADE by Robert Brown on May 2, 2012 at 7:00:46 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Mike Molenda on May 1, 2012 at 8:20:14 pm
- Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Herb Sevush on May 1, 2012 at 8:34:07 pm
  - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 9:32:24 pm
    - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Herb Sevush on May 1, 2012 at 9:43:02 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Michael Hancock on May 1, 2012 at 9:52:42 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David Lawrence on May 1, 2012 at 9:59:15 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 1, 2012 at 10:28:44 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Herb Sevush on May 1, 2012 at 10:33:46 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by David Lawrence on May 1, 2012 at 10:52:53 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Walter Soyka on May 1, 2012 at 11:00:56 pm
      - Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Tangier Clarke on May 1, 2012 at 10:04:26 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Dennis Radeke on May 2, 2012 at 12:15:58 am
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Rich Rubasch on May 2, 2012 at 12:52:24 am
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Michael Gissing on May 2, 2012 at 3:49:15 am
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Jeremy Garchow on May 2, 2012 at 4:06:38 am
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Franz Bieberkopf on May 2, 2012 at 2:41:45 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by che broadnax on May 8, 2012 at 2:33:32 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Ken Pugh on May 8, 2012 at 2:53:47 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by che broadnax on May 8, 2012 at 6:13:10 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Franz Bieberkopf on May 2, 2012 at 2:46:27 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Dennis Radeke on May 2, 2012 at 2:54:52 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Todd Kopriva on May 2, 2012 at 8:37:11 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Jeremy Garchow on May 2, 2012 at 10:08:25 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Jeremy Garchow on May 2, 2012 at 10:14:31 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Ken Pugh on May 5, 2012 at 12:52:22 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Chris Harlan on May 5, 2012 at 5:53:53 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Michael Gissing on May 5, 2012 at 10:48:03 pm
        Re: What are you thinking about CS6? by Ken Pugh on May 6, 2012 at 11:46:56 am

Blog: Post NAB - The NLE Wars between the "A's" will continue, much to the users benefit. by gary adcock on May 1, 2012 at 4:00:22 pm

2 million new adobe PPro seats by Richard Cardonna on Apr 29, 2012 at 7:14:58 pm
- Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Oliver Peters on Apr 29, 2012 at 7:47:28 pm
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Richard Cardonna on Apr 29, 2012 at 7:56:06 pm
    - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Steve Connor on Apr 29, 2012 at 10:29:16 pm
      - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Richard Cardonna on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:46:16 am
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Steve Connor on Apr 30, 2012 at 7:49:33 am
- Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Bill Davis on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:00:49 pm
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Richard Cardonna on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:10:53 pm
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Neil Patience on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:14:33 pm
    - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Richard Cardonna on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:27:12 pm
      - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:36:59 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Kevin Patrick on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:42:51 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by David McGavran on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:56:03 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 30, 2012 at 1:01:59 pm
      - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Neil Patience on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:43:06 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Oliver Peters on Apr 29, 2012 at 9:40:45 pm
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Erik Lundberg on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:50:52 am
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Dennis Radeke on Apr 30, 2012 at 10:06:48 pm
- 2 million and 1 by Lance Bachelder on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:38:16 pm
  - Re: 2 million and 1 by Eric Santiago on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:41:28 pm
    - Re: 2 million and 1 by Lance Bachelder on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:35:40 am
  - Re: 2 million and 1 by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 29, 2012 at 10:08:55 pm
    - Re: 2 million and 1 by David Lawrence on Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41:30 pm
      - Re: 2 million and 1 by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 29, 2012 at 10:51:19 pm
        Re: 2 million and 1 by David Lawrence on Apr 29, 2012 at 11:09:02 pm
        Re: 2 million and 1 by Alex Hawkins on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:10:08 am
        Re: 2 million and 1 by Aindreas Gallagher on May 3, 2012 at 9:46:42 pm
    - Re: 2 million and 1 by Lance Bachelder on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:40:17 am
- Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Alan Okey on Apr 29, 2012 at 11:05:26 pm
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Jules bowman on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:46:29 am
    - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Alex Hawkins on Apr 30, 2012 at 2:20:28 am
- Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Leo Hans on Apr 29, 2012 at 11:29:28 pm
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Daniel Frome on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:05:11 am
    - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Lance Bachelder on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:39:45 am
      - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Steve Connor on Apr 30, 2012 at 7:55:22 am
  - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:06:21 am
    - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Dennis Radeke on Apr 30, 2012 at 11:05:01 am
      - Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 30, 2012 at 2:08:51 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Eric Santiago on Apr 30, 2012 at 3:10:23 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by John Heagy on Apr 30, 2012 at 4:49:30 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Dennis Radeke on Apr 30, 2012 at 5:03:12 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Eric Santiago on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:04:20 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Richard Cardonna on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:35:12 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:40:23 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Chris Harlan on Apr 30, 2012 at 5:00:27 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Oliver Peters on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:02:38 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Chris Harlan on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:27:01 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Richard Cardonna on Apr 30, 2012 at 6:39:58 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Oliver Peters on Apr 30, 2012 at 7:14:09 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Chris Harlan on Apr 30, 2012 at 7:45:03 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Oliver Peters on Apr 30, 2012 at 7:52:37 pm
        Re: 2 million new adobe PPro seats by Joseph W. Bourke on May 1, 2012 at 2:25:00 pm

Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 27, 2012 at 10:34:07 pm
- Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 27, 2012 at 11:22:06 pm
  - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 27, 2012 at 11:43:31 pm
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 12:46:18 am
      - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 1:03:06 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:15:05 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 5:40:55 pm
  - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 28, 2012 at 1:06:16 am
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 1:41:23 am
      - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 28, 2012 at 1:51:19 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 3:34:35 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:29:13 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 3:38:08 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Chris Harlan on Apr 28, 2012 at 3:48:02 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 5:18:08 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 5:58:18 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:05:59 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Craig Seeman on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:18:56 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:35:17 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 7:04:08 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 7:08:30 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 7:58:45 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:09:25 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:31:05 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 8:34:57 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:51:22 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:03:35 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:49:13 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Craig Seeman on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:20:01 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:55:44 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 28, 2012 at 9:32:52 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 9:59:54 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 28, 2012 at 10:19:42 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 28, 2012 at 10:39:52 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 29, 2012 at 12:35:30 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Alex Hawkins on Apr 29, 2012 at 11:19:46 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 3:47:06 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by David Lawrence on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11:02 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 30, 2012 at 2:07:44 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 28, 2012 at 10:20:42 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 3:24:46 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Craig Seeman on Apr 29, 2012 at 12:40:32 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Steve Connor on Apr 29, 2012 at 12:57:00 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 3:51:26 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Craig Seeman on Apr 29, 2012 at 4:02:08 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 4:43:10 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Andy Mees on Apr 29, 2012 at 4:07:18 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 4:37:34 pm
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Chris Harlan on Apr 28, 2012 at 1:43:04 am
      - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Andrew Kimery on Apr 28, 2012 at 2:28:16 am
- Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Craig Seeman on Apr 27, 2012 at 11:24:39 pm
  - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Bobby Mosca on Apr 27, 2012 at 11:46:49 pm
- Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Chris Kenny on Apr 28, 2012 at 12:07:39 am
  - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Bill Davis on Apr 28, 2012 at 2:50:48 am
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Don Walker on Apr 28, 2012 at 3:06:10 am
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Andrew Kimery on Apr 28, 2012 at 3:13:40 am
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Chris Harlan on Apr 28, 2012 at 4:43:04 am
      - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Chris Harlan on Apr 28, 2012 at 4:46:01 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Thomas Frank on Apr 28, 2012 at 9:21:56 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Richard Herd on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:27:14 am
      - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jules bowman on Apr 28, 2012 at 2:35:24 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Alex Hawkins on Apr 29, 2012 at 11:03:49 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Bill Davis on May 1, 2012 at 5:00:07 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jules bowman on May 1, 2012 at 7:17:28 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on May 1, 2012 at 11:42:15 am
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Bill Davis on May 2, 2012 at 4:01:42 am
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Alex Hawkins on Apr 29, 2012 at 10:51:40 am
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 30, 2012 at 2:11:39 pm
- Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by tony west on Apr 28, 2012 at 10:09:46 am
  - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 29, 2012 at 12:58:12 pm
- Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Simon Ubsdell on Apr 29, 2012 at 12:52:20 pm
  - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 29, 2012 at 1:15:46 pm
    - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Simon Ubsdell on Apr 29, 2012 at 3:48:38 pm
      - Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 29, 2012 at 7:30:47 pm
        Re: Apple engineers versus an editor's ability to set persistent in to out points in their footage. by Steve Connor on May 10, 2012 at 12:29:06 pm

Service: MadWerkz Studios by eric matthews on Apr 27, 2012 at 4:51:16 am

Service: Lewis Menga by Lewis Menga on Apr 24, 2012 at 11:21:08 pm

AE vs Smoke by Richard Cardonna on Apr 24, 2012 at 4:33:14 pm
- Re: AE vs Smoke by Dave LaRonde on Apr 24, 2012 at 4:50:32 pm
  - Re: AE vs Smoke by Richard Cardonna on Apr 24, 2012 at 5:15:32 pm
  - Re: AE vs Smoke by Walter Soyka on Apr 25, 2012 at 1:25:58 am
- Re: AE vs Smoke by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on Apr 24, 2012 at 5:15:17 pm
  - Re: AE vs Smoke by Richard Cardonna on Apr 24, 2012 at 5:19:04 pm
- Re: AE vs Smoke by Andrew Somers on Apr 24, 2012 at 5:51:54 pm
  - Re: AE vs Smoke by Petros Kolyvas on Apr 24, 2012 at 8:36:12 pm
- Re: AE vs Smoke by Walter Soyka on Apr 24, 2012 at 9:33:20 pm
  - Re: AE vs Smoke by Richard Cardonna on Apr 24, 2012 at 10:57:18 pm
    - Re: AE vs Smoke by Walter Soyka on Apr 25, 2012 at 1:00:17 am
      - Re: AE vs Smoke by Richard Cardonna on Apr 25, 2012 at 2:15:13 am
        Re: AE vs Smoke by Todd Kopriva on Apr 25, 2012 at 5:57:30 am
        Re: AE vs Smoke by Walter Soyka on Apr 25, 2012 at 9:24:51 pm
        Re: AE vs Smoke by Richard Cardonna on Apr 26, 2012 at 4:20:47 pm
        Re: AE vs Smoke by Shawn Miller on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:47:28 pm
        Re: AE vs Smoke by Roland R. Kahlenberg on Apr 27, 2012 at 7:44:51 pm
        Re: AE vs Smoke by Richard Cardonna on Apr 28, 2012 at 9:43:15 pm
        Re: AE vs Smoke by dermot shane on Apr 29, 2012 at 4:18:30 pm

Desktop Monitor for Web Color Grading by Zak Ray on Apr 24, 2012 at 1:59:17 am
- Re: Desktop Monitor for Web Color Grading by Jerry Hofmann on Apr 24, 2012 at 7:03:02 pm
  - Re: Desktop Monitor for Web Color Grading by Zak Ray on Apr 24, 2012 at 7:55:21 pm

News: Adobe CS6 Release Delivers Major Milestone Innovations for Video Pros by Cow News Droid on Apr 23, 2012 at 6:11:00 pm

Blog: New Adobe Webinars for Free Training by Richard Harrington on Apr 23, 2012 at 2:34:00 pm

CS 6 and Speedgrade by Ron Pestes on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:36:29 pm
- Re: CS 6 and Speedgrade by Chris Borjis on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:47:20 am
  - Re: CS 6 and Speedgrade by Greg Andonian on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:22:26 am
  - Re: CS 6 and Speedgrade by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:42:03 am

One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:47:07 am
- Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:14:50 am
- Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:20:04 am
  - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57:18 am
  - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:50:26 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:32 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:13:30 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:39:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:43:08 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:17:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:30:59 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:58:28 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:31:58 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:00:49 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:57:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jason J Rodriguez on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:36:37 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:30 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:24:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Greg Andonian on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:45:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00:55 am
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:10:06 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:14:05 am
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:09:58 pm
        Re: One year later... by Paul Nordin on Apr 21, 2012 at 10:30:40 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mitch Ives on Apr 22, 2012 at 5:42:19 am
    - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:29:14 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Harlan on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:07:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:51:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:37:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37:07 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:41:22 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23:17 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15:11 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:25:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:31:23 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Chris Harlan on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:08:41 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06:35 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:04:43 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:33:29 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:49:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09:25 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:30:08 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:58 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:20:28 pm
        Re: One year later... NOW: standardizing on one tool or using them all? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:53:03 am
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:01:44 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:01:49 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
        Re: One year later... by Lance Bachelder on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:23:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:27:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Herb Sevush on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:48:18 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Walter Soyka on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:26:21 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:56:57 pm
- Re: One year later... by Lemur Hayop on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:43:07 am
  - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31:28 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 20, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:47:26 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:47:23 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:50:33 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:18:30 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:11:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 4:34:38 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:07:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:15:48 am
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:04:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:25:54 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:55:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 3:03:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Dennis Radeke on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:47:26 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:30:14 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:39:27 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:50:04 am
        Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:29:09 pm
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:38:00 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 6:47:45 am
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:12:40 am
        Re: One year later... by Chris Kenny on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:05:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Shane Ross on Apr 21, 2012 at 5:57:16 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:05:36 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:45:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Tim Wilson on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:06:07 pm
        Re: One year later... by David Roth Weiss on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59:31 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:16:54 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:09:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jim Giberti on Apr 20, 2012 at 11:17:38 pm
        Re: One year later... by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:11:07 am
- Re: One year later... by tony west on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:58:44 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:22:17 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:08:28 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 5:49:41 pm
        Re: One year later... by Mark Raudonis on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06:52 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:56:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Kimery on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:12:05 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:46:19 am
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:44:02 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:52:55 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:12:03 pm
        Re: One year later... by Craig Seeman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:00 pm
- Re: One year later... by John Christie on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:28:14 pm
  - Re: One year later... by Michael Gissing on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:56:47 pm
    - Re: One year later... by David Lawrence on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:19:27 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:38:42 pm
- Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 11:54:05 am
  - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:42:29 pm
    - Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:48:55 pm
      - Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:54:31 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:55:45 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 12:58:35 pm
        Re: One year later... by Daniel Frome on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:07:27 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jules bowman on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:16:47 pm
        Re: One year later... by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 21, 2012 at 2:26:15 pm
        Re: One year later... by Andrew Richards on Apr 21, 2012 at 9:36:18 pm

Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Jim Wiseman on Apr 19, 2012 at 5:25:29 am
- Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Cliff Stephenson on Apr 19, 2012 at 5:37:07 am
  - Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Christopher Travis on Apr 19, 2012 at 11:31:44 am
    - Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Tompkins on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:12:39 pm
- Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Michael Hendrix on Apr 19, 2012 at 1:24:29 pm
  - Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Borjis on Apr 19, 2012 at 4:08:52 pm
    - Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Jim Wiseman on Apr 19, 2012 at 5:03:13 pm
      - Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Borjis on Apr 19, 2012 at 5:45:06 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:25:46 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Tompkins on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:34:31 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Jim Wiseman on Apr 19, 2012 at 6:36:24 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Erik Swanson on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:12:27 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Ernest Ratliff on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:13:38 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Cliff Stephenson on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:15:13 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:24:55 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Borjis on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:29:04 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:31:48 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Borjis on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:33:10 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:37:19 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Borjis on Apr 19, 2012 at 8:01:06 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 19, 2012 at 8:32:35 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Borjis on Apr 19, 2012 at 10:23:13 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Cliff Stephenson on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:21:25 am
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Jim Wiseman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:57:53 am
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:20:32 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:24:04 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Jim Wiseman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:54:12 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:03:10 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Borjis on Apr 19, 2012 at 7:28:32 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Cliff Stephenson on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:23:27 am
      - Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by David McGavran on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:30:51 am
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Jim Wiseman on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:14:35 am
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 20, 2012 at 1:27:22 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by David McGavran on Apr 20, 2012 at 4:18:53 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Jim Wiseman on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:11:35 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Andy Edwards on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:14:48 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Chris Tompkins on Apr 20, 2012 at 8:27:45 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Wil Renczes on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:32:58 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Tom Daigon on Apr 20, 2012 at 9:43:55 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by David McGavran on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:16:47 pm
        Re: Happy with 6.0, not so happy with the Mac Version by Andy Edwards on Apr 20, 2012 at 10:33:19 pm

I really want to stay in the app but... by Gustavo Bermudas on Apr 18, 2012 at 7:29:07 am
- Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by Alan Okey on Apr 18, 2012 at 2:57:19 pm
  - Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by dermot shane on Apr 18, 2012 at 3:20:52 pm
    - Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by jake blackstone on Apr 18, 2012 at 4:18:21 pm
      - Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by Richard Cardonna on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:51:46 pm
      - Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by Dennis Kutchera on Apr 22, 2012 at 1:02:24 am
  - Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by Alan Okey on Apr 20, 2012 at 6:34:47 pm
- Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by Richard Cardonna on Apr 18, 2012 at 5:57:05 pm
  - Re: I really want to stay in the app but... by Don Greening on Apr 26, 2012 at 6:44:35 am

