Mark Spano

Rafael Amador

Jeremy Garchow

Pat DeFilippo

Chris Tompkins

Michael Sacci

Clint Wardlow

John Pale

Decks & VTRs

ADD A NEW POST • CHANGE FORUM • SEARCH • SUBSCRIBE

Analogue To SDI Mini Converter issues.... by Andrew Petrouis on Dec 28, 2011 at 5:03:39 pm
- Re: Analogue To SDI Mini Converter issues.... by Gene Colburn on Dec 29, 2011 at 1:51:12 am
- Re: Analogue To SDI Mini Converter issues.... by Justin Strauber on Dec 29, 2011 at 2:40:14 am

io express and beta digitizing by joshua schwarz on Dec 28, 2011 at 4:13:20 pm

Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Christopher Kechichian on Dec 27, 2011 at 4:51:26 pm
- Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Bret Williams on Dec 27, 2011 at 9:23:26 pm
  - Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Christopher Kechichian on Dec 28, 2011 at 8:45:32 am
    - Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Dennis Kutchera on Dec 28, 2011 at 11:42:36 pm
      - Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Bret Williams on Dec 29, 2011 at 4:35:22 am
        Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Dennis Kutchera on Dec 31, 2011 at 3:39:23 pm
        Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Bret Williams on Dec 31, 2011 at 8:57:14 pm
      - Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Christopher Kechichian on Dec 29, 2011 at 8:07:55 am
        Re: Blackmagic Intensity Extreme or Matrox MXO2 mini? by Bret Williams on Dec 31, 2011 at 8:56:33 pm

DVX100b to Final Cut Pro quality drop by Aaron Moore on Dec 25, 2011 at 7:18:36 am
- Re: DVX100b to Final Cut Pro quality drop by Chris Tompkins on Dec 26, 2011 at 12:50:38 am

Is a capture and playback device a passthrough or a pitstop? by Frank Black on Dec 23, 2011 at 4:10:23 am
- Re: Is a capture and playback device a passthrough or a pitstop? by Jeff Meyer on Dec 28, 2011 at 1:41:39 am

FCP Won't recognize HVX200 as deck by Kyle Joyce on Dec 23, 2011 at 2:41:25 am
- Re: FCP Won't recognize HVX200 as deck by Chris Tompkins on Dec 23, 2011 at 1:49:16 pm
  - Re: FCP Won't recognize HVX200 as deck by Mark Suszko on Dec 23, 2011 at 8:17:49 pm
    - Re: FCP Won't recognize HVX200 as deck by Mark Suszko on Dec 23, 2011 at 8:23:39 pm
- Re: FCP Won't recognize HVX200 as deck by Mikey Bouchereau on Jan 2, 2012 at 4:49:22 am

Never thought I'd be doing this again...It's nearly 2012 by Ben Oliver on Dec 22, 2011 at 3:54:45 pm
- Re: Never thought I'd be doing this again...It's nearly 2012 by Chris Babbitt on Dec 22, 2011 at 4:05:21 pm
  - Re: Never thought I'd be doing this again...It's nearly 2012 by Ben Oliver on Dec 22, 2011 at 4:05:46 pm
- Re: Never thought I'd be doing this again...It's nearly 2012 by Dave LaRonde on Dec 22, 2011 at 4:07:52 pm
  - Re: Never thought I'd be doing this again...It's nearly 2012 by Ben Oliver on Dec 22, 2011 at 4:10:52 pm
    - Re: Never thought I'd be doing this again...It's nearly 2012 by Mark Suszko on Dec 22, 2011 at 5:16:05 pm
      - Re: Never thought I'd be doing this again...It's nearly 2012 by Ben Oliver on Dec 22, 2011 at 9:57:17 pm

News: Blackmagic Design Releases Avid DNxHD Public Beta Update for HyperDeck Studio by Cow News Droid on Dec 21, 2011 at 7:18:00 pm
- Re: News: Blackmagic Design Releases Avid DNxHD Public Beta Update for HyperDeck Studio by Bob Zelin on Dec 22, 2011 at 2:32:59 am
  - Re: News: Blackmagic Design Releases Avid DNxHD Public Beta Update for HyperDeck Studio by Tim Wilson on Dec 22, 2011 at 4:43:30 pm
    - Re: News: Blackmagic Design Releases Avid DNxHD Public Beta Update for HyperDeck Studio by Bouke Vahl on Dec 24, 2011 at 3:14:30 pm
- Re: News: Blackmagic Design Releases Avid DNxHD Public Beta Update for HyperDeck Studio by Fabiano Waewell on Feb 24, 2012 at 2:15:35 pm

More lenses, or a camcorder? by Chris Barnes on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:47:39 pm
- Re: More lenses, or a camcorder? by Jorden Mosley on Dec 21, 2011 at 10:32:25 pm
- Re: More lenses, or a camcorder? by Noah Kadner on Dec 22, 2011 at 12:59:15 am
  - Re: More lenses, or a camcorder? by Chris Barnes on Dec 22, 2011 at 2:50:18 am
    - Re: More lenses, or a camcorder? by Colin McQuillan on Dec 22, 2011 at 3:38:40 am
      - Re: More lenses, or a camcorder? by Chris Barnes on Dec 22, 2011 at 4:46:22 pm
        Re: More lenses, or a camcorder? by Colin McQuillan on Dec 22, 2011 at 11:48:54 pm
        Re: More lenses, or a camcorder? by John Frey on Dec 24, 2011 at 3:01:11 am

strangest thing I have ever seen by Javier Diaz on Dec 21, 2011 at 3:52:24 pm
- Re: strangest thing I have ever seen by Mark Suszko on Dec 21, 2011 at 3:57:05 pm
  - Re: strangest thing I have ever seen by Javier Diaz on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:00:31 pm
    - Re: strangest thing I have ever seen by Dave LaRonde on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:32:29 pm
      - Re: strangest thing I have ever seen by Javier Diaz on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:42:26 pm
      - Re: strangest thing I have ever seen by Javier Diaz on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:47:04 pm
        Re: strangest thing I have ever seen by Tony Alznauer on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:52:48 pm
        Re: strangest thing I have ever seen by Javier Diaz on Dec 21, 2011 at 7:30:31 pm

1-hr tape only accepts 40 minutes of media from timeline when printing to video by marsha lake on Dec 21, 2011 at 3:52:38 am
- Re: 1-hr tape only accepts 40 minutes of media from timeline when printing to video by Greg Leslie on Dec 21, 2011 at 4:51:02 am
  - Re: 1-hr tape only accepts 40 minutes of media from timeline when printing to video by marsha lake on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:39:27 pm
- Re: 1-hr tape only accepts 40 minutes of media from timeline when printing to video by Mark Morache on Dec 21, 2011 at 6:57:42 am
  - Re: 1-hr tape only accepts 40 minutes of media from timeline when printing to video by marsha lake on Dec 21, 2011 at 1:35:57 pm
    - Re: 1-hr tape only accepts 40 minutes of media from timeline when printing to video by Bret Williams on Dec 21, 2011 at 5:46:15 pm
      - Re: 1-hr tape only accepts 40 minutes of media from timeline when printing to video by marsha lake on Dec 21, 2011 at 7:56:31 pm

Service: AVI Systems by Matt Johnson on Dec 20, 2011 at 10:00:27 pm

BRU PE - Changing computers by Nate Winspear on Dec 19, 2011 at 10:49:53 pm

Sony HVR-V1U camera will not play tapes shot on Canon XH-A1S by Jason Furrer on Dec 18, 2011 at 6:30:40 pm
- Re: Sony HVR-V1U camera will not play tapes shot on Canon XH-A1S by Todd Terry on Dec 18, 2011 at 8:06:07 pm

capture formats for upconvert to HD with Multibridge Eclipse and premiere pro cs5 by Reid VanVoris on Dec 15, 2011 at 9:57:15 pm

DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Robie Flores on Dec 15, 2011 at 9:56:37 pm
- Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Michael Sacci on Dec 15, 2011 at 10:17:47 pm
  - Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Robie Flores on Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24:45 pm
    - Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Michael Sacci on Dec 15, 2011 at 10:50:07 pm
      - Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Robie Flores on Dec 15, 2011 at 11:00:07 pm
        Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Michael Sacci on Dec 15, 2011 at 11:34:49 pm
        Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Mark Spano on Dec 16, 2011 at 7:27:09 pm
        Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Robie Flores on Dec 16, 2011 at 7:29:26 pm
        Re: DVD vs. Digibeta- which one is higher quality? by Michael Sacci on Dec 16, 2011 at 10:50:24 pm

Possible formats for upconversion to HD with BMD Multibridge Eclipse and PPCS5 on Mac by Reid VanVoris on Dec 15, 2011 at 9:54:56 pm

Running basics on SONY HD CAM HDWD2000 by jay agoglia on Dec 15, 2011 at 8:45:54 pm
- Re: Running basics on SONY HD CAM HDWD2000 by Mark Spano on Dec 15, 2011 at 9:23:29 pm
  - Re: Running basics on SONY HD CAM HDWD2000 by jay agoglia on Dec 16, 2011 at 1:24:17 am

Online and finishing by Danny Davis on Dec 14, 2011 at 8:57:21 pm
- Re: Online and finishing by Shane Ross on Dec 14, 2011 at 9:54:07 pm
  - Re: Online and finishing by Sam Cole on Dec 14, 2011 at 11:10:30 pm
    - Re: Online and finishing by Danny Davis on Dec 14, 2011 at 11:57:02 pm
      - Re: Online and finishing by Shane Ross on Dec 15, 2011 at 12:04:48 am
      - Re: Online and finishing by Sam Cole on Dec 15, 2011 at 11:12:50 pm

Closed Captioning by Charles Bruzzese on Dec 14, 2011 at 3:32:09 pm
- Re: Closed Captioning by Chuck Wall on Dec 16, 2011 at 10:48:35 pm

How to convert 4:3 video to ful frame 16:9 by Ismet Arnautalic on Dec 14, 2011 at 12:36:04 pm
- Re: How to convert 4:3 video to ful frame 16:9 by AJA Sales Department on Dec 14, 2011 at 5:30:39 pm
  - Re: How to convert 4:3 video to ful frame 16:9 by Ismet Arnautalic on Dec 16, 2011 at 9:55:19 am
    - Re: How to convert 4:3 video to ful frame 16:9 by AJA Sales Department on Dec 16, 2011 at 4:03:03 pm

Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Pat DeFilippo on Dec 14, 2011 at 12:51:36 am
- Re: Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by James Beattie on Dec 20, 2011 at 4:47:18 pm

Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Pat DeFilippo on Dec 14, 2011 at 12:50:49 am

Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Pat DeFilippo on Dec 14, 2011 at 12:49:50 am
- Re: Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Shane Ross on Dec 14, 2011 at 1:48:55 am
  - Re: Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Pat DeFilippo on Dec 14, 2011 at 3:24:12 am
    - Re: Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Bret Williams on Dec 14, 2011 at 4:02:13 am
      - Re: Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Steve Eisen on Dec 14, 2011 at 1:55:40 pm
    - Re: Looking to BUY Mac Pro, RAM, AJA LHi, Production Monitor, Speakers, Keyboards... by Jerry Hofmann on Dec 14, 2011 at 2:52:59 pm

Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Olly Lawer on Dec 13, 2011 at 12:06:50 pm
- Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Craig Seeman on Dec 13, 2011 at 3:18:40 pm
  - Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Olly Lawer on Dec 13, 2011 at 4:09:50 pm
    - Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Craig Seeman on Dec 13, 2011 at 5:19:09 pm
- Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Chris Babbitt on Dec 13, 2011 at 5:11:48 pm
  - Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Craig Seeman on Dec 13, 2011 at 5:23:02 pm
    - Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Craig Seeman on Dec 13, 2011 at 5:25:54 pm
- Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Kevin Patrick on Dec 14, 2011 at 4:41:53 pm
  - Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Craig Seeman on Dec 14, 2011 at 4:51:38 pm
    - Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Kevin Patrick on Dec 15, 2011 at 12:42:11 pm
      - Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Bob Mark on Dec 29, 2011 at 6:53:13 pm
        Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Craig Seeman on Dec 29, 2011 at 7:22:33 pm
        Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Chris Babbitt on Dec 29, 2011 at 8:50:59 pm
        Re: Blu-ray disc brands - comparison by Bob Mark on Dec 29, 2011 at 10:17:10 pm

Used Betacam Videotape by Gregg Schieve on Dec 12, 2011 at 4:24:04 pm
- Re: Used Betacam Videotape by Chuck Pullen on Dec 12, 2011 at 8:25:32 pm

Final Cut Studio/ Best AJA Card and Breakout Box by Lee Denham on Dec 11, 2011 at 11:52:20 pm
- Re: Final Cut Studio/ Best AJA Card and Breakout Box by Steve Eisen on Dec 12, 2011 at 1:09:01 am
- Re: Final Cut Studio/ Best AJA Card and Breakout Box by Neil Patience on Dec 12, 2011 at 2:11:58 am
  - Re: Final Cut Studio/ Best AJA Card and Breakout Box by John Pale on Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50:42 am

HVX200a or HPX170 by Nathaniel Bear on Dec 11, 2011 at 12:38:52 am
- Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Steve Eisen on Dec 12, 2011 at 1:17:31 am
  - Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Dec 12, 2011 at 5:47:52 pm
    - Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Nathaniel Bear on Dec 12, 2011 at 6:14:04 pm
  - Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Nathaniel Bear on Dec 12, 2011 at 6:11:41 pm
    - Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Dec 12, 2011 at 6:25:20 pm
      - Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Steve Eisen on Dec 13, 2011 at 2:26:02 am
        Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Dec 13, 2011 at 4:19:42 am
        Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Nathaniel Bear on Dec 13, 2011 at 5:42:59 pm
        Re: HVX200a or HPX170 by Matthew Sonnenfeld on Dec 17, 2011 at 3:07:12 pm

Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Bijoyini Chatterjee on Dec 8, 2011 at 3:51:43 pm
- Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Dave LaRonde on Dec 8, 2011 at 4:47:46 pm
- Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Steve Eisen on Dec 8, 2011 at 4:56:33 pm
  - Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Bijoyini Chatterjee on Dec 8, 2011 at 5:38:58 pm
    - Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Dave LaRonde on Dec 8, 2011 at 5:51:15 pm
      - Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Bijoyini Chatterjee on Dec 8, 2011 at 6:12:33 pm
        Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Dave LaRonde on Dec 8, 2011 at 6:31:23 pm
        Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Bijoyini Chatterjee on Dec 8, 2011 at 8:45:01 pm
        Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Miriam Lefkowitz on Dec 20, 2011 at 3:57:22 pm
        Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Dave LaRonde on Dec 20, 2011 at 4:18:46 pm
        Re: Trying to master 1920x1080 sequence to SD DVD using a SONY Tape Deck as an intermediary by Miriam Lefkowitz on Dec 20, 2011 at 4:22:55 pm

