BTW, it looks like the real answer is that...

COW Forums : Pinnacle CineWave

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Return to posts index • Read entire thread

BTW, it looks like the real answer is that...
by steve on Mar 7, 2003 at 8:04:12 pm

we were testing this system to see if we wanted to upgrade to OS X. Since this was just a test and we didn't have the correct video card to replace our two video cards, we took out most of the RAM. This left only 512mb which would explain the slow rendering. If we were going to upgrade for real we would of course get a video card that would allow us not to have take out the RAM to use cinewave in X.

Low RAM = slow renders (of course!)

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

slower renders in X by steve on Mar 4, 2003 at 8:26:34 pm
- Re: slower renders in X by Walter Biscardi on Mar 5, 2003 at 2:09:07 pm
  - Re: slower renders in X by steve on Mar 6, 2003 at 5:50:52 pm
    - Re: slower renders in X by Bart Harrison on Mar 6, 2003 at 5:54:45 pm
      - Re: slower renders in X by Johan Edstrom on Mar 6, 2003 at 9:28:45 pm
        Re: slower renders in X by chrispy on Mar 7, 2003 at 2:43:26 am
        Re: slower renders in X by Bart Harrison on Mar 7, 2003 at 3:52:35 am
        c* vs. Shake by naz on Mar 7, 2003 at 8:35:12 am
        Re: slower renders in X by Brian Willard on Mar 7, 2003 at 8:27:16 pm
        Re: slower renders in X by naz on Mar 7, 2003 at 8:46:57 pm
        Re: slower renders in X by Brian Willard on Mar 7, 2003 at 9:06:33 pm
      - What kind of answer is that!?!?! by steve on Mar 7, 2003 at 8:01:12 pm
        Re: Realtime? by francois.stark on Mar 8, 2003 at 6:43:52 pm
- BTW, it looks like the real answer is that... by steve on Mar 7, 2003 at 8:04:12 pm

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS