gary adcock

Robert Monaghan

andrew smith

bryson jones

Dave Pickett

Walter Soyka

Adam Claude Jones

Nick Anderson

Glue Tools

ADD A NEW POST • CHANGE FORUM • SEARCH • SUBSCRIBE

News: Phantom Cine Toolkit for MacOSX Just Released by Cow News Droid on Mar 26, 2012 at 6:40:33 pm

FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 19, 2012 at 2:43:33 am
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58:18 am
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 12:08:10 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by Shane Ross on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:11:32 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Mitch Ives on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34:08 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:10:14 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:05:15 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:09:22 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58:33 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:08:17 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:38:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:44:35 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:47:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:52:06 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03:29 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:08:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:53:35 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:05:36 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04:56 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:24:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:04 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:10:29 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:26:42 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22:44 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:25:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:48:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:08:51 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:54 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:16:18 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Rick Fromet on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:35:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:37:06 pm
        Re: (OT) FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:57:53 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:47:43 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:47:43 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:50:34 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:15:44 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:55:09 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:52:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52:08 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:48 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44:37 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:22:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36:49 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:28:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:35:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 9:27:22 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34:18 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38:29 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:28 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:51:57 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:14:07 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26:16 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40:12 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:25:06 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:12:31 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:09:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:32:19 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:40 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:01:27 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:19:56 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:20 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:52:26 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33:41 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Bill Davis on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:15:53 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36:04 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:38:28 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:21 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:09:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:57:57 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:14:07 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:53:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:03:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:28:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Christian Schumacher on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:08:40 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:43:34 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56:54 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:58:14 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:57:42 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:57:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:05:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:22:03 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:30:36 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:40:19 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:08:28 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:30 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:37:53 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:08 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:53:44 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Thomas Frank on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:29:32 am

2K Phantom .cine timecode variance by Dave Pickett on Mar 10, 2012 at 7:53:34 pm
- Re: 2K Phantom .cine timecode variance by Chris Tomberlin on Mar 11, 2012 at 7:46:51 pm
  - Re: 2K Phantom .cine timecode variance by Dave Pickett on Mar 13, 2012 at 12:36:06 pm
- Re: 2K Phantom .cine timecode variance by Mike Most on Mar 12, 2012 at 12:55:47 am

Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish by Manuel Wenger on Mar 2, 2012 at 8:52:48 pm
- Re: Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish by Sean Donnelly on Mar 4, 2012 at 5:10:10 pm
  - Re: Phantom footage comes in magenta-ish by Manuel Wenger on Mar 5, 2012 at 5:19:49 pm

DPX sequence fixed to 29.97 fps? by Frank Andersson on Feb 27, 2012 at 2:40:49 pm
- Re: DPX sequence fixed to 29.97 fps? by Frank Andersson on May 2, 2012 at 9:24:58 am

Séance - Phantom Camera Software for your Mac! by Robert Monaghan on Feb 11, 2012 at 10:51:11 pm
- Re: Séance - Phantom Camera Software for your Mac! by Ross Pimlott on Mar 13, 2012 at 1:23:18 pm

Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:27:36 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Kevin Patrick on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:35:07 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Mark Dobson on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:10:28 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 5:20:56 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:09:12 pm
    - Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:20:29 pm
      - Re: Remaining enhancements by Craig Seeman on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:59:36 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:22:53 pm
    - Re: Remaining enhancements by Andy Neil on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:55:26 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Ben Scott on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:51:38 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 8:13:14 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:23:46 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by John Heagy on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:46:21 pm
- Re: Remaining enhancements by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:08:59 pm
  - Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 10:14:22 pm
    - Re: Remaining enhancements by Brad Davis on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:09:47 pm
      - Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:16:47 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:24:29 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:29:44 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:37:09 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:31:53 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:41:38 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:52:43 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:56:56 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 8, 2012 at 11:57:44 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:58:22 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:11:32 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:19:17 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:05 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:57:14 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 12:37:40 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by John Heagy on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:26:41 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Michael Gissing on Feb 9, 2012 at 1:36:12 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:00:55 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:15:12 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:33:42 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:28:29 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:38:31 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:52:41 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:05:53 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 2:57:58 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Paul Dickin on Feb 9, 2012 at 9:54:32 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:51 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Oliver Peters on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:30:23 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Craig Seeman on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:51:22 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:05:46 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Chris Harlan on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:22:24 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Walter Soyka on Feb 9, 2012 at 6:34:30 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 9, 2012 at 11:43:43 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 10, 2012 at 4:02:03 am
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Andreas Kiel on Feb 10, 2012 at 7:55:02 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Simon Ubsdell on Feb 11, 2012 at 1:37:16 pm
        Re: Remaining enhancements by Andreas Kiel on Feb 12, 2012 at 1:25:51 am

