Re: Clearing the air

COW Forums : AJA Kona

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: Clearing the air
by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:41:21 pm

Ommmaaaagoshhhhh.....

Ugh.

The reason I said, "It's out there and it's real." is because it is! It's a real, physical product in facilities, whether it/was in beta or not. The HD Fury on the other was not a real, physical product. That's all I said! No misconstruded facts.

Facilities were using Kona HD and there were no facilities using HD Fury. This isn't rocket science. That's all I was eluding to.

If you want a tried and tested FCP HD system, then use Cinewave HD for all I care! I don't give a hoot!

Marco Solorio | OneRiver Media

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by paul on Nov 5, 2002 at 11:46:41 pm
- Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 1:15:24 am
  - Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 2:15:57 am
    - Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 3:41:57 am
      - Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 5:38:29 am
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:16:47 am
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 8:31:48 am
      - Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Grant Petty on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:20:40 am
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:42:14 am
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 8:50:09 am
        Chill out! by Paul Zeliner on Nov 6, 2002 at 2:51:24 pm
        Re: Chill out! by tony salgado on Nov 6, 2002 at 5:14:40 pm
        I don't chill out on slams. by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:07:27 pm
        Re: I don't chill out on slams. by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:26:17 pm
        Re: I don't chill out on slams. by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:42:35 pm
        Re: I don't chill out on slams. by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 7:58:29 pm
        Re: I don't chill out on slams. by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 8:03:37 pm
        White flag by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 8:23:42 pm
        Re: White flag by Rune Hansen on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:39:13 pm
        Re: White flag by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:44:03 pm
        Re: White flag by Grant Petty on Nov 7, 2002 at 12:20:08 pm
        Re: I don't chill out on slams. by Paul Zeliner on Nov 6, 2002 at 9:50:00 pm
        Clearing the air by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:06:36 pm
        Re: Clearing the air by Paul Zeliner on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:25:53 pm
        Re: Clearing the air by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:41:21 pm
        Re: Clearing the air by Grant Petty on Nov 7, 2002 at 12:18:25 pm
        Re: Clearing the air by Paul Zeliner on Nov 7, 2002 at 4:43:15 pm
        Don't want to put fire or anything but that statement was finally made by AJA because of me in part by Bruno Forcier on Nov 8, 2002 at 2:40:06 am
        He said she said we said by Marco Solorio on Nov 8, 2002 at 2:58:34 am
        Re: Don't want to put fire or anything but that statement was finally made by AJA because of me in part by Bruno Forcier on Nov 8, 2002 at 3:05:09 am
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by paul on Nov 6, 2002 at 8:17:32 am
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 8:43:17 am
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Aurora Support on Nov 6, 2002 at 2:17:07 pm
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 5:45:01 pm
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Aurora Support on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:07:41 pm
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Igor van Oostveen on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:33:30 pm
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 6:55:35 pm
  - It was not intended as a cut. by Bart Harrison on Nov 6, 2002 at 3:41:32 pm
    - Re: It was not intended as a cut. by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 5:49:13 pm
      - Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Frederick on Nov 6, 2002 at 7:14:50 pm
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 8:37:36 pm
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Frederick on Nov 6, 2002 at 9:01:44 pm
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:20:50 pm
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Ben Kupfer on Nov 6, 2002 at 11:13:28 pm
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Grant Petty on Nov 7, 2002 at 11:57:34 am
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by francois.stark on Nov 7, 2002 at 12:47:52 pm
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Grant Petty on Nov 7, 2002 at 1:10:25 pm
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by Paul Zeliner on Nov 7, 2002 at 4:25:08 pm
        FCP Trim View Bug by Patrick Inhofer on Nov 7, 2002 at 4:49:01 pm
        Re: FCP Trim View Bug by Marco Solorio on Nov 7, 2002 at 7:27:24 pm
        Re: FCP Trim View Bug by Grant Petty on Nov 9, 2002 at 1:51:43 pm
        Re: FCP Trim View Bug by Mike Stroven on Nov 10, 2002 at 12:03:19 am
        Re: Touchy, Touchy, Touchy by mishka on Nov 7, 2002 at 4:30:58 pm
- Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Patrick Inhofer on Nov 6, 2002 at 3:35:13 pm
  - Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Johan Edstrom on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:06:21 pm
    - Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Marco Solorio on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:12:05 pm
      - Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Johan Edstrom on Nov 6, 2002 at 10:20:59 pm
        Re: Will Kona SD ever do Video+graphics Layer in RT? by Grant Petty on Nov 7, 2002 at 12:10:09 pm
        Getting Off Topic lioke Hell by Bruno Forcier on Nov 8, 2002 at 3:02:13 am
        844x is a different beast by Marco Solorio on Nov 8, 2002 at 3:08:25 am
        Re: 844x is a different beast by Marco Solorio on Nov 8, 2002 at 3:09:47 am
        Re: 844x is a different beast by mark cookman on Nov 8, 2002 at 8:54:37 pm
        Re: 844x is a different beast by Marco Solorio on Nov 8, 2002 at 9:31:15 pm

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS