SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
recent posts
gary adcock
Robert Monaghan
andrew smith
bryson jones
Dave Pickett
Walter Soyka
Adam Claude Jones
Nick Anderson
Glue Tools
GLUE TOOLS
GLUETOOLS
GT CINEONDPX
VIEW: 365 days
VIEW: New Today
VIEW: 2 days
VIEW: 3 days
VIEW: 4 days
VIEW: 5 days
VIEW: 6 days
VIEW: 1 week
VIEW: 2 weeks
VIEW: 1 month
VIEW: 2 months
VIEW: 3 months
VIEW: 6 months
VIEW: 1 year
VIEW: 2 years
VIEW: 3 years
VIEW: 4 years
Thread View
Topical View
Newest Posts / Date View
View Unanswered
ORDER BY: Date
ORDER BY: Relevance
ADD A NEW POST
•
CHANGE FORUM
•
SEARCH
•
SUBSCRIBE
News:
Phantom Cine Toolkit for MacOSX Just Released
by Cow News Droid on Mar 26, 2012 at 6:40:33 pm
FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 19, 2012 at 2:43:33 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 12:08:10 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shane Ross on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:11:32 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Mitch Ives on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:10:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:09:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58:33 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:08:17 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:38:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:44:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:47:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:52:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:08:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:53:35 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:05:36 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:24:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:10:29 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:26:42 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:25:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:48:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:08:51 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:16:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Rick Fromet on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:35:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:37:06 pm
Re: (OT) FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:57:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:47:43 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:47:43 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:50:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:15:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:55:09 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:52:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:48 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44:37 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:22:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16:24 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36:49 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:28:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:35:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 9:27:22 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34:18 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38:29 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:28 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:51:57 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:14:07 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26:16 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40:12 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:25:06 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:12:31 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:09:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:32:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:01:27 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:19:56 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:20 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:52:26 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33:41 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Bill Davis on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:15:53 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by sandy shapiro on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36:04 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:38:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43:05 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:21 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:09:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:57:57 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:14:07 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:53:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34:47 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:03:45 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:28:18 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Andy Field on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Christian Schumacher on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:08:40 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Richard Herd on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:43:34 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56:54 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:58:14 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:57:42 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:57:58 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:05:15 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:22:03 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:30:36 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:40:19 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:08:28 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:30 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:37:53 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:08 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:53:44 pm
Re: FCPX or Not...
by Thomas Frank on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:29:32 am
2K Phantom .cine timecode variance
by Dave Pickett on Mar 10, 2012 at 7:53:34 pm
Re: 2K Phantom .cine timecode variance
by Chris Tomberlin on Mar 11, 2012 at 7:46:51 pm
Re: 2K Phantom .cine timecode variance
by Dave Pickett on Mar 13, 2012 at 12:36:06 pm
Re: 2K Phantom .cine timecode variance
by Mike Most on Mar 12, 2012 at 12:55:47 am
Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish
by Manuel Wenger on Mar 2, 2012 at 8:52:48 pm
Re: Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish
by Sean Donnelly on Mar 4, 2012 at 5:10:10 pm
Re: Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish
by Manuel Wenger on Mar 5, 2012 at 5:19:49 pm
DPX sequence fixed to 29.97 fps?
by Frank Andersson on Feb 27, 2012 at 2:40:49 pm
Re: DPX sequence fixed to 29.97 fps?
by Frank Andersson on May 2, 2012 at 9:24:58 am
Séance - Phantom Camera Software for your Mac!
by Robert Monaghan on Feb 11, 2012 at 10:51:11 pm
Re: Séance - Phantom Camera Software for your Mac!
