Ok, I did it once and I'm doing it once more

COW Forums : HD High-End

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Ok, I did it once and I'm doing it once more
by mishka on Aug 25, 2003 at 8:16:32 pm

I propose we use 22 to refer to HD sampling resolution. This would make full luma/full chroma (HDCAM SR) 22:22:22, full luma/half chroma (D5-HD) 22:11:11. Whether regular HDCAM is 17:6:6 and DVCPRO-HD is 15:9:9 or some other (fractional) numbers is open for discussion.

As a historic precedent take older telecinŽs that scan at double PAL/NTSC resolution - they are referred as 8:8:8 by users and manufactures. Of course this used make them sound good and this approach make current HD formats sound bad but it hopefully clears the confusion.

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

HDCAM 3:1:1? by Chad Briggs on Aug 24, 2003 at 1:56:10 pm
- Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Aug 24, 2003 at 2:30:01 pm
  - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Chad Briggs on Aug 24, 2003 at 5:15:01 pm
- Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 24, 2003 at 5:53:40 pm
  - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Chad Briggs on Aug 24, 2003 at 6:40:38 pm
    - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 24, 2003 at 6:51:06 pm
      - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Aug 24, 2003 at 7:03:54 pm
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 24, 2003 at 7:13:44 pm
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Chad Briggs on Aug 24, 2003 at 7:54:58 pm
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 24, 2003 at 8:30:17 pm
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 24, 2003 at 11:58:44 pm
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Chad Briggs on Aug 25, 2003 at 12:13:00 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 1:22:36 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Mike Most on Aug 25, 2003 at 1:21:27 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 1:25:34 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 1:54:56 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Aug 25, 2003 at 2:50:13 am
    - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 24, 2003 at 11:52:00 pm
  - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 24, 2003 at 6:49:24 pm
    - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 12:23:17 am
      - Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 25, 2003 at 12:48:26 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 1:44:45 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 25, 2003 at 2:13:51 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 2:40:30 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 25, 2003 at 3:06:18 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 25, 2003 at 3:41:02 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 25, 2003 at 3:58:09 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Chad Briggs on Aug 25, 2003 at 4:11:10 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by David Mullen on Aug 25, 2003 at 4:15:09 am
        Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 5:29:21 am
        Great Thread !! by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 5:41:15 am
        Re: Great Thread !! by Chad Briggs on Aug 25, 2003 at 5:46:43 am
        Re: Great Thread !! by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 5:51:05 am
        Re: Great Thread !! by Chad Briggs on Aug 25, 2003 at 1:26:44 pm
        Re: Great Thread !! by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 25, 2003 at 5:49:47 am
        Re: Great Thread !! by Bart Harrison on Aug 25, 2003 at 5:52:50 am
        Re: Great Thread !! by Sean C. Cunningham on Aug 25, 2003 at 7:54:36 am
        Ok, I did it once and I'm doing it once more by mishka on Aug 25, 2003 at 8:16:32 pm
        Re: Ok, I did it once and I'm doing it once more by jean-yves le moine on Aug 26, 2003 at 6:54:34 am
        Re: Ok, I did it once and I'm doing it once more by David Mullen on Aug 26, 2003 at 2:47:46 pm
- Re: HDCAM 3:1:1? by Lance Bachelder on Aug 27, 2003 at 3:36:54 pm

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS