| Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary?
• | | | |
 | Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary?
by Joel Pickford on Jan 30, 2004 at 1:42:05 am |
As I contemplate how to configure the FCP system I am about to buy, I am wondering if it is really neccessary to work uncompressed to and from beta sp source tape. Broadcast professionals tell me that the difference between compressed and uncompressed beta footage is nearly impossible to discern. Would uncompressed quality matter more for transferring the finished piece to 35mm film?
Working uncompressed means spending more money on storage (a robust, raided external drive array instead of cheaper firewire drives) and more money on a Cinewave instead of the lower priced AJA I/O. Also, if a future project gets sufficiently funded to shoot in HD, what would the upgrade considerations be?
Any thoughts or advice would be much appreciated.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Jan 30, 2004 at 2:35:56 am |
[Joel Pickford] "Working uncompressed means spending more money on storage (a robust, raided external drive array instead of cheaper firewire drives) and more money on a Cinewave instead of the lower priced AJA I/O."
You don't need to buy a Cinewave card to work with uncompressed video. Final cut can play up to 7 streams of uncompressed video captured through the Io. Last I looked the Cinewave only did 3, plus 2 graphics tracks. The Cinewave does have some advantages, but it's in need an expensive hardware update in the not to distant future. The Io probably won't need any major updates until Mac's have fast enough Firewire ports to support HD.
It you buy an Io and want to add HD later, you can always add a Kona or Decklink HD card. A very cost effective way to go. The Cinewave is very cool also, but be prepared to spend a great deal more to purchase it, update it, for tech support, and for additional features. You could probably buy a couple of Io's and Kona cards for the same price, plus updates and support would still be less.
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Peter Wilcox on Jan 30, 2004 at 2:48:06 pm |
I use DVPro50 and it looks great and is less filling :o)
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by pao on Jan 31, 2004 at 9:57:01 am |
So AJA Io could capture 10 bit uncompresed video the same "quallity" as AJA Kona. But AJA Io do it through FireWare. What is the difference?
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by bobo on Jan 30, 2004 at 3:42:36 pm |
Joel,
I edit beta-SP using uncompressed 8-bit through an IO. It looks fantastic.
I'm not sure what codec you're considering editing in. If not uncompressed, then what? If what you're asking is, "Is editing beta-SP in the DV codec okay?" (hence, to not have to invest in expensive storage), I'd have to say no way. There is a definite loss of quality with betacam being converted to DV. And, if you mix in any graphics with the DV beta footage, you'll definitely see artifacting and ungliness in them. Go uncompressed. You'll be happier.
... And if you're considering HD in the future anyway, just buy the drives now that will allow you to still use them with HD later.
Bobo
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Brian Lockwood on Jan 30, 2004 at 6:16:37 pm |
BOBO is 100% correct!!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Joel Pickford on Jan 30, 2004 at 8:23:30 pm |
Thanks, everyone. Your posts are very helpful and much appreciated. It sounds like the AJA I/O is the cost effective way to go uncompressed, adding a Kona card later for HD.
Is an expensive, external raided drive array really neccessary to work uncompressed (the alternative being to use four 180GB internal drives and additional external firewire drives as needed)?
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Jan 31, 2004 at 8:31:03 am |
[Joel Pickford] "Is an expensive, external raided drive array really neccessary to work uncompressed (the alternative being to use four 180GB internal drives and additional external firewire drives as needed)?"
It really depends on how much RT you want. Also, what would do when you upgrade to a G5? The 4 internal drives in a G4 won't work in a G5?
The Io does work fine on a G4, but you'll really want to move to a G5 as soon as possible to take full advantage of RT Extreme. I would go with an Expensive RAID (Huge, JBOD SCSI, Xserve) if you can. If not, go with the 4 internals until you update to the G5. Then you could go with 2 250gb SATA drives, or possibly one of the external SATA solutions that will be coming in the next few months.
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by tony salgado on Jan 31, 2004 at 7:32:20 pm |
Joe,
If your are planning to use dv then a g4 dual 1ghz or above will be fine with internal ide drives stripped as a raid.