Glue Tools QuickTime Plugins and AVID MC6 for Mac by Robert Monaghan on Feb 7, 2012 at 10:56:05 am

LUT709 Question by abie silva on Jan 24, 2012 at 8:37:15 pm
- Re: LUT709 Question by Shane Ross on Jan 24, 2012 at 9:01:18 pm
  - Re: LUT709 Question by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 25, 2012 at 12:07:39 am
- Re: LUT709 Question by John Heagy on Jan 25, 2012 at 3:40:09 am

Soon: Phantom Camera/CineStation software for the Mac.. by Robert Monaghan on Jan 18, 2012 at 2:23:10 am

Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D by Mats Andersen on Jan 13, 2012 at 3:08:19 pm
- Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D by gary adcock on Jan 13, 2012 at 3:30:22 pm
- Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D by Robert Monaghan on Jan 14, 2012 at 2:48:31 am
  - Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D by gary adcock on Jan 14, 2012 at 12:12:10 pm
  - Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D by Mats Andersen on Jan 17, 2012 at 11:32:39 am
- Re: Playback in FCP7 with my Decklink HD Extreme 3D - Solution? by Robert Monaghan on Jan 24, 2012 at 7:41:29 pm

News: ALT Systems Names Bruno Munger to Vice President by Cow News Droid on Jan 12, 2012 at 6:56:03 pm

RED 4K DPX Pipeline by Ryan Knight on Jan 11, 2012 at 6:25:49 pm
- Re: RED 4K DPX Pipeline by John-Michael Seng-Wheeler on Jan 12, 2012 at 4:05:06 am
  - Re: RED 4K DPX Pipeline by Kevin Monahan on Jan 13, 2012 at 5:27:43 pm
    - Re: RED 4K DPX Pipeline by Ryan Knight on Jan 13, 2012 at 5:57:45 pm

StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Creative COW on Jan 10, 2012 at 1:05:54 am
- Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Rafael Amador on Jan 10, 2012 at 2:23:40 am
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 10, 2012 at 5:00:44 am
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Ronald Lindeboom on Jan 11, 2012 at 1:31:18 am
    - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 5:12:56 pm
    - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Joseph W. Bourke on Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31:44 pm
      - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Abraham Chaffin on Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47:10 pm
  - Re: StockYard -- Creative COW StockYard is now live in full public beta by Sean Mullen on Jan 11, 2012 at 9:07:12 pm

Some advice about the Cache-A by jack wormell on Jan 3, 2012 at 2:09:43 pm
- Re: Some advice about the Cache-A by Fred Jodry on Jan 3, 2012 at 5:12:11 pm
- Re: Some advice about the Cache-A by Tom Goldberg on Jan 6, 2012 at 12:32:42 am

15% Discount for End Of Year purchases. by Robert Monaghan on Dec 13, 2011 at 2:25:01 pm