Firewire IEEE 1394 Capture problem - Changing Windows 7 1394 driver to (Legacy) solved the problem by Nick Brown on Dec 8, 2011 at 12:47:11 am

SRW5800 w/HKSR-5801 Board for sale by Bob Tur on Dec 6, 2011 at 6:19:50 am

FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Andy Gallun on Dec 5, 2011 at 5:40:46 pm
- Re: FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Fred Miller on Dec 5, 2011 at 6:02:17 pm
  - Re: FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 6:33:53 pm
    - Re: FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Shane Ross on Dec 5, 2011 at 6:34:21 pm
      - Re: FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Andy Gallun on Dec 5, 2011 at 8:47:30 pm
        Re: FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Steve Eisen on Dec 6, 2011 at 1:40:35 am
        Re: FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Andy Gallun on Dec 7, 2011 at 12:02:51 am
        Re: FCP Capture Blues - Sony J-H1 HDCam Deck by Shane Ross on Dec 7, 2011 at 12:08:21 am

general settings for drod and ipad tablets by Trygve Tollefsen on Dec 3, 2011 at 8:52:00 am

Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Jonathan White on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:08:29 am
- Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Oliver Peters on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:31:21 pm
  - Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Jonathan White on Dec 3, 2011 at 7:18:23 pm
    - Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Jari Innanen on Dec 5, 2011 at 9:21:36 pm
      - Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Jonathan White on Dec 5, 2011 at 11:11:01 pm
        Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by alban egger on Dec 6, 2011 at 7:54:22 am
        Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Jonathan White on Dec 6, 2011 at 8:35:20 am
- Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Michael Judd on Dec 7, 2011 at 10:28:35 pm
  - Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Oliver Peters on Dec 7, 2011 at 11:30:08 pm
  - Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Jonathan White on Dec 8, 2011 at 4:01:22 pm
    - Re: Drama Doc with OMF via X27 finished :-) by Simon Ubsdell on Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21:18 pm

By mistake I batch conformed 30fps footage to 24fps, what's best way back? by Andrew Clancy on Dec 2, 2011 at 1:01:50 am
- Re: By mistake I batch conformed 30fps footage to 24fps, what's best way back? by Shane Ross on Dec 2, 2011 at 9:19:46 am
  - Re: By mistake I batch conformed 30fps footage to 24fps, what's best way back? by Andrew Clancy on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:07:12 pm
    - Re: By mistake I batch conformed 30fps footage to 24fps, what's best way back? by Rafael Amador on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:10:12 pm
      - Re: By mistake I batch conformed 30fps footage to 24fps, what's best way back? by Andrew Clancy on Dec 2, 2011 at 5:20:03 pm
        Re: By mistake I batch conformed 30fps footage to 24fps, what's best way back? by Chris Tompkins on Dec 5, 2011 at 1:28:37 pm
  - Re: By mistake I batch conformed 30fps footage to 24fps, what's best way back? by Mark Spano on Dec 5, 2011 at 3:12:09 pm

Digitizing Betacam tapes with FCP7 by Jeff Cadge on Dec 1, 2011 at 2:57:19 am
- Re: Digitizing Betacam tapes with FCP7 by Steve Eisen on Dec 1, 2011 at 4:40:20 am
- Re: Digitizing Betacam tapes with FCP7 by Kannan Raghavan on Dec 1, 2011 at 8:19:41 am
  - Re: Digitizing Betacam tapes with FCP7 by Chris Tompkins on Dec 1, 2011 at 1:09:27 pm
- Re: Digitizing Betacam tapes with FCP7 by Daryl Larson on Dec 20, 2011 at 9:01:48 pm

File based Closed Captioning workflow....any advice? by Dennis Leppell on Nov 30, 2011 at 9:37:43 pm
- Re: File based Closed Captioning workflow....any advice? by Shane Ross on Nov 30, 2011 at 10:15:27 pm

audio and video are out of sync when capturing on fcp by omar qudymat on Nov 30, 2011 at 2:20:48 pm

No Time code from Sony HVR-1500 - Decklink Extreme 3 by Stuart Sharman on Nov 30, 2011 at 10:23:38 am
- Re: No Time code from Sony HVR-1500 - Decklink Extreme 3 by Rafael Amador on Nov 30, 2011 at 3:37:11 pm
  - Re: No Time code from Sony HVR-1500 - Decklink Extreme 3 by Stuart Sharman on Nov 30, 2011 at 8:58:22 pm
    - Re: No Time code from Sony HVR-1500 - Decklink Extreme 3 by Rafael Amador on Dec 1, 2011 at 11:51:25 am
      - Re: No Time code from Sony HVR-1500 - Decklink Extreme 3 by Stuart Sharman on Dec 1, 2011 at 2:23:57 pm
        Re: No Time code from Sony HVR-1500 - Decklink Extreme 3 by Rafael Amador on Dec 1, 2011 at 6:15:19 pm

Should I interlace 7D footage for NTSC beta delivery by Andrew Clancy on Nov 29, 2011 at 9:32:03 pm
- Re: Should I interlace 7D footage for NTSC beta delivery by Neil Patience on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:43:27 pm
  - Re: Should I interlace 7D footage for NTSC beta delivery by Andrew Clancy on Nov 30, 2011 at 2:13:26 am
    - Re: Should I interlace 7D footage for NTSC beta delivery by Neil Patience on Nov 30, 2011 at 9:00:54 pm
      - Re: Should I interlace 7D footage for NTSC beta delivery by Andrew Clancy on Dec 1, 2011 at 5:18:25 pm

Which AJA Card or will Io LA continue to work? by Pat DeFilippo on Nov 29, 2011 at 6:49:14 pm
- Re: Which AJA Card or will Io LA continue to work? by AJA Sales Department on Nov 29, 2011 at 7:48:32 pm
  - Re: Which AJA Card or will Io LA continue to work? by Pat DeFilippo on Nov 29, 2011 at 9:41:43 pm
    - Re: Which AJA Card or will Io LA continue to work? by AJA Sales Department on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:04:10 pm
      - Re: Which AJA Card or will Io LA continue to work? by Pat DeFilippo on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:28:20 pm
        Re: Which AJA Card or will Io LA continue to work? by AJA Sales Department on Nov 30, 2011 at 12:08:00 am

Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Pat DeFilippo on Nov 29, 2011 at 6:42:19 pm
- Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Kevin Monahan on Nov 29, 2011 at 9:28:40 pm
- Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Vince Becquiot on Nov 30, 2011 at 12:41:39 am
  - Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Tom Daigon on Nov 30, 2011 at 4:09:19 am
    - Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Jim Wiseman on Nov 30, 2011 at 7:03:50 am
      - Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Alex Udell on Nov 30, 2011 at 3:31:47 pm
        Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Tom Daigon on Nov 30, 2011 at 4:38:17 pm
        Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Tim Kolb on Dec 2, 2011 at 1:24:32 am
        Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Pat DeFilippo on Dec 2, 2011 at 7:44:28 pm
        Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Tom Daigon on Dec 2, 2011 at 8:23:48 pm
        Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Pat DeFilippo on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:49:56 pm
        Re: Is the 2008 Mac Pro fine or does the 2010 offer that much more? by Tom Daigon on Dec 2, 2011 at 10:51:44 pm

Downscale from 2k to SD by Jonathan White on Nov 28, 2011 at 3:53:45 pm
- Re: Downscale from 2k to SD by Erik Lindahl on Nov 28, 2011 at 10:42:10 pm
  - Re: Downscale from 2k to SD by Rafael Amador on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:07:15 pm
    - Re: Downscale from 2k to SD by Sean Thomas on Dec 3, 2011 at 2:43:54 am

Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Joe Daniels on Nov 26, 2011 at 3:43:47 pm
- Re: Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Robert Brown on Nov 26, 2011 at 4:16:00 pm
  - Re: Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Chris Tompkins on Nov 27, 2011 at 11:33:54 am
    - Re: Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Robert Brown on Nov 27, 2011 at 6:43:20 pm
      - Re: Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Chris Tompkins on Nov 27, 2011 at 6:45:48 pm
        Re: Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Joe Daniels on Nov 28, 2011 at 9:05:36 pm
        Re: Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Chris Tompkins on Nov 28, 2011 at 9:10:57 pm
        Re: Any harm going the "progressive" route when capturing and exporting? by Joe Daniels on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:54:16 pm

Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 23, 2011 at 9:38:18 am
- Re: Very confused about interlace now by Robert Brown on Nov 23, 2011 at 9:57:47 am
  - Re: Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 23, 2011 at 12:27:34 pm
    - Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 2:09:01 pm
      - Re: Very confused about interlace now by Mitch Ives on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:12:42 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:32:16 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Mitch Ives on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:38:59 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:49:11 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Mitch Ives on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:00:51 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:14:53 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Mitch Ives on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:51:59 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:34:25 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Mitch Ives on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:57:35 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:11:19 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Mitch Ives on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:50:02 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 6:12:47 pm
      - Re: Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:31:09 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:35:19 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:38:46 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:43:11 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Andy Neil on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:42:50 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:02:34 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Andy Neil on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:45:06 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:07:09 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Andy Neil on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:45:05 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:51:21 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Kevin Patrick on Nov 23, 2011 at 7:36:39 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 9:10:24 pm
      - Re: Very confused about interlace now by Robert Brown on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:07:10 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:27:19 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:41:07 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 6:40:01 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Robert Brown on Nov 23, 2011 at 7:18:37 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 8:00:29 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Robert Brown on Nov 23, 2011 at 9:03:55 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 23, 2011 at 9:08:21 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Robert Brown on Nov 23, 2011 at 10:28:54 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Andy Neil on Nov 23, 2011 at 10:54:38 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Robert Brown on Nov 23, 2011 at 11:39:09 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 24, 2011 at 12:05:29 am
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Michael Gissing on Nov 24, 2011 at 12:59:04 am
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 24, 2011 at 1:12:55 am
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Michael Gissing on Nov 24, 2011 at 1:22:20 am
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Michael Gissing on Nov 24, 2011 at 1:26:29 am
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Alan Lacey on Nov 24, 2011 at 8:01:39 am
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Bret Williams on Nov 25, 2011 at 9:35:54 pm
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Robert Brown on Nov 26, 2011 at 12:17:17 am
        Re: Very confused about interlace now by Andy Mees on Nov 28, 2011 at 4:09:24 am

capturing digital8 sony tvr260 into fcp by danko muzevic on Nov 22, 2011 at 6:43:39 pm
- Re: capturing digital8 sony tvr260 into fcp by Shane Ross on Nov 22, 2011 at 9:17:07 pm

Firewire dub with Panasonic HD1400 by Eric Strand on Nov 22, 2011 at 6:02:22 pm
- Re: Firewire dub with Panasonic HD1400 by Jan Crittenden Livingston on Nov 22, 2011 at 6:18:40 pm
  - Re: Firewire dub with Panasonic HD1400 by Eric Strand on Nov 22, 2011 at 6:22:44 pm

Service: Popular Pictures by Mathias Popp on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:39:22 pm

Animation/Prores mix outputting to Flash by Adrian Lort-Phillips on Nov 22, 2011 at 2:50:28 pm
- Re: Animation/Prores mix outputting to Flash by Adrian Lort-Phillips on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:18:43 pm
  - Re: Animation/Prores mix outputting to Flash by Rafael Amador on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:30:53 pm
    - Re: Animation/Prores mix outputting to Flash by Adrian Lort-Phillips on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:55:56 pm
      - Re: Animation/Prores mix outputting to Flash by Rafael Amador on Nov 23, 2011 at 1:09:44 am
        Re: Animation/Prores mix outputting to Flash by Adrian Lort-Phillips on Nov 23, 2011 at 8:39:24 am

Cable connections for the BetacamSP 1800 to AJA Kona LHe by Stephen Favaloro on Nov 22, 2011 at 12:36:56 am
- Re: Cable connections for the BetacamSP 1800 to AJA Kona LHe by Shane Ross on Nov 22, 2011 at 1:20:10 am
  - Re: Cable connections for the BetacamSP 1800 to AJA Kona LHe by Stephen Favaloro on Nov 22, 2011 at 4:13:14 am
    - Re: Cable connections for the BetacamSP 1800 to AJA Kona LHe by Shane Ross on Nov 22, 2011 at 8:13:12 am
- Re: Cable connections for the BetacamSP 1800 to AJA Kona LHe by Bob Zelin on Nov 22, 2011 at 2:48:59 am
  - Re: Cable connections for the BetacamSP 1800 to AJA Kona LHe by Stephen Favaloro on Nov 22, 2011 at 4:36:42 am
    - Re: Cable connections for the BetacamSP 1800 to AJA Kona LHe by Bob Zelin on Nov 23, 2011 at 3:15:09 am

Service: DC Pro Video by Cameron Bowman on Nov 21, 2011 at 9:13:28 pm

Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by David Smith on Nov 21, 2011 at 8:19:32 pm
- Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Robert Houllahan on Nov 21, 2011 at 9:32:15 pm
  - Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by David Smith on Nov 21, 2011 at 10:08:18 pm
    - Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Doug Beal on Nov 21, 2011 at 11:07:04 pm
      - Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by David Smith on Nov 22, 2011 at 12:33:07 am
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Robert Houllahan on Nov 22, 2011 at 2:06:14 am
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by David Smith on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:20:05 am
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Robert Houllahan on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:34:49 am
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Robin Erard on Nov 22, 2011 at 7:14:41 am
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Sascha Haber on Nov 22, 2011 at 8:24:09 am
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Joseph Mastantuono on Nov 22, 2011 at 1:33:14 pm
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Robert Houllahan on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:13:46 pm
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by David Smith on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:22:47 pm
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Joseph Mastantuono on Nov 23, 2011 at 2:42:42 pm
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Joseph Owens on Nov 23, 2011 at 4:10:07 pm
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Dean Manion on Nov 24, 2011 at 2:26:31 am
        Re: Why still use 23.976 and 29.97? by Joseph Owens on Nov 24, 2011 at 7:18:29 pm

Hi-8 transfer issues by andy smith on Nov 21, 2011 at 4:38:54 pm
- Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Shane Ross on Nov 21, 2011 at 5:24:41 pm
  - Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Mark Suszko on Nov 21, 2011 at 5:33:52 pm
- Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Brad Wright on Nov 21, 2011 at 5:40:11 pm
  - Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Chris Borjis on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:03:12 pm
    - Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Steve Eisen on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:30:15 pm
      - Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Brad Wright on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:36:37 pm
    - Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Mark Suszko on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:36:18 pm
      - Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by andy smith on Nov 21, 2011 at 8:57:09 pm
        Re: Hi-8 transfer issues by Chris Borjis on Nov 21, 2011 at 9:20:45 pm