How does this change anything? by Joseph Owens on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:24:14 pm
- Re: How does this change anything? by Ryan Holmes on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:19:12 pm
- Re: How does this change anything? by Aaron Neitz on Apr 17, 2012 at 6:07:23 pm
  - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:06:38 pm
    - Re: How does this change anything? by Joseph Owens on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:59:16 pm
      - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:33:05 pm
      - Re: How does this change anything? by dermot shane on Apr 18, 2012 at 12:50:28 am
        Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:55:11 am
        Re: How does this change anything? by Tom Masters on May 4, 2012 at 9:24:28 pm
- Re: How does this change anything? by chris north on Apr 18, 2012 at 10:33:09 am
  - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 18, 2012 at 12:29:22 pm
    - Re: How does this change anything? by dermot shane on Apr 18, 2012 at 3:10:30 pm
      - Re: How does this change anything? by Ryan Holmes on Apr 18, 2012 at 3:44:35 pm
    - Re: How does this change anything? by Anhtu Vu on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:57:43 am
      - Re: How does this change anything? by Hans von Sonntag on Apr 20, 2012 at 7:28:03 am

FCP X media management solutions? by Garrett Gibbons on Apr 16, 2012 at 8:41:09 pm
- Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 16, 2012 at 9:30:03 pm
  - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Garrett Gibbons on Apr 16, 2012 at 10:00:17 pm
- Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jason Jenkins on Apr 16, 2012 at 10:15:06 pm
  - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Garrett Gibbons on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:17:05 am
    - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jason Jenkins on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:49:43 am
  - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Michael Hadley on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:27:56 am
    - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58:13 am
    - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jason Jenkins on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:01:35 am
    - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Andrew Richards on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:13:07 pm
      - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Michael Hadley on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:18:24 pm
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Chris Kenny on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:50:33 pm
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Andrew Richards on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:04:01 pm
- Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 16, 2012 at 10:21:51 pm
  - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 16, 2012 at 10:50:23 pm
    - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 16, 2012 at 11:27:23 pm
      - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 16, 2012 at 11:43:53 pm
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:06:53 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:14:10 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Garrett Gibbons on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:30:01 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:32:24 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:49:03 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Steve Connor on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:12:04 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:39:30 pm
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Steve Connor on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:45:19 pm
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:47:36 pm
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Steve Connor on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:17:21 pm
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Steve Connor on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:44:15 pm
  - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Garrett Gibbons on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:19:52 am
  - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jason Brown on Apr 17, 2012 at 2:22:38 am
    - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Duncan Craig on Apr 17, 2012 at 7:35:51 am
      - Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jason Porthouse on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:52:10 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Duncan Craig on Apr 17, 2012 at 10:47:52 am
        Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Jason Porthouse on Apr 17, 2012 at 11:52:54 am
- Re: FCP X media management solutions? by tony west on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:11:15 pm
- Re: FCP X media management solutions? by Tangier Clarke on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:59:10 pm

News: NVIDIA and Partners Transform Entire Content Creation Workflow at 2012 NAB Show by Cow News Droid on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:19:50 pm

Bravo by Ronen Pestes on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:43:53 pm
- Re: Bravo by Margus Voll on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:50:02 pm
- Re: Bravo by Ryan Holmes on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:04:38 pm
- Re: Bravo by Peter Berg on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:09:18 pm
  - Re: Bravo by Allan White on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:14:42 pm
  - Re: Bravo by Ryan Holmes on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:18:05 pm
    - Re: Bravo by Tim Wilson on Apr 16, 2012 at 8:50:48 pm
      - Re: Bravo by Peter Corbett on Apr 16, 2012 at 10:24:49 pm
        Re: Bravo by Sascha Haber on Apr 17, 2012 at 6:56:59 am
        Re: Bravo by Peter Corbett on Apr 17, 2012 at 7:02:36 am
        Re: Bravo by Paul Nordin on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:46:41 pm
        Re: Bravo by Tim Wilson on Apr 17, 2012 at 6:55:20 pm
        Re: Bravo by Vladimir Kucherov on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:06:35 pm
        Re: Bravo by Peter Chamberlain on Apr 19, 2012 at 5:42:08 am

News: Silicon Imaging delivers SMART 3D for 2K/4K RAW and HD-SDI Cameras by Cow News Droid on Apr 16, 2012 at 5:11:31 pm

This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:40:09 pm
- Re: This also changes everything!!! by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:43:17 pm
  - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:43:53 pm
    - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:45:29 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:48:42 pm
    - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:13:31 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:17:51 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Michael Hancock on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:18:39 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jason Jenkins on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:24:57 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:44:50 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Tim Wilson on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:50:18 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Bret Williams on Apr 16, 2012 at 5:06:02 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jim Giberti on Apr 16, 2012 at 5:24:31 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Lance Bachelder on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:07:44 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Karsten Fischer on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:50:35 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 18, 2012 at 2:45:54 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 18, 2012 at 7:55:21 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 18, 2012 at 12:52:28 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by David Cherniack on Apr 16, 2012 at 5:32:12 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 16, 2012 at 5:33:23 pm
    - Re: This also changes everything!!! by David Lawrence on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Tim Wilson on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:52:44 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:56:41 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by David Lawrence on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:59:34 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:12:28 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by David Lawrence on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:24:18 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Tim Wilson on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:28:46 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:36:57 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Chris Harlan on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:05:57 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jim Giberti on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:59:24 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jason Jenkins on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:05:10 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Hector berrebi on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:54:01 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Chris Kenny on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:33:44 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jim Giberti on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:46:06 pm
- Re: New Intel SSD by Andrew Richards on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:42:57 pm
- Re: This also changes everything!!! by Tero Ahlfors on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:48:36 pm
  - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:14:21 pm
    - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Morten Ranmar on Apr 16, 2012 at 8:57:54 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 17, 2012 at 6:42:59 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Morten Ranmar on Apr 17, 2012 at 7:13:52 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:04:40 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:13:19 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Chris Kenny on Apr 17, 2012 at 1:39:45 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Martyn Greswolde on Apr 17, 2012 at 2:06:46 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 17, 2012 at 2:56:16 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Martyn Greswolde on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:08:04 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:36:43 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Martyn Greswolde on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:53:46 pm
    - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Tero Ahlfors on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:56:50 am
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Greg Andonian on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:45:15 am
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:51:39 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by David Lawrence on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:03:30 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:15:10 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by David Lawrence on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:56:22 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by John Brawley on Apr 17, 2012 at 2:52:36 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:52:25 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:40:36 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by David Lawrence on Apr 17, 2012 at 6:08:26 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Bob Woodhead on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:18:16 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Chris Kenny on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:16:42 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:30:05 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 25, 2012 at 7:50:16 pm
- Re: This also changes everything!!! by Robert Brown on Apr 16, 2012 at 9:50:36 pm
- Re: This also changes everything!!! by Greg Andonian on Apr 16, 2012 at 11:10:27 pm
  - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Eric Mc Guire on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:32:49 am
- Re: This also changes everything!!! by Monty Wentzel on Apr 17, 2012 at 11:32:42 am
  - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Todd Terry on Apr 17, 2012 at 2:48:40 pm
    - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:16:30 pm
    - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Monty Wentzel on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:23:23 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Patrick Jenner on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:56:16 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:23:05 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Patrick Jenner on Apr 18, 2012 at 7:36:14 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Eric Mc Guire on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:31:58 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:41:36 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Chris Harlan on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:26:46 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Tim Wilson on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:50:18 pm
      - Re: This also changes everything!!! by Shawn Miller on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:19:25 pm
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by miles blow on Apr 18, 2012 at 8:22:16 am
        Re: This also changes everything!!! by Steve Connor on Apr 18, 2012 at 8:40:11 am

So now what? by Steve Connor on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:07:03 am
- Re: So now what? by Michael Gissing on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:16:55 am
  - Re: So now what? by Frank Gothmann on Apr 16, 2012 at 9:56:25 am
- Re: So now what? by Alan Okey on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:09:11 pm
- Re: So now what? by Jason Jenkins on Apr 16, 2012 at 2:14:26 pm
- Re: So now what? by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:11:45 pm
  - What Autodesk Giveth Autodesk Taketh by Richard Cardonna on Apr 16, 2012 at 5:08:56 pm
    - Re: What Autodesk Giveth Autodesk Taketh by Michael Gissing on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:09:37 am

Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Don Walker on Apr 16, 2012 at 1:49:53 am
- Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Andrew Richards on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:03:19 am
  - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Chris Harlan on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:29:49 am
    - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:37:59 am
      - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Chris Harlan on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:41:52 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:51:06 am
      - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by dermot shane on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:46:27 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Bobby Mosca on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:54:19 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Richard Cardonna on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:54:31 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:00:23 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Robert Brown on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:21:40 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:51:59 am
      - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Craig Seeman on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:00:45 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:08:07 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Michael Gissing on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:12:03 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Frederic Warren on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:27:26 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Michael Gissing on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:33:53 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:45:10 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Michael Gissing on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:59:25 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Frederic Warren on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:19:47 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Michael Gissing on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:22:49 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Robert Brown on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:23:57 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Frederic Warren on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:35:34 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Walter Soyka on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:01:35 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Chris Harlan on Apr 16, 2012 at 6:50:38 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Walter Soyka on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:19:32 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Chris Harlan on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:39:16 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by TImothy Auld on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:05:36 pm
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Walter Soyka on Apr 17, 2012 at 3:20:59 pm
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Chris Harlan on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:24:23 pm
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Walter Soyka on Apr 18, 2012 at 8:56:21 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Chris Harlan on Apr 18, 2012 at 2:19:38 pm
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Don Walker on Apr 16, 2012 at 3:22:16 pm
      - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Robert Brown on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:16:28 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Lance Bachelder on Apr 16, 2012 at 4:49:32 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Dave Boampong on Apr 16, 2012 at 9:41:58 am
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Alan Okey on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:52:11 pm
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Oliver Peters on Apr 16, 2012 at 1:15:06 pm
        Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Chris Harlan on Apr 16, 2012 at 7:16:40 pm
      - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by katherine taylor on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:43:10 pm
- Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by katherine taylor on Apr 17, 2012 at 10:32:37 pm
  - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by Walter Soyka on Apr 18, 2012 at 8:42:51 am
    - Re: Smoke 2013 Changes Everything by katherine taylor on Apr 18, 2012 at 11:45:24 pm

News: Creative Professionals Supercharge Their Adobe Creative Suite 6 Workflows with NVIDIA GPU Technology by Cow News Droid on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:09:12 pm

Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Steve Connor on Apr 13, 2012 at 3:07:10 pm
- Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Gary Huff on Apr 13, 2012 at 3:25:45 pm
  - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Michael Garber on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:20:16 pm
  - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Thomas Frank on Apr 15, 2012 at 10:26:11 am
    - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 15, 2012 at 10:30:18 am
- Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:40:54 pm
  - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Frank Gothmann on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:50:02 pm
    - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:53:37 pm
    - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Michael Garber on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:01:03 pm
      - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:40:24 pm
  - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Walter Soyka on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:11:13 pm
    - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:31:28 pm
      - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Walter Soyka on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:54:17 pm
        Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:04:27 pm
      - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by walter biscardi on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:12:54 pm
        Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Michael Gissing on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:22:24 pm
        Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:28:20 pm
        Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Frank Gothmann on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:53:00 pm
        Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:08:27 pm
        Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Frank Gothmann on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:16:57 pm
- Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Michael Garber on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:15:19 pm
  - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Michael Gissing on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:37:36 pm
    - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Mark Suszko on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:56:46 pm
      - Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Andrew Richards on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:11:25 pm
- Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by John Davidson on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:46:58 pm
- Re: Interesting Blog post From Walter Biscardi by Daniel Frome on Apr 14, 2012 at 1:17:55 am

Speedgrade CS6 and Geforce by Anton Shu on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:09:36 am
- Re: Speedgrade CS6 and Geforce by Chris Borjis on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:19:29 pm

Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by David Jackson on Apr 13, 2012 at 10:49:48 am
- Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by stig olsen on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:02:12 pm
  - Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by Robert Houllahan on Apr 13, 2012 at 2:39:54 pm
    - Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by Ben Rojas on Apr 13, 2012 at 3:13:26 pm
      - Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by Josh Petok on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:28:06 pm
        Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by dermot shane on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:34:11 pm
        Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by Robert Houllahan on Apr 14, 2012 at 6:48:11 am
        Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by Bill Ravens on Apr 14, 2012 at 10:00:31 am
- Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by Peter Berg on Apr 14, 2012 at 4:43:52 pm
  - Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by dermot shane on Apr 14, 2012 at 7:45:26 pm
    - Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by Peter Berg on Apr 14, 2012 at 9:30:11 pm
      - Re: Avid Symphony? Not in the same league? by dermot shane on Apr 14, 2012 at 9:47:05 pm

Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 12, 2012 at 7:21:09 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Steve Connor on Apr 12, 2012 at 7:26:55 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:52:30 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Lance Bachelder on Apr 12, 2012 at 7:59:52 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:53:28 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Joseph W. Bourke on Apr 13, 2012 at 2:06:08 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:05:10 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Bret Williams on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:42:53 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:01:39 am
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Steve Connor on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:58:59 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:55:53 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Herb Sevush on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:07:15 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:56:39 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Herb Sevush on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:46:59 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:20:36 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Chris Harlan on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:31:58 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:57:19 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Kevin Monahan on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:07:02 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Bob Woodhead on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:35:12 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Marvin Holdman on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:47:01 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Peter Corbett on Apr 12, 2012 at 9:06:48 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Craig Shields on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:57:09 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:03:00 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Bob Woodhead on Apr 13, 2012 at 2:21:50 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Kevin Monahan on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:03:58 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Shawn Miller on Apr 12, 2012 at 9:23:27 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by John Kaley on Apr 12, 2012 at 9:47:53 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Shawn Miller on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:28:52 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:04:42 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Shawn Miller on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:50:23 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Dustin Parsons on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:06:03 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by TImothy Auld on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:39:20 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Jim Giberti on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:58:23 pm
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:58:27 am
        Re: Questions for CS6 by Jim Giberti on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:11:32 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:07:22 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Jules bowman on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:49:40 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by al ellis on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:25:15 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:11:26 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:51:30 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:43:43 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04:42 am
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:13:53 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:12:57 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Aranyshev on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:56:46 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:18:38 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Aranyshev on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:54:01 am
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:12:40 pm
        Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Aranyshev on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:05:38 pm
        Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:07:12 pm
        Re: Questions for CS6 by Kevin Monahan on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:15:37 pm
        Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Aranyshev on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:59:13 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Greg Andonian on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:54:13 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Robert Brown on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:03:05 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Greg Andonian on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:22:10 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Andy Field on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:59:08 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Gissing on Apr 13, 2012 at 5:59:02 am
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Christopher Travis on Apr 13, 2012 at 10:06:50 am
        Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:25:49 am
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:34:50 am
        Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Gissing on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:56:41 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Tapio Haaja on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:07:21 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:22:41 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Jeff Handy on Apr 14, 2012 at 5:39:48 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:36:04 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Steve Connor on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:48:02 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Gissing on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:00:51 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Bob Woodhead on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:19:26 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by John Czerwinski on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:17:38 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:20:42 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Hancock on Apr 13, 2012 at 11:59:52 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:17:46 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Hancock on Apr 13, 2012 at 12:20:56 pm
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Michael Aranyshev on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:41:30 pm
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Kevin Monahan on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:06:24 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Alan Lacey on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:57:39 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Dave LaRonde on Apr 13, 2012 at 3:44:34 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Walter Soyka on Apr 13, 2012 at 4:42:22 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:11:48 pm
- A few more.. by John Davidson on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:03:35 pm
  - Re: A few more.. by Dennis Radeke on Apr 14, 2012 at 2:03:19 pm
  - Re: A few more.. by Alex Hawkins on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:12:28 am
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Dustin Parsons on Apr 13, 2012 at 10:13:55 pm
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Oliver Peters on Apr 14, 2012 at 12:56:59 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by David Foster on Apr 14, 2012 at 3:16:36 am
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by David Foster on Apr 14, 2012 at 3:32:52 am
    - Re: Questions for CS6 by Herb Sevush on Apr 14, 2012 at 3:44:07 am
      - Re: Questions for CS6 by Oliver Peters on Apr 14, 2012 at 10:15:42 am
  - Re: Questions for CS6 by Dennis Radeke on Apr 14, 2012 at 1:57:20 pm
- Re: Questions for CS6 by Matt Trubac on Apr 14, 2012 at 5:04:38 am

Article: NAB 2012: The Year of the Colour Grader by Dennis Kutchera on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:23:30 pm
- Re: Article: NAB 2012: The Year of the Colour Grader by Peter Sartwell on Apr 13, 2012 at 3:49:27 am
- Re: NAB 2012: The Year of the Colour Grader by Barend Onneweer on Apr 13, 2012 at 7:48:53 am
- Re: NAB 2012: The Year of the Colour Grader by shur harewood on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:03:47 am
- Re: NAB 2012: The Year of the Colour Grader by Stephen Smith on Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10:01 pm
  - Re: NAB 2012: The Year of the Colour Grader by Dennis Kutchera on Apr 21, 2012 at 7:24:20 pm
- Re: NAB 2012: The Year of the Colour Grader by Michael Forrest on Apr 23, 2012 at 5:08:45 pm