by Ross Pimlott on Mar 13, 2012 at 1:23:18 pm
Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:27:36 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Kevin Patrick on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:35:07 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Mark Dobson on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:10:28 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:20:56 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:09:12 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:20:29 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:59:36 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:22:53 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:55:26 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Ben Scott on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:51:38 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:13:14 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:23:46 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by John Heagy on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:46:21 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08:59 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:14:22 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:09:47 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:16:47 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:24:29 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:29:44 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:37:09 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:31:53 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:41:38 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:52:43 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:56:56 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:57:44 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:58:22 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:11:32 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:19:17 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:05 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:57:14 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:37:40 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by John Heagy on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:41 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:36:12 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:00:55 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:15:12 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:33:42 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:28:29 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:38:31 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:52:41 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:05:53 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 2:57:58 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Paul Dickin on Feb 9, 2012 at 9:54:32 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:51 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:30:23 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Craig Seeman on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:51:22 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:46 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Chris Harlan on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:22:24 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:34:30 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 11:43:43 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 4:02:03 am
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andreas Kiel on Feb 10, 2012 at 7:55:02 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 11, 2012 at 1:37:16 pm
Re: Remaining enhancements
by Andreas Kiel on Feb 12, 2012 at 1:25:51 am
Glue Tools QuickTime Plugins and AVID MC6 for Mac
by Robert Monaghan on Feb 7, 2012 at 10:56:05 am
LUT709 Question
by abie silva on Jan 24, 2012 at 8:37:15 pm
Re: LUT709 Question
by Shane Ross on Jan 24, 2012 at 9:01:18 pm
Re: LUT709 Question
by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 25, 2012 at 12:07:39 am
Re: LUT709 Question
by John Heagy on Jan 25, 2012 at 3:40:09 am
Soon: Phantom Camera/CineStation software for the Mac..
by Robert Monaghan on Jan 18, 2012 at 2:23:10 am
Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D
by Mats Andersen on Jan 13, 2012 at 3:08:19 pm
Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D
by gary adcock on Jan 13, 2012 at 3:30:22 pm
Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D
by Robert Monaghan on Jan 14, 2012 at 2:48:31 am
Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D
by gary adcock on Jan 14, 2012 at 12:12:10 pm
Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D
by Mats Andersen on Jan 17, 2012 at 11:32:39 am
Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D - Solution?
by Robert Monaghan on Jan 24, 2012 at 7:41:29 pm
News:
ALT Systems Names Bruno Munger to Vice President
by Cow News Droid on Jan 12, 2012 at 6:56:03 pm
RED 4K DPX Pipeline
by Ryan Knight on Jan 11, 2012 at 6:25:49 pm
Re: RED 4K DPX Pipeline
by John-Michael Seng-Wheeler on Jan 12, 2012 at 4:05:06 am
Re: RED 4K DPX Pipeline
by Kevin Monahan on Jan 13, 2012 at 5:27:43 pm
Re: RED 4K DPX Pipeline
by Ryan Knight on Jan 13, 2012 at 5:57:45 pm
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Creative COW on Jan 10, 2012 at 1:05:54 am
Re:
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Rafael Amador on Jan 10, 2012 at 2:23:40 am
Re:
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Sean Mullen on Jan 10, 2012 at 5:00:44 am
Re:
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Ronald Lindeboom on Jan 11, 2012 at 1:31:18 am
Re:
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 5:12:56 pm
Re:
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Joseph W. Bourke on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31:44 pm
Re:
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Abraham Chaffin on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47:10 pm
Re:
StockYard
-- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta
by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 9:07:12 pm
Some advice about the Cache-A
by jack wormell on Jan 3, 2012 at 2:09:43 pm
Re: Some advice about the Cache-A
by Fred Jodry on Jan 3, 2012 at 5:12:11 pm
Re: Some advice about the Cache-A
by Tom Goldberg on Jan 6, 2012 at 12:32:42 am
15% Discount for End Of Year purchases.