For Sale: Sony DVW-M2000 DigiBeta Legacy Format VTR MINT CONDITION by Brian Hughes on Nov 21, 2011 at 4:21:58 pm

sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 20, 2011 at 12:00:19 pm
- Re: sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 20, 2011 at 2:15:44 pm
  - Re: sony hdv deck by Mark Morache on Nov 21, 2011 at 12:12:56 am
    - Re: sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 21, 2011 at 12:40:27 am
      - Re: sony hdv deck by Tony Brittan on Nov 21, 2011 at 1:44:28 am
        Re: sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 21, 2011 at 2:18:01 am
        Re: sony hdv deck by Tony Brittan on Nov 21, 2011 at 2:21:19 am
        Re: sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 21, 2011 at 2:42:35 am
        Re: sony hdv deck by Tony Brittan on Nov 21, 2011 at 12:26:08 pm
        Re: sony hdv deck by T. Payton on Nov 21, 2011 at 3:41:27 pm
        Re: sony hdv deck by Tony Brittan on Nov 21, 2011 at 3:51:15 pm
        Re: sony hdv deck by T. Payton on Nov 21, 2011 at 4:22:14 pm
        Re: sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 21, 2011 at 11:00:29 pm
        Re: sony hdv deck by T. Payton on Nov 22, 2011 at 5:06:11 am
        Re: sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 22, 2011 at 8:59:06 am
        Re: sony hdv deck by T. Payton on Nov 22, 2011 at 3:44:04 pm
        Re: sony hdv deck by adam dewhirst on Nov 23, 2011 at 12:50:10 am

4:3 sd upconvert to HD on decklink extreme by Marten Berkman on Nov 19, 2011 at 1:11:45 am
- Re: 4:3 sd upconvert to HD on decklink extreme by Sean Thomas on Nov 19, 2011 at 2:35:31 am
  - Re: 4:3 sd upconvert to HD on decklink extreme by Marten Berkman on Nov 22, 2011 at 9:29:50 pm

Service: Jose Guzman by jose guzman on Nov 18, 2011 at 12:20:26 am

Live Capture stopping mid-tape by Andrew Pearson on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:39:19 pm
- Re: Live Capture stopping mid-tape by Andrew Pearson on Nov 18, 2011 at 9:52:27 am

Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Dominic Deacon on Nov 17, 2011 at 12:50:50 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Oliver Peters on Nov 17, 2011 at 1:03:06 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Clint Wardlow on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:31:24 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Dominic Deacon on Nov 18, 2011 at 12:33:00 am
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Walter Soyka on Nov 17, 2011 at 2:35:55 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Jim Glickert on Nov 17, 2011 at 3:36:22 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Neil Goodman on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:06:06 pm
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Don Walker on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:54:22 pm
      - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Rafael Amador on Nov 17, 2011 at 4:57:47 pm
        Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Daniel Frome on Nov 17, 2011 at 5:16:25 pm
        Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Dominic Deacon on Nov 19, 2011 at 12:34:16 am
        Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Herb Sevush on Nov 19, 2011 at 12:42:43 am
        Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Dominic Deacon on Nov 19, 2011 at 12:55:26 am
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Jason Jenkins on Nov 17, 2011 at 5:33:50 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Chris Conlee on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:29 pm
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Steve Connor on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:05:39 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Steve Connor on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:03:18 pm
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Chris Conlee on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:15:32 pm
      - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Steve Connor on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:24:00 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Daniel McClintock on Nov 17, 2011 at 8:12:48 pm
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Scott Thomas on Nov 18, 2011 at 5:38:38 am
      - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Chris Harlan on Nov 18, 2011 at 2:48:56 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:04:05 pm
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Steve Connor on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:06:31 pm
      - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Chris Harlan on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:17:20 pm
        Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by TImothy Auld on Nov 18, 2011 at 1:30:23 am
        Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Chris Harlan on Nov 18, 2011 at 2:43:15 am
        Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by TImothy Auld on Nov 18, 2011 at 10:09:38 am
      - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Chris Conlee on Nov 18, 2011 at 12:59:03 am
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Jason Jenkins on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:54:16 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Alan Okey on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:31:03 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Mark Dobson on Nov 17, 2011 at 6:55:53 pm
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Steve Connor on Nov 17, 2011 at 7:18:04 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Jim Giberti on Nov 17, 2011 at 10:35:01 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Greg Burke on Nov 17, 2011 at 8:23:52 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Brian Vedholm on Nov 17, 2011 at 9:30:28 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Andrew Rendell on Nov 17, 2011 at 10:07:40 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Dennis Lisonbee on Nov 17, 2011 at 10:33:35 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 18, 2011 at 12:27:41 am
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Greg Burke on Nov 18, 2011 at 2:17:08 am
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Herb Sevush on Nov 18, 2011 at 3:52:43 pm
      - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Herb Sevush on Nov 18, 2011 at 3:55:06 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Craig Seeman on Nov 18, 2011 at 2:47:27 am
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Mark Morache on Nov 18, 2011 at 3:47:32 am
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Jamie Franklin on Nov 18, 2011 at 6:16:17 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by David Lawrence on Nov 19, 2011 at 7:25:32 am
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Jamie Franklin on Nov 19, 2011 at 6:24:08 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Adam White on Nov 18, 2011 at 6:30:16 pm
  - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Paul Escamilla on Nov 18, 2011 at 7:36:13 pm
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Adam White on Nov 19, 2011 at 2:46:38 am
      - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Michael Gissing on Nov 19, 2011 at 4:18:30 am
    - Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Dennis Radeke on Nov 19, 2011 at 3:16:24 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by Mitch Ives on Nov 18, 2011 at 10:36:53 pm
- Re: Quick Poll. So what's your decision? by walter biscardi on Nov 22, 2011 at 2:24:27 am

Service: L[vfx] & animation Studio by Ruwan Perera on Nov 16, 2011 at 12:29:43 pm

VHS log and capture by Craig Johnson on Nov 14, 2011 at 12:16:54 am
- Re: VHS log and capture by Gary Milligan on Nov 14, 2011 at 1:07:10 am
  - Re: VHS log and capture by Rafael Amador on Nov 14, 2011 at 2:12:46 am
    - Re: VHS log and capture by Craig Johnson on Nov 14, 2011 at 12:53:55 pm
      - Re: VHS log and capture by Chris Tompkins on Nov 14, 2011 at 1:10:56 pm
        Re: VHS log and capture by Mark Suszko on Nov 14, 2011 at 2:45:18 pm
        Re: VHS log and capture by Craig Johnson on Nov 14, 2011 at 3:43:54 pm
        Re: VHS log and capture by Neil Patience on Nov 14, 2011 at 10:54:16 pm
        Re: VHS log and capture by Craig Johnson on Nov 15, 2011 at 2:37:13 am

Anyone else a little frustrated? by Scott Francis on Nov 13, 2011 at 12:41:34 am
- Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Danny Hays on Nov 13, 2011 at 6:37:07 pm
  - Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Scott Francis on Nov 13, 2011 at 7:42:41 pm
    - Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Joshua Helling on Nov 15, 2011 at 6:22:39 pm
      - Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Richard Freemantle on Nov 16, 2011 at 1:09:33 am
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Joshua Helling on Nov 18, 2011 at 5:38:25 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Jack Welten on Nov 20, 2011 at 2:38:59 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Richard Freemantle on Nov 21, 2011 at 11:22:39 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Jack Welten on Nov 20, 2011 at 5:50:18 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Richard Freemantle on Nov 20, 2011 at 6:20:09 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Joshua Helling on Nov 22, 2011 at 1:58:21 am
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Scott Francis on Nov 22, 2011 at 2:16:51 am
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Gunter Puszkar on Nov 22, 2011 at 10:33:18 am
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Joshua Helling on Nov 29, 2011 at 6:21:32 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Gunter Puszkar on Nov 29, 2011 at 7:13:17 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Jack Welten on Nov 26, 2011 at 1:17:20 pm
        Re: Anyone else a little frustrated? by Joshua Helling on Nov 29, 2011 at 6:02:15 pm

Might Be An Interesting Read by Kevin Patrick on Nov 11, 2011 at 1:57:35 pm
- Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:48:20 pm
  - Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 11, 2011 at 4:55:28 pm
    - Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:05:20 pm
      - Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Herb Sevush on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:14:32 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Paul Dickin on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:23:12 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by andy lewis on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:51:17 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 6:02:01 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 6:28:24 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:55:31 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bill Davis on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:55:36 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 6:11:50 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Herb Sevush on Nov 11, 2011 at 6:34:13 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 7:02:15 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bill Davis on Nov 11, 2011 at 8:43:47 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Herb Sevush on Nov 11, 2011 at 9:19:57 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Chris Harlan on Nov 13, 2011 at 2:30:22 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by John Buck on Nov 14, 2011 at 1:26:33 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Chris Harlan on Nov 14, 2011 at 7:50:46 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by John Buck on Nov 14, 2011 at 7:52:54 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Chris Harlan on Nov 14, 2011 at 8:19:37 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by John Buck on Nov 14, 2011 at 8:22:24 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43:55 pm
- Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 11, 2011 at 7:22:49 pm
  - Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 11, 2011 at 7:50:07 pm
    - Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Frank Gothmann on Nov 11, 2011 at 9:02:33 pm
      - Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bret Williams on Nov 14, 2011 at 1:49:44 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bill Davis on Nov 14, 2011 at 5:33:35 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bret Williams on Nov 14, 2011 at 7:38:31 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Craig Seeman on Nov 14, 2011 at 8:01:16 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bill Davis on Nov 15, 2011 at 4:43:17 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by David Roth Weiss on Nov 14, 2011 at 10:09:07 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bill Davis on Nov 15, 2011 at 4:56:21 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by David Roth Weiss on Nov 15, 2011 at 6:07:16 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Chris Harlan on Nov 15, 2011 at 1:57:57 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bill Davis on Nov 15, 2011 at 5:09:50 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Chris Harlan on Nov 15, 2011 at 9:01:22 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Bill Davis on Nov 15, 2011 at 6:34:57 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Chris Harlan on Nov 15, 2011 at 8:01:17 pm
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by John Buck on Nov 16, 2011 at 2:08:52 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Walter Soyka on Nov 15, 2011 at 6:24:16 am
        Re: Might Be An Interesting Read by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 15, 2011 at 4:35:01 pm

Advice on setting up a small Post house by Josh Williams on Nov 11, 2011 at 12:48:29 am
- Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Angelo Lorenzo on Nov 11, 2011 at 3:30:39 am
- Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Andrew Rendell on Nov 12, 2011 at 9:08:41 am
- Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by grinner hester on Nov 30, 2011 at 8:37:03 pm
  - Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Josh Williams on Nov 30, 2011 at 8:55:26 pm
- Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Scott Sheriff on Dec 2, 2011 at 4:36:55 am
- Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Mike Jeffs on Dec 8, 2011 at 11:17:11 pm
  - Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Josh Williams on Dec 8, 2011 at 11:26:54 pm
    - Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Scott Sheriff on Dec 13, 2011 at 9:43:15 am
      - Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by John Young on Dec 13, 2011 at 9:14:14 pm
        Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Mike Jeffs on Dec 13, 2011 at 10:30:02 pm
        Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by John Young on Dec 13, 2011 at 10:47:58 pm
        Re: Advice on setting up a small Post house by Mike Jeffs on Dec 13, 2011 at 11:00:11 pm

device control settings? by Ewan Horlock on Nov 10, 2011 at 11:51:24 am
- Re: device control settings? by Chris Tompkins on Nov 10, 2011 at 12:45:59 pm
  - Re: device control settings? by Ewan Horlock on Nov 10, 2011 at 12:56:16 pm
    - Re: device control settings? by Chris Tompkins on Nov 10, 2011 at 2:12:52 pm
      - Re: device control settings? by Chris Tompkins on Nov 10, 2011 at 2:13:44 pm

Intensity Pro....no SD capture by Scott Francis on Nov 10, 2011 at 12:46:16 am
- Re: Intensity Pro....no SD capture by Danny Hays on Nov 13, 2011 at 6:33:49 pm
  - Re: Intensity Pro....no SD capture by Scott Francis on Nov 22, 2011 at 1:03:44 pm

Premier Crashing by Mark Welch on Nov 9, 2011 at 3:45:53 pm
- Re: Premier Crashing by Jeff Pulera on Nov 9, 2011 at 6:15:14 pm

Capturing HD with HDR FX-7 by Mark Nacovitch on Nov 9, 2011 at 2:02:20 am
- Re: Capturing HD with HDR FX-7 by Jeff Pulera on Nov 9, 2011 at 2:31:09 pm

Swing Shift Post Generalist by Claudia Sparrow on Nov 8, 2011 at 7:40:17 pm
- Re: Swing Shift Post Generalist by Nicholas Graff on Nov 9, 2011 at 10:15:16 am
- Re: Swing Shift Post Generalist by Diego Torroija on Nov 13, 2011 at 7:37:16 pm
- Re: Swing Shift Post Generalist by Jason Gilbert on Jan 6, 2012 at 4:54:24 pm

FCP and camera not connecting by Sarah Fox on Nov 7, 2011 at 7:11:25 pm
- Re: FCP and camera not connecting by Jerry Hofmann on Nov 7, 2011 at 10:37:47 pm
  - Re: FCP and camera not connecting by Sarah Fox on Nov 9, 2011 at 4:22:39 pm

Archiving codec advice by Gautam Pandey on Nov 4, 2011 at 2:09:17 am
- Re: Archiving codec advice by Gautam Pandey on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:40:32 am
- Re: Archiving codec advice by Gary Hazen on Nov 21, 2011 at 6:39:08 pm
  - Re: Archiving codec advice by Gautam Pandey on Nov 22, 2011 at 7:11:10 am
    - Re: Archiving codec advice by Gary Hazen on Nov 23, 2011 at 3:38:56 pm
      - Re: Archiving codec advice by Gautam Pandey on Nov 23, 2011 at 7:44:16 pm
      - Re: Archiving codec advice by Neil Sadwelkar on Jan 21, 2012 at 7:10:27 am
        Re: Archiving codec advice by Gautam Pandey on Jan 22, 2012 at 4:35:19 am
- Re: Archiving codec advice by Brittany DeLillo on Feb 14, 2012 at 4:34:28 pm
  - Re: Archiving codec advice by Gautam Pandey on Nov 22, 2012 at 6:34:21 am

Interlace showing up in sequence by Andrea Stewart on Nov 3, 2011 at 10:31:10 pm
- Re: Interlace showing up in sequence by Chris Tompkins on Nov 3, 2011 at 10:49:46 pm
- Re: Interlace showing up in sequence by Brad Wright on Nov 4, 2011 at 2:13:53 pm
  - Re: Interlace showing up in sequence by Andrea Stewart on Nov 4, 2011 at 3:02:24 pm

Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:51:25 pm
- Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:13:14 pm
  - Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:29:21 pm
    - Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:34:36 pm
      - Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Mark Dobson on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:22:06 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:26:24 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:33:45 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Oliver Peters on Nov 2, 2011 at 7:52:32 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Oliver Peters on Nov 2, 2011 at 8:01:58 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Steve Connor on Nov 2, 2011 at 8:50:57 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Oliver Peters on Nov 2, 2011 at 9:56:21 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by T. Payton on Nov 3, 2011 at 2:36:56 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 3, 2011 at 3:43:41 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by T. Payton on Nov 3, 2011 at 9:38:16 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Oliver Peters on Nov 3, 2011 at 9:42:28 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:05:41 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by T. Payton on Nov 3, 2011 at 9:05:57 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 4, 2011 at 4:06:27 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by T. Payton on Nov 4, 2011 at 4:57:33 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Steve Connor on Nov 3, 2011 at 9:10:06 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 3, 2011 at 10:33:07 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Steve Connor on Nov 4, 2011 at 3:10:35 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 4, 2011 at 4:07:22 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Steve Connor on Nov 4, 2011 at 4:35:09 pm
- Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by alban egger on Nov 4, 2011 at 6:39:54 pm
  - Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by alban egger on Nov 4, 2011 at 6:45:04 pm
    - Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 13, 2011 at 8:02:13 pm
      - Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Oliver Peters on Nov 13, 2011 at 8:08:24 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Jonathan White on Nov 13, 2011 at 8:38:25 pm
        Re: Do I use X for a 1/2 hour broadcast doc. ? by Oliver Peters on Nov 13, 2011 at 8:44:07 pm

This is a stretch by Neal Klaeser on Nov 2, 2011 at 11:55:08 am
- Re: This is a stretch by Rafael Amador on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:23:10 pm
  - Re: This is a stretch by Shane Ross on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:54:07 pm
    - Re: This is a stretch by Mark Suszko on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:54:56 pm
      - Re: This is a stretch by Neal Klaeser on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:37:23 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Shane Ross on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:39:59 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Bret Williams on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:43:15 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Bret Williams on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:52:43 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by David Roth Weiss on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:53:46 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Bret Williams on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:03:11 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Neal Klaeser on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:55:42 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Bret Williams on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:04:32 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Bret Williams on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:08:00 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Neal Klaeser on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:27:25 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Bret Williams on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:45:58 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Neal Klaeser on Nov 3, 2011 at 6:43:59 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Rafael Amador on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:28:12 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Shane Ross on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:34:02 pm
        Re: This is a stretch by Rafael Amador on Nov 3, 2011 at 4:37:43 am
        Re: This is a stretch by Bret Williams on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:50:34 pm

V4HD and SD ProRes 422 by steve knattress on Nov 2, 2011 at 9:53:05 am
- Re: V4HD and SD ProRes 422 by steve knattress on Jan 9, 2012 at 8:13:32 pm
- Re: V4HD and SD ProRes 422 by Ian Liuzzi-Fedun on May 22, 2012 at 4:52:47 am
  - Re: V4HD and SD ProRes 422 by steve knattress on May 22, 2012 at 1:18:15 pm

Apple's Mac business plan by Gerald Baria on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:23:49 am
- Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Carsten Orlt on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:27:19 am
- Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:43:53 am
  - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Brad Bussé on Nov 2, 2011 at 7:40:02 pm
- Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Walter Soyka on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:41:34 pm
- Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 2, 2011 at 3:29:35 pm
  - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Bob Zelin on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:38:49 pm
    - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Jerry Hofmann on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:17:45 pm
      - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Bill Davis on Nov 2, 2011 at 8:21:23 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Walter Soyka on Nov 2, 2011 at 8:30:39 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 8:59:32 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 2, 2011 at 8:34:46 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Bill Davis on Nov 2, 2011 at 11:48:00 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by David Roth Weiss on Nov 3, 2011 at 12:10:09 am
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Jerry Hofmann on Nov 3, 2011 at 2:36:37 am
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by David Roth Weiss on Nov 3, 2011 at 5:14:19 am
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Gerald Baria on Nov 3, 2011 at 11:17:16 am
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Jerry Hofmann on Nov 3, 2011 at 11:48:39 am
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 3, 2011 at 1:23:27 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Craig Seeman on Nov 3, 2011 at 2:12:54 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 3, 2011 at 2:26:59 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Craig Seeman on Nov 3, 2011 at 2:52:15 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 3, 2011 at 3:02:00 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Craig Seeman on Nov 3, 2011 at 5:01:31 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by David Roth Weiss on Nov 3, 2011 at 6:18:59 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Steve Connor on Nov 3, 2011 at 6:25:43 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by David Roth Weiss on Nov 3, 2011 at 6:58:52 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Steve Connor on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:05:18 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:10:22 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Steve Connor on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:15:13 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:19:25 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by David Roth Weiss on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:41:37 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by David Roth Weiss on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:33:57 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Steve Connor on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:43:11 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by David Roth Weiss on Nov 3, 2011 at 8:45:04 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Herb Sevush on Nov 3, 2011 at 12:35:27 am
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Jerry Hofmann on Nov 2, 2011 at 9:03:38 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Steve Connor on Nov 2, 2011 at 9:08:12 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Jerry Hofmann on Nov 2, 2011 at 9:25:18 pm
      - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 2, 2011 at 10:41:21 pm
        Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Jerry Hofmann on Nov 3, 2011 at 2:58:27 am
- Re: Apple's Mac business plan by James Mortner on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:34:56 pm
  - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Neil Hurwitz on Nov 3, 2011 at 12:21:40 am
    - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by Michael Gissing on Nov 3, 2011 at 12:29:11 am
    - Re: Apple's Mac business plan by James Mortner on Nov 3, 2011 at 9:15:03 am

Reactions to Apples business model by Morten Ranmar on Nov 1, 2011 at 9:53:37 pm
- Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 1, 2011 at 10:12:47 pm
- Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Steve Connor on Nov 1, 2011 at 10:36:44 pm
  - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Aindreas Gallagher on Nov 1, 2011 at 11:18:16 pm
    - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Jim Giberti on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:34:37 am
      - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Aindreas Gallagher on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:41:01 am
- Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 1, 2011 at 11:23:38 pm
  - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Frank Gothmann on Nov 1, 2011 at 11:55:10 pm
    - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:21:48 am
      - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Jim Giberti on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:39:06 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by David Roth Weiss on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:47:14 am
      - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Bill Davis on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:41:07 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Aindreas Gallagher on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:02:23 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Herb Sevush on Nov 2, 2011 at 3:22:31 pm
      - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Darren Kelly on Nov 2, 2011 at 12:52:09 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Michael Gissing on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:02:33 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Carsten Orlt on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:14:10 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:25:52 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Michael Gissing on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:03:31 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:46:35 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Michael Gissing on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:00:57 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Frank Gothmann on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:53:36 pm
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by James Culbertson on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:45:14 pm
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Carsten Orlt on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:05:03 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:17:51 am
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Walter Soyka on Nov 2, 2011 at 3:03:30 am
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 2, 2011 at 3:58:38 am
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:20:20 am
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Walter Soyka on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:10:59 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Franz Bieberkopf on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:37:09 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Frank Gothmann on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:56:27 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Walter Soyka on Nov 2, 2011 at 3:00:41 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:05:57 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Walter Soyka on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:40:39 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:16:19 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Bill Davis on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:01:30 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:15:27 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:16:42 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:12:57 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Walter Soyka on Nov 2, 2011 at 4:49:38 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Frank Gothmann on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:05:41 pm
        Re: actions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:11:42 pm
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:27:10 am
        Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 2, 2011 at 2:32:31 am
  - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by James Culbertson on Nov 2, 2011 at 6:40:08 am
- Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Mark Bein on Nov 2, 2011 at 9:41:18 am
  - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Simon Ubsdell on Nov 2, 2011 at 11:05:21 am
- Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Andrew Rendell on Nov 3, 2011 at 5:34:49 pm
  - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Jeremy Garchow on Nov 3, 2011 at 5:44:21 pm
    - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Craig Seeman on Nov 3, 2011 at 8:52:44 pm
      - Re: Reactions to Apples business model by Andrew Rendell on Nov 4, 2011 at 4:13:38 pm

FYI - BLACKMAGIC does not support PAL PROGRESSIVE video by slobodan milivojevic on Nov 1, 2011 at 2:20:18 pm
- Re: FYI - BLACKMAGIC does not support PAL PROGRESSIVE video by Andrew Rendell on Nov 1, 2011 at 4:04:50 pm
  - Re: FYI - BLACKMAGIC does not support PAL PROGRESSIVE video by slobodan milivojevic on Nov 3, 2011 at 9:45:10 am

HDCAM Capture by Steven Probets on Oct 31, 2011 at 4:04:42 pm
- Re: HDCAM Capture by Mark Spano on Oct 31, 2011 at 4:33:37 pm

hyper deck studio by Claude Castonguay on Oct 30, 2011 at 9:12:00 pm
- Re: hyper deck studio by Noah Kadner on Oct 31, 2011 at 3:56:14 pm
  - Re: hyper deck studio by Claude Castonguay on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:52:56 pm

Downconvert Capture from HD1200a Deck Problem by David Michael on Oct 30, 2011 at 6:34:10 pm
- Re: Downconvert Capture from HD1200a Deck Problem by David Michael on Oct 30, 2011 at 9:17:25 pm

Deck buying question by Chris Cea on Oct 30, 2011 at 1:08:48 pm

Exporting from DVD Studio Pro, Create an online file for review of subtitles by Jessica Jones on Oct 29, 2011 at 10:15:43 pm
- Re: Exporting from DVD Studio Pro, Create an online file for review of subtitles by Alex Asp on Oct 29, 2011 at 10:29:51 pm
- Re: Exporting from DVD Studio Pro, Create an online file for review of subtitles by Brad Wright on Oct 30, 2011 at 3:25:44 pm
  - Re: Exporting from DVD Studio Pro, Create an online file for review of subtitles by Jessica Jones on Oct 31, 2011 at 6:30:20 pm
    - Re: Exporting from DVD Studio Pro, Create an online file for review of subtitles by Brad Wright on Oct 31, 2011 at 6:37:01 pm

SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by slobodan milivojevic on Oct 28, 2011 at 4:56:02 pm
- Re: SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by Mark Spano on Oct 28, 2011 at 8:35:49 pm
  - Re: SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by slobodan milivojevic on Oct 28, 2011 at 8:49:34 pm
    - Re: SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by slobodan milivojevic on Nov 1, 2011 at 2:18:07 pm
      - Re: SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by Mark Spano on Nov 1, 2011 at 3:31:15 pm
        Re: SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by slobodan milivojevic on Nov 1, 2011 at 8:38:07 pm
        Re: SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by slobodan milivojevic on Nov 3, 2011 at 9:26:59 am
        Re: SDI PAL progressive output looks bad by Mark Spano on Nov 3, 2011 at 1:50:33 pm

Network HD Broadcast Delivery by John Grote, Jr. on Oct 28, 2011 at 3:39:07 pm
- Re: Network HD Broadcast Delivery by John Grote, Jr. on Oct 28, 2011 at 6:00:35 pm
- Re: Network HD Broadcast Delivery by Andrew Rendell on Oct 28, 2011 at 7:49:08 pm
  - Re: Network HD Broadcast Delivery by Bob Zelin on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:46:08 pm
    - Re: Network HD Broadcast Delivery by John Grote, Jr. on Nov 2, 2011 at 5:24:36 pm
      - Re: Network HD Broadcast Delivery by Chris Walsh on Nov 3, 2011 at 2:24:37 pm
        Re: Network HD Broadcast Delivery by John Grote, Jr. on Nov 3, 2011 at 4:47:36 pm
        Re: Network HD Broadcast Delivery by Chris Walsh on Nov 3, 2011 at 5:40:13 pm

Converting compsite to component to connect to capture device by Dan Cramer on Oct 26, 2011 at 5:17:39 pm
- Re: Converting compsite to component to connect to capture device by Chris Tompkins on Oct 27, 2011 at 12:17:07 pm
  - Re: Converting compsite to component to connect to capture device by Dan Cramer on Oct 27, 2011 at 12:37:54 pm
    - Re: Converting compsite to component to connect to capture device by Chris Tompkins on Oct 27, 2011 at 12:42:20 pm
      - Re: Converting compsite to component to connect to capture device by Noah Kadner on Nov 3, 2011 at 5:13:45 am
- Re: Converting compsite to component to connect to capture device by grinner hester on Nov 4, 2011 at 3:40:53 pm

Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Roman Varas on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:34:59 pm
- Re: Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Shane Ross on Oct 26, 2011 at 12:18:48 am
  - Re: Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Roman Varas on Oct 26, 2011 at 12:27:11 am
    - Re: Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Shane Ross on Oct 26, 2011 at 4:20:21 am
- Re: Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Steve Eisen on Oct 26, 2011 at 1:19:44 am
  - Re: Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Roman Varas on Oct 26, 2011 at 1:33:09 am
    - Re: Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Steve Eisen on Oct 29, 2011 at 3:56:10 am
- Re: Umatic to H264 - Calling MXO2 MAX gurus. by Nick Brown on Nov 18, 2011 at 11:30:48 pm

Capture Not Working - No Input Signal Present by Nick Hennessey on Oct 25, 2011 at 9:59:45 pm
- Re: Capture Not Working - No Input Signal Present by Shane Ross on Oct 25, 2011 at 10:41:47 pm
  - Re: Capture Not Working - No Input Signal Present by Nick Hennessey on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:06:50 pm

Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 25, 2011 at 7:38:54 pm
- Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 25, 2011 at 7:52:31 pm
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 25, 2011 at 8:04:53 pm
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 25, 2011 at 8:13:31 pm
      - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Bill Davis on Oct 25, 2011 at 9:01:09 pm
- Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:14:00 pm
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by David Roth Weiss on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:44:29 pm
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Brian Mulligan on Oct 26, 2011 at 1:40:21 pm
      - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by David Roth Weiss on Oct 26, 2011 at 5:36:39 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 26, 2011 at 7:58:15 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by David Roth Weiss on Oct 26, 2011 at 9:58:30 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Brian Mulligan on Oct 26, 2011 at 8:04:07 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by David Roth Weiss on Oct 26, 2011 at 10:05:39 pm
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:53:38 pm
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 26, 2011 at 1:09:04 am
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Greg Andonian on Oct 26, 2011 at 7:51:01 am
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Chris Harlan on Oct 26, 2011 at 3:40:28 pm
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rodney Clarke on Oct 11, 2012 at 12:13:21 am
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 11, 2012 at 12:18:49 pm
      - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rodney Clarke on Oct 11, 2012 at 9:51:42 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 12, 2012 at 12:15:25 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rodney Clarke on Oct 12, 2012 at 11:50:20 pm
- Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by James Culbertson on Oct 26, 2011 at 6:33:42 am
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Chris Harlan on Oct 26, 2011 at 7:30:30 am
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 26, 2011 at 12:48:02 pm
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by James Culbertson on Oct 26, 2011 at 4:33:30 pm
      - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Chris Harlan on Oct 26, 2011 at 7:42:40 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 26, 2011 at 7:53:43 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Chris Harlan on Oct 26, 2011 at 8:11:05 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jason Jenkins on Oct 27, 2011 at 4:18:22 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Chris Harlan on Oct 26, 2011 at 7:57:54 pm
      - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 26, 2011 at 7:58:24 pm
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 26, 2011 at 3:47:38 pm
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 26, 2011 at 4:02:04 pm
- Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Ian Bailey on Oct 26, 2011 at 8:26:28 am
  - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 26, 2011 at 9:14:55 am
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Ian Bailey on Oct 26, 2011 at 12:32:09 pm
      - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 26, 2011 at 1:33:57 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 26, 2011 at 3:39:03 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 26, 2011 at 3:40:28 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 26, 2011 at 10:28:51 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by James Culbertson on Oct 26, 2011 at 10:50:30 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Bill Davis on Oct 27, 2011 at 6:11:04 am
    - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 26, 2011 at 4:53:24 pm
      - Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 27, 2011 at 4:39:35 am
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 27, 2011 at 12:16:27 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 1:48:16 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 27, 2011 at 4:02:29 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 27, 2011 at 2:09:42 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 2:25:24 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 27, 2011 at 4:56:31 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 5:08:10 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 5:17:21 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 27, 2011 at 6:33:22 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by James Culbertson on Oct 27, 2011 at 8:02:35 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 8:25:46 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 28, 2011 at 12:04:36 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 27, 2011 at 6:31:47 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 6:54:20 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 27, 2011 at 7:45:03 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 8:20:45 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 27, 2011 at 9:24:06 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 27, 2011 at 9:35:23 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Rafael Amador on Oct 27, 2011 at 6:55:05 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Clint Wardlow on Oct 27, 2011 at 7:59:28 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by Bill Davis on Oct 27, 2011 at 10:49:41 pm
        Re: Will old formats Apple in the future? by James Culbertson on Oct 27, 2011 at 11:56:24 pm

Advice on codecs for Archiving by Gautam Pandey on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:04:41 am
- Re: Advice on codecs for Archiving by Gautam Pandey on Nov 21, 2011 at 7:42:18 am
  - Re: Advice on codecs for Archiving by Gautam Pandey on Nov 28, 2011 at 10:34:34 am
    - Re: Advice on codecs for Archiving by Gautam Pandey on Nov 22, 2012 at 6:29:21 am

EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Bob Cole on Oct 25, 2011 at 1:33:52 am
- Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 25, 2011 at 7:26:55 am
  - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 25, 2011 at 1:21:13 pm
    - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 25, 2011 at 2:04:15 pm
      - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 25, 2011 at 2:06:40 pm
      - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:06:05 pm
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:09:38 pm
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:22:19 pm
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:25:49 pm
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:29:38 pm
- Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Jim Cunningham on Oct 25, 2011 at 2:07:59 pm
  - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 26, 2011 at 4:18:52 am
    - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Michael Palmer on Oct 26, 2011 at 1:03:51 pm
      - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Michael Slowe on Oct 27, 2011 at 11:17:17 am
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Bob Cole on Oct 27, 2011 at 11:40:04 am
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Michael Slowe on Oct 27, 2011 at 2:07:58 pm
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Bob Cole on Oct 27, 2011 at 2:23:56 pm
      - Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by jim stamos on Oct 31, 2011 at 7:56:08 am
        Re: EX1R (and other LCD-viewfinder cameras) viewing aid/alternative? by Bob Cole on Oct 31, 2011 at 12:46:28 pm

FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Chris Borjis on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:12:10 pm
- Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:19:43 pm
- Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Leo Baker on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:22:19 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Leo Baker on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:23:44 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:55:29 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Kevin Monahan on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:59:14 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Leo Baker on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:46:27 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Shane Ross on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:48:04 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Kevin Monahan on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:09:28 pm
- Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Angelo Lorenzo on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:05:18 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Ron Pestes on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:14:54 pm
  - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Thomas Pohl on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:33:22 pm
    - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Chris Borjis on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:50:32 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Chris Tompkins on Oct 24, 2011 at 10:34:48 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 24, 2011 at 10:39:49 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Michael Hancock on Oct 24, 2011 at 11:41:53 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 24, 2011 at 11:54:01 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 24, 2011 at 11:58:21 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 12:13:29 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 6:39:37 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 28, 2011 at 7:01:43 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 7:31:27 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tom Daigon on Oct 28, 2011 at 8:37:27 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 9:18:30 pm
      - Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:13:09 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by gus evangelista on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:18:24 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:38:35 am
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 25, 2011 at 12:19:11 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:01:28 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:17:54 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by David Cherniack on Oct 25, 2011 at 6:21:41 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Oct 28, 2011 at 7:08:44 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Philipp Hampl on Oct 28, 2011 at 10:03:29 pm
        Re: FCP > Premiere users...should I wait for CS 6? by Tim Kolb on Nov 3, 2011 at 4:48:07 pm

Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Mark Dobson on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:21:58 am
- Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Herb Sevush on Oct 24, 2011 at 12:26:41 pm
  - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Rafael Amador on Oct 24, 2011 at 1:51:13 pm
  - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Mark Dobson on Oct 24, 2011 at 2:10:32 pm
    - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Herb Sevush on Oct 24, 2011 at 2:36:12 pm
      - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Joseph W. Bourke on Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51:59 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Mark Dobson on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:11:14 pm
      - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Mark Dobson on Oct 24, 2011 at 3:56:36 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Joseph W. Bourke on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:09:03 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Herb Sevush on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:23:55 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Mark Dobson on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:08:53 pm
    - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Jim Giberti on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:38:28 pm
      - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by David Roth Weiss on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:52:34 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Steve Connor on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:36:34 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by David Roth Weiss on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:48:52 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Steve Connor on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:51:23 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by David Roth Weiss on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:57:36 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Steve Connor on Oct 24, 2011 at 7:59:41 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by David Roth Weiss on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:04:27 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Steve Connor on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:09:57 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:13:56 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by David Roth Weiss on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:33:45 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:41:46 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Steve Connor on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:50:33 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by alban egger on Oct 28, 2011 at 11:12:07 am
  - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Craig Seeman on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:04:28 pm
    - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Herb Sevush on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:29:00 pm
- Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Christian Schumacher on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:12:16 pm
  - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Craig Seeman on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:36:55 pm
    - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Christian Schumacher on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:56:38 pm
      - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Craig Seeman on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:22:47 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Christian Schumacher on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:53:08 pm
  - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:50:29 pm
    - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Christian Schumacher on Oct 24, 2011 at 6:42:52 pm
      - Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Christian Schumacher on Oct 24, 2011 at 8:39:05 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Craig Seeman on Oct 24, 2011 at 9:17:18 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Christian Schumacher on Oct 25, 2011 at 2:06:01 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Craig Seeman on Oct 25, 2011 at 2:50:15 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Walter Soyka on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:01:55 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Craig Seeman on Oct 25, 2011 at 3:11:08 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 25, 2011 at 4:06:04 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by Mark Dobson on Oct 25, 2011 at 6:21:49 pm
        Re: Carrion Crow and Roadkill by alban egger on Oct 28, 2011 at 11:24:46 am

What would it take? by Oliver Peters on Oct 22, 2011 at 2:56:23 pm
- Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 22, 2011 at 3:53:15 pm
  - Re: What would it take? by Oliver Peters on Oct 22, 2011 at 4:18:48 pm
    - Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 22, 2011 at 4:54:46 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Oliver Peters on Oct 22, 2011 at 5:04:09 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Craig Seeman on Oct 22, 2011 at 5:14:27 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Herb Sevush on Oct 22, 2011 at 5:21:14 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Phil Brockett on Oct 22, 2011 at 6:14:50 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Oliver Peters on Oct 22, 2011 at 6:27:27 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Martti Ekstrand on Oct 22, 2011 at 6:35:27 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Oliver Peters on Oct 22, 2011 at 6:40:41 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Geert van den Berg on Oct 22, 2011 at 6:57:20 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Martti Ekstrand on Oct 24, 2011 at 5:17:13 am
        Re: What would it take? by Phil Brockett on Oct 22, 2011 at 9:38:54 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Roth Weiss on Oct 22, 2011 at 10:03:13 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Phil Brockett on Oct 22, 2011 at 11:18:44 pm
- Re: What would it take? by Liam Hall on Oct 22, 2011 at 7:27:41 pm
  - Re: What would it take? by Bill Davis on Oct 22, 2011 at 9:39:51 pm
    - Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 22, 2011 at 10:14:00 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Bill Davis on Oct 22, 2011 at 10:31:20 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:43:44 am
        Re: What would it take? by Bill Davis on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:20:15 pm
    - Re: What would it take? by Aindreas Gallagher on Oct 23, 2011 at 12:50:12 am
- Re: What would it take? by John Davidson on Oct 22, 2011 at 9:39:04 pm
  - Re: What would it take? by David Roth Weiss on Oct 22, 2011 at 10:10:36 pm
    - Re: What would it take? by Scott Cumbo on Oct 22, 2011 at 11:32:48 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:52:34 am
        Re: What would it take? by Scott Cumbo on Oct 23, 2011 at 3:26:17 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:10:48 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Roth Weiss on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:24:25 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:59:35 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Scott Cumbo on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:43:50 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:55:43 pm
        Re: What would it take? by kim krause on Oct 24, 2011 at 10:28:04 am
- Re: What would it take? by Nathan Bezner on Oct 23, 2011 at 1:09:51 am
- Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:25:00 am
  - Re: What would it take? by Chris Harlan on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:56:36 am
    - Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 2:16:38 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 2:43:46 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 3:05:37 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 3:54:17 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:23:57 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:39:02 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 2:58:06 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 2:55:25 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 2:47:58 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 3:25:00 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 3:57:38 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:10:54 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Herb Sevush on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:16:34 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:27:12 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Herb Sevush on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:38:50 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:47:13 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Herb Sevush on Oct 23, 2011 at 7:09:34 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:40:27 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:31:47 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:56:48 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:22:47 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:29:52 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:38:34 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Walter Soyka on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:32:18 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:37:55 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:43:14 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:26:08 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 4:56:20 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:14:15 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:19:11 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:30:48 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:36:45 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:41:55 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Cherniack on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:24:21 pm
        Re: What would it take? by David Lawrence on Oct 23, 2011 at 9:01:18 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Craig Seeman on Oct 23, 2011 at 9:18:41 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 24, 2011 at 10:10:05 am
        Re: What would it take? by Steve Connor on Oct 23, 2011 at 10:25:35 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:37:42 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Walter Soyka on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:41:36 pm
  - Re: What would it take? by Morten Ranmar on Oct 23, 2011 at 6:57:29 am
    - Re: What would it take? by alban egger on Oct 23, 2011 at 2:36:45 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Rafael Amador on Oct 23, 2011 at 3:17:49 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Bret Williams on Nov 4, 2011 at 6:03:25 am
        Re: What would it take? by Oliver Peters on Nov 4, 2011 at 2:04:10 pm
  - Re: What would it take? by Walter Soyka on Oct 23, 2011 at 5:45:23 pm
    - Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 2:59:41 pm
      - Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 24, 2011 at 3:37:09 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Oliver Peters on Oct 24, 2011 at 3:49:56 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 24, 2011 at 3:56:34 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:03:44 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:20:26 pm
        Re: What would it take? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 4:57:54 pm

Video feedback loop (maybe?) by Eddie Stein on Oct 21, 2011 at 12:06:27 pm
- Re: Video feedback loop (maybe?) by Andrew Rendell on Oct 22, 2011 at 11:17:53 am
- Re: Video feedback loop (maybe?) by Bob Zelin on Oct 23, 2011 at 7:51:10 pm
  - Re: Video feedback loop (maybe?) by Eddie Stein on Oct 25, 2011 at 8:42:59 pm

Converting PAL to NTSC timecode by Sam Cole on Oct 20, 2011 at 11:29:09 pm
- Re: Converting PAL to NTSC timecode by Mark Spano on Oct 21, 2011 at 4:25:32 pm

Question about frame rates and captioning by Jeremy Brunson on Oct 20, 2011 at 6:33:26 pm
- Re: Question about frame rates and captioning by Jason Livingston on Oct 20, 2011 at 7:10:46 pm

BlackMagic AVI file, Mini-DV, and Premiere Pro CS4 by Tei Jackson on Oct 19, 2011 at 7:58:57 pm
- Re: BlackMagic AVI file, Mini-DV, and Premiere Pro CS4 by Jeff Pulera on Oct 20, 2011 at 4:11:18 pm

IGNORE THIS- GREMLIN FOUND by Ally Shore on Oct 19, 2011 at 7:34:25 pm

Where we are: No need for debate by Ben Holmes on Oct 19, 2011 at 1:52:32 pm
- Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Steve Connor on Oct 19, 2011 at 2:04:31 pm
- Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Kevin Patrick on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:28:27 pm
- Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Craig Seeman on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:48:59 pm
  - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Walter Soyka on Oct 19, 2011 at 4:35:23 pm
    - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Craig Seeman on Oct 19, 2011 at 4:57:52 pm
      - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Walter Soyka on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:31:07 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Bill Davis on Oct 19, 2011 at 6:50:07 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Walter Soyka on Oct 19, 2011 at 7:34:03 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Bill Davis on Oct 22, 2011 at 10:50:17 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Walter Soyka on Oct 23, 2011 at 8:36:48 am
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 24, 2011 at 3:05:11 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Walter Soyka on Oct 26, 2011 at 4:51:15 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 26, 2011 at 5:52:53 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Dennis Radeke on Oct 27, 2011 at 10:41:17 am
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Walter Soyka on Oct 27, 2011 at 7:58:48 pm
      - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Dennis Radeke on Oct 19, 2011 at 7:42:03 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Craig Seeman on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:21:49 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Walter Soyka on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:56:13 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Craig Seeman on Oct 19, 2011 at 9:15:26 pm
- Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Chris Harlan on Oct 19, 2011 at 4:01:36 pm
  - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Rafael Amador on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:02:56 pm
    - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Kevin Patrick on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:34:58 pm
      - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Kevin Patrick on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:49:51 pm
      - @ Kevin by Rafael Amador on Oct 20, 2011 at 2:09:08 am
        Re: @ Kevin by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 20, 2011 at 2:47:46 am
        Re: @ Jeremy by Rafael Amador on Oct 20, 2011 at 3:05:51 am
        Re: @ Kevin by Kevin Patrick on Oct 20, 2011 at 10:59:35 am
- Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Rob Brandreth-Gibbs on Oct 19, 2011 at 5:43:41 pm
  - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Bill Davis on Oct 19, 2011 at 7:06:39 pm
    - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Rob Brandreth-Gibbs on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:37:41 pm
      - Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Bill Davis on Oct 19, 2011 at 9:13:48 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Rob Brandreth-Gibbs on Oct 20, 2011 at 12:49:56 am
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Herb Sevush on Oct 20, 2011 at 3:31:30 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Jim Giberti on Oct 20, 2011 at 8:44:07 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Michael Gissing on Oct 20, 2011 at 10:10:16 pm
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Rob Brandreth-Gibbs on Oct 21, 2011 at 7:59:59 am
        Re: Where we are: No need for debate by Martin Curtis on Oct 27, 2011 at 10:58:39 am