A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:02:23 pm
- Re: A Nice Plus by Steve Connor on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:12:13 pm
  - Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:13:02 pm
    - Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:17:24 pm
      - Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:25:00 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:37:36 pm
      - Re: A Nice Plus by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:41:22 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:46:35 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Oliver Peters on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:52:02 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:53:22 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Oliver Peters on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:44:54 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Ben Scott on Dec 6, 2011 at 9:33:16 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Oliver Peters on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:04:19 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:41:22 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Oliver Peters on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:57:38 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:42:16 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:18:59 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 7, 2011 at 3:01:35 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 10:55:34 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Mark Bein on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:10:57 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:15:45 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:29:12 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Lance Bachelder on Dec 9, 2011 at 12:44:21 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:31:19 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:38:01 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:48:26 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:57:50 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:18:10 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:25:00 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Shane Ross on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:30:18 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:49:45 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:57:34 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:59:20 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 12:52:20 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Chris Harlan on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:01:50 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Robert Brown on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:30:04 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 2:19:28 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Steve Connor on Dec 8, 2011 at 4:11:14 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Christian Schumacher on Dec 8, 2011 at 5:40:33 pm
- Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:36:48 pm
- Re: A Nice Plus by Daniel Frome on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:17:22 am
  - Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:04:06 am
    - Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:12:52 am
      - Re: A Nice Plus by Jim Giberti on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:02:25 am
- Re: A Nice Plus by Christian Schumacher on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:49:12 am
  - Re: A Nice Plus by Rafael Amador on Dec 6, 2011 at 9:24:14 am
    - Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 3:07:51 pm
      - Re: A Nice Plus by Rafael Amador on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:08:27 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:41:33 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:00:12 pm
- Re: A Nice Plus by tony west on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:21:45 pm
  - Re: A Nice Plus by Christian Schumacher on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:46:40 pm
    - Re: A Nice Plus by Steve Connor on Dec 6, 2011 at 4:48:18 pm
      - Re: A Nice Plus by Christian Schumacher on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:05:44 pm
    - Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 6, 2011 at 5:04:33 pm
- Re: A Nice Plus by Alexander Joyce on Dec 8, 2011 at 3:08:55 pm
  - Re: A Nice Plus by Rafael Amador on Dec 9, 2011 at 2:54:57 am
    - Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 9, 2011 at 5:47:53 am
      - Re: A Nice Plus by Christian Schumacher on Dec 9, 2011 at 3:18:31 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 9, 2011 at 4:04:25 pm
    - Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 9, 2011 at 5:32:55 pm
      - Re: A Nice Plus by Rafael Amador on Dec 10, 2011 at 3:48:39 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Walter Soyka on Dec 10, 2011 at 6:07:19 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 10, 2011 at 6:25:22 pm
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 11, 2011 at 2:56:34 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Rafael Amador on Dec 11, 2011 at 11:04:30 am
        Re: A Nice Plus by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 11, 2011 at 4:00:58 pm

DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 1, 2011 at 5:43:47 pm
- Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:13:49 pm
  - Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:53:35 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 1:32:40 am
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:02:37 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:36:41 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 2:41:09 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 3:31:14 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:35:51 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:43:00 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:49:44 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:56:59 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:01:53 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:05:38 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:06:31 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 3, 2011 at 11:16:36 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:02:22 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:26:40 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Oliver Peters on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:50:53 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve FCP X roundtrip by Jeremy Garchow on Dec 4, 2011 at 12:54:44 am

DPX sequence timeline editing by Elliott Balsley on Nov 30, 2011 at 1:44:07 am
- Re: DPX sequence timeline editing by Dane Cannon on Nov 30, 2011 at 4:21:45 pm

Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1 by Dave Pickett on Nov 21, 2011 at 6:43:41 pm
- Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1 by Dwaine Maggart on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:43:26 pm
  - Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1 by Anders Holck on Nov 23, 2011 at 1:56:45 pm
  - Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1 by Dave Pickett on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:43:35 pm
    - Re: Phantom 10bit Packed Cine and Resolve 8.1 by Anders Holck on Jan 31, 2012 at 11:14:27 pm

Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by Jonas Petersson on Nov 1, 2011 at 1:21:11 pm
- Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by bryson jones on Nov 1, 2011 at 3:24:08 pm
  - Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by Jonas Petersson on Nov 1, 2011 at 4:44:51 pm
    - Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by bryson jones on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:13:03 am
      - Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by Jonas Petersson on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:52:23 am
      - Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by Jonas Petersson on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:46:59 am
        Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by bryson jones on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:16:47 am
        Re: Correct way to work with DPX sequences? by Rolf Howarth on Nov 6, 2011 at 10:58:27 pm