by Robert Monaghan on Dec 13, 2011 at 2:25:01 pm
A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:02:23 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Steve Connor on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:12:13 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:13:02 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:17:24 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:25:00 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:37:36 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:41:22 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:46:35 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Oliver Peters on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:52:02 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:53:22 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Oliver Peters on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:44:54 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Ben Scott on Dec 6, 2011 at 9:33:16 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Oliver Peters on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:04:19 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:41:22 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Oliver Peters on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:57:38 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:42:16 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:18:59 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 7, 2011 at 3:01:35 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:55:34 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Mark Bein on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:10:57 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:15:45 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:29:12 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Lance Bachelder on Dec 9, 2011 at 12:44:21 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:31:19 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:38:01 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:48:26 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:57:50 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:18:10 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:25:00 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Shane Ross on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:30:18 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:49:45 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:57:34 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:59:20 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:52:20 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Chris Harlan on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:01:50 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Robert Brown on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:30:04 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:19:28 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Steve Connor on Dec 8, 2011 at 4:11:14 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Christian Schumacher on Dec 8, 2011 at 5:40:33 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:36:48 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Daniel Frome on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:17:22 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:04:06 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:12:52 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:02:25 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Christian Schumacher on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:49:12 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Rafael Amador on Dec 6, 2011 at 9:24:14 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:07:51 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Rafael Amador on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:08:27 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:41:33 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:00:12 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by tony west on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:21:45 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Christian Schumacher on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:46:40 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Steve Connor on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:48:18 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Christian Schumacher on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:05:44 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:04:33 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Alexander Joyce on Dec 8, 2011 at 3:08:55 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Rafael Amador on Dec 9, 2011 at 2:54:57 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 9, 2011 at 5:47:53 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Christian Schumacher on Dec 9, 2011 at 3:18:31 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 9, 2011 at 4:04:25 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 9, 2011 at 5:32:55 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Rafael Amador on Dec 10, 2011 at 3:48:39 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Walter Soyka on Dec 10, 2011 at 6:07:19 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 10, 2011 at 6:25:22 pm
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 11, 2011 at 2:56:34 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Rafael Amador on Dec 11, 2011 at 11:04:30 am
Re: A Nice Plus
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 11, 2011 at 4:00:58 pm
DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 1, 2011 at 5:43:47 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:13:49 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:53:35 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 1:32:40 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:02:37 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:36:41 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:41:09 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:31:14 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:35:51 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:43:00 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:49:44 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:56:59 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:01:53 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:05:38 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:06:31 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 3, 2011 at 11:16:36 pm
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:02:22 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:26:40 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Oliver Peters on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:50:53 am
Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip
by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:54:44 am
DPX sequence timeline editing
by Elliott Balsley on Nov 30, 2011 at 1:44:07 am
Re: DPX sequence timeline editing
by Dane Cannon on Nov 30, 2011 at 4:21:45 pm
Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1
by Dave Pickett on Nov 21, 2011 at 6:43:41 pm
Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1
by Dwaine Maggart on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:43:26 pm
Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1
by Anders Holck on Nov 23, 2011 at 1:56:45 pm
Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1
by Dave Pickett on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:43:35 pm
Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1
by Anders Holck on Jan 31, 2012 at 11:14:27 pm
Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by Jonas Petersson on Nov 1, 2011 at 1:21:11 pm
Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by bryson jones on Nov 1, 2011 at 3:24:08 pm
Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by Jonas Petersson on Nov 1, 2011 at 4:44:51 pm
Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by bryson jones on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:13:03 am
Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by Jonas Petersson on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:52:23 am
Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by Jonas Petersson on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:46:59 am
Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by bryson jones on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:16:47 am
Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences?
by Rolf Howarth on Nov 6, 2011 at 10:58:27 pm
Glue Tools DPX and Blackmagic Multibridge playback
by Frank Laughlin on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:47:05 pm
ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?!
by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:13:47 am
Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?!
by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:47:53 am
Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?!
by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:52:16 am
Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?!
by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 19, 2011 at 1:19:17 am
Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?!
by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 4:40:53 pm
Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?!
by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:06:06 pm
Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?!