Blog: Whoa Nellie - CS6 announced - SPEEDGRADE added to suite but there is more ( did I mention the Canon C500?) by gary adcock on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24:49 pm

Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Benjamin Lundin on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:22:45 pm
- Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Tom Daigon on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33:26 pm
  - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Jim Wiseman on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:44:32 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Chris Borjis on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:58:55 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Dave Fleming on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:54:19 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Benjamin Lundin on Apr 12, 2012 at 7:56:16 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Tom Daigon on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:16:20 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Jim Wiseman on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:55:32 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Mel Feliciano on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:40:31 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Chris Borjis on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:53:45 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Dave Fleming on Apr 13, 2012 at 1:21:26 am
        Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Tom Daigon on Apr 13, 2012 at 3:19:10 am
        Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Mike Squires on Apr 14, 2012 at 4:12:26 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Todd Kopriva on Apr 14, 2012 at 9:19:51 pm
- Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Jil Kalaran on May 10, 2012 at 7:42:44 am
  - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Todd Kopriva on May 14, 2012 at 9:14:31 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro CS 6 - Changes revealed! by Jil Kalaran on May 15, 2012 at 5:34:46 pm

Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Tom Daigon on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38:04 am
- Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Angelo Lorenzo on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:50:22 am
  - Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Todd Kopriva on Apr 12, 2012 at 9:06:56 am
    - Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Joseph W. Bourke on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:51:44 pm
      - Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Tom Daigon on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:56:13 pm
        Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Stefano Sarzi Madidini on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:19:25 pm
        Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Tom Daigon on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:22:32 pm
        Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Steve Connor on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:08:21 pm
        Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Todd Kopriva on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:15:08 pm
        Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Steve Connor on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:18:40 pm
        Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Stefano Sarzi Madidini on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:28:32 pm
        Re: Whats new in CS6 Production Premium? Im glad you asked by Todd Kopriva on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:46:58 pm
        Todd. Encore? by Chris Borjis on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:54:47 pm
        Re: Todd. Encore? by Todd Kopriva on Apr 23, 2012 at 6:07:25 pm

Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36:57 am
- Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:52:01 am
  - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Lance Bachelder on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:08:11 am
    - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:13:51 am
      - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:16:37 am
        Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by David Lawrence on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:23:05 am
        Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Chris Harlan on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:54:41 am
        Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Aindreas Gallagher on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:42:55 am
        Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Lance Bachelder on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:25:06 am
  - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Herb Sevush on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:00:15 pm
    - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Kevin Monahan on Apr 12, 2012 at 7:41:59 pm
      - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Herb Sevush on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:03:40 pm
- Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by David McGavran on Apr 12, 2012 at 5:25:22 am
  - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Phillip Mortimer on Apr 12, 2012 at 10:32:04 am
    - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Michael Gissing on Apr 12, 2012 at 1:44:01 pm
    - Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Walter Soyka on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:01:28 pm
- Re: Some pre NAB CS6 info including Speedgrade integration by Greg Andonian on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:58:42 am

News: Adobe Transforms Video Workflows with Upcoming Creative Suite 6 Production Premium Release to Be Previewed at the 2012 NAB Show by Cow News Droid on Apr 12, 2012 at 4:07:26 am

True no budget setup for grading, what are the best options? by Gabriel Bergeron on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:11:30 am
- Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by David Lawrence on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:25:31 pm
  - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Hancock on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:32:04 pm
  - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Eric Michael Cap on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:32:42 pm
    - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Dennis Radeke on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:57:34 pm
      - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Davee Schulte on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:35:57 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Dennis Radeke on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:54:59 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Richard Cardonna on Sep 27, 2011 at 2:30:05 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Joseph W. Bourke on Sep 27, 2011 at 2:34:54 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:32:17 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:02:54 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:04:53 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Steve Connor on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:28:40 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:51:09 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Rob Ainscough on Nov 8, 2011 at 5:45:11 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:57:55 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:06:55 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:54:43 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Sacci on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:15:33 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by David Roth Weiss on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:29:17 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Gissing on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:52:49 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Erik Mickelson on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:54:41 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by David Roth Weiss on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:06:35 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Richard Cardonna on Oct 7, 2011 at 2:17:18 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 7, 2011 at 3:09:02 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Sacci on Sep 28, 2011 at 6:55:23 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:14:29 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Rooney on Oct 5, 2011 at 5:39:49 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:39:33 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Gissing on Sep 28, 2011 at 6:54:40 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:47:41 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Marvin Holdman on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:23:15 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Lemur Hayop on Oct 1, 2011 at 5:02:04 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Gissing on Oct 1, 2011 at 11:48:40 pm

Resolve NAB Speculation by Paul Nordin on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:27:54 am
- Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Juan Salvo on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:41:28 am
  - Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Colin Travers on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:35:49 am
    - Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Juan Salvo on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:40:44 am
      - Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Robert Houllahan on Apr 10, 2012 at 1:01:44 pm
        Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Vladimir Kucherov on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:08:58 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Sascha Haber on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:29:00 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Joseph Owens on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:07:20 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Peter Berg on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:42:52 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Joseph Owens on Apr 10, 2012 at 9:49:28 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Sascha Haber on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:29:59 am
        Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Mike Most on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:29:26 pm
        Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Vladimir Kucherov on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:34:50 pm
        Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by stig olsen on Apr 10, 2012 at 10:43:49 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Joseph Mastantuono on Apr 11, 2012 at 4:56:06 am
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Eric Santiago on Apr 11, 2012 at 7:29:20 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Juan Salvo on Apr 11, 2012 at 7:45:52 pm
        Re: solve NAB Speculation by Sascha Haber on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:33:15 am
        Re: Resolve NAB Speculation by Sascha Haber on Apr 13, 2012 at 6:32:36 am

Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 9, 2012 at 8:18:35 pm
- Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 9, 2012 at 8:26:18 pm
  - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by David Lawrence on Apr 9, 2012 at 8:41:13 pm
    - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 9, 2012 at 8:46:35 pm
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Lance Bachelder on Apr 9, 2012 at 9:31:18 pm
  - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 9, 2012 at 9:32:52 pm
    - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 9, 2012 at 9:45:56 pm
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 9, 2012 at 9:50:31 pm
- Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Chris Harlan on Apr 9, 2012 at 9:04:42 pm
- Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Alan Okey on Apr 9, 2012 at 9:35:33 pm
  - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Michael Gissing on Apr 9, 2012 at 11:41:08 pm
    - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Brian Mulligan on Apr 10, 2012 at 12:34:36 am
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 1:12:38 am
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Michael Horton on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:59:03 am
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 11, 2012 at 5:56:49 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Herb Sevush on Apr 11, 2012 at 6:52:35 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Alan Okey on Apr 11, 2012 at 7:31:44 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by David Jahns on Apr 11, 2012 at 7:37:08 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Alan Okey on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:23:07 pm
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Steve Connor on Apr 10, 2012 at 8:57:33 am
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Brian Mulligan on Apr 10, 2012 at 11:23:26 am
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Steve Connor on Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35:16 am
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:51:34 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Brian Mulligan on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:13:05 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:19:18 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Dan Stewart on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:02:04 pm
- Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Thomas Frank on Apr 9, 2012 at 11:53:24 pm
  - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 9, 2012 at 11:55:29 pm
    - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Don Walker on Apr 10, 2012 at 1:41:47 am
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Chris Harlan on Apr 10, 2012 at 1:54:52 am
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Lance Bachelder on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:00:47 am
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by João Manuel Tocha on Apr 10, 2012 at 7:41:16 am
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Herb Sevush on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:32:59 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Lance Bachelder on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:54:20 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:10:20 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17:06 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Joe Murray on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:13:38 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:26:37 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Joe Murray on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:40:40 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 11, 2012 at 9:45:48 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Thomas Frank on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:20:08 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Steve Connor on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:21:50 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Thomas Frank on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:34:36 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:38:09 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Herb Sevush on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:27:03 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Thomas Frank on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:37:20 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:39:06 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Herb Sevush on Apr 10, 2012 at 5:44:27 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Chris Harlan on Apr 10, 2012 at 6:22:45 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Herb Sevush on Apr 10, 2012 at 6:29:48 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Chris Harlan on Apr 10, 2012 at 6:58:43 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Chris Harlan on Apr 10, 2012 at 8:35:56 pm
- Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:11:01 pm
  - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:40:07 pm
    - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:46:05 pm
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Steve Connor on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:59:11 pm
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Alan Okey on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:59:24 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:17:19 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Alan Okey on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:48:56 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:55:37 pm
  - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Lance Bachelder on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:35:39 pm
    - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by David Jahns on Apr 10, 2012 at 7:08:28 pm
      - Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Lance Bachelder on Apr 10, 2012 at 7:38:20 pm
        Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Ben Rojas on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:54:09 pm
- Re: Autodesk Smoke is changing. Everything. by Walter Soyka on Apr 13, 2012 at 8:07:31 am

slog lut by Sebastian Laurens on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:41:17 am
- Re: slog lut by dermot shane on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:13:51 pm
  - Re: slog lut by Sebastian Laurens on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:25:15 pm
    - Re: slog lut by dermot shane on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:09:57 pm
      - Re: slog lut by Fred Ricci on Apr 7, 2012 at 11:25:30 am
        Re: slog lut by dermot shane on Apr 8, 2012 at 10:51:58 pm
        Re: slog lut by Fred Ricci on Apr 9, 2012 at 8:23:09 am

Blog: NAB 2012 is coming and it's less than 2 weeks away- so what's going to be there? by gary adcock on Apr 2, 2012 at 1:39:10 pm

Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Mel Matsuoka on Apr 1, 2012 at 11:34:27 am
- Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Peter Chamberlain on Apr 1, 2012 at 1:00:09 pm
  - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Boris Tivchev on Apr 1, 2012 at 2:01:55 pm
    - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Gabriele Turchi on Apr 1, 2012 at 6:54:38 pm
- Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Dmitry Kitsov on Apr 1, 2012 at 7:58:25 pm
- Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Knut Jansohn on Apr 1, 2012 at 9:57:04 pm
  - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Robbie Carman on Apr 2, 2012 at 12:00:48 am
  - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Mike Most on Apr 2, 2012 at 12:46:41 am
    - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Knut Jansohn on Apr 2, 2012 at 10:36:46 am
      - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Mike Most on Apr 2, 2012 at 3:28:26 pm
        Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Knut Jansohn on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:34:38 pm
        Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Mike Most on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:59:03 pm
        Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Knut Jansohn on Apr 2, 2012 at 5:08:38 pm
        Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Gustavo Bermudas on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:03:28 pm
- Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Rohit Gupta on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:49:46 am
  - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by stig olsen on Apr 2, 2012 at 10:10:31 am
- Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Paul Jay on Apr 2, 2012 at 10:21:29 am
  - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Ernest Ratliff on Apr 2, 2012 at 2:25:09 pm
  - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Mel Matsuoka on Apr 2, 2012 at 9:10:28 pm
    - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by michael stirling on Apr 3, 2012 at 12:37:56 pm
      - Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Neil Sadwelkar on Apr 3, 2012 at 6:47:55 pm
- Re: Resolve Feature Requests (The "Too-Late-for-NAB" edition) by Nichole Kizer on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:41:10 pm

What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Tim Wilson on Mar 26, 2012 at 8:21:41 am
- Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Greg Andonian on Mar 26, 2012 at 9:12:48 am
- Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Bernhard Grininger on Mar 26, 2012 at 10:30:35 am
  - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Andrew Richards on Mar 26, 2012 at 1:14:58 pm
- Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Bob Woodhead on Mar 26, 2012 at 10:43:30 am
  - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 26, 2012 at 1:54:27 pm
    - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Steve Connor on Mar 26, 2012 at 3:05:16 pm
      - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Jim Giberti on Mar 26, 2012 at 5:39:48 pm
    - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Jim Giberti on Mar 26, 2012 at 5:36:41 pm
  - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 26, 2012 at 2:22:14 pm
    - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Shane Ross on Mar 26, 2012 at 5:14:53 pm
- Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Lance Bachelder on Mar 26, 2012 at 6:30:29 pm
  - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Michael Gissing on Mar 26, 2012 at 9:50:46 pm
    - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Oliver Peters on Mar 26, 2012 at 10:14:05 pm
      - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Alex Hawkins on Mar 27, 2012 at 2:59:23 am
      - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Chris Harlan on Mar 27, 2012 at 11:54:40 pm
- Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Herb Sevush on Mar 27, 2012 at 6:07:54 pm
- Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Chris Harlan on Mar 28, 2012 at 2:04:44 am
- Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Jerry Hofmann on Apr 2, 2012 at 4:12:09 pm
  - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by David Roth Weiss on Apr 3, 2012 at 2:58:44 am
    - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Herb Sevush on Apr 3, 2012 at 4:04:37 pm
      - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Steve Connor on Apr 3, 2012 at 4:07:03 pm
      - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 4:10:08 pm
        Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Steve Connor on Apr 3, 2012 at 4:33:45 pm
      - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Oliver Peters on Apr 3, 2012 at 4:11:05 pm
        Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Shane Ross on Apr 3, 2012 at 4:38:11 pm
        Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by David Roth Weiss on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:19:02 am
        Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by Scott Miles on Apr 5, 2012 at 10:31:21 pm
      - Re: What do you REALLY want to see at NAB? (Non-Apple edition) by David Roth Weiss on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:01:51 am

Baselight for FCP by Walter Soyka on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:12:47 pm
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:21:03 pm
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Neil Patience on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:09:32 pm
  - Re: Baselight for FCP by dermot shane on Mar 21, 2012 at 11:58:49 pm
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Alexander Higgins on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:08:16 pm
  - Re: Baselight for FCP by Lance Bachelder on Mar 21, 2012 at 11:30:00 pm
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 21, 2012 at 11:47:26 pm
      - Re: Baselight for FCP by Walter Soyka on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:30:26 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Lance Bachelder on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:32:06 am
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Alexander Higgins on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:00:33 am
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:38:13 am
  - Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:51:18 am
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:58:31 am
    - Re: Baselight for FCP by Frank Gothmann on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:59:46 am
      - Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:05:42 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:28:44 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Shane Ross on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:35:04 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:53:18 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:48:57 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:44:06 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Michael Gissing on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:52:56 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:05:52 pm
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Jim Giberti on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:40:09 am
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Deepa Parbhoo on Mar 22, 2012 at 2:34:42 pm
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Craig Seeman on Mar 22, 2012 at 4:07:04 pm
        Re: Baselight for FCP by Keith Pratt on Mar 24, 2012 at 12:16:07 am
- Re: Baselight for FCP by Robert Brown on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:31:56 pm

What's new in Premiere 6? by Kevin Allar on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:27:54 pm
- Re: What's new in Premiere 6? by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:37:16 pm
  - Conan editors give sneak preview of PrP CS6 by Tom Daigon on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:55:58 pm
  - Conan editors give sneak preview of PrP CS6 by Tom Daigon on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:56:59 pm
    - Re: Conan editors give sneak preview of PrP CS6 by Alex Udell on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:57:13 pm
    - Re: Conan editors give sneak preview of PrP CS6 by Tom Daigon on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:19:54 pm
  - Re: What's new in Premiere 6? by David Mathis on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:42:44 pm
- Re: What's new in Premiere 6? by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:20:08 am
  - Re: What's new in Premiere 6? by Alex Udell on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:45:09 am
    - Re: What's new in Premiere 6? by Peter Corbett on Mar 20, 2012 at 11:53:50 pm
- Re: What's new in Premiere 6? by Greg Andonian on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:44:44 am