Glue Tools DPX and Blackmagic Multibridge playback by Frank Laughlin on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:47:05 pm

ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:13:47 am
- Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:47:53 am
  - Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:52:16 am
    - Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 19, 2011 at 1:19:17 am
      - Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 4:40:53 pm
        Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by andrew smith on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:06:06 pm
        Re: ARRI FCP workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx?! by Peter Chamberlain on Oct 20, 2011 at 1:24:59 am

Arri FCP Workflow - LUT's & converting .ari sequences to .dpx by andrew smith on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:25:08 pm

ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Bruce Colgate on Oct 14, 2011 at 4:52:12 am
- Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Doug Fish on Oct 14, 2011 at 5:12:49 am
- Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Bob Zelin on Oct 15, 2011 at 9:39:25 pm
  - Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Bruce Colgate on Oct 16, 2011 at 1:08:37 am
    - Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Kip Draper on Oct 16, 2011 at 11:48:26 am
      - Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Bob Zelin on Oct 16, 2011 at 3:56:23 pm
      - Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Fabio Cormack on Oct 17, 2011 at 11:02:38 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Kip Draper on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:39:24 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Fabio Cormack on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:11:49 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Kip Draper on Oct 20, 2011 at 10:23:43 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Fabio Cormack on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:29:10 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Doug Fish on Oct 21, 2011 at 9:41:24 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Jarod Breshears on Oct 22, 2011 at 1:55:24 am
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Doug Fish on Oct 22, 2011 at 3:21:39 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Jarod Breshears on Oct 22, 2011 at 9:54:25 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Doug Fish on Oct 23, 2011 at 2:43:30 am
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Jarod Breshears on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:35:44 am
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Kip Draper on Oct 22, 2011 at 3:23:06 am
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Dominik Twardowski on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:31:12 am
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Kip Draper on Oct 25, 2011 at 4:22:20 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Doug Fish on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:13:02 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Bruce Colgate on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:30:29 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Fabio Cormack on Oct 26, 2011 at 12:30:13 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Kip Draper on Oct 30, 2011 at 7:33:59 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Fabio Cormack on Oct 31, 2011 at 4:12:00 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Vladimir Philogene on Nov 25, 2011 at 11:35:45 pm
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Bruce Colgate on Nov 26, 2011 at 6:23:12 am
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Doug Fish on Nov 26, 2011 at 7:34:21 am
        Re: ATEM TV Studio: Successful HDMI cables? by Matt Bonfield on Jan 28, 2012 at 4:04:28 pm

QuickTime fix for Glue Tools and MacOSX 10.7 Lion by Robert Monaghan on Oct 13, 2011 at 1:45:49 am

no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files by Dan Goulder on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:47:45 pm
- Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files by Robert Monaghan on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:53:59 pm
  - Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files by Dan Goulder on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:28:15 pm
    - Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files by gary adcock on Oct 7, 2011 at 1:53:39 pm
    - Re: no 10-bit rgb video out with 10-bit rgb dpx files by Robert Monaghan on Oct 7, 2011 at 3:40:04 pm

ARRI Alexa LogC filter for Final Cut, now available separately. by Robert Monaghan on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:21:39 pm

Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ??? by Aysegul Efe on Oct 1, 2011 at 12:09:40 pm
- Re: Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ??? by Michael Phillips on Oct 1, 2011 at 8:31:26 pm
  - Re: Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ??? by Aysegul Efe on Oct 3, 2011 at 12:05:45 pm
    - Re: Avid mc 5.5 phantom workflow ??? by Robert Monaghan on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:16:50 pm

iif ACES workflow, thoughts? by Jonny Revolt on Sep 14, 2011 at 5:37:49 am
- Re: iif ACES workflow, thoughts? by Mike Most on Sep 14, 2011 at 7:02:39 am

IBC 2011 - At Vision Research Booth! by Robert Monaghan on Sep 2, 2011 at 6:18:08 am

Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP by Greg Brayton on Sep 1, 2011 at 1:23:30 am
- Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP by Oliver Peters on Sep 2, 2011 at 1:40:14 am
  - Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP by andrew smith on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:34:56 pm
    - Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP by Oliver Peters on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:21:37 am
    - Re: Impoting ALEXA footage into FCP by gary adcock on Oct 19, 2011 at 1:28:05 am

phantom flex cine files to dpx workflow by Phillip Choe on Aug 25, 2011 at 2:11:44 am
- Re: phantom flex cine files to dpx workflow by Danny Scotting on Aug 25, 2011 at 3:02:41 am
  - Re: phantom flex cine files to dpx workflow by Nikola Stefanovic on Aug 25, 2011 at 7:40:15 am

ASC-CDL Toolkit for Final Cut Pro/Motion is now available. by Robert Monaghan on Aug 18, 2011 at 4:08:38 pm

Advice needed: FCP7 - Glue Tools - Color - workflow - how to keep 25 fps by Alexandra Wesche on Aug 18, 2011 at 2:29:06 pm
- Re: Advice needed: FCP7 - Glue Tools - Color - workflow - how to keep 25 fps by Robert Monaghan on Aug 18, 2011 at 3:13:16 pm
  - Re: Advice needed: FCP7 - Glue Tools - Color - workflow - how to keep 25 fps by Alexandra Wesche on Aug 18, 2011 at 3:47:16 pm

Adding Subtitle by Nick Anderson on Aug 9, 2011 at 1:35:06 am
- Re: Adding Subtitle by Christopher Tay on Aug 9, 2011 at 2:26:16 am
  - Re: Adding Subtitle by Nick Anderson on Aug 9, 2011 at 2:29:46 pm
    - Re: Adding Subtitle by Jonathon Lee on Aug 9, 2011 at 6:17:50 pm
      - Re: Adding Subtitle by Karam Nuriel on Nov 12, 2011 at 10:52:19 pm
      - Re: Adding Subtitle by Jonathon Lee on Aug 10, 2011 at 2:05:56 am
      - Re: Adding Subtitle by Nick Anderson on Aug 10, 2011 at 3:00:38 am
        Re: Adding Subtitle by Jonathon Lee on Aug 10, 2011 at 3:57:20 am
        Re: Adding Subtitle by Nick Anderson on Aug 15, 2011 at 12:37:08 am
        Re: Adding Subtitle by Marc Fisher on Aug 18, 2011 at 8:38:45 pm
        Re: Adding Subtitle by Jonathon Lee on Aug 18, 2011 at 10:20:33 pm

Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 12:30:33 am
- Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Roth Weiss on Aug 4, 2011 at 12:38:53 am
- Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Rafael Amador on Aug 4, 2011 at 1:07:31 am
  - Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:22:57 am
    - Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:44:45 am
      - Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:51:12 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:09:23 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:13:52 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:10:17 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:18:07 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:24:24 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:27:51 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:40:07 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Rafael Amador on Aug 4, 2011 at 11:04:14 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 2:14:25 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Rafael Amador on Aug 4, 2011 at 10:24:52 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 10:40:48 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 4, 2011 at 3:58:24 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 5, 2011 at 5:16:07 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Paul Provost on Aug 5, 2011 at 5:49:02 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Rafael Amador on Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56:23 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Paul Provost on Aug 6, 2011 at 3:51:56 am
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Rafael Amador on Aug 5, 2011 at 4:34:28 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Paul Provost on Aug 5, 2011 at 5:42:45 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 5, 2011 at 6:58:45 pm
        Re: Does FCP degrade 10 bit files/clips? by David Smith on Aug 6, 2011 at 5:37:17 am

COW: New CAREER CENTER, Find or Post JOBS, or Promote Your SERVICES OFFERED - FREE! by Creative COW on Jul 20, 2011 at 8:21:36 pm
- Re: COW: New CAREER CENTER, Find or Post JOBS, or Promote Your SERVICES OFFERED - FREE! by Mike Cohen on Jul 27, 2011 at 4:14:50 pm