Service: Dimitrius Beck by Dimitrius Beck Silva on Oct 17, 2011 at 4:52:07 pm

horizantal lines during playback of 2k files on my linux resolve by prathvish hegde on Oct 17, 2011 at 11:57:02 am
- Re: horizantal lines during playback of 2k files on my linux resolve by Blase Theodore on Oct 17, 2011 at 6:38:54 pm
  - Re: horizantal lines during playback of 2k files on my linux resolve by prathvish hegde on Oct 18, 2011 at 6:05:11 am
    - Re: horizantal lines during playback of 2k files on my linux resolve by Ramesh Jai on Oct 19, 2011 at 6:18:57 pm

Video: Sample Footage by Dimitrius Beck Silva on Oct 17, 2011 at 10:00:35 am
- Re: Sample Footage by Kevin Burton on Nov 14, 2011 at 5:49:29 am

problems capturing hdv mini dv tapes into fcp with sony deck by dustin frank on Oct 15, 2011 at 2:52:06 am
- Re: problems capturing hdv mini dv tapes into fcp with sony deck by Eric Strand on Oct 19, 2011 at 1:08:40 am

cant capture hdv into fcp...sony hvr-m25au deck by dustin frank on Oct 15, 2011 at 2:49:56 am

Connection Question by Pat DeFilippo on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:36:03 pm
- Re: Connection Question by Andrew Rendell on Oct 15, 2011 at 9:50:23 am

DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 14, 2011 at 4:46:42 pm
- Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 14, 2011 at 7:24:49 pm
- Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 7:40:47 pm
  - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Neil Goodman on Oct 14, 2011 at 7:43:55 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:15:17 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by kim krause on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:44:36 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:35:35 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Chris Harlan on Oct 16, 2011 at 12:21:56 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 16, 2011 at 2:32:39 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Chris Harlan on Oct 16, 2011 at 2:53:39 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 16, 2011 at 3:31:13 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Robert Brown on Oct 17, 2011 at 4:16:47 am
  - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:35:48 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:37:31 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:16:26 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:23:19 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:46:10 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:15:50 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:44:10 pm
  - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:47:01 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:51:23 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:04:34 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:16:46 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Mark Morache on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:39:17 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:47:54 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Mark Morache on Oct 14, 2011 at 11:18:39 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 11:44:25 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 12:06:08 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Mark Morache on Oct 15, 2011 at 12:29:43 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 1:10:04 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 16, 2011 at 7:10:30 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 4:08:20 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:19:14 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 18, 2011 at 12:35:04 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 4:42:47 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 18, 2011 at 6:31:06 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 7:46:25 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 18, 2011 at 8:04:38 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 8:30:48 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 18, 2011 at 8:35:43 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:11:28 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 19, 2011 at 9:31:41 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 19, 2011 at 11:00:21 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 19, 2011 at 12:11:48 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:17:00 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:25:00 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:30:35 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:47:58 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 19, 2011 at 7:02:51 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 19, 2011 at 7:57:21 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:10:32 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:11:36 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:11:15 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:12:12 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 21, 2011 at 12:07:30 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 21, 2011 at 4:33:44 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:36:34 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:53:38 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 21, 2011 at 6:21:15 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 21, 2011 at 7:03:11 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 10:26:10 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:46:36 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:57:25 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 21, 2011 at 6:16:10 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 21, 2011 at 6:56:48 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 9:48:56 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:11:24 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:16:17 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 21, 2011 at 7:09:15 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 7:24:50 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 21, 2011 at 7:46:20 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 7:52:32 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:28:23 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 21, 2011 at 5:35:54 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 10:49:26 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 21, 2011 at 11:02:32 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 11:43:42 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Paul Dickin on Oct 21, 2011 at 1:39:06 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 22, 2011 at 1:02:56 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 21, 2011 at 10:35:02 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 18, 2011 at 8:30:24 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:02:46 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:07:50 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:21:24 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Walter Soyka on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:28:09 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 9:34:40 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Chris Harlan on Oct 18, 2011 at 10:45:34 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 18, 2011 at 10:47:40 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 10:58:01 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 18, 2011 at 11:00:03 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02:14 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Mark Bein on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:34:42 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:47:36 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:59:13 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:04:50 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:13:38 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:52:29 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by kim krause on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:56:19 pm
  - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Sohrab Sandhu on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:57:25 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Nikola Stefanovic on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:56:21 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Clint Wardlow on Oct 15, 2011 at 12:07:04 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 12:10:38 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Clint Wardlow on Oct 15, 2011 at 12:47:18 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 15, 2011 at 12:52:02 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 12:55:02 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Oliver Peters on Oct 15, 2011 at 3:45:40 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by kim krause on Oct 15, 2011 at 8:16:24 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:52:14 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:59:31 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Glen Hurd on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:48:00 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Oliver Peters on Oct 15, 2011 at 1:10:44 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:08:19 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:17:51 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:30:13 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:57:23 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:02:56 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:30:37 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 6:45:48 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 15, 2011 at 6:55:11 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 7:10:33 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Shawn Miller on Oct 15, 2011 at 8:09:57 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 8:46:16 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Shawn Miller on Oct 15, 2011 at 9:47:37 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 10:05:09 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 10:38:40 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Shawn Miller on Oct 15, 2011 at 10:59:34 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Shawn Miller on Oct 15, 2011 at 10:58:32 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Lawrence on Oct 17, 2011 at 10:53:04 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 18, 2011 at 5:10:30 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Gary Huff on Oct 15, 2011 at 9:11:34 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 9:42:32 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Gary Huff on Oct 16, 2011 at 2:09:14 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 16, 2011 at 2:32:19 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Gary Huff on Oct 16, 2011 at 4:42:06 am
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 3:24:26 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Gary Huff on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:14:51 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:19:52 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:39:05 pm
  - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:20:27 am
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Greg Andonian on Oct 15, 2011 at 6:29:42 am
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:27:45 pm
    - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 15, 2011 at 3:49:35 pm
      - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:36:47 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 15, 2011 at 4:46:54 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:04:32 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:15:14 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:20:56 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:29:12 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:55:36 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Herb Sevush on Oct 15, 2011 at 6:06:18 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 15, 2011 at 6:12:41 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 6:31:21 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by David Roth Weiss on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:36:08 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Craig Seeman on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:58:32 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 16, 2011 at 9:27:41 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Rafael Amador on Oct 17, 2011 at 5:03:29 pm
        Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Steve Connor on Oct 17, 2011 at 5:09:05 pm
  - Re: DaVinci Resolve 8.1 -- now with FCPXML roundtrip support by Jacob Kerns on Oct 15, 2011 at 9:55:45 pm

V-Chip with CPC DTV Software by Gerald Hetrick on Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12:59 pm
- Re: V-Chip with CPC DTV Software by Jason Livingston on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:15:28 pm

Footage shot on XHA1 captured with a HV40? by Paco Sweetman on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:18:19 pm
- Re: Footage shot on XHA1 captured with a HV40? by Todd Terry on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:23:27 pm
  - Re: Footage shot on XHA1 captured with a HV40? by Paco Sweetman on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:37:55 pm
    - Re: Footage shot on XHA1 captured with a HV40? by Paco Sweetman on Oct 16, 2011 at 4:02:04 pm
      - Re: Footage shot on XHA1 captured with a HV40? by Todd Terry on Oct 16, 2011 at 4:54:01 pm

Dear FCPX team, by Luke Hale on Oct 13, 2011 at 4:22:19 pm
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Paul Jay on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:40:15 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Morten Ranmar on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:47:23 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 5:47:27 pm
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Hall on Oct 13, 2011 at 6:55:36 pm
      - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:04:28 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:27:39 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:37:13 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:58:54 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:01:41 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Glen Hurd on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:44:19 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Mitch Ives on Oct 13, 2011 at 10:36:01 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Benjamin Mullins on Oct 14, 2011 at 3:15:49 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 6:11:39 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Davis on Oct 16, 2011 at 9:44:51 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 2:32:02 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by TImothy Auld on Oct 16, 2011 at 9:55:15 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 2:45:14 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:30:27 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:37:52 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Walter Soyka on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:43:10 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:47:18 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 11:12:23 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 2:09:03 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Walter Soyka on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:02:35 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:10:45 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Oliver Peters on Oct 13, 2011 at 11:07:55 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Geert van den Berg on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:29:42 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 13, 2011 at 9:37:53 pm
        Re: Dear FCPX team, by Gerald Baria on Oct 14, 2011 at 12:17:58 am
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jim Glickert on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:06:18 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Greg Burke on Oct 14, 2011 at 3:05:40 am
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Bill Hall on Oct 14, 2011 at 12:39:41 pm
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Chris Harlan on Oct 17, 2011 at 6:14:28 am
- Re: Dear FCPX team, by Mark Palmos on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:40:34 am
  - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Luke Hale on Oct 17, 2011 at 7:42:37 pm
    - Re: Dear FCPX team, by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:15:55 pm

Service: Jn Rer by John Rehberger on Oct 13, 2011 at 4:18:30 pm

imac not playing audio from timeline by Kate Cone on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:47:52 pm
- Re: imac not playing audio from timeline by Neal Broffman on Oct 12, 2011 at 5:18:26 pm

The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Franz Bieberkopf on Oct 12, 2011 at 5:37:00 am
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Tom Wolsky on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:44:27 am
  - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Franz Bieberkopf on Oct 13, 2011 at 12:50:11 am
    - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Tom Wolsky on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:43:49 am
      - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by David Lawrence on Oct 13, 2011 at 11:34:57 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Steve Connor on Oct 14, 2011 at 7:38:39 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by David Lawrence on Oct 14, 2011 at 7:52:44 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Steve Connor on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:10:08 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Steve Connor on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:32:57 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by David Lawrence on Oct 14, 2011 at 9:12:22 pm
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by David Lawrence on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:47:08 am
  - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Tom Wolsky on Oct 12, 2011 at 7:00:09 am
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Steve Connor on Oct 12, 2011 at 8:42:44 am
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Henry Vaughan on Oct 12, 2011 at 11:02:24 am
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Daniel Frome on Oct 12, 2011 at 12:53:12 pm
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Herb Sevush on Oct 12, 2011 at 1:02:31 pm
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 3:41:37 pm
  - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Brett Sherman on Oct 12, 2011 at 5:29:39 pm
    - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 5:43:43 pm
      - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Herb Sevush on Oct 12, 2011 at 5:51:29 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 5:58:57 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Herb Sevush on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:02:47 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:04:35 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Herb Sevush on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:07:11 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:23:31 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:33:06 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 7:12:20 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 12, 2011 at 8:02:54 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by David Lawrence on Oct 12, 2011 at 8:07:22 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 8:40:52 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 12, 2011 at 8:58:58 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Rafael Amador on Oct 13, 2011 at 12:03:59 am
  - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Franz Bieberkopf on Oct 13, 2011 at 12:54:24 am
    - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Andy Neil on Oct 14, 2011 at 6:35:12 am
      - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Steve Connor on Oct 14, 2011 at 7:29:17 pm
    - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Nora Williams on Oct 15, 2011 at 2:37:26 am
- Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Gerald Baria on Oct 13, 2011 at 2:15:00 am
  - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Rafael Amador on Oct 14, 2011 at 4:41:24 pm
    - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 14, 2011 at 5:18:43 pm
      - Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Rafael Amador on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:06:53 am
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 15, 2011 at 7:04:37 am
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Rafael Amador on Oct 16, 2011 at 12:56:47 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 17, 2011 at 12:34:07 am
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by David Powell on Jan 9, 2012 at 10:56:28 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Jeremy Garchow on Jan 9, 2012 at 10:58:41 pm
        Re: The Open Timeline and Spatial Workflows -- Another Example by Tom Wolsky on Jan 9, 2012 at 11:25:42 pm

KiPro not recording, and Reel N/A by Butch Henderson on Oct 11, 2011 at 12:14:34 am
- Re: KiPro not recording, and Reel N/A by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 3:50:32 pm
  - Re: KiPro not recording, and Reel N/A by Butch Henderson on Oct 11, 2011 at 11:17:05 pm

Dropped Frames by Marco Aguilar on Oct 10, 2011 at 3:59:17 pm
- Re: Dropped Frames by David Roth Weiss on Oct 10, 2011 at 4:08:16 pm

Digging my own grave? by Daniel Peace on Oct 10, 2011 at 2:57:40 pm
- Re: Digging my own grave? by Roland R. Kahlenberg on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:51:34 pm
  - Re: Digging my own grave? by Daniel Peace on Oct 10, 2011 at 6:52:31 pm
    - Re: Digging my own grave? by Joseph W. Bourke on Oct 10, 2011 at 9:05:53 pm
- Re: Digging my own grave? by Walter Soyka on Oct 11, 2011 at 2:14:18 pm
  - Re: Digging my own grave? by Daniel Peace on Oct 11, 2011 at 3:53:02 pm