I am using a dual 1 ghz, with four internal ide drives and I am able to do 8 bit uncompressed. My footage originates from Betacam sp, digi beta or dvcpro. I have a fifth drive installed for my boot drive. No heat issues at all and the system works day in and day out. I even take it out on location for HD shoots as I can accept an SD SDI downconverted signal for capture into FCP for offline compositing my chroma key shoots.
My testing has shown in dv using RT extreme I can get between 3-5 layers of video in medium to low quality mode. In 8 bit I use my Kona SD for real time effects.
If your looking to save alot of money you don't need to get a G5 with an external raid. The G4 and internal ide drives stripped as a raid is the best value dollar for dollar.
I must completely disagree that the difference between uncompressed and a compressed codec such as DV or others are not noticeable. It is indeed and on some footage it is quite obvious. Sort of the difference between a fine wine and a cheap wino wine substitute or maybe a Ferrari and a ford pinto
Good luck,
Tony Salgdo
G4 dual 1 ghz, Kona SD, FCP 4.1.1, QT 6.5, (4) internal IDE drives 120 gb stripped as a raid via OSX, Panther 10.2.3.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Joel Pickford on Feb 2, 2004 at 7:00:57 am |
Many thanks for your advice on the G-4 with internal drives. Is there some reason that multiple ide drives cannot be installed in a G-5? Do 7200 rpm external firewire drives work as well as the internal ones?
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Feb 2, 2004 at 7:15:02 am |
[Joel Pickford] " Is there some reason that multiple ide drives cannot be installed in a G-5?"
G5's use SATA drives, instead of the ATA drives you're using now. Besides there is only room for two in a G5 (I know about the Wiebetech solution, but at over 2K I don't believe it's an option many people would consider).
[Joel Pickford] "Do 7200 rpm external firewire drives work as well as the internal ones?
Firewire externals work well as single drives, but their performance is not as good as it should be on G5's when striped together into a RAID.
Tony!
Return to Posts Index
Read Entire"
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by L. Shea on Feb 2, 2004 at 6:55:50 pm |
Tony,
I recently set up my new G5 with 2 internal 250G drives and I'm running OSX off a TEMPO HD card with a Hitachi Travelstar Drive. This gives me 500 gigs to play with until next year's storage upgrade. The system's been up and running for a few days now with no problems... So Far, So Good!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Feb 2, 2004 at 7:19:01 pm |
[L. Shea] "I recently set up my new G5 with 2 internal 250G drives and I'm running OSX off a TEMPO HD card with a Hitachi Travelstar Drive. This gives me 500 gigs to play with until next year's storage upgrade. The system's been up and running for a few days now with no problems... So Far, So Good!"
That's good to hear. I was hoping someone would post their experiences with the Tempo HD card. How many layers of real-time 8-bit and 10-bit uncompressed video are you getting (add a couple/few layers and scale them -except the back layer - so you can see them play)?
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Joel Pickford on Feb 2, 2004 at 9:45:12 pm |
This is good stuff on storage solutions for the G-4 and G-5. Keep it coming. I am really trying to sort this stuff out on my own, as sales people at ProMax and other dealers tend to push the most expensive solutions, even if they aren't really what someone needs.
My needs are as follows: I will be cutting feature length documentaries from beta sp source tapes. My editing ratio will be approximately 30:1+, so I assume I will have to digitize at lower res for cutting and then batch digitize the finished piece uncompressed (as I have previously using Media 100). I am not that concerned with real time effects, just image/sound quality and storage stability and effeciency. I also anticipate shooting my next documentary in HD, so I will require adequate hardware to meet that need within a year or so.
More advice on ways of configuring a system to meet these needs would be greatly appreciated. I tend to spend my time focused on my projects rather than reading up on the latest cards and storage options, so further advise and explanations will be most helpful.
Many thanks,
Joel
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Feb 3, 2004 at 1:36:06 am |
[Joel Pickford] "More advice on ways of configuring a system to meet these needs would be greatly appreciated. I tend to spend my time focused on my projects rather than reading up on the latest cards and storage options, so further advise and explanations will be most helpful. "
Your best bet is to forget HD until you need it. It's getting cheaper every few months and would be stupid to buy a RAID and/or system for something you're not going to use for a year. Just know that you may have to replace all your hardware when you do go with HD in the future.
