Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive

	COW Forums : AJA Kona VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT

Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Clay Walker on Mar 18, 2003 at 1:20:41 pm

<>

Well, I am not against the idea. I am certainly listening.

The only counter response I could make to this would be that my Medea drive has failed 3 times within the last 12 months due to IDE drive failure...





http://www.planbproductions.com
why not start with Plan B?

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

• 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Clay Walker on Mar 10, 2003 at 5:09:28 am
  • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Bill Macomber on Mar 10, 2003 at 5:27:44 pm
    • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Clay Walker on Mar 10, 2003 at 5:34:45 pm
      • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Matt Silverman on Mar 10, 2003 at 5:46:38 pm
        • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Clay Walker on Mar 10, 2003 at 5:49:00 pm
      • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by francois.stark on Mar 18, 2003 at 8:30:21 am
        • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Clay Walker on Mar 18, 2003 at 1:20:41 pm
          • SCSI vs ATA->FC vs SATA discussion by francois.stark on Mar 18, 2003 at 3:31:24 pm
            • Re: SCSI vs ATA->FC vs SATA discussion by Clay Walker on Mar 19, 2003 at 1:28:18 pm
  • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Bob Zelin on Mar 11, 2003 at 4:15:59 am
    • Re: 146 GB vs 73 GB drive by Clay Walker on Mar 11, 2003 at 4:26:19 am

---