Why duplicate forum by Richard Cardonna on Mar 17, 2012 at 2:28:07 am

Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:19:44 am
- Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 16, 2012 at 1:42:33 am
  - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:05:44 am
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 16, 2012 at 3:39:04 am
- Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Gary Huff on Mar 16, 2012 at 3:49:11 am
  - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Douglas K. Dempsey on Mar 16, 2012 at 4:19:21 am
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dennis Radeke on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:55:37 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Lance Bachelder on Mar 16, 2012 at 6:21:50 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dennis Radeke on Mar 16, 2012 at 6:28:43 pm
  - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 9:06:37 am
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Walter Soyka on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:47:08 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by dermot shane on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:46:03 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Walter Soyka on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:52:30 am
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:53:18 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 3:37:44 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 16, 2012 at 4:05:43 pm
  - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dennis Radeke on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:52:43 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 1:39:54 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dennis Radeke on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:23:34 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:29:48 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Walter Soyka on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:54:22 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Bernhard Grininger on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:29:03 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dennis Radeke on Mar 16, 2012 at 2:54:06 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Richard Herd on Mar 16, 2012 at 3:09:19 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Bret Williams on Mar 16, 2012 at 4:33:37 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Bernhard Grininger on Mar 17, 2012 at 8:57:51 am
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Bernhard Grininger on Mar 17, 2012 at 1:23:56 pm
  - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 16, 2012 at 1:53:00 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Greg Andonian on Mar 18, 2012 at 12:14:54 am
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Bernhard Grininger on Mar 18, 2012 at 9:54:00 am
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 18, 2012 at 12:45:21 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 18, 2012 at 12:17:43 pm
- Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Steve Connor on Mar 16, 2012 at 8:16:37 am
- Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Greg Andonian on Mar 16, 2012 at 10:29:03 am
- Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Liam Hall on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:27:03 pm
  - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by andy lewis on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:39:16 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dennis Radeke on Mar 16, 2012 at 12:57:11 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Liam Hall on Mar 16, 2012 at 1:03:08 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 1:37:50 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Frank Gothmann on Mar 16, 2012 at 3:05:40 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Andy Neil on Mar 16, 2012 at 4:45:06 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Chris Harlan on Mar 16, 2012 at 8:58:12 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Bret Williams on Mar 16, 2012 at 4:39:16 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 16, 2012 at 6:10:07 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Richard Cardonna on Mar 16, 2012 at 9:27:40 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Richard Cardonna on Mar 16, 2012 at 9:28:57 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Daniel Frome on Mar 18, 2012 at 6:43:35 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dennis Radeke on Mar 18, 2012 at 6:46:33 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Dustin Parsons on Mar 16, 2012 at 8:39:25 pm
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Tapio Haaja on Mar 17, 2012 at 12:33:00 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by David Cherniack on Mar 17, 2012 at 3:59:37 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by John Heagy on Mar 17, 2012 at 9:28:24 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by David Cherniack on Mar 17, 2012 at 11:33:33 pm
- Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Hector berrebi on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:24:54 pm
  - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Richard Cardonna on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:57:03 pm
    - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Erik Lindahl on Mar 28, 2012 at 7:35:20 am
      - Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 28, 2012 at 12:41:35 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Erik Lindahl on Mar 28, 2012 at 12:53:55 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Bernhard Grininger on Mar 28, 2012 at 1:11:50 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 28, 2012 at 1:28:08 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 28, 2012 at 1:34:03 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Erik Lindahl on Mar 28, 2012 at 1:45:05 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Walter Soyka on Mar 28, 2012 at 2:31:04 pm
        Re: Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 28, 2012 at 3:13:55 pm

Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 6, 2012 at 11:45:10 pm
- Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Cliff Stephenson on Mar 7, 2012 at 1:04:55 am
  - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Alex Udell on Mar 7, 2012 at 1:59:52 am
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Lance Bachelder on Mar 7, 2012 at 5:56:35 pm
  - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 7, 2012 at 9:30:19 pm
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Jacob Kerns on Mar 8, 2012 at 12:09:01 am
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Cliff Stephenson on Mar 8, 2012 at 12:29:27 am
      - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 8, 2012 at 1:46:50 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 6:25:36 pm
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 2:10:54 am
- Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Angelo Lorenzo on Mar 7, 2012 at 8:28:12 am
  - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 7, 2012 at 1:18:13 pm
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Richard Cardonna on Mar 9, 2012 at 1:44:19 am
- Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Daniel Frome on Mar 8, 2012 at 2:13:35 am
  - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Richard Cardonna on Mar 8, 2012 at 2:47:29 am
  - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 6:29:08 pm
- Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 2:48:40 am
  - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Daniel Frome on Mar 8, 2012 at 1:41:30 pm
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 8, 2012 at 1:56:56 pm
      - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 4:38:46 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 8, 2012 at 4:54:36 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 6:19:00 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 8, 2012 at 7:44:07 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 10:00:57 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 8, 2012 at 10:40:55 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 9:46:34 pm
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 6:37:06 pm
      - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Daniel Frome on Mar 8, 2012 at 7:04:01 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 10:12:11 pm
      - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Mike Molenda on Mar 8, 2012 at 9:56:54 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Steve Brame on Mar 8, 2012 at 10:14:15 pm
        Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Mike Molenda on Mar 8, 2012 at 11:07:00 pm
- Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Greg Andonian on Mar 8, 2012 at 9:33:25 pm
  - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Richard Cardonna on Mar 9, 2012 at 1:56:06 am
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Greg Andonian on Mar 9, 2012 at 3:40:05 am
    - Re: Why is PPro not suited for feature films? by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 9, 2012 at 9:04:15 am
      - PPro in films by Richard Cardonna on Mar 9, 2012 at 5:52:41 pm
        Re: PPro in films by Todd Kopriva on Mar 11, 2012 at 3:59:24 am
        Re: PPro in films by Richard Cardonna on Mar 11, 2012 at 4:21:59 am
        Re: PPro in films by Benjamin Lundin on Mar 12, 2012 at 5:23:34 am
        Re: PPro in films by Richard Cardonna on Mar 12, 2012 at 4:09:47 pm

Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 5, 2012 at 7:18:38 am
- Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by robert coulin on Mar 5, 2012 at 9:14:24 am
  - Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Grant Kay on Mar 5, 2012 at 9:34:09 am
    - Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Brian Mulligan on Mar 5, 2012 at 1:06:09 pm
      - Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 5, 2012 at 3:52:06 pm
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Brian Mulligan on Mar 5, 2012 at 6:11:06 pm
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55:12 pm
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by robert coulin on Mar 5, 2012 at 7:04:54 pm
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Hans von Sonntag on Mar 6, 2012 at 8:14:29 am
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by robert coulin on Mar 6, 2012 at 9:23:35 am
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Hans von Sonntag on Mar 6, 2012 at 10:00:45 am
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by robert coulin on Mar 6, 2012 at 12:53:44 pm
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by robert coulin on Mar 8, 2012 at 1:24:23 pm
        Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Michael Aranyshev on Apr 7, 2012 at 7:19:35 pm
- Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by moody glasgow on Mar 7, 2012 at 8:04:48 pm
  - Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by David Jahns on Mar 7, 2012 at 11:55:48 pm
    - Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by dermot shane on Mar 17, 2012 at 8:25:24 pm
- Re: Does anyone actually edit in smoke ? by Andriy Toloshnyy on Mar 29, 2012 at 4:50:11 am

My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Ruffo on Mar 4, 2012 at 10:18:40 pm
- Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Mathieu Marano on Mar 5, 2012 at 3:10:38 am
  - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Ruffo on Mar 5, 2012 at 4:17:21 am
    - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Mike Most on Mar 5, 2012 at 4:09:34 pm
- Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Juan Salvo on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:07:08 pm
  - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Houllahan on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:44:51 pm
    - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Robert Ruffo on Mar 6, 2012 at 5:02:25 am
      - Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 6, 2012 at 5:37:41 am
        Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Antoine Baumann on Mar 10, 2012 at 11:12:56 am
        Re: My Dream: AE plugins within nodes - Better glow effects - Curve-based HSL by Gabriele Turchi on Mar 10, 2012 at 4:54:27 pm

Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish by Manuel Wenger on Mar 2, 2012 at 8:52:48 pm
- Re: Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish by Sean Donnelly on Mar 4, 2012 at 5:10:10 pm
  - Re: Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish by Manuel Wenger on Mar 5, 2012 at 5:19:49 pm

New upgrade to Premiere Pro when? by Frank Cervarich on Mar 1, 2012 at 5:09:24 pm
- Re: New upgrade to Premiere Pro when? by Chris Borjis on Mar 1, 2012 at 5:28:48 pm
  - Re: New upgrade to Premiere Pro when? by Todd Kopriva on Mar 1, 2012 at 11:48:57 pm
    - Re: New upgrade to Premiere Pro when? by Herb Sevush on Mar 2, 2012 at 1:32:01 pm
- Re: New upgrade to Premiere Pro when? by Angelo Lorenzo on Mar 2, 2012 at 3:55:14 am
- Re: New upgrade to Premiere Pro when? by Greg Andonian on Mar 2, 2012 at 6:11:17 am
  - Re: New upgrade to Premiere Pro when? by Bob Woodhead on Mar 2, 2012 at 11:52:52 pm

How to test stereoscopic 3D by Carlos Angeli on Feb 29, 2012 at 11:04:45 am
- Re: How to test stereoscopic 3D by Ramil Pasibe on Feb 29, 2012 at 4:31:37 pm
  - Re: How to test stereoscopic 3D by Carlos Angeli on Mar 4, 2012 at 8:17:30 pm
    - Re: How to test stereoscopic 3D by Matt Faw on May 2, 2012 at 12:28:41 am

8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 28, 2012 at 2:01:19 am
- Re: 8bit Banding by John Cuevas on Feb 28, 2012 at 2:14:10 pm
  - Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 28, 2012 at 2:57:02 pm
    - Re: 8bit Banding by Kevin Camp on Feb 28, 2012 at 6:11:39 pm
      - Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 28, 2012 at 9:21:57 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 3:01:34 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 4:39:53 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 4:47:27 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 5:31:03 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 5:43:31 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 5:51:00 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Erik Lindahl on Feb 29, 2012 at 6:19:23 pm
        Re: 8bit Banding by Jon Merrifield on Feb 29, 2012 at 6:28:39 pm

If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Bobby Mosca on Feb 27, 2012 at 3:14:56 pm
- Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Oliver Peters on Feb 27, 2012 at 3:29:35 pm
- Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Bret Williams on Feb 27, 2012 at 3:48:23 pm
  - Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Bobby Mosca on Feb 27, 2012 at 4:24:45 pm
    - Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Lance Bachelder on Feb 27, 2012 at 6:22:01 pm
      - Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Walter Soyka on Feb 27, 2012 at 6:56:51 pm
      - Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Shawn Miller on Feb 27, 2012 at 7:59:29 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Lance Bachelder on Feb 27, 2012 at 8:37:25 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Shawn Miller on Feb 27, 2012 at 9:27:45 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Tim Wilson on Feb 27, 2012 at 9:39:04 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by TImothy Auld on Feb 27, 2012 at 10:09:46 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Bret Williams on Feb 28, 2012 at 5:24:43 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Steve Connor on Feb 28, 2012 at 11:40:59 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Dominic Deacon on Feb 28, 2012 at 11:53:59 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Lance Bachelder on Feb 28, 2012 at 3:27:44 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Bret Williams on Feb 28, 2012 at 5:37:58 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Steve Connor on Feb 28, 2012 at 11:44:21 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Oliver Peters on Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54:29 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Shawn Miller on Feb 28, 2012 at 12:18:26 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Lance Bachelder on Feb 28, 2012 at 3:24:32 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Bret Williams on Feb 28, 2012 at 5:44:28 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Joseph Owens on Feb 29, 2012 at 12:32:17 am
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Mitch Ives on Feb 29, 2012 at 6:27:21 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Shawn Miller on Feb 29, 2012 at 8:43:51 pm
        Re: If I thought the switch was inevitable... by Walter Soyka on Feb 29, 2012 at 9:31:43 pm

Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Bobby Mosca on Feb 25, 2012 at 8:54:42 pm
- Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Steve Connor on Feb 25, 2012 at 9:03:18 pm
- Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Liam Hall on Feb 25, 2012 at 9:11:07 pm
  - Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Dennis Radeke on Feb 26, 2012 at 1:51:54 am
    - Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Oliver Peters on Feb 26, 2012 at 3:25:21 am
      - Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Bobby Mosca on Feb 26, 2012 at 3:46:02 am
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Lance Bachelder on Feb 26, 2012 at 9:03:35 am
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 26, 2012 at 2:08:01 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Lance Bachelder on Feb 27, 2012 at 10:34:26 am
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Steve Connor on Feb 26, 2012 at 9:14:36 am
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Marcus Samuel-Gaskin on Feb 26, 2012 at 12:14:40 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Oliver Peters on Feb 26, 2012 at 2:12:52 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 26, 2012 at 2:22:05 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Oliver Peters on Feb 26, 2012 at 4:27:08 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Oliver Peters on Feb 26, 2012 at 4:34:13 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Michael Gissing on Feb 26, 2012 at 11:55:53 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Lance Bachelder on Feb 27, 2012 at 10:30:14 am
    - Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Liam Hall on Feb 26, 2012 at 10:30:14 am
      - Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Shawn Miller on Feb 27, 2012 at 5:48:04 am
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by andy lewis on Feb 27, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 27, 2012 at 8:32:00 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Jim Giberti on Feb 27, 2012 at 10:10:15 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Lance Bachelder on Feb 28, 2012 at 3:45:54 am
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Aaron Williams on Feb 28, 2012 at 3:13:46 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Oliver Peters on Feb 28, 2012 at 3:29:00 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 28, 2012 at 5:48:56 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Oliver Peters on Feb 28, 2012 at 6:25:27 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 28, 2012 at 7:46:25 pm
        Re: Color Correction: FCPX vs Premiere Pro by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 28, 2012 at 7:42:43 pm

Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 22, 2012 at 12:44:10 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Tom Wolsky on Feb 22, 2012 at 1:40:07 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:07:17 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Rafael Amador on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:29:54 pm
  - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by T.a. Franks on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:39:17 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 11:47:04 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:31:52 pm
- Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 3:10:01 pm
  - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:15:34 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 6:51:30 pm
      - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 7:40:22 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 8:50:06 pm
      - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:19:15 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Walter Soyka on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:43:16 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:44:33 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:12:59 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:49 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Bill Davis on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12:21 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:13:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Michael Gissing on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:26:00 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Gary Cole on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:11:07 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:40:44 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 11:52:37 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless (now OT: organization in FCPX vs FCP7) by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:28:29 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:13:05 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:53:14 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:34:51 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:50:43 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:23:15 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:58:20 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:59:21 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:48:20 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:39:23 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:16:39 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:19:25 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:22:48 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:50:34 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:30 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:08:23 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:22:10 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:47:44 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:39:34 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:49:36 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:49:53 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:33 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:31:16 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:50:14 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:06:06 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:20:48 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Walter Soyka on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:52:36 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:27 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:04:37 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:30:55 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:43:23 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:46:43 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:52:00 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:59:12 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:09:51 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:23:56 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Chris Harlan on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:04:56 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:13:22 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:11:29 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:45:34 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:06:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:12:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:50:00 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:04 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jim Giberti on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:07:38 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 24, 2012 at 12:37:54 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:03:45 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 1:10:41 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 2:48:18 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:55:00 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00:44 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:07:55 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Steve Connor on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:10:59 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:18:36 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:34:34 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:18:05 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:27:24 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:02:39 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:27:33 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 23, 2012 at 11:04:37 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Franz Bieberkopf on Feb 24, 2012 at 1:52:45 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Oliver Peters on Feb 24, 2012 at 2:05:36 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bill Davis on Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45:20 am
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:48:21 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:45:09 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 7:07:19 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:09:09 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:11:16 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:15:45 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Bret Williams on Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25:50 pm
        Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Christian Schumacher on Feb 24, 2012 at 5:37:18 pm
    - Re: Motion TRACKS versus FCP X Trackless by Richard Herd on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:32:07 pm

Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Steve Gresser on Feb 22, 2012 at 3:43:31 am
- Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Ramil Pasibe on Feb 22, 2012 at 4:16:00 pm
  - Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Steve Gresser on Feb 22, 2012 at 4:22:19 pm
    - Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Tom Daigon on Feb 22, 2012 at 5:45:28 pm
      - Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Steve Gresser on Feb 22, 2012 at 7:53:22 pm
        Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Tom Daigon on Feb 22, 2012 at 9:54:49 pm
        Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Steve Gresser on Feb 22, 2012 at 10:17:42 pm
        Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Ramil Pasibe on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:50:27 am
        Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Tom Daigon on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:13:19 am
        Re: Apple, R3D, and Premiere Pro CS5.5 by Ramil Pasibe on Feb 23, 2012 at 6:45:22 am

Article: Bill Roberts, Director of Video Product Management, Adobe Systems & Adobe's Past, Present & Future by Debra Kaufman on Feb 15, 2012 at 10:28:29 pm
- Re: Bill Roberts, Director of Video Product Management, Adobe Systems & Adobe's Past, Present & Future by Abraham Richman on Feb 16, 2012 at 12:27:19 am
  - @Abraham Richman by Kevin Monahan on Feb 17, 2012 at 2:06:23 am
- Re: Bill Roberts, Director of Video Product Management, Adobe Systems & Adobe's Past, Present & Future by Jim Wiseman on Feb 16, 2012 at 3:02:16 pm
- Re: Bill Roberts, Director of Video Product Management, Adobe Systems & Adobe's Past, Present & Future by Kevin Monahan on Feb 17, 2012 at 2:03:12 am
  - @Kevin Monahan by Stefani Rice on Feb 17, 2012 at 3:43:49 am
- Re: Bill Roberts, Director of Video Product Management, Adobe Systems & Adobe's Past, Present & Future by Ra-ey Saleh on Feb 17, 2012 at 5:20:09 am

JLCooper's Eclipse CX and Ethernet Interface Card (Included) STILL IN BOX by leslie allen on Feb 9, 2012 at 4:45:44 am

Any rumors about 6.0? by Ron Pestes on Feb 7, 2012 at 6:50:33 pm
- Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Angelo Lorenzo on Feb 7, 2012 at 9:27:34 pm
  - Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Todd Kopriva on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:56:00 am
    - Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Ryan Patch on Feb 8, 2012 at 7:42:06 am
      - Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Angelo Lorenzo on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:09:37 am
      - Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Shawn Miller on Feb 9, 2012 at 4:41:40 am
    - Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Alistair Cooper on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:09:55 am
      - Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Todd Kopriva on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:29:59 pm
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Bob Woodhead on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:14:34 pm
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Ron Pestes on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:45:26 am
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Joseph W. Bourke on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:58:11 pm
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by John Frey on Feb 9, 2012 at 8:56:18 pm
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Andy Sims on Feb 9, 2012 at 9:57:26 pm
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Joseph W. Bourke on Feb 9, 2012 at 10:45:06 pm
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Alex Hawkins on Feb 11, 2012 at 1:13:17 am
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Erik Mickelson on Feb 13, 2012 at 3:59:07 am
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Jon Barrie on Feb 13, 2012 at 4:54:13 am
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Erik Mickelson on Feb 13, 2012 at 6:05:25 am
        Re: Any rumors about 6.0? by Jon Barrie on Feb 13, 2012 at 6:21:10 am

FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Michael Hancock on Jan 31, 2012 at 2:11:37 pm
- Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Rafael Amador on Jan 31, 2012 at 3:15:21 pm
- Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 3:35:49 pm
  - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Michael Hancock on Jan 31, 2012 at 3:37:05 pm
    - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 3:39:54 pm
      - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Mark Morache on Jan 31, 2012 at 3:50:50 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 4:34:43 pm
  - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Walter Soyka on Jan 31, 2012 at 3:56:14 pm
    - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 4:36:53 pm
      - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Andy Neil on Jan 31, 2012 at 6:34:29 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Craig Seeman on Jan 31, 2012 at 6:55:12 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Andy Neil on Jan 31, 2012 at 6:57:54 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:16:27 pm
    - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Rafael Amador on Jan 31, 2012 at 4:43:16 pm
      - Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Craig Seeman on Jan 31, 2012 at 4:51:24 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 4:57:48 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Craig Seeman on Jan 31, 2012 at 5:49:07 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 5:54:04 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Craig Seeman on Jan 31, 2012 at 5:58:15 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Walter Soyka on Jan 31, 2012 at 6:26:26 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Craig Seeman on Jan 31, 2012 at 6:48:20 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Walter Soyka on Jan 31, 2012 at 6:50:56 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Craig Seeman on Jan 31, 2012 at 7:35:40 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Andrew Kimery on Jan 31, 2012 at 7:57:15 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Bret Williams on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:45:21 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Andrew Kimery on Jan 31, 2012 at 8:52:16 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Thomas Frank on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:01:22 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Andrew Kimery on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:15:22 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Thomas Frank on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:21:45 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Bret Williams on Feb 1, 2012 at 5:17:22 am
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:24:12 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Thomas Frank on Jan 31, 2012 at 9:31:34 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Rafael Amador on Feb 1, 2012 at 3:28:22 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Thomas Frank on Feb 1, 2012 at 3:31:43 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Gary Huff on Feb 1, 2012 at 5:14:03 pm
        Re: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts by Bret Williams on Feb 1, 2012 at 10:56:52 pm

Adobe Prelude by Ian Bailey on Jan 28, 2012 at 5:33:10 pm
- Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 28, 2012 at 6:22:33 pm
  - Re: Adobe Prelude by Tom Wolsky on Jan 28, 2012 at 6:27:27 pm
    - Re: Adobe Prelude by Steve Connor on Jan 28, 2012 at 7:07:46 pm
    - Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 28, 2012 at 7:08:13 pm
      - Re: Adobe Prelude by Ian Bailey on Jan 28, 2012 at 8:06:12 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Frank Gothmann on Jan 28, 2012 at 8:16:19 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 28, 2012 at 8:24:24 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Joseph W. Bourke on Jan 28, 2012 at 9:14:34 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Franz Bieberkopf on Jan 28, 2012 at 9:45:23 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 28, 2012 at 9:48:20 pm
    - Re: Adobe Prelude by Andrew Kimery on Jan 28, 2012 at 10:16:40 pm
      - Re: Adobe Prelude by Thomas Frank on Jan 29, 2012 at 12:17:05 am
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Brian Mulligan on Jan 29, 2012 at 12:40:55 am
- Re: Adobe Prelude by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 29, 2012 at 7:04:43 am
  - Re: Adobe Prelude by Dennis Radeke on Jan 29, 2012 at 11:35:20 am
    - Re: Adobe Prelude by Tom Wolsky on Jan 29, 2012 at 12:00:28 pm
      - Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 29, 2012 at 2:40:30 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Tom Wolsky on Jan 29, 2012 at 3:23:05 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 29, 2012 at 3:28:40 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 29, 2012 at 3:38:46 pm
        Philip Hodgetts take on prelude by Richard Cardonna on Jan 29, 2012 at 3:33:50 pm
      - @Tom by Joseph W. Bourke on Jan 29, 2012 at 5:52:04 pm
    - Re: Adobe Prelude by Thomas Frank on Jan 29, 2012 at 12:09:55 pm
      - Re: Adobe Prelude by Tom Wolsky on Jan 29, 2012 at 3:43:33 pm
        Re: Adobe Prelude by Oliver Peters on Jan 29, 2012 at 3:47:39 pm

Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 27, 2012 at 12:22:36 am
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Chris Harlan on Jan 27, 2012 at 1:29:20 am
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Mark Raudonis on Jan 27, 2012 at 3:50:00 am
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Juan Salvo on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:06:52 am
  - @Mark Raudonis by walter biscardi on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:44:39 am
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Ken Zukin on Jan 27, 2012 at 3:59:39 am
  - @Ken Zukin by walter biscardi on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:43:16 am
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Mitch Ives on Jan 27, 2012 at 7:22:51 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:48:41 am
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Mark Dobson on Jan 27, 2012 at 6:16:29 am
    - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 27, 2012 at 2:46:28 pm
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Ben Oliver on Jan 27, 2012 at 1:38:00 pm
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Phil Hoppes on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:45:35 pm
    - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 28, 2012 at 3:09:31 pm
      - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Phil Hoppes on Jan 29, 2012 at 1:53:45 pm
        Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 29, 2012 at 5:10:36 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Ron Pestes on Jan 27, 2012 at 5:09:21 am
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Chris Harlan on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:43:04 pm
    - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Ron Pestes on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:57:03 pm
      - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Chris Harlan on Jan 27, 2012 at 9:20:22 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by David Lawrence on Jan 27, 2012 at 5:58:50 am
- Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Dennis Radeke on Jan 27, 2012 at 11:30:25 am
  - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Kris Merkel on Jan 27, 2012 at 2:12:14 pm
  - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 27, 2012 at 2:47:41 pm
  - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Job ter Burg on Jan 27, 2012 at 9:32:14 pm
    - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 28, 2012 at 3:12:19 pm
      - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Job ter Burg on Jan 30, 2012 at 7:04:02 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Tj Jaglinski on Jan 27, 2012 at 2:32:03 pm
  - @Tj Jaglinski by walter biscardi on Jan 27, 2012 at 3:28:13 pm
- Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Mike Zimbard on Jan 27, 2012 at 3:35:22 pm
  - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 27, 2012 at 3:56:55 pm
    - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Mike Zimbard on Jan 27, 2012 at 11:19:41 pm
  - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 28, 2012 at 3:03:41 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Mark Suszko on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:16:25 pm
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Richard Herd on Jan 27, 2012 at 9:21:21 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Sara Nichols on Jan 27, 2012 at 4:27:21 pm
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 28, 2012 at 3:13:57 pm
- I'll always appreciate Apple for holding Avid's feet to the fire by John Chay on Jan 27, 2012 at 5:09:54 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Liam Hall on Jan 27, 2012 at 7:33:20 pm
- Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by John Christie on Jan 28, 2012 at 12:02:16 am
  - Re: Article: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 28, 2012 at 3:00:57 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Ramil Pasibe on Jan 28, 2012 at 5:29:11 pm
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Jan 29, 2012 at 5:13:32 pm
    - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Ramil Pasibe on Jan 31, 2012 at 5:08:43 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Mark Chapin on Jan 28, 2012 at 6:57:19 pm
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Joseph Owens on Jan 28, 2012 at 10:13:39 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! - Good Said by Jon Merrifield on Jan 28, 2012 at 11:36:42 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Buddy Couch on Jan 29, 2012 at 3:46:49 pm
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Richard Herd on Jan 30, 2012 at 5:16:12 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Richard Harrington on Jan 29, 2012 at 5:29:06 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Michael Sacci on Jan 31, 2012 at 5:49:20 am
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Pat DeFilippo on Jan 31, 2012 at 3:49:06 pm
  - @Pat DeFilippo by Pat DeFilippo on Jan 31, 2012 at 4:15:14 pm
  - @Pat DeFilippo by walter biscardi on Jan 31, 2012 at 4:31:22 pm
    - Re: @Pat DeFilippo by Richard Herd on Jan 31, 2012 at 10:38:00 pm
      - Re: @Pat DeFilippo by walter biscardi on Jan 31, 2012 at 10:48:16 pm
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Adam Hain on Feb 1, 2012 at 8:12:41 am
- Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Alex Hawkins on Feb 6, 2012 at 5:06:26 am
  - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by Doug Weiner on Feb 13, 2012 at 5:14:51 pm
    - Re: What a Long, Strange Year It's Been! by walter biscardi on Feb 13, 2012 at 6:30:50 pm

At a Crossroads in Editing by Kevin Matluk on Jan 18, 2012 at 8:01:51 pm
- Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Simon Ubsdell on Jan 18, 2012 at 8:09:48 pm
- Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Herb Sevush on Jan 18, 2012 at 8:22:32 pm
  - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Darren Kelly on Jan 18, 2012 at 8:35:27 pm
    - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Adam White on Jan 18, 2012 at 9:00:42 pm
      - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Craig Seeman on Jan 18, 2012 at 9:19:19 pm
- Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Robert Bracken on Jan 18, 2012 at 10:13:23 pm
- Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Andy Neil on Jan 18, 2012 at 10:23:06 pm
  - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Mark Morache on Jan 19, 2012 at 7:25:01 am
  - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Dennis Radeke on Jan 20, 2012 at 1:24:53 pm
- Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by John Davidson on Jan 19, 2012 at 1:18:22 am
  - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Dennis Radeke on Jan 20, 2012 at 1:27:45 pm
    - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by John Davidson on Jan 22, 2012 at 12:06:01 am
- Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Richard Herd on Jan 19, 2012 at 4:12:44 pm
- Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Chris Kenny on Jan 20, 2012 at 11:37:12 am
  - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Marvin Holdman on Jan 20, 2012 at 10:00:40 pm
    - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Herb Sevush on Jan 20, 2012 at 10:06:26 pm
    - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Chris Kenny on Jan 21, 2012 at 2:28:31 am
      - Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Dennis Radeke on Jan 21, 2012 at 2:01:56 pm
        Re: At a Crossroads in Editing by Michael Gissing on Jan 21, 2012 at 10:40:49 pm

StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Creative COW on Jan 10, 2012 at 1:05:54 am
- Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Rafael Amador on Jan 10, 2012 at 2:23:40 am
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 10, 2012 at 5:00:44 am
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Ronald Lindeboom on Jan 11, 2012 at 1:31:18 am
    - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 5:12:56 pm
    - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Joseph W. Bourke on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31:44 pm
      - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Abraham Chaffin on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47:10 pm
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 9:07:12 pm

Colorista II in CS5.5 by Craig Shields on Dec 30, 2011 at 2:31:43 pm
- Re: Colorista II in CS5.5 by Ken Pugh on Dec 30, 2011 at 5:29:47 pm
  - Re: Colorista II in CS5.5 by Tom Daigon on Dec 30, 2011 at 6:15:00 pm
    - Re: Colorista II in CS5.5 by Craig Shields on Dec 30, 2011 at 6:35:50 pm
      - Re: Colorista II in CS5.5 by Tom Daigon on Dec 30, 2011 at 6:48:40 pm
        Re: Colorista II in CS5.5 by Craig Shields on Dec 30, 2011 at 7:14:22 pm
        Re: Colorista II in CS5.5 by Tom Daigon on Dec 30, 2011 at 7:15:23 pm
        Re: Colorista II in CS5.5 by Ramil Pasibe on Jan 1, 2012 at 4:27:38 pm

Speedgrade CS6 by Paul mitchell on Dec 24, 2011 at 6:11:15 pm
- Re: Speedgrade CS6 by Dan Kirklin on Dec 24, 2011 at 7:34:33 pm
  - Re: Speedgrade CS6 by Paul mitchell on Dec 24, 2011 at 10:07:04 pm
    - Re: Speedgrade CS6 by Gustavo Bermudas on Dec 27, 2011 at 5:07:41 am
    - Re: Speedgrade CS6 by jake blackstone on Dec 28, 2011 at 12:16:38 am
- Re: Speedgrade CS6 by Margus Voll on Dec 24, 2011 at 11:50:29 pm
  - Tangent element by Lee Niederkofler on Dec 26, 2011 at 3:40:32 pm
    - Re: Tangent element by Robert Houllahan on Dec 26, 2011 at 4:07:09 pm
      - Re: Tangent element by Margus Voll on Dec 26, 2011 at 4:22:15 pm
- Re: Speedgrade CS6 by jake blackstone on Dec 28, 2011 at 12:31:52 am
  - Re: Speedgrade CS6 by Gabriele Turchi on Dec 28, 2011 at 2:25:06 pm
    - Re: Speedgrade CS6 by Sascha Haber on Dec 28, 2011 at 4:24:17 pm
    - Re: Speedgrade CS6 by kim krause on Dec 29, 2011 at 7:42:05 pm
      - Re: Speedgrade CS6 by jim bachalo on Feb 25, 2012 at 7:00:50 pm

New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 12:54:51 am
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:32:59 am
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 19, 2011 at 3:34:51 am
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 19, 2011 at 2:29:44 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Andreas Kiel on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:24:15 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 19, 2011 at 6:18:52 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 21, 2011 at 5:31:44 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 5:56:01 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:02:00 am
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Aindreas Gallagher on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:21:55 am
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Phil Hoppes on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:15:47 am
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jim Giberti on Dec 20, 2011 at 4:16:32 am
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 19, 2011 at 2:27:28 am
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Rafael Amador on Dec 19, 2011 at 3:24:50 am
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 2:02:18 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:37:17 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:06:22 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Phil Hoppes on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:33:59 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:58:00 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:34:26 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 19, 2011 at 9:00:34 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:07:21 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:22:26 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bret Williams on Dec 20, 2011 at 2:30:54 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 20, 2011 at 4:10:08 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bret Williams on Dec 20, 2011 at 7:47:49 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Christian Schumacher on Dec 20, 2011 at 1:32:58 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 20, 2011 at 7:59:09 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Christian Schumacher on Dec 20, 2011 at 9:36:15 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 20, 2011 at 9:52:23 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Christian Schumacher on Dec 20, 2011 at 10:06:58 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 20, 2011 at 10:37:00 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:28:52 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:38:18 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:39:52 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:47:55 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 21, 2011 at 5:06:22 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Christian Schumacher on Dec 21, 2011 at 11:52:04 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 2:24:55 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 22, 2011 at 7:09:22 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 3:46:23 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Paul Dickin on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:16:45 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:32:42 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:59:33 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 21, 2011 at 5:07:51 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 21, 2011 at 5:10:35 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 5:44:06 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:01:57 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:03:16 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:07:09 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:09:45 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:46:35 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:56:11 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 7:25:24 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 7:48:09 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 7:57:50 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 8:01:00 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 8:13:15 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 8:37:24 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 21, 2011 at 8:51:53 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 9:39:34 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 21, 2011 at 9:55:35 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:12:54 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:21:52 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:45:11 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:57:04 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 11:14:58 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 11:39:09 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 12:35:29 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 22, 2011 at 5:44:55 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 5:51:51 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 22, 2011 at 6:41:21 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 22, 2011 at 3:04:28 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 7:34:20 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 22, 2011 at 8:04:17 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 21, 2011 at 9:22:55 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 9:55:02 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 12:56:51 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 22, 2011 at 1:10:58 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 1:20:45 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 22, 2011 at 1:28:18 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 22, 2011 at 1:40:37 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 22, 2011 at 2:00:13 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 2:07:29 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 9:50:51 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:19:22 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:37:43 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 11:09:45 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 11:19:44 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 21, 2011 at 9:51:28 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:10:20 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:36:38 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:57:26 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 21, 2011 at 11:35:11 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 12:29:30 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 22, 2011 at 12:43:24 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 22, 2011 at 7:48:20 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 21, 2011 at 8:42:24 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Mont Sherar on Jan 2, 2012 at 10:50:04 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Jan 2, 2012 at 11:40:59 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Jan 2, 2012 at 11:44:14 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:04:30 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Christian Schumacher on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:34:37 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 20, 2011 at 7:40:40 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Brian Mulligan on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:25:57 am
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by John Joyce on Dec 19, 2011 at 7:19:34 am
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 19, 2011 at 2:15:16 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Frank Gothmann on Dec 19, 2011 at 2:53:43 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:08:16 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:52:48 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 19, 2011 at 6:18:46 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 9:29:23 am
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Andreas Kiel on Dec 19, 2011 at 12:53:06 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:40:16 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:17:43 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:53:22 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:19:53 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:34:37 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:41:39 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 19, 2011 at 7:52:18 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:06:24 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:34:21 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:02:52 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:13:29 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:15:38 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21:36 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 6:01:43 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 20, 2011 at 12:09:31 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 20, 2011 at 12:12:23 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 20, 2011 at 12:29:14 am
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:04:05 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Andreas Kiel on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:30:14 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 1:34:22 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Mark Dobson on Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16:22 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Christian Schumacher on Dec 19, 2011 at 3:46:40 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:06:27 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:31:57 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:40:37 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:54:55 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Mitch Ives on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:40:29 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:34:34 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 19, 2011 at 3:15:52 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 3:56:44 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:01:27 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:24:56 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:37:20 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Cherniack on Dec 20, 2011 at 12:05:03 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 20, 2011 at 12:21:16 am
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:14:03 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:27:02 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Oliver Peters on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:17:45 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shawn Miller on Dec 19, 2011 at 4:46:04 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:03:46 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shawn Miller on Dec 19, 2011 at 9:33:55 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:09:55 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shawn Miller on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:19:42 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Marvin Holdman on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:07:03 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:12:32 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:10:28 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:27:56 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Lawrence on Dec 19, 2011 at 7:30:07 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 19, 2011 at 7:34:03 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 7:51:37 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 19, 2011 at 7:53:46 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 19, 2011 at 8:16:38 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 19, 2011 at 8:31:30 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 19, 2011 at 8:49:27 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 19, 2011 at 5:54:04 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Philip Hodgetts on Dec 19, 2011 at 9:53:29 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:06:02 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:13:21 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Philip Hodgetts on Dec 20, 2011 at 6:13:04 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 20, 2011 at 6:22:51 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16:27 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:39:41 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:29:11 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:43:10 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Chris Harlan on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:55:22 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 20, 2011 at 1:15:16 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 19, 2011 at 11:55:29 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 20, 2011 at 12:48:49 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 20, 2011 at 1:01:03 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 20, 2011 at 1:25:40 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 20, 2011 at 3:04:56 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 20, 2011 at 1:44:53 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Shane Ross on Dec 20, 2011 at 1:11:17 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 20, 2011 at 1:24:25 am
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Philip Hodgetts on Dec 20, 2011 at 6:22:43 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Walter Soyka on Dec 20, 2011 at 9:33:07 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. - Or Not. by Franz Bieberkopf on Dec 19, 2011 at 9:31:15 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Benjamin Mullins on Dec 20, 2011 at 4:02:50 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by James Daugherty on Dec 20, 2011 at 7:17:29 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 20, 2011 at 7:26:41 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 20, 2011 at 7:39:27 pm
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 20, 2011 at 8:13:28 pm
- Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by kim krause on Dec 21, 2011 at 9:58:23 am
  - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Bill Davis on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:58:46 pm
    - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Joseph Owens on Dec 30, 2011 at 6:07:56 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 30, 2011 at 8:04:32 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 30, 2011 at 8:12:06 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 30, 2011 at 8:50:35 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Steve Connor on Dec 30, 2011 at 8:54:15 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 30, 2011 at 9:35:10 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Herb Sevush on Dec 30, 2011 at 9:57:41 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 30, 2011 at 10:08:11 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Joseph Owens on Dec 30, 2011 at 10:04:37 pm
        Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by David Roth Weiss on Dec 30, 2011 at 10:11:16 pm
      - Re: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read. by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 31, 2011 at 1:41:49 am