If you are only going to use Beta SP (and DV) the most cost effective solution for you would probably be either a Decklink SP card or an AJA Io LA. If you think you might need Digibeta, S video, addtionally. and want a breakout box more similar to you old Media 100, I go with the full AJA Io.
The nice thing about the Io is that it's much less likely to become obsolete or incompatible with newer G5's as they come out. If you need HD later you can always buy a Decklink or Kona HD card to add to you Io instead of replacing it - very nice. It doesn't use up a PCI slot either.
For the RAID, I'd go with the same setup as L. Shea above as it should give you all you need for a couple of layers of RT 8-bit uncompressed. 10-bit is probably overkill for you in most cases. It is possible for example, you're doing some graphics and you're getting banding in the gradients, that you might want to go 10-bit.
So the setup I would go with, from what I understand of your situation, is:
G5 dual 2ghz
3-4gb RAM
2x250gb SATA drives (cheapest is to custom order your G5 with the upgraded 250gb Maxtor drive, then buy a second 250 Maxtor at the best price you can find. Make sure it's the same model). However, if you want to buy them both from someone other than Apple I would purchase the Hitachi drives instead.
Firmtek SATA card (faster than Apple's built-in controller).
A Wiebetech or other good Firewire 800 drive (250gb) to use as your startup drive and for extra storage (not for captured footage that you want to work with). You could also go with the Tempo PCI hard drive card as L. Shea did above. Very few people are speaking about their experiences with them. I tend to avoid PCI cards when I can, because of future compatibility, space, and heat issues, but it should work fine. Make sure to get the faster 7200 rpm drive.
One or Two 23" Cinema Displays.
This is my recommendation for a basic, but functional system today. However, I wouldn't buy one today unless you have the jobs to pay for it and another in a couple of months. NAB is coming up fast, and everything will change then. I would wait and see what everyone is saying afterwards.
The good thing about a company like ProMax is that you get their support when things go wrong. I personally, would not go through them for most setups, but that's because I know the technology and how to troubleshoot it. The devil is in the details with these systems. I may give you great advice, but leave out some little detail that I do without thinking. This little omission could leave you with a non functioning system. That's why ProMax and other good VAR's are a good value for most end users and company's.
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Joel Pickford on Feb 3, 2004 at 7:51:22 pm |
Ok, rereading your post I realize that you ARE recommending the AJA IO over that other capture card.
Regarding display, are non-Apple flat screen monitors compatible?
Joel
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by L. Shea on Feb 2, 2004 at 10:32:12 pm |
Tony,
I ran a test with some 10 bit uncompressed footage. I was able to layer 6 video clips before I needed to render. Being new to the Io world, I'm not sure if that's good, bad, or average...
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by L. Shea on Feb 2, 2004 at 11:53:48 pm |
Tony,
I ran a test with some 10 bit uncompressed footage. I was able to layer 6 video clips before I needed to render. Being new to the Io world, I'm not sure if that's good, bad, or average with this (incredibly cool) system...
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Feb 3, 2004 at 1:06:09 am |
[L. Shea] "I ran a test with some 10 bit uncompressed footage. I was able to layer 6 video clips before I needed to render. Being new to the Io world, I'm not sure if that's good, bad, or average with this (incredibly cool) system... "
6 layers of uncompressed 10-bit on only a two drive RAID? I don't think that's possible. I expected you to say two or maybe three layers (or even one of 10-bit). The fastest Apple Xserve RAID (fully loaded) only does 7-8 layers of 8-bit uncompressed. The very fast Huge systems RAID's are doing maybe 6 layers of 8-bit UC. Of course, 10-bit would be even less on those systems.
I think you maybe overstated by a factor of three or four. However, I believe for 8-bit, the two drive internal SATA drive (with a Firmtek SATA PCI card), and the Tempo PCI card startup drive, would be enough to do some real work without much rendering (except for effects, keying, animation, etc).
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by L. Shea on Feb 3, 2004 at 12:38:52 pm |
It sounds like I set up the test incorrectly. I digitized 10 bit uncompressed video. I inserted a 10 second clip on the first layer, and then scaled 5 additional layers over it. Besides the scaling, I didn't use any other effects. I didn't see the red render line until I added video on the 7th video track. These clips contained no audio.
