SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
FORUMS:
list
list (w/ descriptions)
archive
tags
search
hall of fame
recent posts
Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes
Cow Forums
:
HD High-End
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes
by
Ed Brown
on Apr 30, 2003 at 12:24:20 am
Dear Wizards,
I am not a techie, I work with techies. Now talking to CMOS engineers, I got impression that uncompressed 1080p plus at 4:4:4 is no problem. The problem is over 1 gig/sec readout. It could overwelm storage. Yes, it can be shot straight to disk. The Viper 4:4:4 cam uses,I think, 1:2.5 compression and Director Friend disks. Yes, we are not talking tapes here. Must be disks. Viper monator reads slightly green and must like film be processed for final images.
As i understand CMOS engineers, there are two problems: a prism to split light and the biggie: what do you want out back end
that video guys would like other that uncompressed? That is why I
ask you. There are people working on MPEG 2 and 4. Which is better? I confess to being ignorant. Ithink it was MAD who wrote:
'Why not a downloadable Codec? Why not have the camera really spit this u-tagged, RGBA stream with a master connector and have "user downloadable" codecs for recording and standard production? That would keep it current for quite a while."
If I understand that correctly, that could be like Avid's new
32? bit codex? And have a "card" you could insert another
codex or MPEG in for read out.
Help me what would make for "dream" video camera?
With CMOS sensors there is a paradyn shift in possible images.
Question is what "read outs" would be most useful?
Ed --not all clear on concept of data out --- but clear there must be a way for a very affordable camera with 1080P images
at 24, 30, 60 and 4:4:4 or 4:2:2 with edit friendly read out
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Ed Brown on Apr 29, 2003 at 5:15:00 pm
Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 29, 2003 at 7:18:03 pm
Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 29, 2003 at 7:21:03 pm
Re: tinkering with idea of making CMOS HD cam; what readout codex?
by Mads on Apr 29, 2003 at 8:28:50 pm
Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 12:24:20 am
does this make sense for readout?
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 12:55:57 am
Re: does this make sense for readout?
by Bob Bonniol on Apr 30, 2003 at 1:26:19 am
Re: does this make sense for readout?
by jean-yves le moine on Apr 30, 2003 at 7:42:41 am
Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam?
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 9:42:53 am
Re: Wizards, take look at Jean's suggested "Sheer" Good for dream cam?
by Mads on Apr 30, 2003 at 9:53:46 am
Mads, all dream cameras are cheaper, better, faster! This could be real.
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:07:18 pm
Re: all dream cameras could be real.
by Mads on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:31:29 pm
Re: all dream cameras could be real.
by Darby Marriott on May 1, 2003 at 2:16:33 am
Darby, you got dream camera specs
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 3:55:23 pm
Re: all dream cameras could be real.
by Eric Susch on May 1, 2003 at 10:26:09 pm
Eric, non moving storage = silent?
by Ed Brown on May 2, 2003 at 10:39:52 pm
Re: Eric, non moving storage = silent?
by Eric Susch on May 3, 2003 at 4:08:12 am
Re: UNCOMPRESSED 2k p 4:4:4 should be no problem, other yes
by Darby Marriott on Apr 30, 2003 at 3:27:40 pm
Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Ed Brown on Apr 30, 2003 at 4:10:09 pm
Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on Apr 30, 2003 at 5:18:30 pm
Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Darby Marriott on Apr 30, 2003 at 6:09:09 pm
Re: Darby, that ACCOM system looks good.
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 1, 2003 at 2:46:25 am
Kino and Darby: need both solutions
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 2:16:16 pm
Re: Kino and Darby: need both solutions
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 2:19:34 pm
Re: Kino and Darby: need both solutions
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 1, 2003 at 8:35:13 pm
humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper?
by Ed Brown on May 1, 2003 at 10:59:22 pm
Re: humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper?
by Joaquin (Kino) Gil on May 2, 2003 at 12:33:38 am
Re: humor me, how get Quicktime wrapper?
by gmasonmd on May 2, 2003 at 7:19:00 am
CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests
by Ed Brown on May 2, 2003 at 11:23:10 am
Re: CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests
by jean-yves le moine on May 4, 2003 at 8:32:28 am
Re: CMOS are radical tech. Cost about $3000. ChallengeCCD interests
by gmasonmd on May 4, 2003 at 10:16:58 am
Jean, mission from God explained is making "Revivin' Romance" movie
by Ed Brown on May 4, 2003 at 5:51:29 pm
Re: Jean, mission from God explained is making "Revivin' Romance" movie
by jean-yves le moine on May 5, 2003 at 7:47:22 am
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]