by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 20, 2011 at 1:24:59 am
Arri FCP Workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx
by andrew smith on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:25:08 pm
ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Bruce Colgate on Oct 14, 2011 at 4:52:12 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Doug Fish on Oct 14, 2011 at 5:12:49 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Bob Zelin on Oct 15, 2011 at 9:39:25 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Bruce Colgate on Oct 16, 2011 at 1:08:37 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Kip Draper on Oct 16, 2011 at 11:48:26 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Bob Zelin on Oct 16, 2011 at 3:56:23 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Fabio Cormack on Oct 17, 2011 at 11:02:38 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Kip Draper on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:39:24 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Fabio Cormack on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:11:49 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Kip Draper on Oct 20, 2011 at 10:23:43 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Fabio Cormack on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:29:10 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Doug Fish on Oct 21, 2011 at 9:41:24 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Jarod Breshears on Oct 22, 2011 at 1:55:24 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Doug Fish on Oct 22, 2011 at 3:21:39 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Jarod Breshears on Oct 22, 2011 at 9:54:25 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Doug Fish on Oct 23, 2011 at 2:43:30 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Jarod Breshears on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:35:44 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Kip Draper on Oct 22, 2011 at 3:23:06 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Dominik Twardowski on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:31:12 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Kip Draper on Oct 25, 2011 at 4:22:20 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Doug Fish on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:13:02 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Bruce Colgate on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:30:29 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Fabio Cormack on Oct 26, 2011 at 12:30:13 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Kip Draper on Oct 30, 2011 at 7:33:59 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Fabio Cormack on Oct 31, 2011 at 4:12:00 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Vladimir Philogene on Nov 25, 2011 at 11:35:45 pm
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Bruce Colgate on Nov 26, 2011 at 6:23:12 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Doug Fish on Nov 26, 2011 at 7:34:21 am
Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables?
by Matt Bonfield on Jan 28, 2012 at 4:04:28 pm
QuickTime fix for Glue Tools and MacOSX 10.7 Lion
by Robert Monaghan on Oct 13, 2011 at 1:45:49 am
no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files
by Dan Goulder on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:47:45 pm
Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files
by Robert Monaghan on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:53:59 pm
Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files
by Dan Goulder on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:28:15 pm
Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files
by gary adcock on Oct 7, 2011 at 1:53:39 pm
Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files
by Robert Monaghan on Oct 7, 2011 at 3:40:04 pm
ARRI Alexa LogC filter for Final Cut, now available separately.
by Robert Monaghan on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:21:39 pm
Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ???
by Aysegul Efe on Oct 1, 2011 at 12:09:40 pm
Re: Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ???
by Michael Phillips on Oct 1, 2011 at 8:31:26 pm
Re: Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ???
by Aysegul Efe on Oct 3, 2011 at 12:05:45 pm
Re: Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ???
by Robert Monaghan on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:16:50 pm
iif ACES workflow, thoughts?
by Jonny Revolt on Sep 14, 2011 at 5:37:49 am
Re: iif ACES workflow, thoughts?
by Mike Most on Sep 14, 2011 at 7:02:39 am
IBC 2011 - At Vision Research Booth!
by Robert Monaghan on Sep 2, 2011 at 6:18:08 am
Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP
by Greg Brayton on Sep 1, 2011 at 1:23:30 am
Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP
by Oliver Peters on Sep 2, 2011 at 1:40:14 am
Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP
by andrew smith on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:34:56 pm
Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP
by Oliver Peters on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:21:37 am
Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP
by gary adcock on Oct 19, 2011 at 1:28:05 am
phantom flex cine files to dpx workflow
by Phillip Choe on Aug 25, 2011 at 2:11:44 am
Re: phantom flex cine files to dpx workflow
by Danny Scotting on Aug 25, 2011 at 3:02:41 am
Re: phantom flex cine files to dpx workflow
by Nikola Stefanovic on Aug 25, 2011 at 7:40:15 am
ASC-CDL Toolkit for Final Cut Pro/Motion is now available.
