Creative COW

SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US

FORUMS:

list (w/ descriptions)

Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam?


	Cow Forums : HD High-End VIEW POSTS • ADD A NEW POST • SEARCH • CHANGE FORUM

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam?
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 9:42:53 am

Dear Wizards,
Dream camera needs to process googles of data. Check out this and what do you think?
Ed

"SheerVideo™ is a faster-than-real-time, powerful, perfect-fidelity QuickTime video codec (patents pending).
By storing in Sheer™ format instead of uncompressed formats such as D1 or Cineon, you can:

double your disk capacity
double your disk speed
double your transmission speed by compressing on the fly even over dedicated gigabit Ethernet or OC-24 optical link
maintain absolutely perfect fidelity, every single bit in the restored image identical to the original

For example, SheerVideo lets your favorite video editor automatically pack 10GB of uncompressed video into 4.5GB of SheerVideo on disk and perfectly restore it on the fly faster than real time. This means you can store all your working and production video assets in Sheer format without compromise.

Sheer Versatility: Film & CGI (RGB[A] 8b) and Video (Y'CBCR[A] 8b 4:4:4[:4], 4:2:2; progressive, interlaced; SD, HD)
Sheer Speed: 100MB/s on a 1GHz G4 -- 50X faster than any other perfect-fidelity codec -- on the fly
Sheer Power: 2.2X smaller files on typical high-detail real-world footage (e.g. Kodak PhotoCD PCD0992)
Sheer Fidelity: 100% exact duplicate of original after restoration"

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Current Message Thread:

tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex? by Ed Brown on Apr 29, 2003 at 5:15:00 pm
- Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex? by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 29, 2003 at 7:18:03 pm
  - Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex? by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 29, 2003 at 7:21:03 pm
- Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex? by Mads on Apr 29, 2003 at 8:28:50 pm
  - Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 12:24:20 am
    - does this make sense for readout? by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 12:55:57 am
      - Re: does this make sense for readout? by Bob Bonniol on Apr 30, 2003 at 1:26:19 am
      - Re: does this make sense for readout? by jean-yves le moine on Apr 30, 2003 at 7:42:41 am
        Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam? by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 9:42:53 am
        Re: Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam? by Mads on Apr 30, 2003 at 9:53:46 am
        Mads, all dream cameras are cheaper, better, faster! This could be real. by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:07:18 pm
        Re: all dream cameras could be real. by Mads on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:31:29 pm
        Re: all dream cameras could be real. by Darby Marriott on May 1, 2003 at 2:16:33 am
        Darby, you got dream camera specs by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 3:55:23 pm
        Re: all dream cameras could be real. by Eric Susch on May 1, 2003 at 10:26:09 pm
        Eric, non moving storage = silent? by Ed Brown on May 2, 2003 at 10:39:52 pm
        Re: Eric, non moving storage = silent? by Eric Susch on May 3, 2003 at 4:08:12 am
    - Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes by Darby Marriott on Apr 30, 2003 at 3:27:40 pm
      - Darby, that ACCOM system looks good. by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:10:09 pm
        Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good. by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 30, 2003 at 5:18:30 pm
        Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good. by Darby Marriott on Apr 30, 2003 at 6:09:09 pm
        Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good. by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 1, 2003 at 2:46:25 am
        Kino and Darby: need both solutions by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 2:16:16 pm
        Re: Kino and Darby: need both solutions by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 2:19:34 pm
        Re: Kino and Darby: need both solutions by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 1, 2003 at 8:35:13 pm
        humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper? by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 10:59:22 pm
        Re: humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper? by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 2, 2003 at 12:33:38 am
        Re: humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper? by gmasonmd on May 2, 2003 at 7:19:00 am
        CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests by Ed Brown on May 2, 2003 at 11:23:10 am
        Re: CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests by jean-yves le moine on May 4, 2003 at 8:32:28 am
        Re: CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests by gmasonmd on May 4, 2003 at 10:16:58 am
        Jean, mission from God explained is making "Revivin' Romance" movie by Ed Brown on May 4, 2003 at 5:51:29 pm
        Re: Jean, mission from God explained is making "Revivin' Romance" movie by jean-yves le moine on May 5, 2003 at 7:47:22 am

Note: If you are a registered user please click here to login before posting.

Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click here if you do not have an account.

Name

E-Mail Address

Subject

E-Mail me when someone responds

Just This Message

Entire Thread

None

Message:

Note: The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key. Read more...

Add your message signature

Note: By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's Code of Conduct.

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • TRAINING • VIDEOS - REELS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS

© CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved.

[Top]