A couple easy questions... by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 19, 2011 at 3:52:19 pm
- Re: A couple easy questions... by Robbie Carman on Jul 19, 2011 at 7:25:18 pm
  - Re: A couple easy questions... by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 19, 2011 at 7:52:52 pm
    - Re: A couple easy questions... by Robbie Carman on Jul 19, 2011 at 8:22:36 pm
      - Re: A couple easy questions... by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 19, 2011 at 9:13:11 pm
    - Re: A couple easy questions... by Fabio Cormack on Jul 20, 2011 at 12:14:49 am
- Re: A couple easy questions... by Robert Monaghan on Jul 20, 2011 at 2:12:18 pm
  - Re: A couple easy questions... by Yurii Hydrick on Jul 20, 2011 at 3:14:58 pm

Question about AVCHD Clip Rename by Patrick Murphy on Jul 16, 2011 at 7:52:43 pm
- Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename by Steve Brame on Jul 16, 2011 at 9:40:55 pm
  - Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename by Alex Udell on Jul 17, 2011 at 1:14:24 pm
    - Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename by Patrick Murphy on Jul 17, 2011 at 6:38:34 pm
      - Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename by Tom Daigon on Jul 17, 2011 at 6:46:21 pm
        Re: Question about AVCHD Clip Rename by Alex Udell on Jul 18, 2011 at 2:05:58 pm

FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use? by David Smith on Jul 10, 2011 at 12:32:23 am
- Re: FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use? by Hector berrebi on Jul 10, 2011 at 4:19:26 am
  - Re: FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use? by David Smith on Jul 10, 2011 at 4:39:37 am
- Re: FCP uses Cinema Tools - what does Avid MC 5.5 use? by Chris Conlee on Jul 12, 2011 at 9:21:42 pm

DPX & Timecode Data Managment confusion by David Smith on Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50:33 am
- Re: DPX & Timecode Data Managment confusion by Robert Monaghan on Jul 20, 2011 at 1:51:52 pm

Glue Tools CineonDPX works with Compressor 4 by Robert Monaghan on Jul 7, 2011 at 10:49:55 pm

Reprieve: Compressor 4 works with Glue Tools.. by Robert Monaghan on Jun 28, 2011 at 4:03:55 am
- Re: Reprieve: Compressor 4 works with Glue Tools.. by James Mortner on Jun 28, 2011 at 8:46:19 am

So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:03:44 pm
- Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tom Daigon on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:07:15 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Jamie Franklin on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:09:39 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Sohrab Sandhu on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:54:20 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:06:13 am
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Joseph W. Bourke on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:02:08 pm
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:27:13 pm
- Re: So who is the best candidate? by Marcus Umstead on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:14:40 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Steve Connor on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:21:32 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Peter Corbett on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:34:00 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:37:35 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Andrew Wilson on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:23:21 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 10:36:10 pm
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Craig Wall on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:04:53 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:18:25 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tom Daigon on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:23:27 pm
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Kevin Monahan on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:13:49 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:31:11 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Kevin Monahan on Jun 24, 2011 at 3:32:38 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:46:03 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 11:35:36 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:54:13 pm
- Re: So who is the best candidate? by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:00:41 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:19:05 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:25:50 pm
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:31:05 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:34:26 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:57:13 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Daniel Frome on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:40:02 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Daniel Frome on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:37:32 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:58:19 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:08:25 am
- Re: So who is the best candidate? by Jim Giberti on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:20:30 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:28:47 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Neil Goodman on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:34:12 pm
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 23, 2011 at 11:55:17 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:10:16 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Daniel Frome on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:51:19 am
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Craig Wall on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:04:29 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 12:26:25 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:28:29 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Gary Huff on Jun 24, 2011 at 6:05:54 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 1:53:47 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 24, 2011 at 3:12:33 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 10:10:49 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 25, 2011 at 12:50:01 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 25, 2011 at 11:41:12 pm
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 26, 2011 at 12:21:14 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 26, 2011 at 11:22:29 am
        Re: So who is the best candidate? by Ivan Radovanovic on Jun 27, 2011 at 4:35:07 pm
- Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 1:34:38 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tom Daigon on Jun 24, 2011 at 1:54:24 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Tim Wilson on Jun 24, 2011 at 2:22:28 pm
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by David Cherniack on Jun 24, 2011 at 3:11:16 pm
    - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 24, 2011 at 9:52:10 pm
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by David Cherniack on Jun 24, 2011 at 10:34:36 pm
      - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Dennis Radeke on Jun 25, 2011 at 8:33:20 pm
- Re: So who is the best candidate? by Jim Wiseman on Jun 26, 2011 at 2:04:20 am
  - Re: So who is the best candidate? by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 26, 2011 at 11:47:01 am