by Robert Monaghan on Aug 18, 2011 at 4:08:38 pm
Advice needed: FCP7 - Glue Tools - Color - workflow - how to keep 25 fps
by Alexandra Wesche on Aug 18, 2011 at 2:29:06 pm
Re: Advice needed: FCP7 - Glue Tools - Color - workflow - how to keep 25 fps
by Robert Monaghan on Aug 18, 2011 at 3:13:16 pm
Re: Advice needed: FCP7 - Glue Tools - Color - workflow - how to keep 25 fps
by Alexandra Wesche on Aug 18, 2011 at 3:47:16 pm
Adding Subtitle
by Nick Anderson on Aug 9, 2011 at 1:35:06 am
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Christopher Tay on Aug 9, 2011 at 2:26:16 am
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Nick Anderson on Aug 9, 2011 at 2:29:46 pm
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Jonathon Lee on Aug 9, 2011 at 6:17:50 pm
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Karam Nuriel on Nov 12, 2011 at 10:52:19 pm
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Jonathon Lee on Aug 10, 2011 at 2:05:56 am
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Nick Anderson on Aug 10, 2011 at 3:00:38 am
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Jonathon Lee on Aug 10, 2011 at 3:57:20 am
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Nick Anderson on Aug 15, 2011 at 12:37:08 am
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Marc Fisher on Aug 18, 2011 at 8:38:45 pm
Re: Adding Subtitle
by Jonathon Lee on Aug 18, 2011 at 10:20:33 pm
Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 12:30:33 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Roth Weiss on Aug 4, 2011 at 12:38:53 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Rafael Amador on Aug 4, 2011 at 1:07:31 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:22:57 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:44:45 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:51:12 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:09:23 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:13:52 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:10:17 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:18:07 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:24:24 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:27:51 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:40:07 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Rafael Amador on Aug 4, 2011 at 11:04:14 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:14:25 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Rafael Amador on Aug 4, 2011 at 10:24:52 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:58:24 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 5, 2011 at 5:16:07 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Paul Provost on Aug 5, 2011 at 5:49:02 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Rafael Amador on Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56:23 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Paul Provost on Aug 6, 2011 at 3:51:56 am
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Rafael Amador on Aug 5, 2011 at 4:34:28 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Paul Provost on Aug 5, 2011 at 5:42:45 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 5, 2011 at 6:58:45 pm
Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips?
by David Smith on Aug 6, 2011 at 5:37:17 am
COW: New CAREER CENTER, Find or Post JOBS, or Promote Your SERVICES OFFERED - FREE!
by Creative COW on Jul 20, 2011 at 8:21:36 pm
Re: COW: New CAREER CENTER, Find or Post JOBS, or Promote Your SERVICES OFFERED - FREE!
by Mike Cohen on Jul 27, 2011 at 4:14:50 pm
A couple easy questions...
by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 19, 2011 at 3:52:19 pm
Re: A couple easy questions...
by Robbie Carman on Jul 19, 2011 at 7:25:18 pm
Re: A couple easy questions...
by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 19, 2011 at 7:52:52 pm
Re: A couple easy questions...
by Robbie Carman on Jul 19, 2011 at 8:22:36 pm
Re: A couple easy questions...
by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 19, 2011 at 9:13:11 pm
Re: A couple easy questions...
by Fabio Cormack on Jul 20, 2011 at 12:14:49 am
Re: A couple easy questions...
by Robert Monaghan on Jul 20, 2011 at 2:12:18 pm
Re: A couple easy questions...
by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 20, 2011 at 3:14:58 pm
Question about AVCHD Clip Rename
by Patrick Murphy on Jul 16, 2011 at 7:52:43 pm
Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename
by Steve Brame on Jul 16, 2011 at 9:40:55 pm
Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename
by Alex Udell on Jul 17, 2011 at 1:14:24 pm
Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename
by Patrick Murphy on Jul 17, 2011 at 6:38:34 pm
Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename
by Tom Daigon on Jul 17, 2011 at 6:46:21 pm
Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename
by Alex Udell on Jul 18, 2011 at 2:05:58 pm
FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use?
by David Smith on Jul 10, 2011 at 12:32:23 am
Re: FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use?
by Hector berrebi on Jul 10, 2011 at 4:19:26 am
Re: FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use?
by David Smith on Jul 10, 2011 at 4:39:37 am
Re: FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use?
by Chris Conlee on Jul 12, 2011 at 9:21:42 pm
DPX & Timecode Data Managment confusion
by David Smith on Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50:33 am
Re: DPX & Timecode Data Managment confusion
by Robert Monaghan on Jul 20, 2011 at 1:51:52 pm
Glue Tools CineonDPX works with Compressor 4
by Robert Monaghan on Jul 7, 2011 at 10:49:55 pm
Reprieve: Compressor 4 works with Glue Tools..
by Robert Monaghan on Jun 28, 2011 at 4:03:55 am
Re: Reprieve: Compressor 4 works with Glue Tools..
