SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
recent posts
Mads, all dream cameras are cheaper, better, faster! This could be real.
Cow Forums
:
HD High-End
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Mads, all dream cameras are cheaper, better, faster! This could be real.
by
Ed Brown
on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:07:18 pm
Dear Mads,
CMOS sensors are not controled by the Japanse monopoly and their associated suppliers. With CMOS sensors it is possible to get far better images faster at cheaper prices than Sony controlled CCD's.
With that better/ best given, the challenge is how to engineer the camera. Biggest challenge is processing data from CMOS sensors. That an a good prism to split light.
And since this is dream camera, might as well design this for HD and perhaps two editing solutions: HD 1080 plus at 4:4:4 and
more standard 4:2:2 at HD.
Idea is togowhere no video camera has before. To make camera that if you invest $25,000 it will not be obsolete in two years.
To perhaps design it so can upgrade the back end data processors. For lens, frame and prism are fairly well developed.
Hey, in this dream camera, perhaps, we should be able to even upgrade the CMOS sensors.
So toanswer your question: yes, cheaper, faster, better and easily upgradable.
That is why Iam asking you, the end users, what you would want.
My sense is the existing camera manufactors like Ikie and JVC are planning new CMOS cameras. But they may botch it like JVC did with HD cam with 30P, 24p. Also, when the critical CMOS can be bought for sales tax, it should be possible to build a much cheaper camera with 20% built in for research and development for
constant improvements that are upgradable to existing cams.
Ed
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Ed Brown on Apr 29, 2003 at 5:15:00 pm
Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 29, 2003 at 7:18:03 pm
Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 29, 2003 at 7:21:03 pm
Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Mads on Apr 29, 2003 at 8:28:50 pm
Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 12:24:20 am
does this make sense for readout?
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 12:55:57 am
Re: does this make sense for readout?
by Bob Bonniol on Apr 30, 2003 at 1:26:19 am
Re: does this make sense for readout?
by jean-yves le moine on Apr 30, 2003 at 7:42:41 am
Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam?
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 9:42:53 am
Re: Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam?
by Mads on Apr 30, 2003 at 9:53:46 am
Mads, all dream cameras are cheaper, better, faster! This could be real.
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:07:18 pm
Re: all dream cameras could be real.
by Mads on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:31:29 pm
Re: all dream cameras could be real.
by Darby Marriott on May 1, 2003 at 2:16:33 am
Darby, you got dream camera specs
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 3:55:23 pm
Re: all dream cameras could be real.
by Eric Susch on May 1, 2003 at 10:26:09 pm
Eric, non moving storage = silent?
by Ed Brown on May 2, 2003 at 10:39:52 pm
Re: Eric, non moving storage = silent?
by Eric Susch on May 3, 2003 at 4:08:12 am
Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes
by Darby Marriott on Apr 30, 2003 at 3:27:40 pm
Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:10:09 pm
Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 30, 2003 at 5:18:30 pm
Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Darby Marriott on Apr 30, 2003 at 6:09:09 pm
Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 1, 2003 at 2:46:25 am
Kino and Darby: need both solutions
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 2:16:16 pm
Re: Kino and Darby: need both solutions
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 2:19:34 pm
Re: Kino and Darby: need both solutions
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 1, 2003 at 8:35:13 pm
humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper?
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 10:59:22 pm
Re: humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper?
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 2, 2003 at 12:33:38 am
Re: humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper?
by gmasonmd on May 2, 2003 at 7:19:00 am
CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests
by Ed Brown on May 2, 2003 at 11:23:10 am
Re: CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests
by jean-yves le moine on May 4, 2003 at 8:32:28 am
Re: CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests
by gmasonmd on May 4, 2003 at 10:16:58 am
Jean, mission from God explained is making "Revivin' Romance" movie
by Ed Brown on May 4, 2003 at 5:51:29 pm
Re: Jean, mission from God explained is making "Revivin' Romance" movie
by jean-yves le moine on May 5, 2003 at 7:47:22 am
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]