My raided drives consist of 2 Western Digital 250GB Serial ATAs.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Joel Pickford on Feb 3, 2004 at 7:21:06 pm |
Tony,
That's great. Very helpful. So you would go with that PCI card you mentioned over the AJA IO?
Also, I thought of saving money on display by getting a couple of those $375 17" flat screens (or maybe the $600 19" models) that you see in mail order catalogues or at Fry's. I also need a new 12" NTSC monitor and thought about going with the much cheaper JVC instead of the standard Sony model. What do you think?
Joel
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Feb 3, 2004 at 8:19:57 pm |
[Joel Pickford] "That's great. Very helpful. So you would go with that PCI card you mentioned over the AJA IO?"
It's a tough call, but I like the Io for most things. The Decklink does have advantages when it comes to previewing to a NTSC monitor from applications other than FCP. However, I would expect more features like this from AJA/Apple at NAB and beyond. Remember, Apple writes all the software (drivers, etc) for the Io as it was codeveloped by both company's.
[Joel Pickford] " thought of saving money on display by getting a couple of those $375 17" flat screens (or maybe the $600 19" models) that you see in mail order catalogues or at Fry's. I also need a new 12" NTSC monitor and thought about going with the much cheaper JVC instead of the standard Sony model. What do you think? "
I don't really have much of an opinion on the cheaper monitors. I've been fortunate enough to always have the high-end monitors. If you're doing this professionally, I don't believe this is an area I would skimp on. I would try to get at least the 14" Sony 600 line + NTSC monitor for video previewing.
Don't forget you'll need a good mixer, cables, blackburst, tbc, decks, etc. It's quite expensive to build up a pro system. I'm sure you must already have some of that from before.
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Joel Pickford on Feb 4, 2004 at 1:07:43 am |
Thanks, Tony. I will probably wait until after NAB, even though I have financing in place and am itching to go. In the mean time I can log footage, write a first draft script, and look for the stock footage and archival stills that I need. I either already have, or plan on purchasing all of my peripheral hardware such as decks, monitors, mixing board, speakers, etc. used or from discount retailers, and then buying only the CPU, storage, IO, cards and software from ProMax.
I just acquired a beautiful, spacious, custom-built L-shaped corner editing table from another producer who relocated and rebuilt his studio from the ground up. Here's a small tip for nonlinear editors who are planning to work in tight spaces, as I do: go to a music store such as Guitar Center to buy racks that are low priced and can fit underneath a standard height editing table.
I shoot commercially, but I only edit my own documentaries, so I don't need to impress anybody with a $2000 Apple Cinema Display. I prefer to spend my money on quality capture and dependable storage instead of fancy monitors. I just need to make sure these XYZ flat screen monitors from Fry's or wherever will be Apple compatible.
JVC has a 750 line 17" switchable 16:9 - 4:3 monitor with underscan and adjustable color temperature to match the ambient lighting for around $750 (Sony's 14" model sells for around $1,100).
Regarding a separate, rack mounted TBC, is it necessary? I have worked with them in the past when renting edit suites and I liked them very much, especially for cleaning up footage that was a little dark or in need of a little color correction. It allowed me to clean up the footage BEFORE digitizing it. But everyone I have talked to lately says I only need the one built in to my PVW-2800 deck. What do you think?
Joel
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Feb 4, 2004 at 1:45:15 am |
Joel, it's sounds like you've got a pretty good handle on everything. I remember reading some negative posts about the JVC monitors and that's why I'm cautious about them. I personally have no experience with them at all so you may want to ask on the FCP forum. Make sure they have all the i/o you need.
The Cinema displays are more than pretty to look at, they are very good monitors. However, I can see trying the less expensive one to save money for now. Most DVI and/or VGA monitors are going to work fine on new Mac. you may need an adapter if you're running more than one, but you can get that when you purchase you Mac. I would find some that you think might work and then search the Apple discussions forums to see if you can find any post from people having problems with that brand/model. http://discussions.info.apple.com/ or here's another good place for info: http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/
The built-in TBC on your deck should be fine, unless you need an external TBC for other sources such as 3/4" and VHS.
I agree with the Guitar Center racks. I have a couple I bought years ago for almost nothing that still hold everything just fine.