Migrating to Resolve. Dealing with duplicated filenames? by Rodrigo Silvestri on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:09:23 am
- Re: Migrating to Resolve. Dealing with duplicated filenames? by Jaime OBradovich on Nov 18, 2011 at 4:45:45 am
  - Re: Migrating to Resolve. Dealing with duplicated filenames? by Rodrigo Silvestri on Nov 23, 2011 at 3:51:50 am

SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Richard Dee on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:15:58 pm
- Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Rodrigo Silvestri on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:43:31 pm
  - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Paul Provost on Nov 16, 2011 at 11:54:07 pm
- Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Mel Matsuoka on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:19:53 am
  - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Margus Voll on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:49:28 am
    - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Gabriele Turchi on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:13:32 am
- Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Peter Berg on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:09:19 am
  - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Patrick Morgan on Nov 17, 2011 at 11:37:54 am
    - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by dermot shane on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:37:37 pm
  - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Gabriele Turchi on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:23:05 pm
- Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Clayton Burkhart on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:31:23 am
  - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Rick Turners on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:16:22 pm
    - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by illya laney on Nov 18, 2011 at 6:54:30 am
  - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Robert Houllahan on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:23:18 pm
    - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Fabio Cormack on Nov 18, 2011 at 2:49:20 am
      - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Margus Voll on Nov 18, 2011 at 4:45:37 am
    - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Clayton Burkhart on Nov 18, 2011 at 5:51:45 am
      - Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Richard Cardonna on Nov 18, 2011 at 5:07:10 pm
        Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Clayton Burkhart on Nov 18, 2011 at 5:33:19 pm
        Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Michael Gissing on Nov 22, 2011 at 4:37:55 am
        Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Peter Berg on Nov 22, 2011 at 7:17:59 am
        Re: SInce Davinci now costs nothing, is it worth anything? by Sascha Haber on Nov 22, 2011 at 8:36:09 am
        Free Davinci for wintel by Richard Cardonna on Nov 22, 2011 at 10:34:29 am
        Re: Free Davinci for wintel by Ola Haldor Voll on Nov 22, 2011 at 2:35:20 pm
        Re: Free Davinci for wintel by kim krause on Nov 27, 2011 at 11:49:12 am
        Re: Free Davinci for wintel by Margus Voll on Nov 27, 2011 at 1:01:22 pm
        Re: Free Davinci for wintel by Patrick Morgan on Nov 27, 2011 at 5:27:51 pm
        Re: Free Davinci for wintel by kim krause on Nov 27, 2011 at 6:35:08 pm
        Re: Free Davinci for wintel by Sascha Haber on Nov 28, 2011 at 1:05:54 pm

Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Rasmus Jürs on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:06:48 pm
- Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Clark Bierbaum on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:36:50 pm
  - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Rasmus Jürs on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:51:33 pm
    - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Clark Bierbaum on Nov 11, 2011 at 7:54:38 pm
- Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Ola Haldor Voll on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:38:09 pm
  - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Rasmus Jürs on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:58:39 pm
    - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Ola Haldor Voll on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:05:02 pm
  - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Rasmus Jürs on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:59:13 pm
    - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Margus Voll on Nov 11, 2011 at 8:44:50 pm
      - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Robert Houllahan on Nov 11, 2011 at 8:57:57 pm
        Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Rick Turners on Nov 11, 2011 at 9:56:37 pm
  - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Jason Jones on Nov 11, 2011 at 9:15:41 pm
    - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Ola Haldor Voll on Nov 11, 2011 at 10:25:29 pm
      - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by alan partesons on Nov 11, 2011 at 11:55:53 pm
- Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Perry Trest on Nov 12, 2011 at 4:08:15 am
  - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Margus Voll on Nov 12, 2011 at 8:40:10 am
    - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Clayton Burkhart on Nov 12, 2011 at 10:44:01 am
      - Re: Overrated, overcomplicated and non removable. by Ola Haldor Voll on Nov 12, 2011 at 11:11:18 am

Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by David Lawrence on Oct 28, 2011 at 11:23:30 pm
- Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Andrew Richards on Oct 28, 2011 at 11:43:34 pm
  - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 28, 2011 at 11:52:37 pm
    - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Craig Seeman on Oct 29, 2011 at 4:04:53 pm
      - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Franz Bieberkopf on Oct 29, 2011 at 5:39:54 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Craig Seeman on Oct 29, 2011 at 6:34:34 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Franz Bieberkopf on Oct 29, 2011 at 6:54:31 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Craig Seeman on Oct 29, 2011 at 7:01:09 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Lemur Hayop on Oct 29, 2011 at 8:17:42 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Oliver Peters on Oct 29, 2011 at 8:30:53 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Lemur Hayop on Oct 30, 2011 at 12:26:13 am
      - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Michael Gissing on Oct 30, 2011 at 5:16:35 am
- Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Shawn Miller on Oct 29, 2011 at 12:06:38 am
  - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Neil Goodman on Oct 29, 2011 at 12:14:24 am
    - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Kevin Monahan on Oct 29, 2011 at 12:25:52 am
      - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Lemur Hayop on Oct 29, 2011 at 3:32:24 am
      - Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Rafael Amador on Oct 29, 2011 at 3:46:59 am
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Steve Connor on Oct 29, 2011 at 9:07:52 am
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Mark Dobson on Oct 29, 2011 at 9:40:18 am
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Andy Field on Oct 29, 2011 at 10:37:24 am
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Oliver Peters on Oct 29, 2011 at 12:46:56 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Andy Field on Oct 29, 2011 at 4:05:11 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Pedro de la Fuente on Oct 31, 2011 at 1:33:00 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 31, 2011 at 5:50:32 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! But also a bit bust for FCPX ... by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 31, 2011 at 6:12:52 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Pedro de la Fuente on Oct 31, 2011 at 6:33:10 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:38:37 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:41:14 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Pedro de la Fuente on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:46:43 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:51:24 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Pedro de la Fuente on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:55:57 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:57:37 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:59:31 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 31, 2011 at 8:00:58 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Pedro de la Fuente on Oct 31, 2011 at 8:08:15 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 31, 2011 at 8:11:33 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! But has issues .... by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 31, 2011 at 8:23:05 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! But has issues .... by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 31, 2011 at 8:41:51 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! But has issues .... by Pedro de la Fuente on Oct 31, 2011 at 8:49:16 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck is FREEEEE!!! But has issues .... by David Lawrence on Nov 1, 2011 at 3:51:17 am

MC 6 announcement? by Paul Provost on Oct 27, 2011 at 10:12:42 pm
- Re: MC 6 announcement? by Khoren Mirzakhanian on Oct 28, 2011 at 12:26:35 am
  - Re: MC 6 announcement? by Mike Jeffs on Oct 28, 2011 at 2:00:32 pm
    - Re: MC 6 announcement? by Paul Provost on Oct 28, 2011 at 2:22:26 pm
      - Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by John Kaley on Oct 28, 2011 at 5:17:33 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Paul Provost on Oct 28, 2011 at 5:20:16 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Daniel Frome on Oct 29, 2011 at 12:10:48 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Richard Cardonna on Oct 30, 2011 at 3:16:08 am
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Paul Provost on Oct 30, 2011 at 5:30:01 am
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Job ter Burg on Oct 30, 2011 at 10:46:44 am
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Paul Provost on Oct 30, 2011 at 4:05:14 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Richard Cardonna on Oct 30, 2011 at 4:38:53 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by John Pale on Oct 30, 2011 at 5:54:48 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Richard Cardonna on Oct 31, 2011 at 2:05:57 am
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Chris Harlan on Oct 31, 2011 at 5:47:29 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Job ter Burg on Oct 31, 2011 at 11:53:52 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Oliver Peters on Nov 1, 2011 at 2:40:25 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Hampus Lager on Nov 1, 2011 at 4:34:56 pm
        Re: MC 6 announcement? (Lord save Avid) by Gaz Evans on Nov 2, 2011 at 11:42:01 am

FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Chris Borjis on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:12:10 pm
- Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:19:43 pm
- Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Leo Baker on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:22:19 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Leo Baker on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:23:44 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:55:29 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Kevin Monahan on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:59:14 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Leo Baker on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:46:27 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Shane Ross on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:48:04 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Kevin Monahan on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:09:28 pm
- Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Angelo Lorenzo on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:05:18 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Ron Pestes on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:14:54 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Thomas Pohl on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:33:22 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Chris Borjis on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:50:32 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Chris Tompkins on Oct 24, 2011 at 10:34:48 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 24, 2011 at 10:39:49 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Michael Hancock on Oct 24, 2011 at 11:41:53 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 24, 2011 at 11:54:01 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 24, 2011 at 11:58:21 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 12:13:29 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 6:39:37 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 28, 2011 at 7:01:43 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 7:31:27 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 28, 2011 at 8:37:27 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 9:18:30 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:13:09 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by gus evangelista on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:18:24 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:38:35 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 25, 2011 at 12:19:11 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:01:28 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:17:54 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 6:21:41 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 7:08:44 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 28, 2011 at 10:03:29 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Nov 3, 2011 at 4:48:07 pm

ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:13:47 am
- Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:47:53 am
  - Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:52:16 am
    - Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 19, 2011 at 1:19:17 am
      - Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 4:40:53 pm
        Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:06:06 pm
        Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 20, 2011 at 1:24:59 am

Colour Grading by Scott Gaskin on Oct 18, 2011 at 11:18:33 am
- Re: Colour Grading by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on Oct 18, 2011 at 12:48:56 pm
  - Re: Colour Grading by Scott Gaskin on Oct 18, 2011 at 7:52:02 pm
- Re: Colour Grading by Walter Soyka on Oct 18, 2011 at 3:48:09 pm
  - Re: Colour Grading by Scott Gaskin on Oct 18, 2011 at 7:53:33 pm
    - Re: Colour Grading by Walter Soyka on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:36:28 pm
      - Re: Colour Grading by Scott Gaskin on Oct 20, 2011 at 8:13:58 pm

Image Sequence Manager ? by Kubo Yoshiharu on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:56:58 am
- Re: Image Sequence Manager ? by Kubo Yoshiharu on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:06:47 am

Dear FCPX team, by Luke Hale on Oct 13, 2011 at 4:22:19 pm
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Paul Jay on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:40:15 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Morten Ranmar on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:47:23 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:47:27 pm
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Hall on Oct 13, 2011 at 6:55:36 pm
      - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:04:28 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:27:39 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:37:13 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:58:54 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:01:41 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Glen Hurd on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:44:19 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Mitch Ives on Oct 13, 2011 at 10:36:01 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Benjamin Mullins on Oct 14, 2011 at 3:15:49 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 6:11:39 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Davis on Oct 16, 2011 at 9:44:51 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 2:32:02 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by TImothy Auld on Oct 16, 2011 at 9:55:15 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 2:45:14 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:30:27 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:37:52 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Walter Soyka on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:43:10 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:47:18 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 11:12:23 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 2:09:03 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Walter Soyka on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:02:35 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:10:45 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 11:07:55 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Geert van den Berg on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:29:42 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:37:53 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Gerald Baria on Oct 14, 2011 at 12:17:58 am
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jim Glickert on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:06:18 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Greg Burke on Oct 14, 2011 at 3:05:40 am
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Hall on Oct 14, 2011 at 12:39:41 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Chris Harlan on Oct 17, 2011 at 6:14:28 am
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Mark Palmos on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:40:34 am
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Luke Hale on Oct 17, 2011 at 7:42:37 pm
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:15:55 pm

Service: Evercom Studios by sebastien rossi on Oct 11, 2011 at 9:51:18 am

Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by tom Barton-Humphreys on Oct 6, 2011 at 9:02:16 am
- Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Steve Connor on Oct 6, 2011 at 11:18:38 am
- Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Robin lewis on Oct 6, 2011 at 1:49:03 pm
  - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Robin lewis on Oct 6, 2011 at 1:51:55 pm
  - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by tom Barton-Humphreys on Oct 6, 2011 at 2:16:33 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by David Roth Weiss on Oct 6, 2011 at 3:31:41 pm
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:05:50 pm
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Neil Patience on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:13:48 pm
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by tom Barton-Humphreys on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:47:47 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by David Roth Weiss on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:56:27 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Neil Patience on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:13:08 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Steve Connor on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:21:51 pm
- Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:04:46 pm
  - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by tom Barton-Humphreys on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:50:19 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Steve Connor on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:59:07 pm
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Neil Patience on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:19:31 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by David Roth Weiss on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:20:42 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 7, 2011 at 5:50:43 pm
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Neil on Oct 7, 2011 at 6:20:10 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 7, 2011 at 6:37:15 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Neil on Oct 7, 2011 at 6:59:38 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 7, 2011 at 7:23:17 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Neil on Oct 7, 2011 at 7:45:56 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 7, 2011 at 7:54:04 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Neil on Oct 7, 2011 at 8:20:31 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 8, 2011 at 1:03:18 am
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Yoong on Oct 8, 2011 at 12:24:59 am
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 8, 2011 at 4:12:04 am
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 8, 2011 at 8:05:35 am
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 8, 2011 at 2:16:28 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jamie Franklin on Oct 8, 2011 at 4:50:14 pm
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 6:28:23 pm
  - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Neil on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:14:10 pm
- Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Chris Harlan on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:10:23 pm
- Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Mike Goood on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:51:02 pm
  - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Neil Goodman on Oct 6, 2011 at 7:18:40 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Neil Goodman on Oct 6, 2011 at 7:23:46 pm
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Shane Ross on Oct 6, 2011 at 11:37:00 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Grant Gomm on Oct 7, 2011 at 12:33:14 am
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Neil on Oct 7, 2011 at 12:50:30 am
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Grant Gomm on Oct 7, 2011 at 1:23:42 am
        Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Andy Neil on Oct 7, 2011 at 1:39:22 am
- Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Owen Wexler on Oct 6, 2011 at 10:02:33 pm
- Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Daniel Frome on Oct 7, 2011 at 3:28:44 pm
  - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by tom Barton-Humphreys on Oct 7, 2011 at 3:46:51 pm
  - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by David Cherniack on Oct 7, 2011 at 10:52:03 pm
    - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by Daniel Frome on Oct 8, 2011 at 3:01:36 am
      - Re: Edit Assistant, I was learning FCP7... by David Cherniack on Oct 8, 2011 at 3:15:49 am