by James Mortner on Jun 28, 2011 at 8:46:19 am
So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:03:44 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tom Daigon on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:07:15 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Jamie Franklin on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:09:39 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Sohrab Sandhu on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:54:20 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:06:13 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Joseph W. Bourke on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:02:08 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Marcus Umstead on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:14:40 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Steve Connor on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:21:32 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Peter Corbett on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:34:00 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:37:35 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Andrew Wilson on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:23:21 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:36:10 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Craig Wall on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:04:53 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:18:25 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tom Daigon on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:23:27 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Kevin Monahan on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:13:49 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:31:11 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Kevin Monahan on Jun 24, 2011 at 3:32:38 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:46:03 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 11:35:36 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:54:13 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:00:41 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:19:05 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:25:50 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:31:05 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:34:26 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:57:13 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Daniel Frome on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:40:02 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:37:32 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:58:19 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:08:25 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Jim Giberti on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:20:30 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:28:47 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Neil Goodman on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:34:12 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:55:17 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:10:16 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Daniel Frome on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:51:19 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Craig Wall on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:04:29 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:26:25 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:28:29 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Gary Huff on Jun 24, 2011 at 6:05:54 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 1:53:47 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 24, 2011 at 3:12:33 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 10:10:49 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 25, 2011 at 12:50:01 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 25, 2011 at 11:41:12 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 26, 2011 at 12:21:14 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 26, 2011 at 11:22:29 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 27, 2011 at 4:35:07 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 1:34:38 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 1:54:24 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Tim Wilson on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:22:28 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by David Cherniack on Jun 24, 2011 at 3:11:16 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:52:10 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by David Cherniack on Jun 24, 2011 at 10:34:36 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Dennis Radeke on Jun 25, 2011 at 8:33:20 pm
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Jim Wiseman on Jun 26, 2011 at 2:04:20 am
Re: So who is the best candidate?
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 26, 2011 at 11:47:01 am
A 'pro' app with missing features
by Chris Kenny on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:28:16 pm
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Craig Seeman on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:47:04 pm
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Steve Mitchell on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:02:09 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Andrew Corneles on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:53:29 pm
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Chris Kenny on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:25:37 pm
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Greg Burke on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:43:47 pm
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Herb Sevush on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:11:03 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Chris Kenny on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:16:02 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Herb Sevush on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:45:26 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:26:37 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Chris Kenny on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:29:57 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 22, 2011 at 2:31:26 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Chris Kenny on Jun 22, 2011 at 2:46:54 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 22, 2011 at 2:58:25 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Tom Daigon on Jun 22, 2011 at 4:10:50 am
Re: A 'pro' app with missing features
by Michael Aranyshev on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:34:54 am
FCPX and Glue Tools.
by Robert Monaghan on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:52:12 pm
Re: FCPX and Glue Tools.
by Robert Monaghan on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:23:44 am
Re: FCPX and Glue Tools.
by james durante on Jul 1, 2011 at 4:54:10 pm
Re: FCPX and Glue Tools.
by Robert Monaghan on Jul 1, 2011 at 5:05:59 pm
Re: FCPX and Glue Tools.
by Michael Aranyshev on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:27:27 pm
Re: FCPX and Glue Tools.
by Robert Monaghan on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:43:06 pm
Re: FCPX and Glue Tools.
by Michael Aranyshev on Jul 12, 2011 at 5:19:47 pm
Re: FCPX and Glue Tools.
by Robert Monaghan on Jul 12, 2011 at 5:30:43 pm
444 to DPX and keeping TC
by Samuel Smith on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:42:24 pm
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC
by Dave LaRonde on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:59:15 pm
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC
by Walter Soyka on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:33:17 pm
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5?
by Walter Soyka on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:37:08 pm
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5?
by Samuel Smith on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:11:02 pm
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5?
by Walter Soyka on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:39:29 pm
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5?