A 'pro' app with missing features by Chris Kenny on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:28:16 pm
- Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Craig Seeman on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:47:04 pm
  - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Steve Mitchell on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:02:09 am
- Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Andrew Corneles on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:53:29 pm
  - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Chris Kenny on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:25:37 pm
    - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Greg Burke on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:43:47 pm
- Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Herb Sevush on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:11:03 am
  - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Chris Kenny on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:16:02 am
    - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Herb Sevush on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:45:26 am
- Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:26:37 am
  - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Chris Kenny on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:29:57 am
    - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 22, 2011 at 2:31:26 am
      - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Chris Kenny on Jun 22, 2011 at 2:46:54 am
        Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Adam Claude Jones on Jun 22, 2011 at 2:58:25 am
        Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Tom Daigon on Jun 22, 2011 at 4:10:50 am
  - Re: A 'pro' app with missing features by Michael Aranyshev on Jun 22, 2011 at 1:34:54 am

FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:52:12 pm
- Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:23:44 am
- Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by james durante on Jul 1, 2011 at 4:54:10 pm
  - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jul 1, 2011 at 5:05:59 pm
- Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Michael Aranyshev on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:27:27 pm
  - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jul 12, 2011 at 4:43:06 pm
    - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Michael Aranyshev on Jul 12, 2011 at 5:19:47 pm
      - Re: FCPX and Glue Tools. by Robert Monaghan on Jul 12, 2011 at 5:30:43 pm

444 to DPX and keeping TC by Samuel Smith on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:42:24 pm
- Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC by Dave LaRonde on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:59:15 pm
- Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC by Walter Soyka on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:33:17 pm
- Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5? by Walter Soyka on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:37:08 pm
  - Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5? by Samuel Smith on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:11:02 pm
    - Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5? by Walter Soyka on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:39:29 pm
      - Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC -- CS5.5? by Danny Hays on Jun 22, 2011 at 3:07:13 am
- Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC by Robert Monaghan on Jun 26, 2011 at 6:57:05 pm
- Re: 444 to DPX and keeping TC by Shiloh Heyman on Oct 19, 2011 at 6:45:15 am

Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:20:55 pm
- Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by John Kilgour on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:27:01 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tony Brittan on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:32:02 pm
- Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Clayton Burkhart on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:31:12 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:36:28 pm
    - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Craig Shields on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:06:32 pm
      - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tim Wilson on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:17:11 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Simon Ubsdell on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:22:58 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tim Wilson on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:29:20 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Craig Shields on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:27:42 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:33:22 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Craig Shields on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:36:01 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:46:37 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Peter Corbett on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:57:35 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 4:21:37 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 6:37:01 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Victor Perez on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:37:34 pm
    - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Matthew Rogers on Jun 21, 2011 at 2:59:34 pm
      - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Dean Neal on Jun 21, 2011 at 3:45:44 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by David Cherniack on Jun 21, 2011 at 4:53:25 pm
- Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Kylee Wall on Jun 21, 2011 at 4:18:16 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 5:57:10 pm
    - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Sohrab Sandhu on Jun 21, 2011 at 6:41:57 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Terry Mikkelsen on Jun 21, 2011 at 7:18:20 pm
    - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 7:38:48 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Roland Manuel on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:02:49 am
- Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by gary adcock on Jun 21, 2011 at 7:46:41 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:34:22 pm
    - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by gary adcock on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:46:18 pm
      - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:21:22 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:48:16 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Stephan Walfridsson on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:57:57 pm
      - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Tom Daigon on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:20:57 pm
  - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 8:50:23 pm
    - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by gary adcock on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:22:37 pm
      - Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by David Roth Weiss on Jun 21, 2011 at 10:36:19 pm
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by cam khoury on Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09:07 am
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by Al Bergstein on Jun 22, 2011 at 5:35:22 am
        Re: Big dissappoint for professionals!! by gary adcock on Jun 22, 2011 at 11:30:06 am

conform from DPX by Robin Erard on Jun 20, 2011 at 3:10:11 pm
- Re: conform from DPX by illya laney on Jun 20, 2011 at 4:57:16 pm

ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by Christopher Tay on Jun 10, 2011 at 3:15:39 am
- Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by Tim Farrell on Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45:30 am
  - Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by Christopher Tay on Jun 10, 2011 at 6:08:29 am
    - Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by Neil Sadwelkar on Jun 11, 2011 at 11:38:03 am
- Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by Jens Herold on Jun 10, 2011 at 6:59:25 am
- Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by illya laney on Jun 10, 2011 at 5:23:55 pm
  - Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by Michael Aranyshev on Jun 10, 2011 at 5:50:49 pm
    - Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by prathvish hegde on Jun 14, 2011 at 12:51:13 pm
      - Re: ARRIRAW, offline editing and conform in Resolve by illya laney on Jun 14, 2011 at 9:20:50 pm

3D + export workflow advice? by Tom Sanders on Jun 4, 2011 at 5:39:59 pm
- Re: 3D + export workflow advice? by Tom Sanders on Jun 4, 2011 at 7:05:26 pm

gluetools dpx - sequential numbers not starting at 1 by Tom Sanders on Jun 4, 2011 at 7:40:22 am

Conforming FCP sequence to Color with both R3D and DPX source material by Michael Ward on Jun 4, 2011 at 1:10:29 am
- Re: Conforming FCP sequence to Color with both R3D and DPX source material by Everest Mokaeff on Jun 5, 2011 at 7:55:27 pm

Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Clay Vernon on May 25, 2011 at 6:57:59 pm
- Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Dave LaRonde on May 25, 2011 at 7:19:45 pm
- Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Darby Edelen on May 25, 2011 at 8:31:23 pm
  - Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Clay Vernon on May 25, 2011 at 9:13:43 pm
    - Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Walter Soyka on May 25, 2011 at 10:11:27 pm
    - Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Bill Kelly on May 26, 2011 at 3:02:33 am
      - Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Walter Soyka on May 26, 2011 at 2:51:25 pm
        Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Josemarcos Ganan on May 26, 2011 at 4:40:46 pm
        Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Clay Vernon on May 26, 2011 at 4:52:05 pm
        Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Dave LaRonde on May 26, 2011 at 5:48:41 pm
        Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Josemarcos Ganan on May 27, 2011 at 3:52:56 pm
        Re: Apple ProRes CODEC question. Is there an alternative for this scenario? by Walter Soyka on May 27, 2011 at 4:06:18 pm

Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by David Jahns on Jun 30, 2009 at 10:14:59 pm
- Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by gary adcock on Jul 3, 2009 at 1:33:00 pm
  - Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by David Jahns on Jul 6, 2009 at 4:45:22 pm
    - Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by gary adcock on Jul 7, 2009 at 2:05:43 pm
      - Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by David Jahns on Jul 7, 2009 at 4:33:02 pm
        Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by gary adcock on Jul 8, 2009 at 4:59:54 pm
- Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Robert Monaghan on Jul 9, 2009 at 12:31:08 am
  - Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by David Jahns on Jul 9, 2009 at 1:07:21 am
  - Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Julian Lalinde on Oct 10, 2011 at 4:31:45 pm
    - Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Robert Monaghan on Oct 10, 2011 at 4:42:01 pm
      - Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Julian Lalinde on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:05:35 pm
        Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Robert Monaghan on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:13:14 pm
        Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Julian Lalinde on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:26:08 pm
        Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Julian Lalinde on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:33:56 pm
        Re: Workflow - Phantom Cam & 35mm by Robert Monaghan on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:39:26 pm

1 2 3 Next >>

ADD A NEW POST • SEARCH • CHANGE FORUM