You might want to checkout Ebay as it is a very good source of used gear at much better prices than you'll get from a discount retailers. Of course, you have to be very careful, but I've been buying equipment on Ebay for years with no problems.
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Rayzrsharp on Feb 4, 2004 at 3:44:11 am |
Tony, your posts are very helpful. But I have a question for you. What's your hardware set up. For example, decks, monitors, storage etc. I have the financing in place as well but I'm waiting for the release of the new G5 updates. Curious as to what configuration your using. If you already posted this info can you provide a link or at least get me close to where I can find it? Thanks.
Reed Black
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Tony! on Feb 4, 2004 at 7:03:26 am |
It's a long list. I've got 3 FCP systems right now. One with an Io, one with a Decklink card, and one with the Cinewave. I've also got a Media 100i system. 2 of the systems are on Dual 2ghz G5's (Io and Cinewave) and the others are on various G4's. I have a Huge DualMax 1200 RAID, a Medea RAID, a DATA Direct RAID, and an older Megadrive RAID. I use the Sony NTSC monitors 20 4NU (if I remember correctly). I use the Cinema Displays (23" and 22") - they're awesome. I use Mackie HR 824 and Event 20/20 powered speakers. I use Mackie 1604 mixers. I have a Sony PD 150 video camera. DSR-1500, UVW 1800, BVU 800, Panasonic SV 3800, and various VHS decks (I rent Digibeta as needed). and tons of other stuff that is too much to list.
If I were to buy a new system it would probably be something like this:
• Latest top-of-the-line G5 (4gb memory, two 250 Hitachi or Maxtor SATA drives, ATI 9800 S video card).
• Firmtek's SATA PCI card to run the internal SATA drives.
• I probably use a Wiebetech Firewire drive for my OS X system startup drive.
• ATTO UL4D SCSI card (if needed)
• Two 23" Cinema Displays (unless Apple finally announces the 30" ones).
• A DSR 45 (or better) DV/DVCAM deck
• A UVW-1800 (or better) Beta SP deck
• An Xserve RAID (preferably fully loaded with the extra cache and drive). A very solid second choice would be the new Huge RAID's.
• NTSC monitor would be tough because I'd want an HD model, but the pricing on those… ouch. I'd have to research the latest models.
• Probably a Mackie mixer, but I'd have to get up-to-date on all the latest features of the new models before I could say which one.
• I love the Mackie HR824 powered speakers, so that would probably be my choice again..
• I like Asante network switches and Epson printers and scanners.
• I'd have to see what NAB brings for a new video camera and lights.
• The choice of capture device is really dependent on your needs. Right now today, I like the Io and the aging Cinewave. After NAB, I'll probably like the Io and the new Cinewave. But the Decklink cards are very good values, so I wouldn't rule them out. There are other company's that are not standing still either, so expect a couple of more possibilities soon.
• I'd also be looking carefully at HDV to see if it's time has come. If so, decks, camera's, and capture devices are worth researching.
My equipment is always in a constant state of change. There's really two ways to go about keeping a system running. Either you buy it and don't touch it again (no updates, etc) and run it into the ground). This is what many Avid editors have done over the years. Or you do what I do - update everything all the time. This is more costly and you will have some problems, but your capabilities and skills continue to grow.
I'm sure my list is one everyone can add to or change. I left out a lot of necessary items, so if you don't know what you need you probably should find a good VAR. There are several that post here regularly.
Hope that helps a little, expect changes after NAB.
Tony!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Rayzrsharp on Feb 4, 2004 at 3:46:00 pm |
Thanks Bro, really, really, really helpful!
Rayzrsharp
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Is working uncompressed from beta sp really neccesary? by Joel Pickford on Feb 4, 2004 at 5:23:38 pm |
Many thanks, Tony!
Regarding the external TBC, what would be be some good models to look for on eBay? Unfortunately a lot of footage only exists on VHS and from time to time it becomes neccessary to use a bit of it. And speaking of VHS, what are some good, edit-quality, rack-mountable S-VHS decks? Can VHS also be brought in through the IO? Might it be better to simply dub VHS footage to beta sp and bring it in that way, eliminating the need for an external TBC?
Joel
| | | | |
| |
|