Anyone like the color board? by andy lewis on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:00:18 pm
- Re: Anyone like the color board? by Brian Mulligan on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:21:51 pm
- Re: Anyone like the color board? by Craig Seeman on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:25:50 pm
  - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Walter Soyka on Sep 28, 2011 at 4:39:50 pm
    - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Chris Harlan on Sep 28, 2011 at 6:24:22 pm
    - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Bill Davis on Sep 28, 2011 at 8:37:46 pm
      - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Chris Harlan on Sep 28, 2011 at 8:50:44 pm
      - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Walter Soyka on Sep 28, 2011 at 8:54:54 pm
  - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Marvin Holdman on Sep 28, 2011 at 4:40:51 pm
  - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Michael Sacci on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:04:25 pm
- Re: Anyone like the color board? by Alan Okey on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:29:11 pm
  - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Craig Seeman on Sep 28, 2011 at 4:38:42 pm
- Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 28, 2011 at 6:00:00 pm
  - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Morten Ranmar on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:04:54 pm
  - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Andy Neil on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:09:32 pm
    - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:22:05 pm
      - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Bill Davis on Sep 28, 2011 at 8:50:34 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jim Giberti on Sep 28, 2011 at 10:18:55 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by andy lewis on Sep 28, 2011 at 11:31:23 pm
      - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 29, 2011 at 12:13:18 am
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 29, 2011 at 1:11:20 am
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 29, 2011 at 1:47:24 am
  - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Ben Scott on Sep 29, 2011 at 11:11:52 am
    - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Gerald Baria on Sep 29, 2011 at 11:37:26 pm
      - Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:51:19 am
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Neil Patience on Sep 30, 2011 at 12:40:21 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 12:52:53 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 30, 2011 at 4:25:16 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 30, 2011 at 4:24:02 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 6:18:15 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 30, 2011 at 6:54:42 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:27:58 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Andy Neil on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:37:45 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:45:21 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:37:39 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:44:41 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:47:53 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:52:24 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:57:41 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 30, 2011 at 8:02:29 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14:27 pm
        Re: Anyone like the color board? by Michael Gissing on Sep 30, 2011 at 10:40:39 pm

Blog: Wes Plate joining Adobe a very big move. by walter biscardi on Sep 28, 2011 at 2:33:20 am
- Re: Wes Plate joining Adobe a very big move. by walter biscardi on Sep 30, 2011 at 11:17:07 am
- Re: Wes Plate joining Adobe a very big move. by Joshua Ortiz on Sep 30, 2011 at 8:00:47 pm

Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Lemur Hayop on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:55:43 pm
- Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by David Lawrence on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:25:31 pm
  - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Hancock on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:32:04 pm
  - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Eric Michael Cap on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:32:42 pm
    - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Dennis Radeke on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:57:34 pm
      - Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Davee Schulte on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:35:57 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Dennis Radeke on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:54:59 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Richard Cardonna on Sep 27, 2011 at 2:30:05 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Joseph W. Bourke on Sep 27, 2011 at 2:34:54 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:32:17 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:02:54 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:04:53 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Steve Connor on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:28:40 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:51:09 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Rob Ainscough on Nov 8, 2011 at 5:45:11 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:57:55 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:06:55 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:54:43 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Sacci on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:15:33 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by David Roth Weiss on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:29:17 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Gissing on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:52:49 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Erik Mickelson on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:54:41 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by David Roth Weiss on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:06:35 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Richard Cardonna on Oct 7, 2011 at 2:17:18 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 7, 2011 at 3:09:02 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Sacci on Sep 28, 2011 at 6:55:23 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Craig Seeman on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:14:29 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Rooney on Oct 5, 2011 at 5:39:49 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:39:33 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Gissing on Sep 28, 2011 at 6:54:40 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:47:41 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Marvin Holdman on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:23:15 pm
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Lemur Hayop on Oct 1, 2011 at 5:02:04 am
        Re: Automatic Duck going to Adobe by Michael Gissing on Oct 1, 2011 at 11:48:40 pm

Blog: Automatic Duck's Wes Plate joins Adobe Systems. by gary adcock on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:42:52 pm
- Re: Blog: Automatic Duck's Wes Plate joins Adobe Systems. by walter biscardi on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:34:44 pm
  - Re: Blog: Automatic Duck's Wes Plate joins Adobe Systems. by Kevin Monahan on Sep 26, 2011 at 9:45:31 pm
    - Re: Blog: Automatic Duck's Wes Plate joins Adobe Systems. by Greg Andonian on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:07:43 am
- @Greg Andonian by gary adcock on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:01:04 pm
  - Re: @Greg Andonian by Alex Udell on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:45:27 pm
    - Re: @Greg Andonian by Richard Cardonna on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:50:37 pm

macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by kim krause on Sep 25, 2011 at 8:04:02 am
- Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 25, 2011 at 9:37:34 am
- Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Andreas Kiel on Sep 25, 2011 at 10:57:10 am
  - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 25, 2011 at 2:03:40 pm
    - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 25, 2011 at 7:36:15 pm
      - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Andrew Richards on Sep 26, 2011 at 5:42:17 pm
      - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Andy Neil on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:15:36 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:19:06 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 26, 2011 at 10:31:11 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 1:44:12 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 27, 2011 at 4:27:32 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:16:35 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 26, 2011 at 9:16:29 pm
  - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Kenny on Sep 25, 2011 at 2:08:48 pm
    - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gerald Baria on Sep 26, 2011 at 12:19:20 am
- Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 25, 2011 at 2:19:47 pm
  - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 25, 2011 at 6:00:57 pm
    - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 25, 2011 at 7:18:51 pm
  - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 25, 2011 at 6:40:06 pm
    - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Bill Davis on Sep 25, 2011 at 8:18:55 pm
      - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 25, 2011 at 10:00:33 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 25, 2011 at 11:49:22 pm
      - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 25, 2011 at 11:37:47 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Tim Wilson on Sep 26, 2011 at 1:35:15 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 2:48:51 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 26, 2011 at 3:27:02 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Tim Wilson on Sep 26, 2011 at 4:04:11 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by kim krause on Sep 26, 2011 at 9:06:46 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12:26 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 26, 2011 at 2:32:11 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 2:43:29 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 26, 2011 at 3:16:23 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:21:34 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:33:19 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gerald Baria on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:25:56 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:31:22 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:49:27 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 9:17:04 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Steve Connor on Sep 26, 2011 at 9:55:34 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 10:10:35 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gerald Baria on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:52:47 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by kim krause on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:00 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:39:43 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by kim krause on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:06:44 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:23:22 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by kim krause on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:41:39 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:57:05 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 29, 2011 at 12:18:16 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gerald Baria on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:12:19 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 27, 2011 at 1:31:27 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gerald Baria on Sep 28, 2011 at 6:41:47 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 26, 2011 at 9:56:56 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 10:23:26 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 12:48:33 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:48:58 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 26, 2011 at 10:09:00 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 10:11:28 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 26, 2011 at 10:17:40 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 27, 2011 at 1:46:58 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 3:55:27 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by David Lawrence on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:11:05 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:44:29 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 3:32:26 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:12:08 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:49:26 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:15:03 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:30:31 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:53:51 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:10:02 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:58:40 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:03:37 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:25:35 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:34:14 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:44:29 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:52:00 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:59:11 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:03:41 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:17:14 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:16:54 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:19:18 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:30:25 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:28:01 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:34:07 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47:06 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:30:00 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:55:27 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:57:07 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:58:39 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:03:45 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:50:42 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:47:49 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:55:20 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:02:16 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:13:57 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:39:58 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 28, 2011 at 12:03:32 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:15:31 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 28, 2011 at 2:22:25 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 2:37:39 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:28:46 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 2:31:52 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 4:41:33 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:32:21 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:36:51 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:40:15 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:37:22 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:13:05 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:32:31 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by David Lawrence on Sep 28, 2011 at 4:44:35 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:43:11 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by David Lawrence on Sep 29, 2011 at 5:52:13 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 29, 2011 at 5:58:47 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 29, 2011 at 4:48:23 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 29, 2011 at 5:41:25 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 6:09:15 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 29, 2011 at 6:28:45 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 6:52:07 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 29, 2011 at 6:55:18 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:01:36 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by David Lawrence on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:24:36 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:33:12 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:43:14 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47:42 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:53:21 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Christian Schumacher on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:19:43 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 29, 2011 at 9:08:39 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:30:38 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 29, 2011 at 9:08:50 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 29, 2011 at 9:58:27 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 29, 2011 at 11:11:47 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 29, 2011 at 11:19:42 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Herb Sevush on Sep 30, 2011 at 2:40:05 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:48:46 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:04:12 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:16:58 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:20:00 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:48:30 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by David Lawrence on Sep 29, 2011 at 9:04:18 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by TImothy Auld on Sep 30, 2011 at 12:15:34 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by David Lawrence on Sep 29, 2011 at 6:59:14 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:13:06 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:24:16 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:47:37 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 2:09:30 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by David Lawrence on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:39:56 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:59:36 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 27, 2011 at 2:18:49 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 4:41:42 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 4:44:37 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:01:11 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:31:14 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:56:21 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:41:11 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Tim Wilson on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:55:37 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:59:21 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:02:04 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Tim Wilson on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:32:20 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Bill Davis on Sep 28, 2011 at 12:21:33 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Tim Wilson on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:18:53 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Andy Neil on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:42:25 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 27, 2011 at 1:21:48 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 4:33:42 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 27, 2011 at 4:44:32 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 27, 2011 at 4:57:41 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 4:58:17 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:51:29 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:34:14 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 27, 2011 at 7:00:14 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:22:55 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:38:43 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Bernard Newnham on Sep 26, 2011 at 2:54:48 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Craig Seeman on Sep 26, 2011 at 3:20:12 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Steve Connor on Sep 26, 2011 at 4:00:11 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:07:17 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Clint Wardlow on Sep 26, 2011 at 4:02:17 pm
- Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Lemur Hayop on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:50:24 pm
- Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:26:22 pm
  - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by James Mortner on Sep 27, 2011 at 12:00:13 pm
    - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by kim krause on Sep 27, 2011 at 5:25:25 pm
      - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Clint Wardlow on Sep 27, 2011 at 6:58:59 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gerald Baria on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:10:33 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Walter Soyka on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:34:01 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:15:03 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47:09 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Rafael Amador on Sep 28, 2011 at 11:10:37 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Clint Wardlow on Sep 28, 2011 at 3:47:47 pm
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Bill Davis on Sep 28, 2011 at 10:49:22 pm
- Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 7:35:20 pm
  - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 28, 2011 at 11:30:38 pm
    - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 28, 2011 at 11:57:13 pm
    - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Michael Hancock on Sep 29, 2011 at 12:52:56 am
      - Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Chris Harlan on Sep 29, 2011 at 1:28:08 am
        Re: macbook air and fcpx- the new portable edit suite by Michael Hancock on Sep 29, 2011 at 2:35:00 am

The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Greg Burke on Sep 24, 2011 at 10:12:44 pm
- Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Andy Neil on Sep 24, 2011 at 10:44:04 pm
- Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Bill Davis on Sep 24, 2011 at 10:56:47 pm
  - Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Don Scioli on Sep 25, 2011 at 12:00:57 am
  - Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Marvin Holdman on Sep 25, 2011 at 2:48:33 am
  - Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Mitch Ives on Sep 26, 2011 at 2:01:02 pm
- Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Marvin Holdman on Sep 25, 2011 at 2:42:15 am
  - Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Gerald Baria on Sep 25, 2011 at 5:40:38 am
    - Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Tim Wilson on Sep 25, 2011 at 5:58:46 am
      - Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by kim krause on Sep 25, 2011 at 7:43:39 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 25, 2011 at 11:46:01 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Bernard Newnham on Sep 25, 2011 at 1:09:56 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Craig Seeman on Sep 25, 2011 at 1:39:58 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Bill Davis on Sep 25, 2011 at 7:36:13 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Tim Wilson on Sep 25, 2011 at 8:58:41 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Craig Seeman on Sep 25, 2011 at 1:48:46 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Tim Wilson on Sep 25, 2011 at 2:17:43 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Craig Seeman on Sep 25, 2011 at 2:39:47 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 25, 2011 at 7:50:28 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Craig Seeman on Sep 25, 2011 at 10:29:40 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 25, 2011 at 11:00:13 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Craig Seeman on Sep 26, 2011 at 12:44:44 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 26, 2011 at 12:58:26 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Craig Seeman on Sep 26, 2011 at 3:09:12 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by John Joyce on Sep 26, 2011 at 4:12:38 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Greg Andonian on Sep 26, 2011 at 5:07:09 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by kim krause on Sep 26, 2011 at 9:05:39 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Marvin Holdman on Sep 26, 2011 at 5:50:37 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Gary Huff on Sep 27, 2011 at 2:53:31 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Bill Davis on Sep 27, 2011 at 8:39:46 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Marvin Holdman on Sep 27, 2011 at 9:11:44 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Tim Wilson on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:36:05 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Bill Davis on Sep 29, 2011 at 12:53:23 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Tim Wilson on Sep 29, 2011 at 7:26:07 am
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Jim Woo on Sep 29, 2011 at 3:14:04 pm
      - Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Marvin Holdman on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:58:23 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by TImothy Auld on Sep 28, 2011 at 2:32:46 pm
        Re: The first signs of the death of final cut pro 7.... :( by Marvin Holdman on Sep 28, 2011 at 2:55:21 pm

answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Marco Badalassi on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:55:21 pm
- Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Marco Badalassi on Sep 23, 2011 at 2:06:00 pm
  - Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Craig Seeman on Sep 23, 2011 at 2:48:47 pm
    - Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by TImothy Auld on Sep 23, 2011 at 3:21:13 pm
- Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by David Cherniack on Sep 23, 2011 at 4:29:57 pm
  - Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Craig Seeman on Sep 23, 2011 at 4:50:56 pm
    - Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Marvin Holdman on Sep 23, 2011 at 5:05:54 pm
      - Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Tim Wilson on Sep 23, 2011 at 5:41:23 pm
    - Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Dennis Radeke on Sep 24, 2011 at 10:23:37 am
- Re: answer to post below: Switching to PC... by Chris Walsh on Sep 24, 2011 at 8:03:22 pm

Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by walter biscardi on Sep 21, 2011 at 11:54:54 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Tom Daigon on Sep 22, 2011 at 12:17:46 am
- Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 22, 2011 at 1:01:20 am
  - Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by walter biscardi on Sep 22, 2011 at 9:03:03 pm
    - Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 22, 2011 at 11:05:06 pm
      - @Aindreas Gallagher by walter biscardi on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:24:29 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Dan Stewart on Sep 22, 2011 at 1:06:26 pm
- @Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Herb Sevush on Sep 22, 2011 at 1:42:46 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Marvin Holdman on Sep 22, 2011 at 3:11:37 pm
- Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Chris Walsh on Sep 22, 2011 at 4:47:27 pm
  - Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Richard Cardonna on Sep 22, 2011 at 7:27:33 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by emy fehmi on Sep 22, 2011 at 5:59:22 pm
  - @emy fehmi by Herb Sevush on Sep 22, 2011 at 6:22:52 pm
  - @emy fehmi by Herb Sevush on Sep 22, 2011 at 6:24:22 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by John Ward on Sep 22, 2011 at 7:32:12 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Marcus Moore on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:02:04 am
  - @Marcus Moore by Herb Sevush on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:54:19 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by TImothy Auld on Sep 23, 2011 at 12:10:25 pm
  - @TImothy Auld by Chris Harlan on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:57:22 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Brittany DeLillo on Sep 23, 2011 at 3:16:58 pm
- @Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Tim Wilson on Sep 23, 2011 at 5:54:06 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by kim krause on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:36:37 pm
  - @kim krause by Herb Sevush on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:54:08 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by kim krause on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:41:51 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by kim krause on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:53:02 pm
  - @kim krause by Herb Sevush on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:18:06 pm
    - @Herb Sevush by walter biscardi on Sep 24, 2011 at 12:17:02 pm
  - @kim krause by walter biscardi on Sep 23, 2011 at 9:24:39 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Patrick Sheffield on Sep 24, 2011 at 7:23:03 am
- @Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Patrick Sheffield on Sep 24, 2011 at 7:46:08 am
  - @Patrick Sheffield by walter biscardi on Sep 24, 2011 at 12:11:41 pm
- @Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Patrick Sheffield on Sep 24, 2011 at 8:17:59 am
  - @Patrick Sheffield by walter biscardi on Sep 24, 2011 at 12:01:00 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Justin Nathanson on Sep 25, 2011 at 1:22:07 am
- @Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Gerald Baria on Sep 25, 2011 at 5:57:17 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Patricio Veloso on Sep 25, 2011 at 7:17:39 am
  - @Patricio Veloso by walter biscardi on Sep 25, 2011 at 11:50:58 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Jacob Kerns on Sep 26, 2011 at 12:56:47 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Jacob Kerns on Sep 26, 2011 at 12:58:27 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Jacob Kerns on Sep 26, 2011 at 1:04:21 am
- Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by David Lawrence on Sep 26, 2011 at 7:56:10 pm
  - Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by walter biscardi on Sep 26, 2011 at 8:45:01 pm
    - Re: Article: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by David Lawrence on Sep 26, 2011 at 10:22:51 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Joseph Mastantuono on Sep 27, 2011 at 10:13:18 pm
  - @Joseph Mastantuono by Patrick Sheffield on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:26:50 pm
  - @Joseph Mastantuono by walter biscardi on Sep 28, 2011 at 1:17:03 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Winston A. Cely on Sep 29, 2011 at 9:25:20 pm
  - @Winston A. Cely by walter biscardi on Sep 30, 2011 at 10:32:47 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Rob Manning on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:24:48 am
- @Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Rob Manning on Sep 30, 2011 at 7:52:08 am
  - @Rob Manning by walter biscardi on Sep 30, 2011 at 10:35:34 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Eric Kuehnapfel on Sep 30, 2011 at 5:14:21 pm
  - @Eric Kuehnapfel by walter biscardi on Sep 30, 2011 at 5:52:29 pm
- @Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Rob Manning on Oct 1, 2011 at 8:54:21 am
  - @Rob Manning by walter biscardi on Oct 1, 2011 at 11:53:46 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Matt Short on Oct 1, 2011 at 1:47:11 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Jimm Fox on Oct 1, 2011 at 4:24:10 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Emiliano Tidona on Oct 1, 2011 at 5:10:49 pm
  - @Emiliano Tidona by walter biscardi on Oct 1, 2011 at 7:56:45 pm
    - @walter biscardi by Emiliano Tidona on Oct 2, 2011 at 12:17:17 am
      - @Emiliano Tidona by walter biscardi on Oct 2, 2011 at 1:04:23 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by ron sussman on Oct 2, 2011 at 2:48:33 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Jackie Virgo on Oct 3, 2011 at 11:39:42 pm
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by Scott Shucher on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:20:49 am
- Re: Post Production: Did Everything Change in Post? by David Peralta on Oct 20, 2011 at 8:03:00 pm
  - @David Peralta by walter biscardi on Oct 20, 2011 at 8:54:12 pm