FCPX or Not? by Steve Connor on Oct 8, 2011 at 7:23:07 am
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Philip Davies on Oct 8, 2011 at 11:20:44 am
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Dean Neal on Oct 8, 2011 at 12:14:04 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Mark Dobson on Oct 8, 2011 at 12:24:25 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Kevin Patrick on Oct 8, 2011 at 1:08:49 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not? by Mark Dobson on Oct 8, 2011 at 4:44:50 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Tony Badea on Oct 8, 2011 at 1:48:32 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Owen Wexler on Oct 8, 2011 at 2:30:36 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 8, 2011 at 3:21:05 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Devin Crane on Oct 8, 2011 at 3:46:06 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not? by Mark Morache on Oct 8, 2011 at 4:10:04 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 8, 2011 at 4:33:36 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Mark Morache on Oct 8, 2011 at 6:51:43 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 8, 2011 at 7:33:03 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Mark Morache on Oct 8, 2011 at 7:42:09 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 8, 2011 at 7:52:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Mark Morache on Oct 8, 2011 at 8:11:27 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 9, 2011 at 4:51:34 am
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Steve Connor on Oct 9, 2011 at 1:12:35 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Herb Sevush on Oct 9, 2011 at 2:14:09 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Tahir Ramzan on Oct 9, 2011 at 2:22:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Steve Connor on Oct 9, 2011 at 3:24:40 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Gary Huff on Oct 8, 2011 at 4:39:43 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Andrew Hays on Oct 8, 2011 at 5:41:07 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Rafael Amador on Oct 8, 2011 at 6:22:26 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 8, 2011 at 6:44:08 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Tahir Ramzan on Oct 8, 2011 at 9:08:42 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Liam Hall on Oct 8, 2011 at 9:24:28 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Tahir Ramzan on Oct 8, 2011 at 10:15:20 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Erik Lundberg on Oct 8, 2011 at 10:01:29 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by Aindreas Gallagher on Oct 9, 2011 at 12:00:07 am
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Daniel Annefelt on Oct 9, 2011 at 12:38:34 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not? by Rafael Amador on Oct 9, 2011 at 1:23:25 am
      - Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Gissing on Oct 9, 2011 at 1:37:56 am
      - Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 9, 2011 at 4:41:04 am
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Rafael Amador on Oct 9, 2011 at 3:25:19 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 9, 2011 at 3:42:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Rafael Amador on Oct 9, 2011 at 6:39:17 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 11:56:10 am
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 10, 2011 at 12:11:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 1:13:48 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Chris Harlan on Oct 10, 2011 at 4:51:36 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:24:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Chris Harlan on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:34:00 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:49:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Chris Harlan on Oct 10, 2011 at 6:03:56 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 6:24:11 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Chris Harlan on Oct 10, 2011 at 6:38:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 8:16:37 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Chris Harlan on Oct 11, 2011 at 12:26:55 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not? by Aindreas Gallagher on Oct 9, 2011 at 1:34:31 am
      - Re: FCPX or Not? by Herb Sevush on Oct 9, 2011 at 4:17:46 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Shane Ross on Oct 10, 2011 at 3:42:49 am
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 10, 2011 at 5:25:14 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Rafael Amador on Oct 11, 2011 at 10:28:23 am
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 11, 2011 at 2:55:26 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 3:36:34 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Shane Ross on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:05:09 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:18:02 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Andy Neil on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:41:52 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not? by John Christie on Oct 10, 2011 at 10:11:12 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not? by Rafael Amador on Oct 11, 2011 at 10:18:03 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 3:48:27 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not? by Rafael Amador on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:20:16 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:28:55 pm
        Re: Jeremy 2 by Rafael Amador on Oct 15, 2011 at 5:11:10 am
      - Re: FCPX or Not? by Neil Patience on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:28:36 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:34:07 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:41:49 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:48:08 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:54:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 5:57:57 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:11:04 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:35:37 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:44:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:48:10 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:51:40 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:54:17 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:59:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 7:04:32 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 7:13:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 11, 2011 at 9:53:07 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Simon Ubsdell on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:53:38 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Michael Hancock on Oct 11, 2011 at 6:57:04 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Neil Patience on Oct 12, 2011 at 11:21:55 am
        Re: FCPX or Not? by Neil Patience on Oct 12, 2011 at 11:31:04 am

Creating National Ad Spot by Greg Ball on Oct 7, 2011 at 5:56:13 pm
- Re: Creating National Ad Spot by Todd Terry on Oct 7, 2011 at 8:48:50 pm
  - Re: Creating National Ad Spot by Stephen Smith on Oct 13, 2011 at 8:08:03 pm

Article: Film Fading to Black by Debra Kaufman on Oct 7, 2011 at 4:17:54 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by David Roth Weiss on Oct 7, 2011 at 5:35:40 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Debra Kaufman on Oct 7, 2011 at 4:01:19 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Eugene Lehnert on Oct 7, 2011 at 4:55:00 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 7, 2011 at 5:39:58 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by george manzanilla on Oct 7, 2011 at 6:45:27 pm
  - @george manzanilla by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 7, 2011 at 7:07:54 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Debra Kaufman on Oct 7, 2011 at 7:12:32 pm
- Re: Article: Film Fading to Black by Marco Falcone on Oct 10, 2011 at 1:05:31 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Jiggy Gaton on Oct 12, 2011 at 12:53:48 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Debra Kaufman on Oct 12, 2011 at 1:11:00 am
  - @Debra Kaufman by Jiggy Gaton on Oct 12, 2011 at 1:31:14 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Debra Kaufman on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:19:54 am
  - @Debra Kaufman by Jiggy Gaton on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:32:42 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Patrick Simpson on Oct 12, 2011 at 3:22:12 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Richard WILSON on Oct 12, 2011 at 3:24:17 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Michael Brassert on Oct 12, 2011 at 4:02:27 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Kahleem Poole on Oct 12, 2011 at 5:26:02 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Graham Cooke on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:59:12 am
- Re: The Most Successful television shows are still shot on film. by Alessandro Machi on Oct 12, 2011 at 7:59:31 am
  - @Alessandro Machi by Sean Mullen on Oct 17, 2011 at 6:56:12 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Victor Toader on Oct 12, 2011 at 8:13:35 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Freya Black on Oct 12, 2011 at 11:20:42 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Darren Nauerz on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:19:37 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Charles O. Slavens on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:28:46 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Von Thomas on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:43:25 pm
  - @Von Thomas by Jiggy Gaton on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:55:30 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Darren Nauerz on Oct 12, 2011 at 2:57:48 pm
  - @Darren Nauerz by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 12, 2011 at 4:43:54 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Charles O. Slavens on Oct 12, 2011 at 3:16:35 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Ann Turner on Oct 12, 2011 at 3:41:55 pm
  - @Ann Turner by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 12, 2011 at 4:25:16 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by tom hennig on Oct 12, 2011 at 6:11:53 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by jill mcmillan on Oct 13, 2011 at 3:53:48 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by george manzanilla on Oct 14, 2011 at 8:57:32 am
  - @george manzanilla by Sean Mullen on Oct 17, 2011 at 4:29:36 pm
    - @Sean Mullen by george manzanilla on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:14:31 pm
      - @george manzanilla by Sean Mullen on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:32:07 pm
        @Sean Mullen by george manzanilla on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:50:06 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Debra Kaufman on Oct 14, 2011 at 4:20:32 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Luis Villalon-Meunier on Oct 14, 2011 at 4:57:21 pm
  - @Luis Villalon-Meunier by george manzanilla on Oct 14, 2011 at 5:55:07 pm
- some other related and interesting posts on the subject... by george manzanilla on Oct 14, 2011 at 7:53:25 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Mike Garrick on Oct 14, 2011 at 10:30:18 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Tim Wilson on Oct 14, 2011 at 11:54:39 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Shanna Pharis on Oct 15, 2011 at 2:18:22 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Marco Ruggio on Oct 15, 2011 at 8:08:01 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Royce Allen Dudley on Oct 16, 2011 at 4:11:01 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by george manzanilla on Oct 16, 2011 at 7:10:29 am
  - @george manzanilla by Sean Mullen on Oct 17, 2011 at 4:03:21 pm
    - @Sean Mullen by george manzanilla on Oct 19, 2011 at 8:35:33 am
      - Re: @Sean Mullen by Malcolm Matusky on Nov 5, 2011 at 12:25:16 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by carlos egberto silveira on Oct 16, 2011 at 6:30:28 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by carlos egberto silveira on Oct 16, 2011 at 7:38:44 pm
  - @carlos egberto silveira by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 16, 2011 at 8:14:49 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by carlos egberto silveira on Oct 17, 2011 at 1:58:40 am
- @carlos egberto silveira by bud fritz on Oct 17, 2011 at 4:54:50 am
  - Digital cinematography by Tim Wilson on Oct 17, 2011 at 6:04:46 am
    - @Tim Wilson by Robert Houllahan on Oct 18, 2011 at 12:13:59 am
  - @bud fritz by Damon Vrettos on Oct 18, 2011 at 2:09:52 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Robert Houllahan on Oct 17, 2011 at 7:02:56 am
  - @Robert Houllahan by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 17, 2011 at 3:30:13 pm
    - @Ronald Lindeboom by Robert Houllahan on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:07:37 pm
      - @Robert Houllahan by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:52:44 pm
        @Ronald Lindeboom by Robert Houllahan on Oct 17, 2011 at 10:44:18 pm
        @Robert Houllahan by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 17, 2011 at 11:35:28 pm
        @Robert Houllahan by Flavio Filho on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58:09 pm
        @Flavio Filho by Robert Houllahan on Oct 20, 2011 at 11:12:19 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by carlos egberto silveira on Oct 17, 2011 at 1:23:46 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Charles O. Slavens on Oct 17, 2011 at 2:37:59 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Karl Lohninger on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:39:55 pm
  - @Karl Lohninger by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:28:14 pm
  - @Karl Lohninger by David Roth Weiss on Oct 17, 2011 at 9:36:27 pm
- quoting Aaton, ARRI, etc. by Debra Kaufman on Oct 17, 2011 at 8:50:37 pm
- @Film Fading to Black by Michael Brassert on Oct 17, 2011 at 11:21:55 pm
- @Film Fading to Black by Mike Garrick on Oct 17, 2011 at 11:35:51 pm
- Mike Garrick/film labs by Debra Kaufman on Oct 17, 2011 at 11:47:15 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Douglas Bowker on Oct 19, 2011 at 2:55:01 pm
  - @Douglas Bowker by Ronald Lindeboom on Oct 19, 2011 at 6:02:37 pm
    - @Ronald Lindeboom by Douglas Bowker on Oct 19, 2011 at 6:44:02 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Steven Romano on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:19:34 pm
  - @Steven Romano by Jiggy Gaton on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:49:51 pm
    - @Jiggy Gaton by Mike Garrick on Oct 20, 2011 at 12:15:36 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Franz Wieser on Oct 19, 2011 at 11:54:12 pm
- Re: Article: Film Fading to Black by Mike Cohen on Oct 21, 2011 at 1:58:26 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Robert Shanebrook on Oct 25, 2011 at 1:17:53 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Guydell Maxfield II on Oct 29, 2011 at 11:40:23 pm
- @Guydell by Debra Kaufman on Oct 30, 2011 at 12:29:30 am
  - @Debra Kaufman by Robert Houllahan on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:24:32 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Robert Houllahan on Nov 3, 2011 at 7:21:51 pm
- @Film Fading to Black by Richard Kaufman on Nov 14, 2011 at 7:16:07 pm
- Richard Kaufman by Debra Kaufman on Nov 14, 2011 at 7:41:58 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Mike Prosser on Nov 30, 2011 at 6:04:11 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Douglas Bowker on Nov 30, 2011 at 6:32:46 pm
  - @Douglas Bowker by Ronald Lindeboom on Nov 30, 2011 at 6:45:29 pm
- #Douglas Bowker by Debra Kaufman on Nov 30, 2011 at 6:46:25 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Uwe Engel on Jan 6, 2012 at 2:13:57 pm
- #Uwe Engel by Debra Kaufman on Jan 6, 2012 at 6:06:53 pm
- Lamenting the Lack of Discipline by James Casey on Jan 11, 2012 at 4:26:30 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by David Roth Weiss on Jan 11, 2012 at 5:10:54 am
- Kodak going "banko" can't help matters by David Roth Weiss on Jan 13, 2012 at 11:55:40 pm
- Kodak bankruptcy by Debra Kaufman on Jan 14, 2012 at 12:02:33 am
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Steve fournier on Jan 30, 2012 at 5:48:37 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Trevor McCLung on May 28, 2012 at 7:48:37 am
  - @Trevor McCLung by Ronald Lindeboom on May 28, 2012 at 5:14:38 pm
    - @Ronald Lindeboom by Jiggy Gaton Jiggy Gaton on May 28, 2012 at 5:34:24 pm
- @Trevor McClung by Debra Kaufman on May 28, 2012 at 7:56:43 pm
- Re: Film Fading to Black by Douglas Bowker on Aug 3, 2012 at 5:08:13 pm

Asssistance with workflow ideas! by Dan Melius on Oct 6, 2011 at 3:11:56 pm
- Re: Asssistance with workflow ideas! by Shane Ross on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:25:58 pm
  - Re: Asssistance with workflow ideas! by Dan Melius on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:35:19 pm
    - Re: Asssistance with workflow ideas! by Shane Ross on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:46:30 pm
      - Re: Asssistance with workflow ideas! by Dan Melius on Oct 6, 2011 at 7:00:14 pm

News: Sony Resumes Production And Delivery Of HDCAM SR Professional Tape by Cow News Droid on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:54:07 pm

FCP Log and Capture from Beta-SP tape by Matthew Asher on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:15:09 pm
- Re: FCP Log and Capture from Beta-SP tape by Doug Beal on Oct 5, 2011 at 10:15:52 pm
  - Re: FCP Log and Capture from Beta-SP tape by Matthew Asher on Oct 6, 2011 at 9:44:35 pm
    - Re: FCP Log and Capture from Beta-SP tape by John Pale on Oct 8, 2011 at 4:41:17 pm
      - Re: FCP Log and Capture from Beta-SP tape by Matthew Asher on Oct 8, 2011 at 5:07:44 pm
        Re: FCP Log and Capture from Beta-SP tape by John Pale on Oct 8, 2011 at 9:52:03 pm
        Re: FCP Log and Capture from Beta-SP tape by John Pale on Oct 8, 2011 at 10:08:55 pm

iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Gerald Baria on Oct 5, 2011 at 12:46:43 pm
- Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 1:44:58 pm
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Shields on Oct 5, 2011 at 1:50:37 pm
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 1:53:36 pm
      - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Shields on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:09:53 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:12:38 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Shields on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:18:20 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:22:52 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Seeman on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:54:23 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Bill Davis on Oct 5, 2011 at 5:58:23 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 6:20:24 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by David Lawrence on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:15:01 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Seeman on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:44:04 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:51:22 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Bill Davis on Oct 6, 2011 at 3:51:11 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:26:55 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Gary Huff on Oct 6, 2011 at 12:41:25 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Gary Huff on Oct 6, 2011 at 1:05:01 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:48:12 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Steve Connor on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:52:00 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 5, 2011 at 7:54:06 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 8:00:56 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 5, 2011 at 8:25:56 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 5, 2011 at 8:46:36 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 5, 2011 at 9:23:36 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by David Lawrence on Oct 5, 2011 at 10:04:05 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 6, 2011 at 2:19:53 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 8, 2011 at 3:34:43 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 7, 2011 at 1:51:28 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by David Roth Weiss on Oct 5, 2011 at 4:03:42 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Neil Sadwelkar on Oct 9, 2011 at 8:40:50 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 9, 2011 at 1:12:29 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by kim krause on Oct 9, 2011 at 2:26:50 pm
- Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Marvin Holdman on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:28:03 pm
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Bob Woodhead on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:53:35 pm
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Steve Connor on Oct 5, 2011 at 2:53:53 pm
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Gerald Baria on Oct 7, 2011 at 12:27:27 pm
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Mark Bein on Oct 5, 2011 at 3:16:01 pm
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Andy Neil on Oct 5, 2011 at 3:24:38 pm
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Gerald Baria on Oct 7, 2011 at 12:29:15 pm
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 5, 2011 at 3:58:15 pm
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Marvin Holdman on Oct 5, 2011 at 5:46:26 pm
      - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by shawn Bockoven on Oct 5, 2011 at 10:28:30 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Christian Schumacher on Oct 6, 2011 at 2:15:30 am
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Bill Davis on Oct 6, 2011 at 8:27:41 pm
- Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Owen Wexler on Oct 6, 2011 at 11:51:50 pm
- Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by kim krause on Oct 7, 2011 at 8:04:00 am
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Rafael Amador on Oct 7, 2011 at 9:11:21 pm
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Bill Davis on Oct 8, 2011 at 6:46:38 pm
- Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Seeman on Oct 22, 2011 at 7:11:02 am
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by kim krause on Oct 22, 2011 at 8:53:14 am
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Seeman on Oct 22, 2011 at 2:26:37 pm
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 22, 2011 at 2:53:44 pm
      - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by kim krause on Oct 23, 2011 at 8:36:01 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Steve Connor on Oct 23, 2011 at 10:04:06 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 23, 2011 at 2:46:35 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 23, 2011 at 3:06:44 pm
  - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 22, 2011 at 2:38:43 pm
    - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Seeman on Oct 22, 2011 at 2:54:16 pm
      - Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 22, 2011 at 3:05:56 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by David Cherniack on Oct 22, 2011 at 6:37:56 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Steve Connor on Oct 22, 2011 at 7:03:11 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 22, 2011 at 7:12:16 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Steve Connor on Oct 22, 2011 at 8:08:17 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 22, 2011 at 8:12:51 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Tim Wilson on Oct 22, 2011 at 9:06:46 pm
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Craig Seeman on Oct 31, 2011 at 1:47:22 am
        Re: iPhone 4S new sensor can take 4K at 24p.FCPX can handle 4K.Imagine the possibilities. by Herb Sevush on Oct 31, 2011 at 2:58:59 am

Hardware and setting for importing VHS into FCP by Val Jones on Oct 4, 2011 at 5:44:08 pm
- Re: Hardware and setting for importing VHS into FCP by Shane Ross on Oct 4, 2011 at 6:02:46 pm

Log and Capture GH1 footage using HV20 as deck. by Travis Detweiler on Oct 4, 2011 at 5:44:02 pm

Mini-DV Tape Ingestion by John White on Oct 3, 2011 at 7:36:13 pm
- Re: Mini-DV Tape Ingestion by Everest Mokaeff on Oct 4, 2011 at 10:19:30 am
  - Re: Mini-DV Tape Ingestion by John White on Oct 4, 2011 at 1:04:02 pm
    - Re: Mini-DV Tape Ingestion by Everest Mokaeff on Oct 5, 2011 at 8:40:46 am

Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Benjamin Mullins on Oct 3, 2011 at 6:26:20 am
- Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Carsten Orlt on Oct 3, 2011 at 7:11:25 am
  - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Benjamin Mullins on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:59:21 am
    - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Carsten Orlt on Oct 3, 2011 at 11:24:55 am
      - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Benjamin Mullins on Oct 3, 2011 at 1:02:49 pm
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Steve Connor on Oct 3, 2011 at 1:10:45 pm
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Steve Connor on Oct 3, 2011 at 1:42:08 pm
    - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Craig Seeman on Oct 3, 2011 at 4:23:42 pm
      - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Rafael Amador on Oct 3, 2011 at 6:09:43 pm
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Craig Seeman on Oct 3, 2011 at 7:31:20 pm
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Herb Sevush on Oct 3, 2011 at 8:01:51 pm
- Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Geert van den Berg on Oct 3, 2011 at 8:30:44 pm
  - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Herb Sevush on Oct 3, 2011 at 8:49:13 pm
    - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Geert van den Berg on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:04:10 pm
    - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Kevin Monahan on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:04:58 pm
    - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Shane Ross on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:06:41 pm
      - Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Kevin Monahan on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:13:12 pm
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Geert van den Berg on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:24:40 pm
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Kevin Monahan on Oct 3, 2011 at 11:02:21 pm
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Kristin Leys on Oct 4, 2011 at 3:02:07 am
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by James Mortner on Oct 4, 2011 at 11:56:20 am
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by David Cherniack on Oct 4, 2011 at 5:04:29 am
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Daniel Annefelt on Oct 4, 2011 at 5:35:12 am
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Geert van den Berg on Oct 4, 2011 at 8:31:43 am
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Geert van den Berg on Oct 4, 2011 at 8:34:19 am
        Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Greg Burke on Oct 4, 2011 at 9:33:28 pm
- Re: Why Wait For X To Evolve? by Mark Morache on Oct 5, 2011 at 8:29:34 am

A reflection on trends by Rich Rubasch on Oct 2, 2011 at 11:58:00 pm
- Re: A reflection on trends by Steve Martin on Oct 3, 2011 at 3:46:15 pm
- Re: A reflection on trends by Nick Griffin on Oct 3, 2011 at 5:31:55 pm
  - Re: A reflection on trends by Steve Martin on Oct 3, 2011 at 6:16:49 pm
- Re: A reflection on trends by grinner hester on Oct 3, 2011 at 9:34:35 pm
  - Re: A reflection on trends by Steve Martin on Oct 4, 2011 at 3:20:02 pm
    - Re: A reflection on trends by Nick Griffin on Oct 4, 2011 at 7:33:31 pm
      - Re: A reflection on trends by Bob Zelin on Oct 5, 2011 at 4:02:25 am
- Re: A reflection on trends by walter biscardi on Oct 5, 2011 at 10:17:49 am

having trouble making SD Blu Ray by Sean Sartori on Sep 29, 2011 at 6:49:52 pm
- Re: having trouble making SD Blu Ray by eric pautsch on Sep 29, 2011 at 8:06:14 pm
  - Re: having trouble making SD Blu Ray by Sean Sartori on Sep 29, 2011 at 10:52:19 pm
    - Re: having trouble making SD Blu Ray by eric pautsch on Sep 30, 2011 at 6:43:52 am
      - Re: having trouble making SD Blu Ray by John Mitchell on Oct 1, 2011 at 4:11:10 pm
        Re: having trouble making SD Blu Ray by eric pautsch on Oct 1, 2011 at 8:01:37 pm

Need Betacam camera handle by Mark Frazier on Aug 11, 2011 at 8:29:17 pm
- Re: Need Betacam camera handle by Fred Jodry on Nov 9, 2011 at 5:50:20 pm

HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Ben Epstein on Aug 5, 2011 at 12:58:55 am
- Re: HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Dave LaRonde on Aug 5, 2011 at 3:55:09 pm
  - Re: HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Ben Epstein on Aug 5, 2011 at 5:46:58 pm
    - Re: HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Dave LaRonde on Aug 5, 2011 at 8:55:34 pm
      - Re: HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Ben Epstein on Aug 5, 2011 at 11:24:23 pm
        Re: HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Bret Williams on Aug 7, 2011 at 4:30:54 am
        Re: HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Jim Burns on Aug 7, 2011 at 7:48:02 pm
        Re: HDV stutter on computer but not monitor by Paal T Nygaard on Nov 25, 2011 at 9:07:35 am

Digitizing BetaCam SP by Cody Walters on May 13, 2011 at 9:57:29 pm
- Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by David Roth Weiss on May 13, 2011 at 10:02:38 pm
  - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Steve Eisen on May 13, 2011 at 10:17:31 pm
  - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Cody Walters on May 13, 2011 at 10:51:24 pm
    - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Shane Ross on May 13, 2011 at 11:13:49 pm
      - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by David Roth Weiss on May 13, 2011 at 11:17:08 pm
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Cody Walters on May 14, 2011 at 2:56:53 am
- Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by John Heagy on May 13, 2011 at 11:44:55 pm
  - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Mark Raudonis on May 13, 2011 at 11:53:14 pm
    - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by John Heagy on May 14, 2011 at 1:00:37 am
      - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by David Roth Weiss on May 14, 2011 at 1:06:43 am
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Shane Ross on May 14, 2011 at 1:13:28 am
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by David Roth Weiss on May 14, 2011 at 1:30:53 am
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Michael Gissing on May 14, 2011 at 1:17:08 am
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by John Heagy on May 14, 2011 at 3:06:11 am
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Michael Gissing on May 14, 2011 at 3:29:09 am
      - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Cody Walters on May 14, 2011 at 2:52:18 am
- Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Andrew Rendell on May 14, 2011 at 11:31:09 am
  - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Patrice Freymond on May 14, 2011 at 12:38:06 pm
    - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Andrew Rendell on May 14, 2011 at 5:46:52 pm
      - Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by John Jennings on Oct 28, 2011 at 5:12:06 pm
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by Shane Ross on Oct 28, 2011 at 5:19:31 pm
        Re: Digitizing BetaCam SP by John Jennings on Oct 28, 2011 at 6:15:29 pm

What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Jeremy Cucco on Jan 30, 2011 at 10:39:41 pm
- Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Olin Padilla on Jan 30, 2011 at 11:52:17 pm
  - Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Jeremy Cucco on Jan 31, 2011 at 12:02:02 am
    - Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Olin Padilla on Jan 31, 2011 at 1:39:12 am
      - Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Jeremy Cucco on Jan 31, 2011 at 1:53:54 am
        Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Dennis Radeke on Jan 31, 2011 at 11:32:51 am
        Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Olin Padilla on Jan 31, 2011 at 11:37:10 pm
        Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Jeremy Cucco on Feb 1, 2011 at 2:39:35 am
    - Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Keith Pratt on Feb 5, 2011 at 2:21:54 am
      - Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Jeremy Cucco on Feb 5, 2011 at 3:15:28 am
  - Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by Dennis Radeke on Jan 31, 2011 at 11:29:00 am
- Re: What in the world is my problem? Deinterlacing and other quality issues!! by keith greenfield on Oct 8, 2011 at 10:22:44 am

prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 4:26:31 am
- Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard Harrington on Nov 2, 2010 at 12:40:51 pm
  - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 1:16:31 pm
    - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Lance Bachelder on Nov 2, 2010 at 6:50:38 pm
      - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 6:52:45 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Lance Bachelder on Nov 2, 2010 at 7:02:32 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Omar Itani on Nov 2, 2010 at 7:04:48 pm
- Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard van den Boogaard on Nov 4, 2010 at 8:56:06 am
  - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard Harrington on Nov 4, 2010 at 1:25:38 pm
    - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Lance Bachelder on Nov 4, 2010 at 5:28:27 pm
      - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 3:32:34 am
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Lance Bachelder on Nov 5, 2010 at 6:21:39 am
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 1:32:54 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 2:44:15 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by gary adcock on Nov 5, 2010 at 5:37:56 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Ashish Ranglani on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:18:57 am
    - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard Harrington on Nov 5, 2010 at 3:43:41 am
      - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Stephen Martin on Nov 5, 2010 at 7:52:46 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Robbie Carman on Nov 5, 2010 at 8:34:28 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Garrett Gibbons on Nov 5, 2010 at 10:10:09 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by gary adcock on Nov 6, 2010 at 1:23:07 pm
      - Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Phil Kennedy on Nov 8, 2010 at 4:06:16 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Richard Harrington on Nov 8, 2010 at 6:21:17 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Phil Kennedy on Nov 8, 2010 at 6:42:43 pm
        Re: prores 422 hq vs prores 422 vs prores 444 by Ashish Ranglani on Dec 2, 2011 at 11:34:08 am
- Re: Richard, Lance, Robbie, Gary, Stephen, and everyone else! by Omar Itani on Nov 9, 2010 at 12:39:06 am
  - Re: Richard, Lance, Robbie, Gary, Stephen, and everyone else! by Bryan Mailer on Nov 28, 2012 at 8:49:49 am

Closed Captioning Capture by Darren Clevenger on Oct 1, 2010 at 7:05:56 pm
- Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jason Livingston on Oct 1, 2010 at 7:51:50 pm
  - Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jeff Carr on Mar 1, 2011 at 5:54:04 pm
    - Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jason Livingston on Mar 1, 2011 at 11:33:29 pm
      - Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jeff Carr on Mar 3, 2011 at 9:33:45 pm
        Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jason Livingston on Mar 8, 2011 at 12:06:15 am
        Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jeff Carr on Mar 10, 2011 at 2:26:08 pm
- Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Mark Suszko on Oct 1, 2010 at 7:54:35 pm
  - Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Carissa Mills on Mar 2, 2011 at 1:16:04 am
    - Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Rafae; Parlatore on Dec 8, 2011 at 6:17:39 pm
      - Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jason Livingston on Dec 8, 2011 at 7:39:24 pm
        Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Rafae; Parlatore on Dec 8, 2011 at 8:40:31 pm
        Re: Closed Captioning Capture by Jason Livingston on Dec 9, 2011 at 8:58:47 pm

Video Archiving Solution by Kushpa on Oct 18, 2007 at 2:47:02 pm
- Re: Video Archiving Solution by Mark Suszko on Oct 19, 2007 at 2:38:13 pm
- Re: Video Archiving Solution by Adam Jones on Oct 25, 2011 at 9:10:16 am
  - Re: Video Archiving Solution by Tim Wilson on Oct 25, 2011 at 5:15:39 pm

Audio feedback loop by jrockaz on Nov 21, 2005 at 10:14:12 pm
- Re: Audio feedback loop by Andy Edwards on Nov 21, 2005 at 10:51:49 pm
- Re: Audio feedback loop by creative bloc on Nov 21, 2005 at 10:56:03 pm
  - Re: Audio feedback loop by Bob Zelin on Nov 22, 2005 at 1:03:06 am
    - Re: Audio feedback loop by Jrockaz on Nov 23, 2005 at 5:43:33 pm
    - Re: Audio feedback loop by Eddie Stein on Oct 19, 2011 at 3:47:12 am

2011-01-01 to 2011-04-01 | 2011-04-01 to 2011-07-01 | 2011-07-01 to 2011-10-01 | 2011-10-01 to 2012-01-01 | 2012-01-01 to 2012-04-01 | 2012-04-01 to 2012-07-01 | 2012-07-01 to 2012-10-01 | 2012-10-01 to 2013-01-01 | 2013-01-01 to 2013-04-01 |

ADD A NEW POST • SEARCH • CHANGE FORUM