by Danny Hays on Jun 22, 2011 at 3:07:13 am
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC
by Robert Monaghan on Jun 26, 2011 at 6:57:05 pm
Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC
by Shiloh Heyman on Oct 19, 2011 at 6:45:15 am
Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:20:55 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by John Kilgour on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:27:01 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tony Brittan on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:32:02 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Clayton Burkhart on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:31:12 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:36:28 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Craig Shields on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:06:32 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tim Wilson on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:17:11 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Simon Ubsdell on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:22:58 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tim Wilson on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:29:20 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Craig Shields on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:27:42 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:33:22 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Craig Shields on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:36:01 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:46:37 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Peter Corbett on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:57:35 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 4:21:37 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 6:37:01 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Victor Perez on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:37:34 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Matthew Rogers on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:59:34 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Dean Neal on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:45:44 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by David Cherniack on Jun 21, 2011 at 4:53:25 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Kylee Wall on Jun 21, 2011 at 4:18:16 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:57:10 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Sohrab Sandhu on Jun 21, 2011 at 6:41:57 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Terry Mikkelsen on Jun 21, 2011 at 7:18:20 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 7:38:48 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Roland Manuel on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:02:49 am
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by gary adcock on Jun 21, 2011 at 7:46:41 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:34:22 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by gary adcock on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:46:18 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:21:22 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:48:16 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:57:57 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:20:57 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:50:23 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by gary adcock on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:22:37 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:36:19 pm
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by cam khoury on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09:07 am
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by Al Bergstein on Jun 22, 2011 at 5:35:22 am
Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!!
by gary adcock on Jun 22, 2011 at 11:30:06 am
conform from DPX
by Robin Erard on Jun 20, 2011 at 3:10:11 pm
Re: conform from DPX
by illya laney on Jun 20, 2011 at 4:57:16 pm
ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by Christopher Tay on Jun 10, 2011 at 3:15:39 am
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by Tim Farrell on Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45:30 am
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by Christopher Tay on Jun 10, 2011 at 6:08:29 am
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by Neil Sadwelkar on Jun 11, 2011 at 11:38:03 am
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by Jens Herold on Jun 10, 2011 at 6:59:25 am
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by illya laney on Jun 10, 2011 at 5:23:55 pm
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by Michael Aranyshev on Jun 10, 2011 at 5:50:49 pm
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by prathvish hegde on Jun 14, 2011 at 12:51:13 pm
Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve
by illya laney on Jun 14, 2011 at 9:20:50 pm
3D + export workflow advice?
by Tom Sanders on Jun 4, 2011 at 5:39:59 pm
Re: 3D + export workflow advice?
by Tom Sanders on Jun 4, 2011 at 7:05:26 pm
gluetools dpx - sequential numbers not starting at 1
by Tom Sanders on Jun 4, 2011 at 7:40:22 am
Conforming FCP sequence to Color with both R3D and DPX source material
by Michael Ward on Jun 4, 2011 at 1:10:29 am
Re: Conforming FCP sequence to Color with both R3D and DPX source material
by Everest Mokaeff on Jun 5, 2011 at 7:55:27 pm
Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Clay Vernon on May 25, 2011 at 6:57:59 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Dave LaRonde on May 25, 2011 at 7:19:45 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Darby Edelen on May 25, 2011 at 8:31:23 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Clay Vernon on May 25, 2011 at 9:13:43 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Walter Soyka on May 25, 2011 at 10:11:27 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Bill Kelly on May 26, 2011 at 3:02:33 am
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Walter Soyka on May 26, 2011 at 2:51:25 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Josemarcos Ganan on May 26, 2011 at 4:40:46 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Clay Vernon on May 26, 2011 at 4:52:05 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Dave LaRonde on May 26, 2011 at 5:48:41 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Josemarcos Ganan on May 27, 2011 at 3:52:56 pm
Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario?
by Walter Soyka on May 27, 2011 at 4:06:18 pm
Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by David Jahns on Jun 30, 2009 at 10:14:59 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by gary adcock on Jul 3, 2009 at 1:33:00 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by David Jahns on Jul 6, 2009 at 4:45:22 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by gary adcock on Jul 7, 2009 at 2:05:43 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by David Jahns on Jul 7, 2009 at 4:33:02 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by gary adcock on Jul 8, 2009 at 4:59:54 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Robert Monaghan on Jul 9, 2009 at 12:31:08 am
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by David Jahns on Jul 9, 2009 at 1:07:21 am
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Julian Lalinde on Oct 10, 2011 at 4:31:45 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Robert Monaghan on Oct 10, 2011 at 4:42:01 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Julian Lalinde on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:05:35 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Robert Monaghan on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:13:14 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Julian Lalinde on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:26:08 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Julian Lalinde on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:33:56 pm
Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm
by Robert Monaghan on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:39:26 pm
1
2
3
Next >>
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2012
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]