Article: IBC: Adobe Acquires Iridas, To Be 'The Photoshop of Video' by Debra Kaufman on Sep 16, 2011 at 1:21:27 am
- Re: IBC: Adobe Acquires Iridas, To Be 'The Photoshop of Video' by Maribeth Ratajczyk on Sep 21, 2011 at 1:18:47 pm
- Re: IBC: Adobe Acquires Iridas, To Be 'The Photoshop of Video' by Bruce N. Goren on Sep 22, 2011 at 3:31:23 am
  - Re: IBC: Adobe Acquires Iridas, To Be 'The Photoshop of Video' by Joseph W. Bourke on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:43:29 pm
    - Re: IBC: Adobe Acquires Iridas, To Be 'The Photoshop of Video' by Richard Cardonna on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:16:29 pm

News: IBC: Adobe Acquires Iridas, To Be 'The Photoshop of Video' by Cow News Droid on Sep 15, 2011 at 6:21:27 pm

Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Gustavo Bermudas on Sep 10, 2011 at 6:20:23 am
- Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Kevin Cannon on Sep 10, 2011 at 4:16:26 pm
- Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Dave Williams on Sep 10, 2011 at 4:22:27 pm
  - Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by jake blackstone on Sep 10, 2011 at 5:03:39 pm
    - Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Vladimir Kucherov on Sep 10, 2011 at 5:21:54 pm
    - Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robbie Carman on Sep 10, 2011 at 5:35:33 pm
  - Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Dave Pickett on Sep 10, 2011 at 8:10:58 pm
- Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Gustavo Bermudas on Sep 10, 2011 at 9:11:32 pm
  - Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Sascha Haber on Sep 10, 2011 at 9:32:27 pm
    - Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by prathvish hegde on Sep 11, 2011 at 11:19:09 am
      - Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Dave Williams on Sep 11, 2011 at 1:38:18 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Joseph Owens on Sep 11, 2011 at 4:27:18 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Peter Chamberlain on Sep 11, 2011 at 5:25:58 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robin Erard on Sep 11, 2011 at 6:25:41 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robert Houllahan on Sep 11, 2011 at 6:47:33 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Gustavo Bermudas on Sep 11, 2011 at 8:13:38 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Kent Kumpula on Sep 12, 2011 at 3:58:59 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Joseph Owens on Sep 12, 2011 at 4:28:26 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Kent Kumpula on Sep 12, 2011 at 5:12:19 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robert Houllahan on Sep 12, 2011 at 7:09:15 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robert Houllahan on Sep 12, 2011 at 7:38:14 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Kent Kumpula on Sep 12, 2011 at 8:33:35 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robert Houllahan on Sep 12, 2011 at 8:54:31 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Kent Kumpula on Sep 12, 2011 at 9:30:37 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Ola Haldor Voll on Sep 12, 2011 at 11:31:10 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Gustavo Bermudas on Sep 13, 2011 at 1:14:14 am
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by jake blackstone on Sep 13, 2011 at 9:53:37 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robert Houllahan on Sep 14, 2011 at 2:42:44 am
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by jake blackstone on Sep 14, 2011 at 6:38:19 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robert Houllahan on Sep 14, 2011 at 7:46:20 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by jake blackstone on Sep 16, 2011 at 2:04:05 am
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by Robert Houllahan on Sep 17, 2011 at 4:54:12 pm
        Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by jake blackstone on Sep 17, 2011 at 5:44:07 pm
- Re: Poll: How much would you pay for Resolve panels? by daniel canela on Sep 14, 2011 at 3:41:42 am

News: Adode Showcases Advances in Broadcast Workflows at IBC 2011 by Cow News Droid on Sep 8, 2011 at 7:40:15 pm

News: Adobe Acquires IRIDAS Technology by Cow News Droid on Sep 8, 2011 at 7:18:12 pm

Tangent Element by Paul mitchell on Sep 8, 2011 at 2:46:17 pm
- Re: Tangent Element by Sascha Haber on Sep 8, 2011 at 3:13:11 pm
  - Re: Tangent Element by Robert Houllahan on Sep 8, 2011 at 3:33:29 pm
    - Re: Tangent Element by Andy Winter on Sep 8, 2011 at 3:46:02 pm
      - Re: Tangent Element by Ola Haldor Voll on Sep 8, 2011 at 4:05:03 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Christopher Adams on Sep 8, 2011 at 4:33:38 pm
  - Re: Tangent Element by illya laney on Sep 9, 2011 at 12:32:43 am
    - Re: Tangent Element by Kent Kumpula on Sep 9, 2011 at 7:25:16 am
      - Re: Tangent Element by Kent Kumpula on Sep 9, 2011 at 8:36:24 am
        Re: Tangent Element by Sascha Haber on Sep 9, 2011 at 9:04:45 am
        Re: Tangent Element by Kent Kumpula on Sep 9, 2011 at 9:34:31 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Paul mitchell on Sep 10, 2011 at 2:41:03 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Chris Rose on Sep 10, 2011 at 4:35:44 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Paul mitchell on Sep 10, 2011 at 6:33:54 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Chris Rose on Sep 10, 2011 at 6:57:55 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Paul mitchell on Nov 24, 2011 at 3:51:04 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Chris Rose on Nov 24, 2011 at 4:13:50 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Mike Most on Dec 11, 2011 at 10:34:31 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by erik verhulst on Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:51 am
        Re: Tangent Element by Greg White on Jan 8, 2012 at 7:49:00 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Chris Rose on Jan 9, 2012 at 9:03:37 am
        Re: Tangent Element by Greg White on Jan 25, 2012 at 9:14:48 am
        Re: Tangent Element by Chris Rose on Jan 27, 2012 at 12:43:30 pm
        Re: Tangent Element by Christopher Adams on Jan 27, 2012 at 3:48:58 pm

Blog: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by walter biscardi on Sep 8, 2011 at 1:54:45 pm
- Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by walter biscardi on Sep 8, 2011 at 11:01:18 pm
- Re: Blog: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by illya laney on Sep 9, 2011 at 12:20:51 am
- Re: Blog: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by Warren Eig on Sep 9, 2011 at 3:42:30 pm
- Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by walter biscardi on Sep 9, 2011 at 3:44:32 pm
  - Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by Marco Solorio on Sep 10, 2011 at 12:11:23 am
    - Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by Sam Cole on Sep 10, 2011 at 6:18:31 am
      - Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by Marco Solorio on Sep 10, 2011 at 6:59:28 am
      - Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by walter biscardi on Sep 10, 2011 at 12:49:05 pm
        Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by Robbie Carman on Sep 10, 2011 at 1:04:33 pm
        Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by walter biscardi on Sep 10, 2011 at 1:30:28 pm
- Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by walter biscardi on Sep 10, 2011 at 3:27:55 pm
- Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by John Sackey on Sep 12, 2011 at 10:46:15 pm
  - @John Sackey by walter biscardi on Sep 13, 2011 at 1:21:04 pm
    - @walter biscardi by John Sackey on Sep 13, 2011 at 1:55:09 pm
- Re: Blog: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by Jon Wright on Sep 13, 2011 at 11:35:40 am
  - @Jon Wright by walter biscardi on Sep 13, 2011 at 12:49:19 pm
    - Re: @Jon Wright by Jon Wright on Sep 13, 2011 at 1:07:36 pm
- Re: Introducing Tangent Design's Element Control Surface by David L on Sep 17, 2011 at 5:02:19 am

Adobe to acquire Iridas by Dennis Radeke on Sep 8, 2011 at 10:03:34 am
- Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Alex Udell on Sep 8, 2011 at 1:04:43 pm
  - Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Kevin Monahan on Sep 8, 2011 at 5:30:10 pm

Adobe to acquire Iridas by Dennis Radeke on Sep 8, 2011 at 10:03:11 am
- Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 8, 2011 at 11:40:42 am
  - Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Steve Connor on Sep 8, 2011 at 12:11:40 pm
- Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Walter Soyka on Sep 8, 2011 at 1:01:52 pm
  - Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Eduardo Serrano on Sep 8, 2011 at 1:39:20 pm
  - Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Jason Jenkins on Sep 8, 2011 at 7:41:48 pm
- Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Robert Brown on Sep 8, 2011 at 3:36:17 pm
- Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Jamie Franklin on Sep 8, 2011 at 3:59:16 pm
  - Re: Adobe to acquire Iridas by Dennis Radeke on Sep 8, 2011 at 4:08:25 pm

Adobe Buys Iridas. SpeedGrade Integrated Into the Next Creative Suite? by illya laney on Sep 8, 2011 at 7:59:36 am
- Re: Adobe Buys Iridas. SpeedGrade Integrated Into the Next Creative Suite? by walter biscardi on Sep 8, 2011 at 10:50:31 pm
  - Re: Adobe Buys Iridas. SpeedGrade Integrated Into the Next Creative Suite? by Todd Kopriva on Sep 9, 2011 at 5:29:06 am
    - Re: Adobe Buys Iridas. SpeedGrade Integrated Into the Next Creative Suite? by Bjarki Gudjonsson on Sep 30, 2011 at 9:34:13 am

Blog: ADOBE Aquires DI leader Iridas by gary adcock on Sep 8, 2011 at 6:18:02 am
- Re: Blog: ADOBE Aquires DI leader Iridas by dany schelby on Sep 8, 2011 at 10:21:02 am
- Re: Blog: ADOBE Aquires DI leader Iridas by walter biscardi on Sep 8, 2011 at 11:03:47 pm
- Re: ADOBE Aquires DI leader Iridas by Todd Kopriva on Sep 10, 2011 at 11:46:04 pm

please delete by Lee Niederkofler on Sep 7, 2011 at 11:39:10 am

Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Lee Niederkofler on Sep 6, 2011 at 10:30:54 pm
- Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Blase Theodore on Sep 7, 2011 at 12:40:24 am
- Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by illya laney on Sep 7, 2011 at 2:41:55 am
  - Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Blase Theodore on Sep 7, 2011 at 2:55:46 am
    - Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Mike Most on Sep 7, 2011 at 3:48:22 am
      - Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Mike Most on Sep 7, 2011 at 4:27:11 am
- Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Paul Jay on Sep 7, 2011 at 10:18:01 am
  - Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Dan Moran on Sep 7, 2011 at 10:20:10 am
    - Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Lee Niederkofler on Sep 7, 2011 at 11:42:27 am
- Re: Feature Request Color Temp/Tint sliders by Joseph Owens on Sep 7, 2011 at 5:37:59 pm

Resolve One Light Into Avid by Thomas Wong on Sep 6, 2011 at 6:37:35 pm
- Re: Resolve One Light Into Avid by Mike Most on Sep 6, 2011 at 7:57:01 pm
  - Re: Resolve One Light Into Avid by Danny Scotting on Sep 7, 2011 at 12:10:02 am
    - Re: Resolve One Light Into Avid by Mike Most on Sep 7, 2011 at 3:39:50 am
    - Re: Resolve One Light Into Avid by Mike Most on Sep 7, 2011 at 4:12:58 am
  - Re: Resolve One Light Into Avid by Thomas Wong on Sep 7, 2011 at 3:28:19 am
    - Re: Resolve One Light Into Avid by Mike Most on Sep 7, 2011 at 3:45:33 am
      - Re: Resolve One Light Into Avid by Thomas Wong on Sep 7, 2011 at 3:54:42 am
        Re: solve One Light Into Avid by Andy Winter on Sep 7, 2011 at 7:23:37 am
        Re: solve One Light Into Avid by Thomas Wong on Sep 8, 2011 at 4:13:25 pm
        Re: solve One Light Into Avid by Mike Most on Sep 8, 2011 at 5:45:09 pm
        Re: solve One Light Into Avid by Mike Most on Sep 8, 2011 at 8:40:50 pm

color versus resolve lite? by kim krause on Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56:40 am
- Re: color versus resolve lite? by Paul Provost on Aug 22, 2011 at 6:47:33 pm
- Re: color versus resolve lite? by walter biscardi on Aug 22, 2011 at 7:07:29 pm
  - Re: color versus resolve lite? by kim krause on Aug 22, 2011 at 7:36:22 pm
    - Re: color versus resolve lite? by Shane Ross on Aug 22, 2011 at 11:24:07 pm
      - Re: color versus resolve lite? by Stuart Ferreyra on Aug 23, 2011 at 1:57:59 am
- Re: color versus resolve lite? by kim krause on Aug 23, 2011 at 7:49:26 am
  - Re: color versus resolve lite? by Peter Chamberlain on Aug 25, 2011 at 3:20:17 am
    - Re: color versus resolve lite? by kim krause on Aug 25, 2011 at 6:21:19 am
    - Re: color versus resolve lite? by Dan Mavric on Dec 28, 2011 at 12:52:14 am
      - Re: color versus resolve lite? by kim krause on Dec 28, 2011 at 5:50:50 am
      - Re: color versus resolve lite? by walter biscardi on Dec 28, 2011 at 3:47:32 pm
        Re: color versus resolve lite? by Dan Mavric on Dec 28, 2011 at 8:31:14 pm

News: IRIDAS SpeedGrade NX Enables Stereo Post Workflow for Ocean 3D by Cow News Droid on Aug 15, 2011 at 8:11:09 pm

News: AbelCine Announces ALEXA Training Classes in New York and Los Angeles by Cow News Droid on Aug 8, 2011 at 6:58:35 pm

News: IRIDAS Bolsters FrameCycler PRO with Greater File Format Support, More Powerful Stereo 3D Engine, and New Interface Enhancements by Cow News Droid on Aug 2, 2011 at 6:50:08 pm

Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Lisa Olshanski on Jun 26, 2011 at 2:54:00 am
- Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Everest Mokaeff on Jun 26, 2011 at 11:13:07 am
  - Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Lisa Olshanski on Jun 26, 2011 at 11:44:52 am
    - Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Lisa Olshanski on Jun 26, 2011 at 12:15:48 pm
      - Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Everest Mokaeff on Jun 26, 2011 at 12:45:34 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Lisa Olshanski on Jun 26, 2011 at 1:18:34 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Everest Mokaeff on Jun 26, 2011 at 2:01:03 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 26, 2011 at 2:08:45 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Rafael Amador on Jun 26, 2011 at 1:26:09 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 26, 2011 at 1:48:50 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Rafael Amador on Jun 26, 2011 at 2:11:40 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Matt Campbell on Feb 23, 2012 at 3:41:42 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 5:53:35 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Matt Campbell on Feb 23, 2012 at 8:21:40 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:03:36 pm
        Re: Need to deliver 29.97 interlaced but footage is 1080p24 by Matt Campbell on Feb 23, 2012 at 9:59:25 pm

FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:52:12 pm
- Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:23:44 am
- Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by james durante on Jul 1, 2011 at 4:54:10 pm
  - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jul 1, 2011 at 5:05:59 pm
- Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Michael Aranyshev on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:27:27 pm
  - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:43:06 pm
    - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Michael Aranyshev on Jul 12, 2011 at 5:19:47 pm
      - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jul 12, 2011 at 5:30:43 pm

News: IRIDAS Debuts SpeedGrade NX at Cine Gear Expo 2011 by Cow News Droid on Jun 1, 2011 at 11:34:17 pm

FS - Tangent CP200-BK by Chris Tomberlin on May 17, 2011 at 4:05:44 pm

ADD A NEW POST • SEARCH • CHANGE FORUM